Chainlink: to the guy calling

[Anonymous No.57869812]

people evil yesterday for moving Link into BTC…since your post

Btc +0.3%
Link -6%

Maybe you’re the evil one?

[Anonymous No.57869820]

To anyone that wasnt here yesterday, you outta read through that thread. If you ever had any reservations about calling it a cult…scary stuff

[Anonymous No.57869837]

To the guy in the post yesterday - do you ever stop and think to yourself where it all went wrong? You know its not the other investors’ fault the coin isnt going up right? Its not your fault either

[Anonymous No.57869847]

>>57869820
link threads are pretty much /gme/ tier nowadays
even up to the "everyone saying anything bad about this xrp tier token is this one guy" thing

[Anonymous No.57869851]

>>57869812
Bump. It's time to spread awareness of the LINK/CLL scam and to call for SEC involvement. The fat man needs to answer for his crimes, unironically.

[Anonymous No.57869878]

Apparently this isnt evil though:

>blatently lying about CCIP release 1/2022 when you know for a fact it’s not even close

>partnering with every major scam, Celsius, Bancor, FTX, etc

>whatever happened at NXT.

I wasnt around then but the chart shows a rug so Im sure people lost money

[Anonymous No.57869958]

>>57869878
It is a major scam and you're doing God's (and the incompetent SEC's) work exposing it and protecting investors from losing their hard-earned money. Have another bump.

[El Arcón No.57869980]

The ones with the hereditary cleft nose deformity mutation, which is so ugly it basically makes me want to throw up now that I'm noticing it, are the evil ones, and, even then, there's more evil ones than that.

[Anonymous No.57870100]

>>57869812

It is evil and he knows what he was doing by making that thread. You either haven't been here for long and haven't been through the blatant strategies to part people with their money or you are involved yourself. BTC is overbought on nearly every time frame especially when he suggested the swap.

Most alts especially on longer time frames are not. Its quite plausible that BTC will range and profits will flow it to alts for awhile.

If you are basing your strategies on the results of a single day then you will fail. He is encouraging rotation in the wrong order and he's doing so intentionally.

This has nothing to do with LINK and more to do with the organized campaigns to fuck people over which I mentioned multiple times and you conveniently leave out.

We are approaching 7 monthly candles of green on BTC. Its unprecedented.

[Anonymous No.57870184]

>>57870100
so what? If BTC shits the bed at this point LINK is destined to revisit $6-8 AND lose a shit load against BTC and ETH
there is literally no reason whatsoever to keep holding LINK, unless you're a deluded long term baggie

[Anonymous No.57870208]

>>57869812
>>57869820
Desperately still trying to get us to sell and still failing miserably lolol keep typing boys maybe you'll convince someone kek

[Anonymous No.57870210]

>>57870100

Here's

AVAX/BTC

Look at how beautiful this chart is on the monthly. A perfect bull flag painted and RSI gearing to cross 50

An excellent rotation target

[Anonymous No.57870226]

>>57869820
Yikes... this is truly terrifying stuff. I just read the thread and literally cannot stop shaking.

[Anonymous No.57870231]

>>57869980
example?

[Anonymous No.57870243]

>>57870100

Here's LINK/BTC on the monthly

A perfect 2 year accumulation pattern creating ADAM & EVE formation. I've never seen something painted so well.

RSI again at a perfect point to cross into bullish territory.

Another great rotation target.

[Anonymous No.57870245]

>>57870210
It looks terrible though? literally every alt looks like this?
are you mentally handicapped?
all I'm seeing here is one truly evil anon desperately trying to convince people they should trade their digital gold with a flawless 15 year track record for speculative useless shitcoins
truly evil

[Anonymous No.57870258]

>>57870184

>>57870243

[Anonymous No.57870270]

>>57870245

Are you blind? It a picture perfect representation of a bull flag on the fucking monthly?

[Anonymous No.57870275]

>>57870243
>a perfect 2 year accumulation pattern
>literally forming lower highs for 4 straight years
Oh I see, you're an actual paid gaslighter

[Anonymous No.57870303]

>>57870245

Also note how the volume has weakened as the bull flag formed. An excellent indication of trend reversal.

[Anonymous No.57870310]

>>57870100
So to summarize: even though the guy is losing money staying in your cult versus holding btc, he’s a bad boy because he left your cult

[Anonymous No.57870313]

>>57870275

What are you talking about. Its a text book example of an Adam & Eve formation.

[Anonymous No.57870341]

>>57870208
I dont care what you do. You arent going to believe that so whatever. But I am gonna call you out for gaslighting, which Im sure you aint gonna like

With your ego, your only play here is to keep doubling down on some kind of insane logic virtue signaling. I get it

[Anonymous No.57870349]

>>57870310

No he's evil for KNOWING suggesting rotation in the wrong order.

Sell LINK if you want but buying BTC with a few select alts right now is absolute madness for retail who doesn't trade and just sits and waits which is the vast majority of people.

[Anonymous No.57870357]

i bought a week ago at $19.37, now i just sold at $19.42 fuck this gay coin shits going in the gutter, watched pepe go up 700% while nothing happened with link

[Anonymous No.57870365]

>>57870349
KNOWINGLY*

[Anonymous No.57870394]

>>57870313
Shouldn't we have had a breakout in Feb? It dumped, the formation is broken

[Anonymous No.57870428]

Its like you want people to be poor.

Even SOLBTC looks similar to AVAX/BTC another solid choice.

Another textbook bullflag. Gorgeous even.

[Anonymous No.57870452]

>>57870394

No? Its on track. The second half of the Adam & Eve formation is essentially a Cup & Handle

A sharp V that blends into a Cup & Handle and it formed over 2 YEARS which is incredible. The longer these formations the better the upside tends to be.

[Anonymous No.57870460]

>>57870341
>I dont care what you do

[Anonymous No.57870466]

>>57869812
People still hold link lol?

[Anonymous No.57870491]

Now I hope OP realizes he is wrong and there is in fact an organized agenda to part people with their money on here and convince retail to purposely make bad decisions.

ITS EVIL as I said.

[Anonymous No.57870507]

>>57870452
Don’t waste your effort trying to help these people.
They’re hopeless

[Anonymous No.57870552]

>>57870507
>Don’t waste your effort trying to help these people.

I like sharing alpha and have no problem doing so. Lurkers may see it.

Again many top alts look amazing right now. Idk when exactly they will take off but they are primed.

>>57870303
>>57870243
>>57870210
>>57870313
>>57870428
>>57870491

For anyone just joining.

[Anonymous No.57870553]

>>57870491
You're right. It is evil. Avarice and greed consume people utterly. The beauty of it is we are the good, and we see the evil. They can't bear that. It weakens their power. They can't touch us.

[Anonymous No.57870608]

>>57870552
>I like sharing alpha, lurkers may see it
Basado nice guy

[Anonymous No.57870614]

>>57870452
you could be right but memecoins have better gains at this point even if LINK catches up. Would rather just catch the memecoin wave and then the ETH ETF wave.

[Anonymous No.57870664]

I might get a small bag of LINK in case another defi summer happens again though.

[Anonymous No.57870686]

>>57870100
this
he is pure evil
satan himself would tell him to tone it down...

[Anonymous No.57870700]

>>57870614
>you could be right but memecoins have better gains at this point even if LINK catches up. Would rather just catch the memecoin wave and then the ETH ETF wave.

This is unwise for average retail investor. Long term analysis shows that for most people they will perform much better with a simple buy and hold spot strategy.

If you want to be active and think you can time meme coin rotation then by all means do so.

Most people have a normal career and aren't autistically following crypto. A DCA strategy in spot for the top alts and BTC is better. Most people lose money playing the memecoin musical chairs.

[Anonymous No.57870737]

>>57870700
Noooooo you can't say that! People MUST buy shitcoins and they simply MUST sell any Chainlink ticker Link tokens they may have. This is imperative!

[Anonymous No.57870739]

>>57870313
It's literally a lower low to the tune of 15%. You may be right about the historical trend of money flows in general, but LINK looks like complete shit. You could fairly easily say the chart is telling us 2300 sats next.

[Anonymous No.57870777]

>>57870100
>>57870552
Based. People like OP are genuinely evil. All they do is lie and spread fear and mistrust.

[Anonymous No.57870810]

>>57870739

>>57870739
>but LINK looks like complete shit.

It looks amazing and Idk what else to tell you. That Adam & Eve pattern is so perfect compared to a textbook example it was almost certainty done by high frequency trading. That is employed by people or organizations with vast resources.

Eventually they plan on selling for more than they accumulated for and they will do so by running up the price and then letting retail take over so they can distribute. Their basis price is likely around $7.50

I already outlined here why.

>>57870243

The handle is in progress

[Anonymous No.57870814]

OP BTFO AHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.57870820]

>>57870777
Digits of truth! CHEEEEECCCKKKEEEDD

[Anonymous No.57870829]

>>57870777

Hard to argue with those trips

[Anonymous No.57870840]

>>57870810
Price prediction, looking ahead some months?

[Anonymous No.57870934]

>>57870840

All I can say is everything in the long term scope for the charts is UP. Short term price predictions are a bad idea and we don't quite have enough information yet for those anyway.

I'm just being patient in the mean time and doing some light gambling on Basechain moonshots basically

I think Coinbase will really streamline the process and do aggressive marketing to introduce new crypto users to it as their introductory experience to on chain adventures and DEFI.

[Anonymous No.57870973]

>>57870934
I wish to got CCIP would go GA. Think it'll start generating revenue quickly?

[Anonymous No.57871014]

>>57870777
Checked. They’ve stepped up the fud recently. I’ll be buying more Link today.

[Anonymous No.57871022]

>>57870810
LINKBTC up to August 2020 is what a bullish chart looks like. FETBTC and INJBTC are some others. LINKBTC is flailing, per usual, after a second double top at the range highs of 4600. It doesn't want to push because it has no momentum behind it and zero relevance to these market conditions, only memes and new bullshit like AI do. You and I may agree to disagree on the chart, but LINK is absolutely not where I'd be rotating my BTC and I'm struggling to understand how you're pointing the finger at OP for being evil while you can very easily interpret the chart completely opposite to how you are insisting on interpreting it.

[Anonymous No.57871057]

Fuck it, it’s only $100 bucks but that’s probably more than OP makes in a year.

[Anonymous No.57871094]

>>57871057
Seems little now but in time it'll be a lot. Keep stacking, anon

[Anonymous No.57871097]

>>57870777
what was the lie? I literally just quoted the prices between yesterday and today. Are you saying coingecko is wrong??

[Anonymous No.57871129]

I see now...you guys are quoting the prices in your imaginary fantasy. That makes more sense. Tell me, are you able to cash out based on those prices

[Anonymous No.57871143]

>>57871097
You're evil. You want others to fail. You think it doesn't matter but it'll fuck you eventually. Karma really is a thing, you know. You abuse your free will. Deep down you know it.

[Anonymous No.57871152]

>>57871022

There really isn't a way to interpret it other than a long term accumulation pattern. People with resources don't buy things over long periods of time for no reason. They plan to run up the price and then unload eventually.

Look up the Adam & Even pattern. Its an obscure but confirmed pattern wealthy players use to acquire large amounts of an asset without raising too much attention in the short term by keeping in a tight range.

[Anonymous No.57871168]

>>57871097

I covered this here

>>57870100

[Anonymous No.57871201]

>>57871129

No one has actually mentioned price predictions at all? Just speculation on probable trend analysis and outcomes. The thread is literally there for everyone to view they can see you are lying. Lmao

[Anonymous No.57871207]

>>57871057
why the fuck is your mobile phone picture almost four megabytes large

[Anonymous No.57871216]

I'm almost selling every single link and going all in shiba and doge

[Anonymous No.57871283]

>>57871216
Hope you've a good length of stout rope standing by

[Anonymous No.57871286]

>>57871152
I fully expect LINK to reach higher vs BTC. I think it'll underperform everything else though, as it has since August 2020, so on the point of how and where to rotate that's all that matters. There are always lots of fancy labels for just about any pattern you like, but upwards stairways of green are undebatable. Those are the trends you catch: SUSTAINED STRENGTH VERSUS BITCOIN. Particularly during pullbacks. The assets I shared did that, LINK has not. It quivers and umms and ahhs and hesitates. An upwards stairway of green that is in blue sky half the time is unambiguous, and best of all doesn't require you to believe that one chosen pattern, among however many you could pick in a chart, was painted by the high frequency bot trades of unknown whales accumulating in the shadows because they are motivated to outperform the market. LINK threads have been drowning in such rapture fantasies for years. Up or out.

[Anonymous No.57871436]

>>57870243
i dont disagree, i track these charts too but if i have learned anything over the years, its that retarded retail mania and irrational market movements can morph these things beyond any rationality.

I'm seeing top signals everywhere now, but i dont think its impossible for irrational stuff to happen still. honestly, i think the chances of BTC trading at 40k or so within a month or two are pretty great but no idea if it spikes a bit more which nukes link, dumps insanely fast which nukes link for a bit, or does a aggressive pump and immediate aggressive dump which can do the same

if link got its own ETF it would stop that kind of bullshit happening

[Anonymous No.57871501]

>>57871286
>INJBTC

Friend this chart is absolute dog shit. It made its massive parabolic expansion already and the RSI has crossed on the monthly. Its trend is DOWN not ready to make a move up.


To anyone lurking this is the kind of shit people are encouraging you to buy. Look how bad it is. The move has already been made. You want to buy during the accumulation and before the expansion Again I hope you are just ignorant.

[Anonymous No.57871506]

>>57871286
your post is emotional
his post is logical and rational
just saying

[Anonymous No.57871539]

>>57871436
ETFs are a meme and not the reason for btc's run up at all

[Anonymous No.57871544]

>>57871436
Someone pointed out the other day that a Link ETF is unlikely while they still hold 350K tokens or whatever it is.
Thoughts on this, anyone?

[Anonymous No.57871571]

>>57870777
OP evil fudder confirmed, thread over

[Anonymous No.57871590]

>>57871501
Dude, we hold Link not because of fucking TA. Idgaf about the chart. I'm invested in the usefulness of the token and looking further into the future than tomorrow. Who the fuck are you trying to convince? Other memeline tealeaf starers, or real people who are investors?
Fucking chart. Gimme a break.

[Anonymous No.57871601]

>>57871436

BTC may make a sudden move to the downside for sure but I see it just as likely it slow bleeds and stays within a relatively tight range allowing profits to flow to alts with primed BTC charts.

I'd have to look a bit more at lower time frames for more specifics on that range.

[Anonymous No.57871624]

>>57871590
>hold Link
>>57871590
>Idgaf about the chart.

Well that's good because its not the LINK chart but the INJ/BTC chart someone else said looked amazing. Lmao

[Anonymous No.57871632]

>>57871590
>inb4 it's BTC
I know that.

[Anonymous No.57871649]

>>57871501
It has had two corrective months after pillaging market dominance for months during BTC first moves up. It's down almost 50% in sats now = opportunity. Sats strength early is the singular most important indicator for alts pre bull.

Your exact brand of thought through the early phases of the last bull run when LINK trickled its way down the market cap list as every other alt in the book ate its lunch is what caused many to miss the entire thing and plunge them into depression as they waited for whatever new pattern to play out or whatever new switch to be turned on.

No more waiting, no more 2 more weeks, no more cup and handle, adam and eve, upside down bamboozled babushka pattern bullshit. Enough theorising. Show strength.

[Anonymous No.57871681]

>>57871506
What was emotional about that? The capital letters for emphasis? Kek. The entire post is about the matter at hand and basic market physics: LINK doesn't show strength and there are many other coins that do. Strength vs sats is king.

[Anonymous No.57871729]

>>57871624
Cool, here's another one for you to wave your magic wand over.

[Anonymous No.57871762]

>>57871649
>It's down almost 50% in sats now = opportunity.

Friend it made its parabolic move on the monthly. The correction will likely be much longer than what you are seeing there.

The RSI was massively overbought and its crossed over. The monthly is a long time frame. I hope it made you money but I wouldn't touch that shit with a 10ft pole until the RSI reset much further.

Don't get me wrong it WAS a beautiful set up and chart but the majority of the move is likely played out for awhile.

[Anonymous No.57871796]

>>57871729

Yes crypto perform at different rates during different time periods. Lmao

INJ was a great pick over LINK in the last year. I would be rotating out of INJ into any of the large cap alts I mentioned over it now.

[Anonymous No.57871899]

>>57871681
>Strength vs sats is king.

[Anonymous No.57871915]

>>57871762
Nice squiggle.

>>57871796
Right, yet you want to skirt the simple fact that LINK has not shown particular strength that the alts that end up having performed the best through a run always do at this phase of the "cycle". This isn't a radical idea. You have your upside down bamboozled babushka strategy, just like you all did last bull, insisting a hidden treasure surely waits around the corner still. I'll keep buying shit that shows actual, observable strength and trend relevance and we'll see which one works best when it's all said and done. Performance against the market does matter, so you have to take your patterns in the broader market context. I do think you have good faith and at least you're actually contributing on this dead shithole which is a welcome change so hope you continue posting even if we disagree.

[Anonymous No.57871953]

>>57871899

Its very clearly a chart that had its parabolic move against BTC and is now going to bleed and consolidate much lower over months.

One can even draw the perfect parabola which came to fruition and is now over. Lol

[Anonymous No.57871959]

>>57871899
Sorry, is that the chart where the coin ran up 6x vs BTC during the early phases of a bull? You can take FETBTC as a clearer example if you like but, just like always, you can expect these kinds of performers to end up having the lion's share when this all wraps up.

[Anonymous No.57871998]

>>57871953
The thread is about rotating. You can pick your entry. There will be plenty of them. Happy squiggling, but that's an alt which has shown significant early sats strength which is as sure a sign as you can get that it has a ticket to the show for the bull.

[Anonymous No.57872007]

>>57871959
no, its the coin that frontran bitcoin's pump and is now bleeding in sats each month. "I got a 6x" is great for determining when to take profits, its absolute ass for predicting the future.

[Anonymous No.57872034]

>>57872007
You just described LINK 4 years ago
the irony

[Anonymous No.57872048]

>>57872034
that INJ anon is talking about holding thru that pattern, which is even funnier

[Anonymous No.57872053]

>>57872007
You absolutely should have taken profit out of INJBTC and put it pretty much straight into BTC. That's the idea. But if we're talking about rotating back into alts, which is the topic at hand, finding early performers is the #1 cheat code. You can fondle yourselves over your patterns all you like but that is how it's done. You can look at LINK itself through 2018-19 as a prime example.

[Anonymous No.57872062]

>>57871915

Idk what else to tell you. The parabolic move came and went. I would secure profits. Its your life but that is what I suggest. The RSI doesn't look good man.

It looks exactly like LINK did August of 2020. You are describing the same events even. Everyone thought it would keep running since BTC was moving and the bull cycle was in effect.

The parabola is played out on INJ and it will likely continue to bleed against BTC. I wish you the best with your investing endeavors.

[Anonymous No.57872089]

>>57872053

Generally profits tend to flow as
BTC runs,
then large MCAP alts,
then solid low MCAP moonshots

[Anonymous No.57872144]

>>57872048

You beat me to it. Lol

Its honestly amazing and I wrote it before I even saw your reply.

>>57872062

[Anonymous No.57872161]

>>57872053
you goal post moving faggot
you told people to buy INJ fucking right now

[Anonymous No.57872162]

>>57872089
No argument from me on that one. But if you're looking to find the gems, the outperformers, you need to catch trends early, and premature performance or strength as BTC moves or corrects is your best bet.

[Anonymous No.57872197]

>>57872161
No, that's your own mental strawman. I said INJBTC was an example of a bullish chart. That's verbatim: >>57871022. I also agreed with the overarching point the other guy made RE OP when he said telling people to sell LINK for BTC doesn't really make sense right now.

Your post is emotional
just saying

[Anonymous No.57872244]

>>57872197
yeah lying faggots piss me off

[Anonymous No.57872287]

>>57872244
Where's the lie? Where did I "tell people to buy INJ fucking right now"? Nowhere, idiot. Go re-read my posts and take a chill pill. It's people like you who ruin decent non-spastic conversation which is just about extinct on biz these days.

[Anonymous No.57872334]

>>57872287
here:

>>57871649
>It's down almost 50% in sats now = opportunity.

calling something an opportunity means you are telling people to buy it
fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.57872414]

>>57872334
That says there is opportunity to buy an asset which has shown significant strength versus BTC over an important time. Opportunity =/= "telling people to buy it right fucking now". I shared the chart as an example of a bullish chart, along with FETBTC which is a far less controversial example. You're an idiot and you should learn to follow a thread of conversation more lucidly and be more comfortable around differing opinions.

[Anonymous No.57872453]

>>57872414

To be fair, when you said I opportunity I also inferred that was you implying it was a good buy right now.

What else does opportunity mean in the context of investing or trading if not to suggest I should get exposure?

[Anonymous No.57872653]

>>57872453
It means INJ represents a chart which has shown strength against BTC in exactly the way you want an alt to show strength at this point of the cycle. If you follow the thread back from the beginning, we disagreed that LINK's chart was a bullish one, and I made the point that I don't think it's well-poised for performance through a run and provided examples of charts which have shown consequential strength since the move began.

The central point is that INJ has shown strength and LINK has not. LINK is rangebound and you're interpreting a set-up in a way I heard a thousand times through 2021 as it bled and bled and bled. You conflate the dynamics too by saying it's the "exact same situation" as LINK back then. It is not. LINK moved before BTC did, which is what I referred to here: >>57872053. This cycle, INJ moved with BTC. It's a part of the momentum in a way LINK never was because it pumped out-of-cycle.

Perhaps we have a different view of market cycle timing, or you're talking in shorter timeframes than I am. It's very simple: I think LINK will continue to sputter through the cycle and by the time the cycle's over INJ and FET among others which have shown relevance and strength will have outperformed. You sound exactly like the posters of years ago who said "the past is the past, don't buy XYZ coin which has performed strongly, keep holding LINK because our day will come" and for those who did they watched it creep geriatrically to $52 and fold instantly.

[Anonymous No.57872881]

>>57872653

There are many alts primed and ready to move. Its obvious you won't change your mind which is fine. But INJ is not a great buy right now.

Look at that chart it had a long accumulation pattern of about 1.5 years which culminated in a parabolic blow off topic.

The play has concluded. Its very obvious to anyone looking at it objectively. I wish you the best but its a bad hold comparative to many other alts which are in he process of ending their long term accumulation periods and nearing ready to under go their expansive move.

Again its almost sad how much you are describing what LINK went through last cycle to what INJ is going through now.

Sure it can still rise against USD this cycle but it will likely continue to bleed against sats.

[Anonymous No.57873061]

>>57872881
INJ has shown strength versus BTC and will likely outperform LINK through to end of cycle from here. That's the opportunity I referred to and the point I'm making. You can go through these semantics however you like, you can go through your "do you really want to buy the coin that already pumped or the one that hasn't pumped yet anon? just look at the babushka, it is very bamboozled" schtick all over again just like last time, but strength matters early in a bull. Every coin which showed strength early last run kept doing so. It's a fundamental dynamic. Your set-ups might be fun for an active trader with a short horizon or something, as I said perhaps your timeline is different to mine, but over the course of a cycle you need to buy into strength and trends. Coins that keep grinding slowly up, underperforming a trend, always look like they're ready to pop and catch up, but it doesn't mean they will.

Your history on LINK and INJ isn't quite right either. As I said, LINK had effectively its own inter-cycle pump. After BTC made its move, it underperformed. INJ moved with BTC and continued to do so for months. Catch trends of the bull, trends that are set the tone for retail and mania.

Agreed, many alts look good, but I think there are so many more to look at than LINK. You should SOL which is a perfect example, I mentioned FET already, there are probably many others. LINK is not strong.

[Anonymous No.57873175]

>>57873061
If you’re talking about it early strength, link basically led this run, popping off days before bitcoin did in autumn

[Anonymous No.57873186]

>>57873061
>INJ has shown strength versus BTC and will likely outperform LINK through to end of cycle from here.

I know that is what you are saying you have essentially repeated it 3 times now I'm and saying its not the case and you are wrong.

Also you keep going back and forth.

First you said opportunity (buy), then you back peddled, and then you are saying out perform (buy)

I don't believe I'll be replying anymore.

The INJ/BTC chart is played out and at best it will get carried by the bull cycle and rise in USD somewhat as LINK did last cycle.

[Anonymous No.57873251]

>>57873061
>Coins that keep grinding slowly up, underperforming a trend, always look like they're ready to pop and catch up, but it doesn't mean they will.

Also with LINK/BTC its following an institutional level formation that is known for in regards to accumulation.

It looks nearly identical. Its probably the closest chart I've ever seen to a text book example.

As I noted here

>>57870313

It truly doesn't get any better than that the risk/reward ratio is unreal.

We disagree completely on our assessments and only time will tell.

Godspeed

[Anonymous No.57873275]

Link niggers need to chill. Defi summer 2.0 is still months away

[Anonymous No.57873274]

>>57869812
Btc at 66.6k right, obviously evil anon.

[Anonymous No.57873278]

>>57873186
I'm repeating my point because you keep ignoring perfectly valid explanations of my point with shit that misrepresents the point and then does not refute it.

You did it just then with that absolutely shameless misrepresentation of what I said. I said INJ will outperform LINK. As in, it is a better alternative than LINK because that is the core of my point which you're so shocked I'm repeating despite refusing to fucking pick it up, you dense cunt.

I was accused of telling everyone to "buy right fucking now" when all I said was there's opportunity and that INJ is a better call as a performer for now through the end of the bull. You want to distort that for fuck knows what reason.

[Anonymous No.57873311]

>>57873251
Don't play fuckin magnanimous if you're going to twist my words. Just because something will outperform LINK doesn't mean I'm suggesting you should buy it because LINK sets such a low bar.

[Anonymous No.57873321]

>>57870210
I am only 33% exposed to the market rn. Half of it is in avax and the other half is in link. Should I wait for a drop before buying more?

[Anonymous No.57873383]

>>57873278
>As in, it is a better alternative than LINK because that is the core of my point which you're so shocked I'm repeating despite refusing to fucking pick it up, you dense cunt.

I'll be incredibly clear this time. I don't believe from the charts that INJ will outperform LINK or any of the alts I mentioned during the rest of this cycle.

[Anonymous No.57873397]

Obsessed faggot

[Anonymous No.57873454]

>>57873383
Yes, and I'm saying the inverse. When you say that my suggesting INJ is an example of a strong alt means "outperform (buy)" it is a dishonest misrepresentation and exactly why I'm stuck repeating myself. It is an example of a strong performing alt which LINK is not. Outperforming LINK is not a trigger to buy in the same way outperforming the shit my dog took outside is not a trigger to buy.

[Anonymous No.57873461]

>>57873321

I would start entering imo. How aggressively you do that is going to be something I can't decide for you. Depends on your risk tolerance and other factors in your life.

I'm patient and will weather draw downs if they occur.

If you have family or dependents to consider, emergency funds, how long you can wait, emotional stability etc so and so forth.

[Anonymous No.57873502]

>>57873454
>When you say that my suggesting INJ is an example of a strong alt

I wouldn't even suggest that anymore as its parabola has come to fruition and its in the process of bleeding sats and then eventual consolidation which will pan out over months.

[Anonymous No.57873557]

You guys are sitting here micro analyzing charts and claiming paradigms exist on an asset class that didn’t even exist 15 years ago.
>get into the alt that shows out early (link/inj) then rotate to bitcoin or other alts when the bull hits
Cool this would have got you wrecked in 2016 as you missed eth’s entire run since it dominated the entire cycle
How about just acknowledging there’s no guaranteed playbook, and the reason most of this board got in link early was a purely fundamental play? Trying to treat bitcoin like this in 2013 would have gotten you wrecked, making bold predictions off such small datasets, the winners other than perfect traders are the people who identified important tech/fundamaental breakthroughs, bought early, and held. To this point that’s bitcoin and eth, and link is already looking like it can be included, it would have to tank massively vs the market this cycle to not be included there, and recent performance aside, it’s a top 5 alt measuring from the bottom in performance.

[Anonymous No.57873584]

>>57873502
Cool, and to which again I say you are exactly like the apologists of last cycle pointing to a pattern and claiming how "textbook" it is as though that is any suggestion of sustained overperformance versus actual, proven strength among the coins that exploded through 2021. Glad we cleared that up.

[Anonymous No.57873624]

>>57873557
>How about just acknowledging there’s no guaranteed playbook

Why are you even here then? Its pretty common knowledge there are no guarantees and we are using speculation with the data that is present to formulate plans

[Anonymous No.57873660]

>>57873584

I will remember this thread and I hope you do to at the end of the cycle.

[Anonymous No.57873772]

>>57873660
Sure will. I remember far too many things on here, anon.
That one post of yours did piss me off but I do genuinely hope we all make it.

[Anonymous No.57873827]

>>57873624
>Why are you even here then?
Because a bunch of giga autists identified the next tech breakthrough in crypto without having to analyze charts, a bunch of us got in early, and we’re currently sitting on an asset that has 100x’d amid retail depression. Sound familiar, that’s bitcoins story 10 years ago.
I’m not even saying you guys can’t discuss charts, that’s fine if you want to try to trade this market, but the other anon claiming inj early is the same as link early 2019 is a fucking joke, there was other shitcoins that pumped in 2019 as well but they died because they were shitcoins, they didn’t show continued strength like anon is claiming inj will. I’m not even saying charts and trading don’t matter, they do, but over long time frames it’s 50\50 technical vs fundamental

[Anonymous No.57873863]

>>57873827
Completely incorrect interpretation of the point I made.

[Anonymous No.57873986]

>>57873863
Your point was an alt showing strength va btc early in the cycle, like link 2018/19, is indicative of it continuing to do so for the rest of the cycle. I’m saying that’s an awful way to interpret the market, low marketcaps get pumped and dumped early without showing continued strength vs bitcoin all the time, and there’s zero fundamental play with inj there so you are entirely at the mercy of whales.

You’re also claiming the smart play in crypto is to ride the early alt and rotate back to bitcoin for the bull because of link last cycle, when doing so for eth in 2016 would have gotten you wrecked as eth followed its early pump with a sustained move that dwarfed bitcoin and minted millionaires.

On the other hand, if you didn’t try to go by charts and just said “hmm worlds first smart contract platform I’m going to hold this”, well, you’re probably pretty comfy right now.

[Anonymous No.57874029]

>>57873986
the ultimate ETH play as a sats stacker WAS to dump it on May 2017 though
oopsie

[Anonymous No.57874161]

>>57873986
There's a difference though. LINK in 2018-19 had performed strongly against sats. It continued to perform but this was inter-cycle. It pumped before the market and before the cycle proper. INJ has moved within the cycle, in the same way many of the best performers through the bull did in Q4 2020, where LINK had pumped Q3 and began flagging. Those were the biggest gainers of the bull. Again, I'm repeating myself despite having articulated all this already but only because the point is being misconstrued.

I'm not sure where you've gotten your second paragraph from, that I'm suggesting rotating back into BTC, and I'd love to see you point me in exactly the direction where you think I've said that. Clearly under my philosophy here I'm saying the bull has already begun and that your alt exposure should be to strong alts, not flagging, weak alts with no sats strength. That's actually the entire point I'm making.

[Anonymous No.57874162]

>>57874029
Yeah if you think you’re going to perfectly call tops and bottoms, but if that was the name of the game we’d all be trillionaires, Identifying eth early and just sitting on it still put you far ahead of bitcoin, and the same is true for link. You can try to trade charts and follow whales, or you can try to be early on the next actual fundamental play in this market, and the truth is you’re still early for links fundamentals. At this point you should be actively shorting link if you feel its not going to run this cycle, because they are running out of runway and something’s going to give when ccip and staking 1.0 drop. The rest of the market is noise that exists for an extremely small group of whales and vc’s to grift off retail. Of course you’ll probably just say
>that’s all crypto will ever be
Which is the ultimate bad faith non argument

[Anonymous No.57874237]

>>57874162
>that’s all crypto will ever be
But it's true that that's what crypto is NOW, therefore buying chainlink is counter-productive when everyone knows the gains are to be made elsewhere. Ergo, The logical thing to do, is to sell your chainlink for something with more potential upside.

[Anonymous No.57874290]

>>57874161
>before the market
>before the cycle proper
>within the cycle
There’s no clear delineation where these points start and end, and almost any criteria you use would only be applicable to a single cycle. Why is links move in 2019 pre cycle when bitcoin had already done a 4x from its bottom over the same period?
This is what I’m talking about, benjamin cowen levels of “analysis”

[Anonymous No.57874336]

>>57869812
Terrifying stuff, thanks for sharing

[Anonymous No.57874349]

>>57874290
this is the shittiest form of sophistry I've seen in a while, you identified yourself what exactly "before the market" actually means here>>57873986
>showing strength va btc early in the cycle, like link 2018/19
and now you choose to play dumb
disgusting

[Anonymous No.57874465]

>>57874290
BTC 3-4xd and then ranged for 18mos or so in the same range it was in before it puked those lows. That's not a bullrun. Be serious. The bullrun began with volatility increasing and the range breaking. This is actually highly comparable to breaking 30k in October 2023. I don't think that needs a quantitative definition and I'd say that that's the domain of people like Ben Cowen. I don't have any issue with the strategy of chasing fundamentals over a long period of time, but I absolutely resent it when people make out like it's a huge mysterious and incomprehensible voodoo game when absolutely everything is flying. PEPE is up like a 9x on the month. I'm not saying you can predict it will be PEPE exactly, but that it's not hard to make money during these times. The question is how to do so efficiently, how to outperform, and there are obviously some different opinions on that itt.

[Anonymous No.57874606]

>>57874336

I already BTFO of OP and he never came back

>>57870552
>>57870349
>>57870100

[Anonymous No.57875174]

>>57871143
you keep trying to project this bullshit in order to save your own ego.

Funny the dichotomy of biz

>we are le stubborn marine autists never selling
then 5 mins later
>noooooooooooo your posts are gonna make people sell!!

make up your mind

[Anonymous No.57875198]

>>57871201
what is the actual lie though? I think you're trying to say we disagree about price prediction, but your emotions keep overrunning your thought process.

[Anonymous No.57875268]

>>57871436
>i think the chances of BTC trading at 40k or so within a month or two are pretty great but no idea if it spikes a bit more which nukes link

which once again proves my point. If BTC goes to $40k, Link will be back around $10. Again, in this scenario, the BTC holder comes out ahead

Link holders starting to remind of crazy liberals, like when a man points out an obvious truth about women and they get called muhhh misogynist, bigot, etc.

[Anonymous No.57875407]

>>57874606
still here... to update everyone on prices:

BTC is net +5% against Link just from yesterday. Apparently it's evil to make someone 5% in one day.

[Anonymous No.57875511]

"It's evil to rotate into other alts given my crystal ball local top"

24 hr prices:

>Link -0.4%
>Eth +5.9%
>BNB +4.5%
>Shib +2%
>Uniswap +15.5%
>Near +23.7%
>FIL +6.2%
>Cosmos +2.2%
>OP +2%
>TAO +9.2%
>HBAR +4.4%
>RNDR +36.5%


L M F A O.... "evil"

[Anonymous No.57875666]

>>57875511
Mindbroken by big chainlink cock. 24/7 big chainlink cock is on your mind
Cuck
Cuck
Cuck
Link
Link
Link
Kneel lil fudboi

[Anonymous No.57875715]

>>57875407
I 20x’d my money last year holding random shit instead of link.

Do you want to btfo an advocate? Just publicly ask them how much money they’re making from running a node.

They tell you to be patient while getting paid a hefty salary working as community advocates, as well as making money running their own KYC’d nodes for chainlink labs. That’s why they don’t care if the token goes up in price or not.

All these “multiple anons” debating you and “bullish” on link telling you 2 more weeks? All of them are only 2-3 advocates switching IPs.

They don’t need to be patient, they just need you to shut the fuck up, accept Sergey’s dumps and stop complaining to make their lives easier.