/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.58138260]

I think chainlink is a great investment.
Reason 1: Oracles are big, and link has that first mover advantage.
Reason 2: CCIP right around the corner. This will usher in a whole new landscape of coins and investment opportunities, kind of like eth in 2017 but bigger.
Reason 3: staking. if you're not in the pool now, you're gonna wanna get into it once it opens up more. you need link to stake, so get it now to have a chance to get in the pool

[Anonymous No.58138306]

>>58138260
Dr;ns. The team owes you NOTHING!

[Anonymous No.58138311]

token not sneeded!

[Anonymous No.58138337]

>>58138260
I think chainlink is pretty nifty too

[Anonymous No.58139158]

Didn't read; never buying

[Anonymous No.58139179]

Yeh i'm new to crypto but chainlink really looks like the one with most potential so ima buy me a bag and stake asap

[Anonymous No.58139216]

>>58138260
8 more years

[Anonymous No.58139224]

I’m new to crypto but chainlink (LINK) really looks like the one with most potential so I’m buying a bag and staking asap! LFG!

[Anonymous No.58139278]

>>58138260
Why is the price bad tho? Checkmate. Buh bye.

[Anonymous No.58139315]

>>58138260
ICP is flipping chainshit by EOW. Cope and seethe baggies kek.

[Anonymous No.58139666]

>>58139278
It's been ranging for a while now. What is Sergey doing about this? Should I cash out the little profit I have made bagholding for a year now into Eth, Naka, and Dua or just leave the shit?

>>58139315

If this is coming from a Jeet, it's well understandable. What makes you think so?
low IQ

[Anonymous No.58139671]

>>58139278
>I only buy pre-punped crypto
Great plan

[Anonymous No.58139734]

>>58139671
wtf does he mean?

You think that would help. If it can't pump now that alts are reflecting the move in BTC, it can't do better.

[Anonymous No.58140123]

>>58138260
Didn't read, not buying.
Get the fuck out with your scam, chainlink only misses bullruns and never pumps.

[Anonymous No.58140226]

Even if you bought Link now or moved it into an EOA from an exchange, you still wouldn't be able to get in come December.

ouch

[Anonymous No.58140246]

>>58140226
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHA BE YOU'RE JEALOUS YOU CAN'T GET INTO THE CHASTITY CAGE WITH ALL THE OTHER LINKKEKS?

Lmao, you fucking faggot
Enjoy your savings account-tier APR

[Anonymous No.58140273]

>>58140226
>Implying I would want to stake LINK for 4.25%
Nah, I'm good on that. I rather trade shitcoins to make gains faster than doing the whole staking thing. You do you though

[Anonymous No.58140283]

>>58138260
>LINK price in 2022: $20
>LINK price in 2024: $18

Hmm...
Can someone explain to me why I should invest in this "product"?

[Anonymous No.58140287]

>>58140246
>be you're
Nice english, brown nigger

[Anonymous No.58140306]

>>58140287
Lmao be keep coping linkcuck

>>58140283
They'll just post cope chars about supposed suppression and beg you to trust the plan.
Linkshit is over as an investment, just a straight up cult now.

[Anonymous No.58140833]

>>58140287
>THE Cuckold of biz

[Anonymous No.58141158]

>>58140246
>BE YOU'RE

[Anonymous No.58141189]

>>58139734
Go buy one of those pumped alts bro. Do it. I mean it sincerely.

[Anonymous No.58141208]

>>58141189
Chainshit is a pumped alt from two cycles ago.
Fresh alts will absolutely demolish it, normies don't want to buy your festering 7 year old bags.

[Anonymous No.58141284]

>>58141208
>can't believe I fell for the shilling last bullrun, would have already fucking made it if it wasn't for stink,
So sorry this happened to you anon. Better luck this cycle, I sincerely hope you make it out of 4 figure purgatory!

[Anonymous No.58142152]

Reason 4: just my personal opinion, but owning link is fun! join the chainlink community reddit/discord/pinterest groups and connect with fellow link marines!

[Anonymous No.58142232]

>>58140226
what's this from?

[Anonymous No.58142418]

Chainlink has the worst ceo in the whole crypto space so no it’s not a good investment right now.

[Anonymous No.58142468]

> Cult leaders are typically obsessed with accumulating wealth and power. In order to do this they have to keep their overhead as low as possible and in some cases get the wealthier followers to donate their own money to the cause. The cult leaders’ workforce IS the devoted followers who are volunteering their time, effort, and life force. The cult leader will convince the volunteers that working for the mission is a great privilege and should not be looked down upon. The followers, whose self-esteem and self-worth have already been worn down, buy in and become the unpaid workforce. The leader will accumulate financial wealth, houses, cars, planes, expensive clothes, etc while the followers often live in abject poverty, struggling to put food on the table. The justification for this disparity is that the leader needs to be able to interact with the normal world at a high level in order to change it. They have to look good to materialistic people. When friends and family question the follower on their poverty the response can be “Money isn't everything” or “Materialism is the big problem in the world” or “Would you rather me be happy or stinking rich… because I would hope you who champion my happiness” None of these arguments make any sense. But the follower has been programmed to reject what they call materialism. The cult leader meanwhile embraces materialism with vigorous lust.

[Anonymous No.58143085]

>>58142468
If Sergey was a cult leader then LINK would be much higher now. Instead he's a well meaning nerd, which in this clown world means getting stepped on by scammers with no recourse.

[Anonymous No.58143109]

>>58143085
that's what Sergey wants you to think, idiot
you'll see soon enough

[Anonymous No.58143201]

>>58143085
>stepped on by scammers with no recourse
Who do you mean? Swift? DTCC? Goldman Sachs? SDX? All of them?

[Anonymous No.58143320]

>>5814320
I think he means Bancor, Celsius, Sam, Fernando, Tom Gonser, York E Rhodes, Zachary Rhynes, Jonny Huxtable etc

[Anonymous No.58144827]

>>58143320
Yep pretty much

[Anonymous No.58144933]

>>58143320
>Bancor, Celsius, Sam, Fernando, Tom Gonser, York E Rhodes, Zachary Rhynes, Jonny Huxtable etc
They never 'stepped on' SN or Chainlink. If i use a chevrolet to so a bank job, does that mean i 'stepped on' the ceo of chevrolet? Chainlink nor its token holders suffered any damage from that. It's fud to suggest otherwise. It's software and the more entities who use it, bad or otherwise, the more Chainlink secures its place. We'd all rather it hadn;t gone down that way, but the people who got stepped on were the customers of the projects you mentioned. Nice fud attempt

[Anonymous No.58145249]

>>58144933
>avocado mental gymnastics

get fucked kike

[Anonymous No.58145339]

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS LPL POOLS CLOSED HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS WE FUCKING TOLD YOU FUCKING SEETHE

BASED JONNY BOLLOCKS AI GENERATED LIMITED EDITION NFTS DROPPING SOON BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE

[Anonymous No.58145460]

>>58145339
whats this... FUCKING "BASED" LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS JONNY BOLLOCKS SHIT???

[Anonymous No.58145464]

>>58145339

CHECKED BASED AND LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

YOU SHOULD HAVE LISTENED ANON

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU

BUY LPL THE ONLY OFFICIAL WAY TO STEAK YOUR LINKIES

WHICH NODES WILL YOU STAKE WITH WITHOUT LPL LOL???

HOW WILL YOU BRIBE NODES TO STEAK YOUR LINK WITHOUT LPL???

NOW THE POOLS CLOSED AND ALL THE BASED KIDDOS ARE CHUDDIE

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED LPL

HUH?

LPL

HUH???

[Anonymous No.58146066]

>>58142232
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-v0-2-early-access-eligibility/

Come on anon you should have known where that was from.

[Anonymous No.58146592]

pic rel

[Anonymous No.58147543]

>>58138260

[Anonymous No.58147558]

>>58138260
ICP has already surpassed link's oracles, CCIP, and staking. the token and project is obsolete.

[Anonymous No.58148072]

>>58138260
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvfYr3GNJ0g

[Anonymous No.58148452]

>>58147558
don't rub it in anon...