/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.57879900]

tax the rich

[Anonymous No.57879934]

taxes are gay

[Anonymous No.57880067]

>>57879900
Tax the rich, feed the poor
Till there are no rich no more?

I'd love to change the world
But I don't know what to do
So I'll leave it up to you

Population keeps on breeding
Nation bleeding, still more feeding economy
Life is funny, skies are sunny
Bees make honey, who needs money, Monopoly

[Anonymous No.57880201]

>>57879900
>tax the rich
t. xrp baggies

[Anonymous No.57880220]

>>57880067
banger

[Anonymous No.57880461]

Only incels with shit genes need money. Sex is the ultimate human experience (sex with drugs if you’re a degenerate) and you don’t need money for it. So yeah tax the rich, nobody needs millions or billions on dollars.

[Anonymous No.57880474]

>>57880461
if no one needs it why do you want to steal it so much?

[Anonymous No.57880596]

>>57880474
I said that people need money, but they don’t need millions of it. And as if most jobs where you get rich isn’t stealing money from others one way or another.

[Anonymous No.57880639]

>>57880596
>I said that people need money, but they don’t need millions of it
How does that translate to "tax the rich"?
People don't need tvs either but that doesn't mean they can't buy them or that they should be taken from them
>And as if most jobs where you get rich isn’t stealing money from others one way or another
No, most jobs where people get rich don't involve stealing

[Anonymous No.57880837]

>>57880639
Tv’s don’t cost much. Yachts do and the money is better spend on healthcare, education, social programs ect.
>most jobs where people get rich don't involve stealing
If you own a factory you’re stealing the worth of labour of your workers. If you’re banker, you’re stealing the money of others ect.

[Anonymous No.57880885]

>>57880837
>people shouldn't be allowed to spend their money however they want because it could be better spent elsewhere because I said so
You're a mentally ill leftist
>If you own a factory you’re stealing the worth of labour of your workers
lmao, the 20th century called they want their retarded ideology that created nothing but famines and misery back

[Anonymous No.57880949]

>>57880885
People are selfish. I’d rather live in a country with a big healthy middle class and the whole country being safe (europe) than in small gated communities with 90% of the country being unsafe (USA).

[Anonymous No.57881091]

>>57880461
T. SexHaver here. I have fucked so many pink pussies it would make your head spin. Women call me ‘Wall Slammer’ becuase I always ‘hit all the walls’ and my penis is 8 inches long. The girls always scream in bed when I am having sex with them.

Just want to let you guys know that you have a small penis if you have guns or money. If you have gold you are bad at sex. Your wife is cheating on you with ME. I am fucking her.

If you have crypto and don’t pay your taxes then girls in college will not give you Sexy Wet Pussy, which is better than life. Pay your taxes, don’t hide guns from the government. Have sex incel.

[Anonymous No.57881092]

>>57879900
>tax the rich
Every leftist that says this also worships the rich mega corps that reinforce their globohomo propaganda.

[Anonymous No.57881187]

Money literally flows, monetary expansion causes money to flow almost exactly like electricity, with the "monetary impedance" (how easy an asset converts to money) of an asset determining how fully an asset inflates for a given increase in monetary base. The wage/productivity divergence is caused by this phenomenon, as labor is an exceptionally illiquid/high impedance asset. The same pattern is seen in other illiquid assets like housing, notice that high-end housing has seen a SHARPER decline (factored for money stock) than low-end housing, which is to be expected as high-end property is even less liquid than normie SFH. In contrast, low impedance (liquid) assets such as gold or equities move in lockstep with monetary expansion. This is the mechanism behind oligarchical parasitism, taxing "the rich" does nothing, only hard money fixes this problem.

[Anonymous No.57881200]

This is what leftists actually believe.

[Anonymous No.57881216]

>>57881187
please post all the pastas like this that you have fren, they're really good

[Anonymous No.57881229]

>>57879900
Tax the Rich until i'm Rich

[Anonymous No.57881252]

>>57879900
Trickle down is a myth. Tax cuts siphon money to the top, which is bad for social stability. Yes. Tax the rich.

[Anonymous No.57881279]

>>57881200
They are right though, and they are actually getting laid and you guys aren’t.

I have literally never met a comrade who was not getting laid, even the trans comrades. Most of the comrades I know are trans and we get together to fuck boipussy every weekend, you guys jack off alone in your basement. The working class will win.

[Anonymous No.57881319]

>>57881200
Demand for food would grow making food more expencive for normal people.

People would get food for free so they would stop working in shitty jobs and it would make everything that comes from 3rd worlds much more expencive

Everyone would be poor in everywere. No matter how hard you work you get nothing because lithium mining nigger wants Fair salary

[Anonymous No.57881321]

>>57879900
NooooOOOOoooOoOoo!
I'm gonna be hecking rocherino one day and have to pay extra on the last 100k before 1 million dollars one time in my life!!!

[Anonymous No.57881324]

>>57881279
Doing that would involve selling vast amounts of assets, which would destroy the wealth of poorer investors while leaving the wealthy relatively unscathed

[Anonymous No.57881349]

>>57881279
>They are right though
lmao so you think pumping trillions of dollars of new demand into the market wont massively raise prices and cause shortages?

>I have literally never met a comrade who was not getting laid, even the trans comrades.
Everyone knows communists and nazis are incels.
If you're authoritarian, you're an incel.

>The working class will win.
I agree, for them to win, communism will lose.

[Anonymous No.57881375]

>>57881349
>>57881279
>>57881319
>>57881324
>>57881200
Reminder this was actually tried in the past and failed miserably.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWWqhsh848E

[Anonymous No.57881382]

>>57879900
Just buy LINU, don't participate in stocks. The elite need our money

[Anonymous No.57881475]

>>57879900
The ADL wont like your post

[Anonymous No.57881487]

>>57881252
False. Monetary expansion siphons resources to the top, for what is created when new money is created other than a new fraudulent claim on existing resources? The social decline always associated with monetary debasement is caused by the physics of money flow, as monetary expansion results in the ineffective parasitic net transfer of resources from income earners to oligarchs, or more broadly, parasitic resource transfer from high impedance asset holders (labor being exceptionally high impedance) to low impedance asset holders.

This is not bad because it's 'unfair' this is bad because it's INEFFICIENT, Economy is naturally positive sum, but fiat allows the manipulation of Economy to favor zero and even negative sum economic transactions. Blasphemy! Economy will not abide -- "The market ahh finds a way" -- and a way it found.

BTC solves money by being a pure, trustless, stateless, fixed unit of account. BTC will continue to grow organically as it performs this function better than anything else. BTC will swallow the world because by increasing in value the world becomes more efficient.

How? There is no means to guarantee more BTC by merely possessing BTC. That is, the real value of BTC after hyperbitcoinization (price equilibrium) only increases if the world is wealthier (Efficient. Wealth, on a systemic level, is efficiency: more from a given input). BTC therefore flows towards productivity as the only way to acquire more BTC is through positive sum economic transactions, increasing global wealth/efficiency exponentially

>>57881216
Thanks fren. Have way too many rants to post them all tho

[Anonymous No.57881643]

>>57881200
>throwing money at world hunger, homelessness and climate change will solve these problems
fucking LMAO

[Anonymous No.57881757]

>>57881375
Sosialism of any kind only works in small communities. Smaller the better.
Capitalism only works in medium sized communities like state or smaller country. Anything bigger should have anarcy.

Best way to handel humans would be small communities like villages with sosialistic structures in cities it could be small blocks or streets. Cities run like bisness and these blocks would be owners and custoners. And biggest power would just take care of big crime, safety outside of cities and infra outside of cities.

No we have oppisite.
No one cares about neighbors.
Citys are socialistic hellholes controlling everything and gov is controlling cities/states or what ever you got and not taking care of infra.

[Anonymous No.57881780]

>>57879900
Rugpulled again, eh?