[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 3 KB, 225x225, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57957929 No.57957929 [Reply] [Original]

>underperformed for years
>always misses the bullruns
>fails to keep up with the market
>deranged eternally coping baggie holders on par with XRP baggies
>nothing ever gets released
>/biz/ threads and Link twitter full of cuck memes, everyone ridiculing Link and coping cultists spewing eternal '2 more weeks' copes
>dumps like a shitcoin while having zero moon potential

This is why you're missing another bullrun, there's nobody left to buy Link.
Boomers have BTC for safe slow gains
Zoomers have doge and shitcoin casino for risky moonshots.
Link is just an expired has-been that offers nothing.

>> No.57957977
File: 374 KB, 2014x1878, Screenshot 2024-03-11 at 6.00.03 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57957977

>>57957929
agreed

>> No.57958024

>>57957977
How will the cult cope once this happens

>> No.57958078

>>57958024
by talking about the fireside chat that is always somehow two weeks away and how the next in an eternal sequence of iterations of chainlink vaporware will magically make the token worth more somehow despite no one ever needing or wanting to use it at all.

>> No.57958101

>>57957929
It was $6 in September

>> No.57958119

>>57957929
>>57957977
>>57958024
>>57958078

sage discord latefags.

>> No.57958150

>>57958078
They've been doing exactly that for 4 years tho, how the fuck can they be so gullible

>>57958101
>>57958119
kek baggies

>> No.57958163

how don't you get it by now

there is no possible combination of words out there that will make me sell, ever. you're merely wasting your time

>> No.57958187

>>57958101
>>57958119
>>57958163
Enjoy making cucked micropenis gains through this entire bullrun retards.

>>57958150
They actually enjoy being cucked I think. They look at the chart bleeding in sats for years and it brings them pleasure. They are sick

>> No.57958245

>>57958150
>>57958187
seethe more poor latefag. biggest lolcows on /biz/

>> No.57958277
File: 198 KB, 1198x938, 1683383225069690.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57958277

Link and utility alts in general are for the millennial midwit crowd.
Dunning Kruger in action

>> No.57958306

>>57958277
could you be anymore brown lol

>> No.57958328

>>57958245
Enjoy your epic gains!!! Maybe link will finally get to 23 dollars one day when bitcoin is 1,000,000 dumbfuck

>> No.57958341

>>57958187
/biz/ in 2026 after the bullrun will be hilarious to see with the link baggies seething and coping after zoomers make more money in crypto in a year than they did in 7 years lmao.
Even the first bullrun newfags who fail to take profit will be cheered up by the Linkie rage and cope that will come in 2/3 years.

>>57958277
Facts

>>57958245
>>57958306
kek baggie

>> No.57958374

>>57958328
old fags laugh at you, intelligent newfags dont listen to you, you waste your time day in and day out shitting up the board because you're a seething latefag lol

>> No.57958396

>>57958341
they could not have picked a worse project to marry lmao thats whats so poetic about it. Zero ability to pump in a fucking bull market while insane gains occur on literally every single token except theres. Its kind of impressive that they are able to lose this hard through yet another bull market. It is going to psychologically destroy many of them probably beyond repair.

>> No.57958402

It’s just not in the design.

>> No.57958425

>>57958374
it doesn't matter. newfags dont give a shit about link anyway, regardless of fud. no one is buying it. No one cares. nothing I say is for them. Its for my own entertainment because you all are so fucked its comical. Enjoy the eternal bleed in sats!

>> No.57958446

>>57958425
lol oh no one is buying, but you make the same jeet thread every day. thanks for protecting us super jeet, sound logic. have another sage.

>> No.57958479

>>57958446
I didnt make the thread and I dont make any threads dummy. Theres more than one person who laughs at linkies because you are the laughing stock of crypto. You are the cucks of crypto and you will be watching red candles on the link/btc chart for the rest of your life

>> No.57958506

>>57958446
>everyone who hates chainlink is all one person
actually you are right and that one person is sergey. he dumps everytime you pump. its not even a question at this point

>> No.57958509

>>57958479
you and your discord coomers make the same jeet threads every day for this particular asset because you're a seething latefag with a paltry bag kek, dont worry you'll still make a lot of money but you wont be fuckyou wealthy like everyone with a mensa tier IQ who caught on earlier than yourself.

>> No.57958540

>>57958509
>6 posts by this ID

Lmao look how rattled you are and it's only the start of your missed bullrun

>> No.57958544

>>57958509
Enjoy the sat bleed. Pretty much all I have to say. nothing you say really matters at all. just look at the fucking chart retard. Admit it, you enjoy being cucked, you enjoy watching the entire market dominate you, it brings you pleasure

>> No.57958558

>>57958540
definitely struck a nerve kek

>> No.57958560

>>57958509
whats this discord you are talking about? sounds fun.

>> No.57958563

THE cuckolds of crypto

>> No.57958594

>>57957929
Its almost like if chainlink had value which makes sense to invest in, then it really only could have derived from its utility and not speculation. Yeah it is probably going to get smoked if the only thing really driving the LINK price is speculation.

Linkies appear to admit that it will take a long time yet for its utility function to drive the price on its own. So then it shouldn't be held right now speculatively, as it can't compete in this regard. Linkies will reply that it can and has competed on some time frames on speculation, but we have to consider whether the current market paradigm supports this. Speculators chiefly wanna know what other speculators will do. What's the temperature of the room say, where is narrative momentum at? And yeah I agree with OP that right now for many its two main options: safer yet still impressive gains are to be found with bitcoin, and if one wants higher risk higher reward its memes gambled on by short-term oriented nihilists who don't pretend to care about much of anything.

>> No.57958607

>>57958563
>>57958560
>>57958544

imagine listening to these discord coomer clowns kek

>> No.57958712

>>57958607
THE cuckold of crypto
(You)

>> No.57958739

>>57958594
the worst part for linkies is that the utility is never coming. If you haven't figured that out by now, you are fucked. Sergey is NOT delivering shit. EVER. Buh Buh But It needs to be safe so its taking a while! If you are this dumb you deserve to watch your investment crab through not just a third bull market but 100 more.

>> No.57958815

>>57958739
They'll keep deluding themselves for another 7 years while being strung along.

>> No.57958851
File: 136 KB, 589x631, 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57958851

>>57958607
wait doesn't the actual team have a discord lol? Isn't that where they secretly announce all of their delays for products that don't exist beyond idea stage? Irony is always lost on the cult

>> No.57958897
File: 53 KB, 1562x543, 3513581351.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57958897

hey there guys i was looking at tradingview and comparing these three cryptos. can you tell me what this means?

>> No.57958967
File: 86 KB, 1400x788, 0_8M9UfZ1qpg9emgiI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57958967

Why would they be of no real value when ChainLink collaborated with Google Cloud? They were Proud to Collaborate With Google? They Collaborated With Google. Their free Medium.com blogpost said they Collaborated With Google Cloud (paid to used google drive)

>> No.57958974

>>57958815
similar to XRP schizos, linkies will hold their worthless shitcoin for decades. Probably in 50 years there will still be elderly retards holding it, maybe then it will experience a small pump as future generations buy it as a joke.

>> No.57959012
File: 45 KB, 1773x175, Link.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57959012

did you guys see this one? They locked the other thread before I could ask if it was a pasta, but damn nice work whoever wrote this

>> No.57959013

>>57958897
enjoy missing another bullrun

>> No.57959014

>>57958897
i figured with all the smart investors that make up the /biz/ community that you all could shed some light on this particular chart.

>> No.57959028

>>57959013
oh does the line on top with the larger% make up the amount of the bullrun they missed? can you explain please?

>> No.57959031

>>57958897
It means you cherry-picked a timeframe that doesn't matter anymore in attempt to relive past glories. Bitcoiners have the past and present, its done amazing in the past and is doing great now as well. They can just go with a longer time frame when appealing to others about its strength if they to want to flex what % up it is.

You can whine about your personal buy-in price and how cheap it was and how much % up you are just to stroke the ego, but that's of no concern to anyone else thinking about what they should do in the present. Doesn't mean retail normies or institutional investors care.

>> No.57959034

>>57958897
>Uncle Rico talks about that one time coach let him run with the first string in practice

>> No.57959050

>>57959031
>>57959034
i selected the maximum timeframe available as evidenced by "all" selected at the bottom. is using all available data considered cherry picking? i didn't realize.

>> No.57959066

>>57959028
can you run the chart from '20 until now?

THE Cuckolds of crypto


>>57959031
>how much % up you are just to stroke the ego
if he really was happy the gains, he wouldn't be here furiously battlling le "fud" (aka reality). It's a weird occurrence where they redirect all their anger at people calling out the truth because they can't go against their cult leaders. It's some real cuck shit

>> No.57959073

>>57959066
i thought cherry picking data points was a problem? can you explain why you've chosen that particular starting point?

>> No.57959083

Did not buy LINK to get rich quick. Sergey must sell tokens to fund the project so by buying I helped fund the project and technological advancement which is far more important than money. Frankly I dont care if I make any money from LINK so long as the project succeeds, and many other holders I have spoken to feels the same way.
Money is not everything in life and if everyone thought like this the crypto space would be take much more seriously.

>> No.57959100

>>57959028
it has been glaringly obvious for YEARS that link's value relative to the market has begun to bleed and will essentially never stop bleeding because it is pure vaporware. It is mega retarded to sit in it still plain and simple. It is only down from here my friend. Congrats on the gains. You can watch them go to zero over a long enough time horizon if you just sit on them. If that is what you want to do I am proud of you because you are a good cuck for sergey

>> No.57959145

>>57959100
as someone who only wants the best for me can you elaborate on why you think the chainlink token is vaporware and why holding it isn't a good plan? you seem convinced that the asset will only decrease in value. do you have additional information you can provide to back up your claims?

>> No.57959263

>>57959145
in two weeks sergey will have a fireside chat in which he will announce the beta pre net v.00000000001 for the CUC (chainlink utility computation) system to go live. It was designed by the smartest computer scientists in the world. I have some charts i could show you and paragraphs full of computer science jargon and complex theoretical equations if you want to see what it does... trust me, when this goes live, 800 Septillion dollars of value will pass through it, which means uhh.... the chainlink erc20 token will go up in value. So actually ignore what i said before, in two weeks you will see a god candle like nothing youve ever witnessed. Just wait until sergey announces the exploratory phase of the beta permissioned access pre net CUC launch

>> No.57959265

i was hoping you smart folks that know so much about crypto investments could help me out but i'm beginning to suspect that you may not have my best interests in mind after all. could one of you explain why you would insisit i not buy or hold an asset you have no financial or emotional attachment to?

>> No.57959274

>57959263
Hahaha no you for you!

>> No.57959281

Cucklink

>> No.57959300

>>57959265
I'm not as smart as the epic computer scientists from Yale and MIT, you're right. That's why now I understand that trusting their complex charts and then followed by a massive incomprehensible number of money is a better way to fully understand whats going on. Link is going to pump so freaking hard due to incredible tokenomics that are scientifically proven by those much smarter than I, maybe you can elaborate some of the epic mathematics that go into these incredible systems?

>> No.57959304

>57959263
I'm laughing at the fact you didn't buy in at .15

>> No.57959309

>>57959263
oh that sounds really great please share whatever information you have available as it seems like i'm speaking with a true insider. i'm confused though because you referred to it as erc-20 and i believe due to the transferandcall feature that it's classified as erc-677. am i mistaken?

>> No.57959345

>>57959309
none of this matters because no one uses ccip and literally never will

>> No.57959375
File: 615 KB, 1086x1004, tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57959375

>>57959263
i was hoping you could explain why a company that collaborated with Google Cloud would be vapor ware? Google Cloud is a giant company? They are collaborators and evidence is published on Medium.com? They put public weather data on google drive?

>> No.57959395

>>57959375
In two weeks mr. google himself will personally make chainlink CCIP official Google.com system. Google.com will use CCIP to do cloud and other systems. Buy now!

>> No.57959400

>>57959345
do you have information about a more well established or preferred competitor i should know about? as far as i'm aware there are only a handful of early access users live at the moment. are they cancelling general access?

>> No.57959422
File: 755 KB, 1179x2210, IMG_5840.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57959422

>checks 24hr change
>LINK is 1 of 2 in the red in a sea of green
Oh..that’s not…..

>> No.57959472

i'm beginning to suspect that there's a concerted effort among the patrons of /biz/ to cast certain tokens/holders of tokens in a bad light. i can't imagine why that might be. does anyone have any insights?

>> No.57959473

50% btc
27% eth
23% link

$75,000 currently. How fucked am I in 5 years?

>> No.57959477

>>57958163
/thread

>> No.57959483

>>57959400
i really hope you do enjoy waiting around 20 years for link to double in value, It will feel super good in 2040 when you sell your links at 50 dollars and the cost of a big mac is 100 dollars. Super intelligent investment plan. You underestimate what early in early access means. it does not mean what you think it does, it means early in the sense that the formation of the fucking stars was early compared to the present day. There will be no product, no RWA, off chain compute, etc... in DECADES. This is vaporware. This is a guy trying to sell you flying car stock in 1928

>> No.57959515

>>57959483
you seem pretty well informed based on the confidence of your assertions. can you provide any links or evidence to support the basis of your claims? we're all here to have a healthy discussion but i have yet to receive any answers to my questions and all the while you've made assertion after assertion without data as well as insult and attack the asset, myself, and holders of the asset in general. can you explain your reasoning for this?

>> No.57959535

>>57959483
and looping back around to the start, could you provide some context to the image from my original post?
>>57958897
thanks

>> No.57959547

>>57959263
Nice job admitting you have a large bag of LINK, no need to act so unhinged

>> No.57959583

imagine listening to discord coomer clowns kek

they all own paltry bags of links. maybe you'll hit 200 links! wowweee!

>> No.57959596

I've been holding a 5 fig LINK stack since 2018, first buy in 17c, dca 50c this thread was made by similar individuals, is this what Delphi has become in 2024?

>> No.57959601

>>57959515
the feigned thoroughness and willingness to engage me with planned well thought out "questioning" is really retarded dude. The onus is actually on YOU, the person holding the cursed and bleeding token for a project that has not delivered anything tangible to make said token's value go up, its not on me, the observer who is coming to a simple logical conclusion: there is nothing behind the buzzwords and nothing will ever be delivered. You will be bogged and mogged by btc from here on out. Congrats on the early gains, re: your epic pic. Now move them out of link before you watch them slowly trend back to zero.

>> No.57959618

>>57957929
Solcard, $Solc on the solana chain, buy it now! :D

>> No.57959621

>>57958163
here are some more words: tiktok, delay, v0.1, release (book), eric remote

>> No.57959630

>>57959601
>observer
>18pbtid

>> No.57959656

>>57959601
i was taught the burden of proof was on those making the claim? all i've asked for was the evidence that i assume was the basis for your bold assertions. i'm simply trying to learn from the more educated /biz/bros. if i'm speaking with the wrong person please point me to a better source of information.

>> No.57959702

>>57959263
Will cuc be able to interface with bbca?

>> No.57959717
File: 151 KB, 1520x320, collaborators.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57959717

>>57959395
Are you suggesting they would just routinely put their logo next to google's logo and say they're collaborators, citing only their own blog posts? And that highly intelligent 4chan investors wouldn't notice this as a potential red flag of fraud? That they feigned understanding the endless jargon the large european man said? Is Chainlink not among the dozens of other coins that have changed society and banking as we know it? I am attempting to inquire intelligently sir, please back your claims with evidence.

>> No.57959739

>>57959656
how am i supposed to provide evidence for the situation that is so blatantly obvious with chainlink. This isn't a hypothetical situation. Here is the situation: they have not delivered anything, they continue to constantly tease and never release ANYTHING, FOR YEARS. The token bleeds endlessly. Yes we know it had a good initial run. Now what? I don't understand where "evidence" comes into play here.
>do you have information about a more well established or preferred competitor i should know about?
I just started my new crypto start up DogShitRetard, it will connect all the worlds data using dog shit. We have no competitors. No one else is trying to use dog shit to connect all the worlds data.

>as far as i'm aware there are only a handful of early access users live at the moment. are they cancelling general access?
Nigger what? First of all general access means absolutely NOTHING, they are not "releasing" general access because NO ONE is fucking using CCIP and if they "release" GA, then it will be apparent as hell. They can also just hold this over bag holders heads endlessly for years.

>> No.57959807

>>57959739
i don't want to be misunderstood so i'll break down your post by topic
>how am i supposed to provide evidence for the situation that is so blatantly obvious with chainlink. This isn't a hypothetical situation. Here is the situation: they have not delivered anything, they continue to constantly tease and never release ANYTHING, FOR YEARS.
VRF, data streams, proof of reserve, and data feeds are live

i'll ignore your second point because it seems to have upset you

>Nigger what? First of all general access means absolutely NOTHING, they are not "releasing" general access because NO ONE is fucking using CCIP
how can anyone use a feature that isn't released yet? those early access users have all used the technology successfully.

>> No.57959851

>>57959807
>VRF, data streams, proof of reserve, and data feeds are live

How do any of these help the price

>narrator: they dont

>> No.57959870

>>57959851
>How do any of these help the price
the assertion was that
>they continue to constantly tease and never release ANYTHING, FOR YEARS
this is false

>> No.57959880

>>57959807
>VRF, data streams, proof of reserve, and data feeds are live
and the token continues to bleed and dump. This is either because it is not needed and serves merely as a funding mechanism to CLL or because no one uses this shit because it is not useful.
>how can anyone use a feature that isn't released yet? those early access users have all used the technology successfully.
CCIP is being used currently right now, any developer can use it and no one cares, no one is using it. What magically happens in general access? if i am a developer right now I can use it. Do floods of normies all the sudden start coding dapps with CCIP integrated them the second sergey hits a magic button. The use that will occur in GA is the use that is occuring now, which is nothing.

>> No.57959903

Thiiiiinking about putting a lot of my stack of this into DOGE, yeahhhhhh just might do that :)

>> No.57959935

>>57959880
CCIP isn't a switch they flip that magically connects the world. it has to be implemented on an individual basis. naturally that begins with a small group of diverse use cases that link devs work directly with users until they manage a secure and modular standard that can be made available to the general public. once they can be sure their one-size-fits-all solution is airtight it can be cleared for general access implementation without their direct involvement.

>> No.57959937

>>57958306
>anymore
Esl projection
Don't you mean "any more" ranjesh?

>> No.57959962

>>57958897
Now add shib.
The way this works is any coin made after bitcoin appears to go up more because it started at 0 value

>> No.57959969

>>57959935
so what you're saying is... you have to wait indefinitely and trust the plan? Now im getting it. TRUST THE PLAN!

>> No.57959975

The night crow flies at midnight.

>> No.57960030

>>57959969
what i'm saying is the content of your posts has been false at best and disingenuous at worst. all of your emotional name calling, misinformation, regurgitation of tired memes, and failed "GOTCHA" posts out you as just another TG fud tranny. i gave you every opportunity to support your posts with more than estrogen supplement fueled emotional outbursts and you couldn't hack it.

>> No.57960042

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE LPL POOLS CLOSED SEETHE

>> No.57960060

>>57960030
Not to mention they collaborated with Google Cloud many times

>> No.57960098

>>57959050
Its not intentional cherrypicking on purpose maybe if you're that stupid I suppose. Link is calculating its % gain probably from near its birth on the market, and its making that the starting point of comparison for the other two as well. Or do you really think bitcoin's % gain isn't higher than 1203 on a longer time frame? Go back to the first couple year's of bitcoin's life, oh wow its up a bajillion % as well since then. But that doesn't matter for the future at all because Link isn't that young anymore.

>> No.57960103

>>57960060
yes your twitter pinned comment mention is legendary. it's a shame they never got anyone from google to agree to advise them

>> No.57960118

>>57960030
I have just gone from being skeptical about chainlink being able to accomplish what it has set out to accomplish, and not understanding how in the fuck the LINK token could possibly accrue any value along the way, to being outright suspicious of them. They are master teasers just endlessly putting a carrot on a stick, with zero payoff.

>> No.57960130

>>57960118
>my feelings
many such cases

>> No.57960208
File: 320 KB, 956x1900, 99878341232.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57960208

>>57960130
enjoy your award kek

>> No.57960233

>>57960208
oh hey look it's that image that fudders post when they don't have anything factual to respond with. very based and on brand
i kneel

>> No.57960270

>>57960130
dont worry, my anger towards CLL's misdeeds and lies to their token paypigs is counteracted with hearty laughter when I look at the chart and its non stop bleeding against btc.

>> No.57960286
File: 392 KB, 1913x1252, 49012341298.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57960286

>>57960233

>> No.57960307

>>57960270
>my intense negative feelings are assuaged during the times the token price fluctuates downward
the rest of your post is flamboyant noise

>> No.57960332

>>57960286
ah it's almost as if a fully realized, much older crypto is more established than a utility token in early access. what a mindfuck

>> No.57960335
File: 68 KB, 764x472, eric.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57960335

>>57960103
Or maybe they got him to speak once and claimed he had some made up position? Like they did with logo? He doesn't even remember what it is?

>> No.57960357

>>57960335
i guess all the videos and articles are a fever dream manifested by the mandela effect. that must be the case based on the text in your screencap you made of the search you made on ?????

>> No.57960383

>>57958594
Scarcity + Desirability = Store of Value
This makes late fags and no poolers absolutely seethe. You WILL pay me 1k per LINK. Sorry the pool is closed.

>> No.57960403
File: 3 KB, 536x130, chainlink-today-logo-retina.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57960403

>>57960357
The news generated from Chainlink's own press release? On the famously scrutinous crpyto blogs? On Chainlinktoday.com ? The videos of cypto retards restating that press release?

>> No.57960407
File: 406 KB, 1170x1666, IMG_0483.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57960407

One of these is not like the others

>> No.57960450

>>57960403
i'm sure if that specific string on that specific site didn't pull anything then there's nothing to see here folks. case closed
>>57960407
are we doing the cherry picking argument again or does that only work when link is down at the moment versus your portfolio

>> No.57960476

>>57960450
Link is always down against my portfolio tho
It’s literally my worst performer by far

>> No.57960482

>>57960407
Fucking hell what an embarassment
Can't believe Sirgay actually locked linkies in a cuckcage so that they miss another bullrun. Pure evil but they deserve it.

>>57960450
Lmao get the fuck outta here advocate, go play Chainlink Defence League on twitter or something you fat cunt

>> No.57960507
File: 9 KB, 374x134, source.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57960507

>>57960450

>> No.57960513

>>57960450
when confronted with the overwhelming fact that link will never go up in sats meaningfully ever again, the linktard still can't understand that it's over. It is literally over for link dude, the token does not accrue value and it never will. it is destined to bleed forever.

>> No.57960582

>>57960476
currently
>>57960482
i used the advocate word, i win
>>57960507
implying that search string means dick
>>57960513
another emotional assertion

literally every fudder in this thread is only capable of "chainlink bad" and "you're dumb because chainlink bad" not a single one of you has posted anything other than emotional drivel or post-bullrun performance numbers to make your case.

>> No.57960595
File: 16 KB, 344x158, news.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57960595

>>57960482
Eric Shit hasn't thought about Cucklink since he got his speaker fee and the page of bullshit talking points, which he did not care was aimed to get lazy retarded 4chan dowsers into emptying their wallets (due to being lazy and retarded)

>> No.57960653

>>57960582
chainlink is your religion so there is no way to really say anything because your belief in it is faith based, i.e. you believe in something that has yet to happen. We do not because we are looking at current and recent past retardation surrounding chainshit including but not limited to sergey token dumps and the absurb time horizon of this EPIC TECH which you take it on faith as coming to full fruition at some point.

>> No.57960664

tell me why the technology is flawed
tell me why boomers won't augment technology they've been using since the 70s
tell me why the world doesn't need faster, more secure, and trustless versions of existing assets, or why the entire concept is a nonstarter

but no. all i get is
>>57960653

>> No.57960695

>>57960582
>>57960664
kek baggie
another bullrun missed, zoomers are gonna make it AGAIN with memecoins while you hold festering link bags

>> No.57960707

>>57960582
>>57960664
Look at the chart, no further arguments needed

>> No.57960722

>>57960695
another zoomer with shitcoin casino brainrot living in defi summer blissfully unaware the space will mature faster than their patchy facial hair
>>57960707
>seee!?!?!?
kek

>> No.57960753

>>57960722
>blissfully unaware the space will mature faster than their patchy facial hair
Lmao you said the same thing before the last bullrun, which you promptly missed. Linktards are incapable of learning and adapting to the market.

7 MORE YEARS MARINEEEEE DIAMOND HAAAANDSSSSS
Enjoy missing another bullrun while everyone else makes money.

>> No.57960759

>>57960664
the technology is flawed because it does not solve any issues to the degree that banks or whatever industry chainlink is targeting will be willing to spend the resources integrating. I would argue that even if said industries did desire to switch to tokenizing and utilizing blockchain tech, that this process of adoption for them would take so astronomically long anyway, the entire planet will look so much different by that time, im talking decades, that the number of unknowns in the investment space and in the given industries will have changed beyond recognition. To invest in a technology that comes to fruition in this far off distant future scenario is really retarded.

Boomers wont augment old tech because again, they dont need to and the incentive is not big enough for them to want to do that, see above.

The world needs a lot of things, the capability of a startup to provide groundbreaking tech in a SOMEWHAT timely manner vs, the world needing that groundbreaking tech are different things. Again, you put faith in CLL ability to solve a problem that is extremely large and is not something that happens overnight, as im sure you'd agree, I'd argue the problem of efficient trade, trustless contracts, etc... is even more vast than you are giving it credit and burried under dinosaur systems that are so vast and interconnected with everything that goes on in the business world (banking, insurance, etc...) that what you are envisioning is beyond fantastical, its silly and its retarded. Its the perfect type of amorphous tech promise that a crypto company like CLL with hundreds of millions of tokens to unload would spin up so that they can endlessly dump on you

>> No.57960828

>>57960759
>first paragraph
already in use by ANZ
>second paragraph
the cost savings gives any first movers an overwhelming advantage
>third paragraph
self aware and still unable to see the forest for the trees. you agree the technology is revolutionary and insist it isn't needed. that it's simultaneously a pie in the sky dream and also that it's unneeded. you really need to work out your talking points with your employer

>> No.57960849

>>57958897
zoom out nigger

>> No.57960880

>>57960849
see
>>57959050

>> No.57961025

>>57960828
>already in use
You mean they did a single demonstration last year “to explore the value of Chainlink”

>> No.57961096

>>57961025
>a successful case study proving the benefits doesn't mean anything!!!!!

>> No.57961275

>>57961096
>30 posts
What's that like 2000 words? Jesus christ lmao.

>> No.57961287

>>57960582
>>57960664
Heres the problem tho - the chart

>> No.57961305

>>57960828
im interested to hear your theory as to why the token has performed so poorly against btc for the past 4 years.

>> No.57961310

>>57961275
>talking about a topic in a related thread
haha got em
>>57961287
see
>>57958897

got em

>> No.57961320

>>57960722
BAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH you can tell this olll broken down cuck doesnt even believe the bullshit hes typing

>Muhhhhh mature market
>team goes on a camping trip

Pick one

>duuuuuuuuude banks will use us
>founder writes a cringe incel fantasy novel
Pick one

>mature
>big mac raffle
Pick one

>> No.57961344

>>57961305
i'm not an expert but my guess is they're trying something that's never been proposed on this scale that will radically change not just crypto but also tradfi
>>57961320
more emotional cherry picking that doesn't represent the posts it's speaking for. do better

>> No.57961358

>>57961310
>got em

2020
BTC $11,000
Link $20

2024
BTC $72,000
Link $21

Yep you “won”

>> No.57961374

>>57961344
The problem still: the chart

You just missed the bullrun

>> No.57961378

>>57961358
yep, you got me. good job. it's true that those numbers are correct.

>> No.57961397

>>57961374
oh man, double posting. you're hyper fudding a point no one is disputing. who could disagree about the price performance? kek

>> No.57961428

>>57957929
its always the same schizo fudding his own bags. we all know that nowadays this specific type of thread is the only place that any discussion about chainlink can happen without it dying with 10 posters, because the discourse drives discussion. but the only anons that would ever benefit never post, just read, so maybe this does work with filtering retards. it's the longest ruse, and man, i still am not sure if you're going to come out and say you're fudding your own bags when we're all 1000 dollars, because you're just that good. you are probably just an ai, that some dude is manually posting as an elaborate shitpost

>> No.57961476

>>57961374
link holders enjoy losing money, thats actually the function of the LINK token i've learned - its to cuck it's holder. I think its a sexual thing for them.

>> No.57961485

>>57961428
no, i just enjoy encouraging fudders to step up their game. if they had anything substantial they wouldn't resort to calling everyone cucks and reposting prices.

>> No.57961498

>>57961428
see
>>57961476
lmao

>> No.57961510

>>57957929
What i still dont get is that they keep coming back with the cuck memes and other assorted sexual insults
Do they not realize this is fortune and we do not give a single solitary fuck about such insults or is it that the third world mind simply cannot abstract away having to defend their worthlessness every waking moment
It must be hell living like that

>> No.57961525

link has been down vs btc for 4+ years because linkies are in the process of repaying their karmic debt to the board after shitting it up incessantly from 2017 through 2020. Four years of hell we had to go through on here with you fags and now you spend 4 years in hell getting raped by bitcoin in performance terms and mentally mindbroken

but don't fret, your redemption will soon be at hand

>> No.57961534

>>57961485
oh, oops, i linked to the wrong poster, was refering to craig wright over here
>>57961476

>> No.57961614

>>57961525
>muh 4chan sanctity
kek

>> No.57961761

>>57961614
kek's on you that's why you spent 4 years in purgatory

>> No.57961763

>>57960042
whats this FUCKING BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDO SHIT?

>> No.57962285
File: 725 KB, 2048x2048, 1702794729796663.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57962285

Take the cuckmaxx pill

>> No.57962647

>>57957929
We were rank 30 and $5 not long ago. Now rank 14 over $20. Soon we will be back in the top 10. Patience.

>> No.57962708

>>57957929
Hi OP, what brings you here?

>> No.57962730

I just exchanged some of my LINK. Not all of it though. But I'm not optimistic so yeah. K bye.

>> No.57962749

>>57959472
toadally dude

>> No.57962775

>>57962730
oh yea me too this thread made me think "you know what I'm going to make decisions that affect my life," y' know?

>> No.57963090

I legit just feel sick watching the charts right now. I want to vomit and cry. I still live in complete squalor and depression, when I should be living comfortably by now. 7 years and I have nothing to show for it. 7 years.

>> No.57963112

>>57963090
>I still live in complete squalor and depression
same, bro
same...

>> No.57963128

>>57963090
oh damn, if you dont actually enjoy being totally cucked and bogged you should sell, link is actually a token that was designed to cuck its holder, if you're not into that i would suggest just selling into btc, which will pump. btc is for pumping and for holders who enjoy gains, link is a cuck coin. some people actually enjoy being dominated by their token, bogged nonstop and cucked by the price, if that is not you then you should def sell. to each his own, im not judging if you are, but if you're not, seriously you should sell.

>> No.57964039

>skims thread
>its kept alive only by the same few discord nufudders abusing airplane mode and replying to themselves over and over again
wow im sure a spot in the pool will open any second now guys
amazing and subtle work lmao
s and h

>> No.57964092

>>57957929
>>underperformed for years
>>always misses the bullruns
>>fails to keep up with the market
>>deranged eternally coping baggie holders on par with XRP baggies
>>nothing ever gets released
>>/biz/ threads and Link twitter full of cuck memes, everyone ridiculing Link and coping cultists spewing eternal '2 more weeks' copes
>>dumps like a shitcoin while having zero moon potential

And yet after years of this, you're still holding.

>> No.57964112

>>57959473
Dude go all in link

>> No.57964209

>>57960759
Not even him but everything you just said applies to AI, which didn't exist a few years ago and is now being integrated into everything because of the irrefutable value it was able to provide.

>> No.57964215

>>57963128

29 pbtid
Give it up for king cuck over here.

>> No.57964843
File: 127 KB, 1070x1070, 1696424118512262.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57964843

alright /biz/ I ADMIT IT, you were right all along. I sold all my link, now what should I buy instead at this point to at least somewhat make it? I have 41k. It seems I'm prices out of SOL at this point (I was originally going to buy SOL for 12 over a year ago but chose LINK instead....), BTC and ETH are also a no go

WHAT SHOULD I DO BIZ PLEASE HELP

>> No.57965108

>>57964843
market is about to crash

>> No.57965340

>>57965108
I kinda feel that too, what do you think I should buy once everything dips?

>> No.57966122

>>57964039
Ur a cuckold

>> No.57966399

>>57958851
do you really not worry about being doxxed/harassed for the rest of your life by a few guys with nothing better to do and all the resources they need to ruin your life? Are you naive or stupid? Do you know where you are?

Regardless, you're clearly already living in hell

>> No.57966546

>>57961510
>we do not give a single solitary fuck about such insults

bahahhahaha you're severely rattled. Whenever someone has to go out of their way to tell you they don't care, they care

and...you are a cuck

>> No.57966574

>>57966546
>10 pbtid

>> No.57966599
File: 366 KB, 673x686, 1222222222.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57966599

>>57966399
lmfao this is the guy in the meme!!!

>resources

BAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


update on the price today folks: -3.5% per usual one of the worst performing coins in the top 100

>> No.57966825

>>57966399
shut up Zack you incel, you ain't gonna do shit

>> No.57967048
File: 568 KB, 1197x936, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57967048

>>57958277

>> No.57967205

>>57966599
you're talking about people who have been holding link since it was .25c, many of whom work in tech and - weren't you *already* doxxed?

>> No.57967890

>>57967205
ok Tim Bryant

>> No.57967896

Chudlink copied Coreto

>> No.57967938

>>57967890
Do you want to try again?

>> No.57967971

>>57967938
no, it's you or else you wouldn't even bother responding
what's up Timmy?

>> No.57967986

>>57967971
Do you want to try again

>> No.57967997

>>57967986
no Timmy
see ya at smartcon ;)

>> No.57968004

Imagine being a cultist for hating one particular coin.
Imagine spending your time that way.
Imagine getting excited to wake up and the first thing you think is, "what are my best friends, who I never met, planning to do to hate those dumb linkies?"
Man. I've been there. With nothing to do. You don't even play videogames because you don't feel like you deserve it, like the hammer is going to come crashing down at any moment...

Get a job. Buy crypto.

>> No.57968019

>>57967997
im gonna go poop on company time and give you another chance to try again

>> No.57968033

>>57968019
>pls, I'm not him pls
too late Timmy, see ya at Smartcon ;)

>> No.57968070

>>57957929
Link fudders have to be the biggest subhumans on the planet at this point with link baggies being only a close second. Reading over this thread I am certain that if all of you who posted killed yourselves the world would be a better place.

>> No.57968078

>>57968033
I'm pooping rn and giving you another chance to state my full name and address on 4 chan . c o m

>> No.57968114

>>57968004
>>57968070
-3.39% today cucks! I know you guys are loving this! congrats! Since you bought the coin to be financially dominated, this must bring you tons of pleasure. Link truly is exceptionally good at what its designed to do (cuck its holders forever)

>> No.57968123

>threatens to doxx somebody
>gets doxxed himself
>proceeds to literally shit his pants while wagecucking
pottery
you literally can't make this stuff up

>> No.57968162

>>57968123
Are you actually schizophrenically dropping names of your Twitter reply guys that live rent free in your head in an attempt to own anonymous posters on 4chan?