[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 238 KB, 1125x1479, cubes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58032211 No.58032211[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

right?

>> No.58032228

>>58032211
12 + 18 + 21

>> No.58032245

>>58032211
There are 17 blocks on the side
From the back and top we see all sides filled
The highest amount would be 17*3*3 = 153
The lowest amount would be, 17 (side) + 6 (back) + 12 (top) = 35
Could be anywhere between 35-153 depending how many blocks are missing

>> No.58032248

>>58032211
it becomes much more complex when you consider that there are cubes within cubes, overlapping cubes, potentially empty space inside the structure, the "cube" unit itself has not been defined, dark matter cubes, cube atom theory, etc

>> No.58032250

only midwits will give an answer like "there is not enough information look at me I am so smart"
low iq and high iq will just give you the most likely answer(which is 12 + 18 + 21) and call it a day and move on with their lives

>> No.58032254

>>58032211
As the tweet mentions there is not enough information.

>> No.58032257

>>58032228
Cubes are floating, gravity is a lie.
There are cubes inside the cubes.
The middle is lower.
The box 3x3x3 is actually one big cube with lines

>> No.58032259

>>58032211
can't be bothered to try

>> No.58032265

>>58032211
literally not enough information

>> No.58032271

>>58032211
The answer cannot be determined because we can't determine the arrangement of cubes visible from the side, or whether theyre eclipsing other cubes or not

>> No.58032299

51, assuming no voids

>> No.58032309
File: 176 KB, 720x541, 1708626768849612.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58032309

>>58032211
Making the assumption that the side view is projected uniformly, its 51. But if the side view isn't projected consistently we don't have enough information to solve it.

>> No.58032310

Nigger is right

>> No.58032317

>>58032245
My math is completely wrong
The most possible cubes are 17*3 = 51
The lowest would be 35
Between 35 and 51

>> No.58032325

>>58032211
How it looks from the side and the too doesn't make sense?

>> No.58032326

>>58032245
Gravity is the 4th piece of the puzzle. Minimum middle lengthwise is 11, minimum side lengthwise is 17 and 17, so minimum total is 45.

Max: 153
Min: 45

>> No.58032331

>>58032245
The range is 35-51

>> No.58032333

>>58032211
51
17 on the side X 3 deep
Top doesn’t matter because it’s an optical illusion

>> No.58032336

>>58032331
Ye i multiplied by 3 too many times

>> No.58032337

>>58032211
he's right, you can' tell the depth of the boxes so from the side view, while you assume it's a stair step down, just the first one could be, and the rest lay flat.

>> No.58032338

>>58032326
/thread

>> No.58032341

>>58032211
51 cubes on the trailer

>> No.58032346

>>58032326
*45-53

>> No.58032374
File: 750 KB, 798x766, 1696334180336122.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58032374

>>58032317
one of the inner cubes that you can't see is actually made up of an infinite number of infinitesimally small cubes, so the maximum number of of cubes is infinity
or possibly, what you are seeing is actually a hollow shell, and there are no cubes at all, and the minimum number of cubes is zero

>> No.58032396

>>58032211
51. Midwits think that some gay cubes can support voids without being glued together

>> No.58032398

>>58032374
there could also be a single white cube that the trailers are buried beneath (we're viewing the bottom)

>> No.58032413

>>58032396
Its not about being in mid air
Its about that the side pic could only be for one row. And the back side could also be for one row.

>> No.58032416

>>58032211
51

>> No.58032425

51

>> No.58032502
File: 1.24 MB, 750x1334, IMG_5277.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58032502

my shitty drawing

why the fuck is /biz/ retarded???

>> No.58032516
File: 324 KB, 868x482, pepe 00.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58032516

>>58032425
>>58032416
>>58032396
>>58032346
>>58032341
>>58032333
>>58032245
>>58032331
>>58032317
>>58032245

It's 43-51, we're all retarded

>> No.58032560

>>58032211
The only answer is 51. Wow what a bunch of retards holy shit

>> No.58032562

>>58032317
>Between 35 and 51
correct answer

>> No.58032574

>>58032516
Did I buy poisoned mouthwash again?

>> No.58032576

>>58032516
Why 43 instead of 53

>> No.58032588

>>58032574
>xtcMOG1B
I feel like this might relate to the situation in the hotel rather than the motuhwash.

>> No.58032590
File: 41 KB, 656x679, 1163196593179.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58032590

>>58032211
The answer is 47 and no one can prove me wrong

>> No.58033712

>>58032211
21+18+12=51

>> No.58033787

>>58032211
One transparent glass cube that's partially painted.

>> No.58033954

>>58032211
This kind of questions on school tests were put there on purpose to penalize the young sperglords who would get stuck trying to solve the problem literally instead of being able to discern what the teacher actually meant like any normal human would.
Otherwise, they might get confused into thinking they were well adjusted and good at things, and that'd help no one.

>> No.58034076
File: 106 KB, 498x498, IMG_5457.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58034076

>>58032211
>Not enough information
But I did have breakfast this morning.

>> No.58034118

>>58032211
About tree fiddy

>> No.58034132

>>58032398
>white cube
>we're viewing the bottom
that's /biz/ since 7 years, give it a rest

>> No.58034153

>>58032211
Hold on, do we count cubes made up of 2x2 or 3x3 smaller cubes?

>> No.58034180

>>58034076
>But I did have breakfast this morning.
I wonder if this joke even makes sense to them

>> No.58034184
File: 212 KB, 1125x1121, IMG_9749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58034184

>>58032211
Nigger there’s 51 cubes on that trailer.

>> No.58034200

>>58032211
impossible to tell

>engineer with 6 years of experience in 3D modelling

>> No.58034270
File: 53 KB, 600x582, brainlet8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
58034270

>>58032211
obviously the answer is 51

but this is the perfect kind of question that midwit rebbidumbs and niggers will overthink (or underthink) and get wrong on IQ tests. It's really a great question.

>WE CAN'T SEE THE OTHER SIDE SO CAN'T POSSIBLY KNOW THE ANSWER!!!!!!
>tic toc nigger, clock is ticking. You are burning daylight overthinking this question
>I...... I CAN'T ANSWER IT BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION!!!!
>well Ken Jim Sung answered it 3 minutes ago and is already 4 questions ahead of you, better pick an answer quick!
>NOOO HE'S ABUSING HIS WHITE PRIVILEGE AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I'M GOING INSANE!!!

>> No.58034282

>>58032211
>picrel
...there's 51 cubes, 21 on the bottom layer, 18 in the middle, 12 on the top. twitter users are genuenly stupid holy shit.
>but achuallly
don't care about your math degree or copium induced hypothetical situations. this is a GRADE SCHOOL math problem.

>> No.58034408

>>58032309
>>58032317
>>58032516
these are the dimwits we get our financial advice from kek.
there is no range, you fucking 70 IQ trannies, gravity prevents anything other than 51 to be true.

>> No.58034434

>>58034408
You’re certiied 100 iq
Im not even joking
Maaaaybe 105 iq but no more than that