Adam & Eve pattern on Chainlink (ticker: Link)

[Anonymous No.58014636]

So where the heck is the breakout? I thought selling in to BTC was supposed to be EVIL because link was forming an amazing Adam and Eve pattern that would send us off in to the stratosphere...

[Anonymous No.58014642]

>>58014636
More like -ack 'em and leave

[Anonymous No.58014646]

that guy really touched a nerve by insinuating that you aren't a moral person

[Anonymous No.58014650]

Just look at this amazing breakout for Chainlink against BTC we're finna be so rich linkmarines, seven years and we're finally mooning... fml I'm never letting hope in to my heart ever again.

[Anonymous No.58014667]

>>58014646
>that guy really touched a nerve by insinuating that you aren't a moral person
nah I was actually agreeing with him in his latest post but its pretty fucking obvious by now that all TA is worthless and can only be analyzed after the fact never before

[Anonymous No.58014712]

>>58014650
>>58014636

Its on the MONTHLY time frame is where its painted not whatever you are posting. As a result, and something I reiterated 934938938593893 times I said in the coming months. When using long term time frames its hard to predict when short term events happen.

[Anonymous No.58014723]

>>58014636
its being painted on the monthly graph so we are still right at the point where its supposed to go up
its only invalidated if we break below 1.8 or if we crab for 3 months from here
thats the downside of monthly memelines invalidation leaves you already fucked

[Anonymous No.58014727]

>>58014650

Okay this one is correct the first pic looks like the Weekly though.

You should probably read the threads I made so you get a better understanding of what I was describing.

>>/biz/thread/57881908#p57891385

[Anonymous No.58014738]

>>58014723

I'm the one who has been making the Adam & Eve threads. This isn't my analysis but do you I suppose

[Anonymous No.58014786]

>>58014738
yeah i remember your threads i was in several
now if memory serves you dont set invalidation points you just pointed out the very obvious chart being painted
i mean this is crypto whale games can paint any scam wick they want and link is massively fucked with in ways i cant keep up with
right now we are at the point where we are supposed to go up so being very generous here a break below the bottom of the eve would be an invalidation or if we crab here for an extended period
altho i dont think there is any realistic instance where crabbing is possible for months here

the point is to shut up the well poisoners who are trying to discredit your analysis by using the weekly chart which shows that failed breakout recently that very clearly is not an invalidation point

[Anonymous No.58014802]

>>58014786
>you don't set any invalidation points, it's always "in the coming months"
>we must stop teh naysayers discrediting your analysis despite the clear invalidation point they are pointing out, because YOU don't have to set any invalidation points apart from "2 more months"
incredible logic right there, desu this copium should last us until the summer

[Anonymous No.58014816]

>>58014712
>>58014723
I forgot to drink my coffee so I was fuming with rage and I somehow stumbled upon the link/btc chart and remembered the adam and eve formation and got pissed off but I'm all good now thx for keeping the hopium alive

[Anonymous No.58014834]

>>58014816
>so I was fuming with rage
Patrick Collins...?

[Anonymous No.58014836]

>>58014802
All ta is bullshit anon
It’s just a way for us to guess when to sell
We all know link is going to paint that chart (or something similar) when ccip goes live

[Anonymous No.58014846]

>>58014636
It’s been 5 years of LINKies spreading their delusions about how generational wealth is right around the corner …if you haven’t heard to just ignore them by now and let them huff their hopium idk what to tell you

[Anonymous No.58014849]

>>58014786
>the point is to shut up the well poisoners who are trying to discredit your analysis by using the weekly chart which shows that failed breakout recently that very clearly is not an invalidation point

This I can agree with

>>58014802
There are invalidation points if you were trading this on leverage. I just won't share them. Its one more confirmation for my spot holdings as the technicals and fundamentals are looking insane together.

[Anonymous No.58014877]

>>58014849
>trading a 2 year pattern on the monthly
>with leverage
>analysing a 2 year pattern on the monthly
>in order to vaguely predict short term movements
>???
and now you disintegrated into spouting pretentious nonsense

[Anonymous No.58014915]

>>58014712
lol cope, its going to be putting in a lower low any day now

buy sergey another mansion, paypig

[Anonymous No.58014948]

>>58014877
>and now you disintegrated into spouting pretentious nonsense

You'd obviously be using the lower time frames to see get an indication of when the Monthly is formation is coming to fruition.

Higher time frames are weighted much stronger than lower. When they all line up together you have greatly enhanced probabilities.

You are just purposely being difficult and not really trying to understand

[Anonymous No.58014957]

>>58014849
looks like the low effort low iq fudsisters have arrived
one word of advice anon unlike your earlier threads simply dont engage with them, it just wastes time and space
everyone with a brain can spot them by now and with every post they make it just bumps the thread so just go in interaction with real anons and ignore all the low iq takes from the fudsisters or never (you) them but address any broad point if its repeated a lot

[Anonymous No.58014960]

>>58014915

Then short it and may the best man win

[Anonymous No.58015041]

>>58014957

That makes sense. Sometimes they appear as people arguing in good faith and then you find they are in fact not after going back and forth for awhile

[Anonymous No.58015124]

>>58014948
how can anyone not see that this is a badly programmed bot?
>to see get an indication of when the Monthly is formation is

[Anonymous No.58015284]

So to summarize: despite the fact that following your astrology would have lost people money, you are the good guy

The cult thought process really is amazing

[Anonymous No.58015678]

It's obviously heading for new lows post-halving.

[Anonymous No.58015762]

original op's adam and eve ta summary = on the monthly link btc is looking good, will probably go up a lot once it gets going, but if it breaks below the 18 support line then that isnt good and means it wasnt an adam and eve but at that point you would have lost many more sats anyway but it probably is an adam and eve in ta.

tldr:
price is manipulated, probably going to go up at some point, maybe in 10 more months, maybe 24 more months, maybe next month.
*but it might not go up and only way to invalidate this is if it breaks down to a very low sats price

in other words, useless waffle.
somebody could start another thread and say if btc gets to 200k by election time then link will break ath, but maybe not.
stating the obvious anon.

[Anonymous No.58016271]

>>58015041
In order to suck you in and derail you, they'll often put on a cloak of good faith, at least initially. The real danger is that you harden yourself against honest criticism and take on aspects of being the cultists they so often screech about.

[Anonymous No.58016999]

>>58015124

No I'm just typing fast. I just got back from volunteering so I was gone for a couple hours or I would have replied sooner. You really think a bot wrote all these replies in this thread too?

>>/biz/thread/57881908#p57891385

[Anonymous No.58017025]

>>58015284

If you looked at the original thread that is not even true. I suggested many alts were going to do well

AVAX, SOL, LINK, AND UNI all look solid on the long term BTC pairings. You can hold more than just LINK. LINK just has the better chart imo. You can argue about a few percent here or there but most people holding spot are looking for multiple Xs of return.

LINK has basically been ranging between 19 and 21 since I made the original thread.

[Anonymous No.58017041]

>>58015762
>but if it breaks below the 18 support line then that isnt good and means it wasnt an adam and eve but at that point you would have lost many more sats anyway but it probably is an adam and eve in ta.

I never said this in any shape or form

[Anonymous No.58017054]

>>58016271

Yes there is a fine balance to be achieved.

[Anonymous No.58017096]

>>58014636
>>58014642
>>58014646
>>58014650
>>58014667
>>58014712
>>58014723
>>58014727
>>58014738
>>58014786
>>58014802
>>58014816
>>58014834
>>58014836
>>58014846
>>58014849
>>58014877
>>58014915
>>58014948
>>58014957
>>58014960
>>58015041
>>58015124
>>58015284
>>58015678
>>58015762
>>58016271
>>58016999
>>58017025
>>58017041
>>58017054
Canton Network makes Chainlink obsolete

[Anonymous No.58017116]

>>58017096
>Canton Network makes Chainlink obsolete

That's great perhaps you should make your own thread about it as this one is about LINK and various TA if you read the OP.

[Anonymous No.58017219]

>>58017116
Cope baggiecuck
Enterprise Interoperability belongs to Canton Network

[Anonymous No.58017343]

>>58017219

The fact you have to spam this in other threads because you would be able to get any traction within your own is telling. No one cares about the Canton Network obviously. That is the truth and its apparent to everyone. Lmao

[Anonymous No.58017497]

>>58017096
canton lol
now there is some old school fud that hasnt been used in a while
but anon didnt you get the update in your discord its icp now that makes link and canton obsolete

[Anonymous No.58017545]

Anon it's not happening

[Anonymous No.58018649]

Meds schizo

[Anonymous No.58019098]

>>58014636
it is evil, and some microscopic swinging gains you could have made doesn't change that
link is the way, the truth, the light
btc is sin, greed, avarice... nothing good comes from it.
submit to God and go all in on his holy token

[Anonymous No.58019581]

>>58014948
the adam and eve scenario got invalidated with the february monthly candle... breakout got rejected hard. by all means, prove me wrong.

[Anonymous No.58019666]

>>58014646
turd worlders get really riled up over the most random insults

[Anonymous No.58020422]

>>58019666
>satan trips
>thinks questions of morality are just "random insults"
checks out

[Anonymous No.58022486]

>>58014636
funny how you wont show the fifty other times the "adam and eve pattern" didnt play out haha

[Anonymous No.58022521]

>>58022486
>funny how you wont show the fifty other times the "adam and eve pattern" didnt play out haha

What other times? Lmao there is only one I'm seeing and its on the Monthly time frame as I explained here. I wasn't even OP of the thread but he was talking about a past thread I made here

>>58016999
>>58017025

[Anonymous No.58023481]

LINK GO DOWN