1 SDL = 1 LINK

[Anonymous No.58434797]

Is this true?
I've been hearing this a lot and Im thinking about buying some...weill 1 SDL = 1 LINK token in the near future?

[Anonymous No.58434808]

>>58434797
no

[Anonymous No.58434812]

>>58434808
How long do you think it will take?

[Anonymous No.58434881]

>>58434812
that would give it a marketcap 10x higher than chainlink. which, while funny to imagine, is unlikely to happen. sdl's performance is tied to chainlink's performance

[Anonymous No.58434892]

>>58434881
Certainly, here's an updated version of the response with your additional information included:

Could you elaborate on how SDL's performance is tied to Chainlink's? Is there a direct connection or dependency between their technologies or market strategies that influences this relationship? Also, considering SDL has only a tenth of the supply of Chainlink and about 14% of that supply circulating, how do you see this impacting the market cap comparison?

[Anonymous No.58434893]

>>58434881
>anon in charge of math
and I can't even delete my post. how embarrassing. SDL = LINK would give it a market cap 1/10 of LINK's. which could be a fair ratio depending on what kind of jobs the sdl nodes end up doing and the revenue they get

[Anonymous No.58434899]

>>58434892
sure chatgpt. the locked sdl token (resdl) gets paid a percentage of all rewards paid out to stlink holders. which means sdl is earning stlink, will earn build rewards, and eventually will be taking a cut of revenue from any stake-collateralized jobs the sdl nodes perform. so if the value of the LINK token goes up, or if chainlink sees broader adoption and sdl nodes see greater job volume, the amount of rewards going to resdl holders will increase

[Anonymous No.58434911]

>>58434899
Checked.
So does this mean it is more possible for 1 SDL = 1 Link?

[Anonymous No.58434932]

>>58434911
it's not impossible but if it were to ever happen, it would be quite distant from now I think

[Anonymous No.58436613]

1 SOL= LINK is not happening in this timeline.
Maybe 1 TRUF, if people would stop being faggots and actually notice the potential an early alt has

[Anonymous No.58436627]

>>58436613
We aren't stupid, we know when an alt is worth.
Now yours, in the other hand...
>TOKEN
>NOT
>NEEDED

[Anonymous No.58436628]

>>58434797
who cares its gonna dump, we are in the beariest market there ever was.

[Anonymous No.58436630]

>>58434911
not really no, no that it will help anyone.

[Anonymous No.58436632]

>>58434892
>>58434892
>Could you elaborate on how SDL's performance is tied to Chainlink's?
>>58434899
>ure chatgpt. the locked sdl token (resdl) gets paid a percentage of all rewards paid out to stlink holders.

So this means that
>>>58434899
>value of the LINK token goes up, or if chainlink sees broader adoption and sdl nodes see greater job volume, the amount of rewards going to resdl holders will increase


That's a long way to say that link by itself is trash.

[Anonymous No.58436633]

>>58434797
buy a stack of link if you can allow yourself to. Can't take any chances

[Anonymous No.58436638]

>>58434797
It's sometimes fun to see a thread like this and see bizraelis posting this kinda cope threads
>>58434899
checked
LINKIES BTFO

[Anonymous No.58436639]

>>58436627
>>TOKEN
>>NOT
>>NEEDED
KEK
Fucking biz you are alright.

[Anonymous No.58436642]

>>58434797
nope, not in this life time.

[Anonymous No.58436645]

>>58436613
not all early alts are made the same.

[Anonymous No.58436646]

>>58436633
>buy!!!
>>58436638
>fuck what i just told that bitch to buy!!!

[Anonymous No.58436650]

>>58436642
>>58436613
rope yourself samefag