stLINK - 8.5218 %

[Anonymous No.57750183]

https://stake.link/staking-pools/stake-link/info

[Anonymous No.57750872]

Out of interest, what's the time between reward rate and token price? If SDL was $6.0 instead of $0.6 would the reward rate be different? Or no tie

[Anonymous No.57750881]

*tie

[Anonymous No.57751004]

wait they really named it stink ahahahaha

[Anonymous No.57751035]

>>57750872
this is the stLINK rate, double that of normal link staking

[Anonymous No.57751042]

>>57750872
the reward rate % in OP is for the stlink pool, it isn't tied to SDL's value.

The reward rate % for reSDL staking will fluctuate based on the value of SDL, the value of LINK, the amount of LINK staked, and the amount of reSDL staked.

SDL price down, LINK price up, LINK amount staked up = higher reSDL reward rate %

SDL price up, LINK price down, reSDL amount up = lower reSDL reward rate %

by far the most bullish things for SDL are increases in LINK's price and increases in stakedotlink's LINK staking pool dominance %

[Anonymous No.57751073]

>>57751042
glad there is something positive
the $700 daily volume makes it look very much like a dead project

[Anonymous No.57751077]

>>57750183
more like stINK amirite?

[Anonymous No.57751167]

>>57751073
it's far from dead
arbitrum going live via ccip soon too

[Anonymous No.57751264]

>>57751167

[Anonymous No.57751277]

>>57750183
What about Chainlink DECO?

[Anonymous No.57751303]

>>57751277
what about rimming horses?

[Anonymous No.57751350]

sdl is better than lpl

if we look at how SDL was originally designed before the rug, it basically was made for nops, lpl holders would have got fuck all. initially SDL was a gating token to allow people to stake, no real income cut

then you have to think.. how much would linkpool's income have topped out at? it was earning 125 link per 25k og LPL stack when they rugged

at 5m stLINK it will earn 140 LINK with an og 25k SDL stack
so if stLINK is as dominant as stETH (lido) then can be very big...
basically you are getting a good cut from 15 node operators of staking revenue vs a tiny cut of 15 nops and a cut of linkpool's full business

[Anonymous No.57752102]

>>57751077

CHECKED

stLINKERS PRINTING!

[Anonymous No.57752145]

>>57751350
>sdl is better than lpl
you mean sdl may end up better than lpl in future

[Anonymous No.57752253]

LATEST NO LPL POOLER COPE JUST DROPPED BASED KIDDOS CHUDDIE

LPL POOLS CLOSED

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY BASED AND CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

MAJOR FUCK UP ALERT

WHEN BASED JONNY TAPS YOUR FAVOURITE HEAD AGAINST THE PUB WALL N ASKS YA IS THE POOL CHUDDIE?

WELL YOU JUST STARE THAT FUCKER RITE BACK IN THE EYES AND SAY POOLS KIDDO BASED N HE'LL FUCKING KNOW N THE NEXT PINT WILL BE ON HIM

LPL

HUH?

LPL

HUH???

[Anonymous No.57752302]

>>57751350
This project is just a parasite on Chainlink. even calling it coinclipping is not right. its like a coinclipping parasite that seeks rent on a very niche specific host(4chan posters, the only place they have ever marketed).

it offers absolutely nothing of value to the ecosysem or chainlink itself. it became absolutely, as it was destined to be, irrellevent the moment staking was launched. yet somehow, like a virus, not even a parasite, it just evolves and mutated to carry on existing on its host.

Once you realise Jonny huxtable and his british payrolled friends dont need more than a couple million each to have a very cushty life in the UK, you will realise why this small time, tiny volume parasitic project exists and why they keep it small time. they dont need much.

[Anonymous No.57752313]

>>57751035
and not even any additional trust assumptions! Amazing!

[Anonymous No.57752329]

>>57752302

Is RPL and LIDO a parasite on Ethereum?

fucking poorfag discord tranny retard

[Anonymous No.57752377]

>>57752329
Nobody who doesnt work for huxtable, or similarly adjacent has your opinion mate.
They screwed over everyone who was dumb enough to even buy LINK POOL originally, which for years I along with many others were warning about that fact it made little sense to speculate on it.

fatty huxtable was just your average faggy fat graduate up norf, into crypto in the geek bullrun of 2017, found LINK on 4chan and then decided to code something with it. a literal kid with no fucking idea about anything at the time, speculating on top of speculating. he marketed it only to biz on purpose because as said, a couple million GBP is more than enough for his goals.

He and his faggy entourage had sole centralised control of their DEX, the only place their scam was traded, they wash traded the FUCK out of it and manipulated it on 0 volume. it was so obvious. they marketing and spammed biz for years giving the fake impression loads of people were into the scam.

Remember thr outrage when Bancor listed their faggot token? that outrage was literally jonnie and his friends themselves spamming biz seething becase they lost sole centralised control of trading their token and wash trading it.

Anyone with a brain knows this bullshit and would never support or defend it, and anyone without one got scammed by them and also would not defend or support it, while jonnie himself runs to defend it constantly and larps as a successful businessman

[Anonymous No.57752441]

>>57752377
my eyes glazed over after the first sentence

[Anonymous No.57752771]

>>57752377

>Nobody who doesnt work for huxtable, or similarly adjacent has your opinion mate.
Implying it matters. I follow the tech and speculate on that. If there's a +$40b industry on staked ETH and LRTs, you can see the need to be liquid. Chainlink staking is no different. Actually, it is. It's much more complex. You are getting breastfed by CLL right now with the community pool, but you'll soon (read:years) will understand the importance of betting on the right node operators.

the rest of the shit you wrote is not even worth responding to. literally deluded thinking jhoneey spends time on 4chan to shill. you clearly know nothing, stay in your hivemind discord buying SOLID.