BTC origin IP was on NSA campus

[Anonymous No.58406990]

ok wtf? explain this one maxipads
https://twitter.com/PRX113/status/1368702481392361476

[Anonymous No.58406992]

https://twitter.com/FinanceLancelot/status/1779979103162044706

[Anonymous No.58407045]

>>58406990
Buttcoins was always the foundation paved for digital currencies.

[Anonymous No.58407061]

>>58406990
origin ip is literally worthless.

If I register a website, it will have the origin ip of the server host I register it with, meaning I can be living in siberia while my domain would be in arizona

even further,

>bitcoins.com

the first official and recognized domain (from satoshi) was bitcoin.org in 2008, so nice try shilling your worthless bag

[Anonymous No.58407064]

>>58406990
this news is literally 10 years old by now

[Anonymous No.58407068]

>>58406990
That IP address belongs to GoDaddy. Whoever made up this retardation about an NSA data center could have saved a lot of time if they had done a cursory web search instead of making up bullshit.

[Anonymous No.58407077]

>>58406992
That's GoDaddy's data center. The address is 2155 E GoDaddy Way in Tempest, AZ. It was not hard to figure this out. You guys suck at sleuthing.

[Anonymous No.58407089]

>>58406990
>>58406992
>bitcoins.com
apologize or your mother dies in her sleep tonight

[Anonymous No.58407122]

>>58407077
Don’t use facts and logic on these tards

[Anonymous No.58407166]

>NSA conspiracy theorists grasping at straws again
Yawn

[Anonymous No.58407176]

>>58407166
>Nakamoto SAtosh
>NSA
It’s literally written into his name bro

[Anonymous No.58407267]

>>58407077
>GoDaddy
Fuck. I always knew in my gut that bitcoin was a scam.

[Anonymous No.58407269]

>>58406990
>>58406992
Vpn

[Anonymous No.58407292]

>>58406992
that finance lancelot guy is retarded. amazing how many idiots follow him. every time he's linked here i have a chuckle

[Anonymous No.58407308]

Buy bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.58407310]

woah a random crack head on twitter solved a 10+ year old mystery that even some of the smartest people in the world couldn't solve. case closed boys

[Anonymous No.58407406]

Here me out

BITcoin. Big International Tax.

Its WEF creating a big international tax.

Explain this one maxipads.

[Anonymous No.58407800]

A "Satoshi" individual never existed. The real "Satoshi" was multiple people; Bitcoin was created by the NSA and possibly several other agencies. It was not a 1-man project. It was a government project.

NSA paper from 1996: https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm

>even talks about the "double spend" problem

Interesting to note is that there's a "Tatsuaki Okamoto" there. Not only does Okamoto sound similar to Nakamoto, but if you rearrange the letters a bit you can get pretty close to Satoshi Nakamoto.

TATSUAKI OKAMOTO
SATO__I _AKAMOTO (discarded: T, U and K)

The extra needed letters are S, H and N.

The NSA created SHA 256, which Bitcoin uses.

S and H can be found in "SHA 256".
Remove S and H from "SHA 256" and left is "A 256".
A is the 1st letter of the alphabet.
So "A 256" equals "1 256".
1+2+5+6 equals 14.
The 14th letter of the alphabet is N.
So "1 256" equals N.
So, "SHA 256" = SHN <--- the extra needed letters missing in "SATO__I _AKAMOTO".

And no, the glowie Craig Wright isn't Satoshi, because a Satoshi individual never existed and Craig is obviously a liar and a hoaxer. However, as he does have glowie connections it's probable he was later tasked with playing the role of "Satoshi" to keep the "Satoshi the individual" myth alive and to be a controlled opposition of sorts (that whole "btc is bad because of low blocksize" etc, and bullshit vision coin is the fake """solution""" to that """problem"""). This explains a lot of things.

[Anonymous No.58408347]

>>58407800
Craig Wright portrayed himself as a glowie to try to gain the professional credibility he sorely lacked.
For example, his "GISCR Vice President" title was completely fake.
You can read Deborah Kobza's testimony in the Kleiman trial to confirm. GISCR was a small organization she created and managed, in which Craig wormed in way, then shamelessly pretended to be a big shot there.
His other big glowie claim is that he was part of a death squad in south america, during which he got shot.
Try not to take anything Craig says too seriously. He certainly doesn't.

[Anonymous No.58409293]

i don't care about this IP address bullshit but if you can't see that BTC, ETH (codius) and XRP were all created as part of one continuous 5th/6th generation information warfare process to enable the transition from a broken post-ww2/post bretton woods unipolar geopolitical system to a multipolar digital economic system without uncontrolled nuclear warfare then you are truly a sloppy-chinned little baby
>goo goo gaga
Grow Up, anon.

[Anonymous No.58409462]

>>58409293
This. Crypto is MADtech. It was created by DARPA in conjunction with libertarians who are trying to build a resilient economic infrastructure in the face of multipolarity and limited nuclear warfare. It is both government created and expressly intended to be decentralized.

[Anonymous No.58409468]

>>58407800

[Anonymous No.58409625]

>>58409293
>>58409462
I refuse to believe that USG as I know it has people with this much foresight within it and they're only hiding in NSA. You meet people from State or CIA or anywhere else and it's a bunch of midwits with an MBA from Duke if you're lucky. You're telling me NSA is where all of the people with more than a 5 year time horizon are stuffed? Doubt

[Anonymous No.58410200]

>>58408347
>GICSR is fake, Craig is just pretending to be a glowie
You are the glowie.

Related to the pic – Regarding GICSR and its connections to the NSA and DHS etc, overwhelming proof he's a glowie asset:
Google search excluding the terms "Bitcoin" and "craig", proving GICSR is connected with the DHS: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22GICSR%22+%22nsa%22+-bitcoin+-craig
Search #2, proving GICSR is connected with the NSA: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22GICSR%22+%22homeland+security%22+-bitcoin+-craig
the above search results archived in case they're different in the future: https://archive.is/ZI7jb and https://archive.is/APIQa
Article about GICSR from January 2003 mentioning Craig (!!!): https://archive.is/MnFl9
PDF about GICSR: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2017/02/14/20160223_global_institute_for_cybersecurity_and_research.pdf
the above PDF archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20221206080118/https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2017/02/14/20160223_global_institute_for_cybersecurity_and_research.pdf
PDF about GICSR: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2020/07/21/NICE2014_%28Kobza%29_GICSR_Global_Cyber_Range%29.pdf
the above PDF archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20230514072207/https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2020/07/21/NICE2014_%28Kobza%29_GICSR_Global_Cyber_Range%29.pdf
Shows a member of GICSR having connections with the NSA and DoD and DHS: https://archive.is/mUQZG
The GICSR site: https://web.archive.org/web/20110802112835/http://www.gicsr.com/

[Anonymous No.58410204]

>>58410200
Picrel was the banner at the top of the GICSR website: https://web.archive.org/web/20110802112835/http://www.gicsr.com/

[Anonymous No.58410214]

>>58410200
Holy shit, just noticed the "old archived Google searches" vs the current live ones are now indeed very different.

archived old searches:
1: https://archive.is/ZI7jb
2: https://archive.is/APIQa

1: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22GICSR%22+%22nsa%22+-bitcoin+-craig
2: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22GICSR%22+%22homeland+security%22+-bitcoin+-craig

The old searches show .gov links and other more "official" sort of sites in the topmost results. In the current searches many of those don't appear.

[Anonymous No.58410215]

>>58410214
Okay, maybe not very different, but they are now indeed different.

[Anonymous No.58410528]

>>58409625
I said nothing about the NSA

[Anonymous No.58410600]

>>58407800
The numbers to name thing is completely schizo talk, why convert only A to a number? The logic is simply because you think the first two are static which is a monumentally false assumption.

The only thing I agree with you is that satoshi isn't one person, at least the "spokesperson" was, but several people worked on it. I also agree that Craig Wright has no credibility

[Anonymous No.58410602]

I badly need $1.4k for my university admission fees. Today is the last date. I am totally helpless. Anyone feeling generous today may help me out so that I can continue my education?

[Anonymous No.58410866]

>>58410200
both glowies and bsv baggies hate this stuff