Metis using CCIP as canonical bridge

[Anonymous No.57778414]

That means all bridging (that isn't done by third world teams running hardware wallets around) will come through CCIP with the fees that come with it. Making CCIP the canonical bridge is the ultimate aim for each blockchain.

https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-gho-cross-chain-strategy/16291

It also helps with integrations more generally. There was some pushback from the Aave DAO about the full CCIP integration that Aave is currently undertaking. The core team told them to fuck off though of course and this will be the ultimate outcome. All chains will bend the knee and Chainlink will be the standard whether they like it or not. Just like all DeFi apps have bent the knee despite their resistance.

https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-gho-cross-chain-strategy/16291

[Anonymous No.57778433]

>>57778414
Oops. Metis link:
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/metis-is-integrating-chainlink-ccip-as-its-canonical-token-bridge-infrastructure-and-official-cross-chain-solution-302076026.html

[Anonymous No.57778439]

>>57778414
oof this is weird and creepy marines

[Anonymous No.57778484]

There is literally only two paths:
Adopt Chainlink and signal to everyone that you're trying to be a "serious" project.
Adopt Pyth and signal to everyone that you're a cynical grifter going for the quick retail scam money.
The latter group is going to get completely squeezed out in the next few years.

[Anonymous No.57779269]

>>57778414
what are you on about? Were dumping as we speak

[Anonymous No.57779651]

AAVE CCIP integration will be bigger once it's live, but nice to see

[Anonymous No.57779693]

>>57778414
vitalik's mom endorsing chainlink. kek

[Anonymous No.57779945]

RSK is the one I'm waiting for.

[Anonymous No.57779974]

>>57779945
Some new ones since I last looked.

[Anonymous No.57780099]

>>57778484
Doubt it'll even take that long. The ever increasing number of hacks and money losses can only go on so long before everyone says "fuck this" and bends the knee

[Anonymous No.57780195]

>>57780099
You are underestimating the amount of people in the industry who are perfectly content to be a not serious project and basically just be a token selling project then "fail" and walk away. Pyth enables that entire darker side of the industry.

>t. working in crypto 3 years and witness the cesspool of scams every day

I should honestly write a book but I'd rather just never think about this shit again once I'm out for good.

[Anonymous No.57780218]

>>57780195
Tell us more

[Anonymous No.57780294]

cool lets check the price

[Anonymous No.57780309]

>>57780294
This. It's crashing

[Anonymous No.57780673]

>>57780195
>t. working in crypto 3 years and witness the cesspool of scams every day
This has really deterred me from trying to get into the industry. I find it exhausting just being a schmuck retail buyer, can't imagine how annoying it must be working in the space.

[Anonymous No.57780692]

>>57778414
WTFTWFWTFWTWF

[Anonymous No.57781177]

>>57780673
At the risk of sounding like a pajeet, both Chainlink Labs and Avalabs seem pretty legit. Emin is a bit unprofessional online but he's got soul and overall the business is good.

[Anonymous No.57781268]

>>57778414
>Scam using other scam to enable scamcoin development

[Anonymous No.57781284]

>>57780195
Wouldn't enabling scams be bullish for Pyth for at least the duration of this cycle? I own both Link and Pyth but mostly because it's the Link of Solana.

[Anonymous No.57782055]

>>57778414
Isn't Metis a joke?

[Anonymous No.57782226]

That's cool and all. But what does this have to do with the chainlink price?

[Anonymous No.57783256]

>>57781177
Yeah I know CLL is probably the most professional team in the industry. Kinda feel weird about them though, as a bagholder enough of my life has been consumed by Chainlink. Don't think I would want to actually work there though.

[Anonymous No.57783261]

And the price?
>dumping