Blackrock proves Chainlink full of shit about RWAs/everything in general

[Anonymous No.58426019]

Isn’t it great how Chainlink has told everyone that you need their bullshit oracles to tokenize any real world assets? And how they don’t provide oracles for Hedera yet are on the GC? And the first major tokenized fund doesn’t need Chainlink’s BS services?

Turns out it is way easier to just put shit onchain yourself instead of dealing with their bull shit cumbersome services. This should be a major wake up call. I can no longer believe any of the bull shit I was sold.

[Anonymous No.58426048]

>>58426019
I’m just gonna do the opposite of black rock out of spite

[Anonymous No.58426058]

>>58426019
>Turns out it is way easier to just put shit onchain yourself
actually it turned out its way too hard and has too many security issues.
building oracles yourself has failed everytime in DeFi.
so why would it be different for TradFi?

[Anonymous No.58426059]

>>58426058
cope. hbar $2 soon

[Anonymous No.58426077]

>>58426058
Because the traditional finance people own all their own data and have built in trust and reputation that is far more valuable than a bull shit web3 service provider.

An “Oracle” is just a server with a private key so it can sign transactions. It isn’t too complicated. Chainlink nodes are just servers that also run “OCR” so they can come to consensus in simple ways with other nodes. I think people with money will just trust that Blackrock can figure out how to put data onchain in a way that can be trusted.

I got duped too and thought oracles were some complex thing. At least I bought at 20c and can still dump at almost 100x.

[Anonymous No.58426142]

>>58426019
>>58426077
As someone familiar with linkies, how do you think they will cope? Is there any plausible cope?

[Anonymous No.58426152]

>>58426142
I think they’ll slowly shift things to pure defi and functions being used for “offchain compute” as if developers are really going to start building smart contracts like:

Do ABC onchain, send result to an oracle to do complex offchain calculation, put result/proof of that calculation onchain and do XYZ. Like constantly sending stuff on and offchain with oracles. No one is going to do that shit. They’ll build on a chain where it makes sense or just use a server.

Then they’ll keep pushing the cross chain narrative until all these thousands of shit chains die and people realize “no one wants to build an application that orchestrates communication between 5 stupid disparate EVMs.”

At that point I think the jig is up unless they turn into an AI company or some other gay company.

[Anonymous No.58426184]

>>58426142
lmao that image

[Anonymous No.58426189]

I should've bought hbar fugggg

[Anonymous No.58426235]

just goes to show how blatantly manipulated link's price is. bullish hbar partnership? price doubles. bullish link partnership? price moves sideways or bitcoin dumps.

[Anonymous No.58426253]

>>58426058
cope stinkie winkie
hbar > u

[Egas No.58426566]

>>58426019
>>58426077
>>58426152
>>58426059
>>58426253
>GUYTH GUYTH GUYTH look I verified my email again to write this gay and retarded fuddie spiel
Uh yeah no. Sorry little fella - all of SWIFT's commentary on this suggests otherwise.
Swift > (You)r headcanon
Just like
Pool's Closed > Thousands upon thousands of hours of effeminate fudcuck manifestos
Just like
Email verification > 24/7 Fudcuck spam and samefagging

Do better
S and H

[Anonymous No.58427261]

>>58426566
>little fella
Were you referring to your networth baggie? Hahahaha

[Anonymous No.58427396]

>>58426566
bro you're literally the only person spamming this board even after the email bullshit
touch grass

[Anonymous No.58427463]

>>58426019
Blackrock has literally nothing to do with this project.

[Anonymous No.58428572]

>>58426019
chainlink has no chance of surviving halving, in a short time LINK will be at 0.005 unlike SSNC.

[Anonymous No.58429127]

HBAR WHAT HAPPENED HAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH AOHNONONO FUDDIESSSSSSS AHAHAHAAHAHAHA