I'm scaling out of BTC

[Anonymous No.58419457]

and scaling into BITCOIN CASH! ooooo yeah.

[Anonymous No.58420016]

Never heard of scale out and scale into, but BCH is the real Bitcoin so good for you.

[Anonymous No.58420030]

>>58419457
Raising block size isn't an intelligent scaling solution, it is a reactionary's idea of kicking the can down the curb for a little while and compromising on decentralization in order to do it. The only reason bcash's blocks are not full and brimming with higher fees from being bombarded with something like trunes, is because no one gives a shit about it and no one ever will. Good luck bagholding the midwit coin, but BSV is the real Bitcoin Cash.

[Anonymous No.58420042]

>>58420030
>BSV is the real Bitcoin Cash.
But the fake Satoshi repped nigger coin is a good choice. I'll stick to Litecoin, thank you.

[Anonymous No.58420068]

What are these shenanigans.

[Anonymous No.58420102]

>>58420016
I used to buy BTC for 5 years but I lost hope for this trash. I never use it. but I had to stick with BTC cause I needed to make gains you know. but now I'm scaling that BTC back into BCH. it will take a few years. I don't want BTC anymore. maybe i'll keep one or two just to be sure.
>>58420030
you are a parrot. you can raise the blocksize a bit. no need to keep it at 1mb like how it was in 2010. bandwith went up 100x, disk size went up 100x. compute power went up 100x. why does the block size stay the same? enjoy your unspendable UTXOS.

[Anonymous No.58420113]

Bcash

[Anonymous No.58420154]

>>58420113
$100 fees on btc per utxo now lol.

[Anonymous No.58420244]

>>58420030
>Raising block size isn't an intelligent scaling solution
That's not the only thing that happened on BCH to scale.
>and compromising on decentralization in order to do it
Bullshit. BTC has become bankercoin, and half the world can't afford to transact in it, but, great, we can verify BTC blocks on Raspberry Pis. Who gives a crap about this "decentralization"? BTC's idea of decentralization and what matters in the network is retarded and wrong. Also Segwit is cancer.

[Anonymous No.58420252]

>>58420244
>and half the world can't afford to transact in it
it's become so bad that I don't even consider using BTC unless the amount is 1 BTC or more and if the 1 BTC is in one UTXO. I am lucky I made big UTXOS most of my btc are 3 BTC UTXOS but it's still so fucking retardded. I have been using , yes actually using crypto a lot the past 3 years and I never actually used BTC. I only used it about 5 times to send from exchange to my wallet when I had enough BTC. that's it. meanwhile I bought literally everything with BCH and XMR, sometimes LTC when BCH and XMR wasn't availalbe (yes that happens) but NEVER EVER have I used BTC. and now the fees are even higher. I didn't even want to use it when the fee was 10 bux but now its 100 bux lol.

[Anonymous No.58420255]

>>58420244
>>58420252
meanwhile I have played onchain poker with BCH. I have sent $0.1 for a funny post in BCH. i have introduced friends with BCH cause transactions with zero comf are great... you get the idea. I have made microtransactions on member.cash. I have written messages into the blockchain with prompt. I have... tipped people some BCH for a nice article on read.cash.. now I''m about to try out BCHBULL onchain leverage contracts and the cauldron BCH dex. you know. BCH is actually exciting and fun to use. I used it a lot and my usage keeps increasing. not so for BTC. only thing I can' do is hold and sell it for something actually usable. lol. so that's why im scaling out of BTC and into BCH. but i'ts ognna be a slow process. currently about 8pct of my folio iss BCH. majority still in BTC. i am worried when BTC pumps cause of the moon tards that BCH will drop back to the 0.005 BTC rate. so I am keeping some BTC to buy that dump if it happens.

[Anonymous No.58420261]

>>58419457
To all newfafs, this is bitcoin derangement syndrome. Watch op get rekt. All shitcoins bleed to zero sats.

[Anonymous No.58420269]

>>58420154
How many utxos on bhc?

[Anonymous No.58420271]

>>58420269
*bch

[Anonymous No.58420273]

>>58420269
? I can send a $0.01 transaction and not worry about it

>>58420269
IDK how many BCH utxo i have. i don't think about it cause the fees are low

pic related. its 1.2sats per byte or $0.001 per transaction

[Anonymous No.58420277]

>>58420273
>>58420271
>>58420269
forgot pic