Linkbros I don't think you understand..

[Anonymous No.57749401]

The wait... is almost over.
It's almost time.

[Anonymous No.57749405]

>>57749401

[Anonymous No.57749411]

oh it's comin'

[Anonymous No.57749430]

We can't even hold $20. I'm so demoralized...

[Anonymous No.57749442]

>>57749430
Thanks for the buying opportunity t. latefag

[Anonymous No.57749651]

>>57749401
I'm so tired.

[Anonymous No.57749774]

>>57749401
OOOO

[Anonymous No.57750134]

>>57749401
lemme guess, just two more weeks?

[Anonymous No.57750155]

>>57749401
Chainlink to $7?

[Anonymous No.57750179]

[Anonymous No.57750206]

I wonder what the sentiment is among all these projects that have had to delay launching for months or even years because of CCIP delays.

[Anonymous No.57750335]

>>57750206
They don’t have a choice, it’s all or nothing.
They need to be on the timeline of history where this shit actually works, or else drastic and grave consequences may occur. As for clabs they’re right on schedule

[Anonymous No.57750357]

>>57750206
I don't know where you're at but its still Feb where I live

[Anonymous No.57750461]

>>57750206
Chainshit labs failed to deliver another product? Color me surprised

[Anonymous No.57750478]

>>57749405
I know what you mean anon, the day of reckoning is comming. Elon has already started pulling the strings, soon we'll be RICH bros, i predict a x5 bump EASILY
Fr i'm really excited man, there's already an almost x2 bump and it's STILL rising

[Anonymous No.57750722]

>>57750357
They said early 2024 ie q1 so if sergey decides to go eat some bigmacs one last time we might only see it at literally the last day of march

[Anonymous No.57750740]

>>57750722
>early 2024 ie q1
While I hate how slow Chainlink is, I love how autistic fuddies latched onto this Q1 idea even though it technically doesn't even mean that.
They're literally counting down days to a deadline that never actually existed.

[Anonymous No.57750806]

in the coming weeks, chainlink will announce a new feature that they've never talked about, that nobody needs for 5 years, and put CCIP on the backburner

[Anonymous No.57750820]

>>57750740
I'm just here waiting for it because interacting with different chains sucks absolute ass. I fucking hate having to always be careful to have enough eth to trade. Further, if chainlink ever releases DECO, it will revolutionize wallets and we can finally stop having to autistically verify every transaction address manually

[Anonymous No.57750842]

>>57750820
I was so sure it was gonna launch in late 2021 lol
Even Aave thought so.

[Anonymous No.57750852]

>>57749401
>It's almost time.
for stinkylink to go down

[Anonymous No.57750916]

This coin created a generation of bag holders. WTF

[Anonymous No.57750940]

I am financially cuckolded

[Anonymous No.57751225]

>>57749401
w.....wtfwt?

[Anonymous No.57751794]

>>57749401
>>57749405
>>57749411
>>57749430
>>57749442
>>57749651
>>57749774
>>57750134
>>57750155
>>57750179
>>57750206
>>57750335
>>57750357
>>57750461
>>57750478
>>57750722
>>57750740
>>57750806
>>57750820
>>57750842
>>57750852
>>57750916
>>57750940
>>57751225
THE cuckolds of crypto
BTC
>83% of ath
ETH
>66% of ath
LINK
>35% of ath

[Anonymous No.57751819]

Yeah I will miss another bullrun and you will be happy

[Anonymous No.57751820]

>>57751794
>link holder calling other link holders cuckolds for holding link

pottery

[Anonymous No.57751903]

>>57750820
So chainlink will do for crypto what Steam did for pc games?

Holy shit strap in lads.

[Anonymous No.57751977]

>>57751794
Correct, but that's also the case of quite a few alts that haven't really started moving yet

[Anonymous No.57752227]

>>57751977
If you solely compare alts chainlink is actually outperforming most of them. Most alts are still at 10 or 20% at ath
>>57750842
Aave is not chainlink you autistic retard kek

[Anonymous No.57752243]

>>57752227
>Aave is not chainlink
Where did I claim or imply it was?

[Anonymous No.57752280]

>>57749401
You might be right.

https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1762600319211507936

[Anonymous No.57752291]

>>57752280
Please don't ever link a Chainlink tweet on here again.
I have ptsd from reading half a dozen empty blabla tweets every single day

[Anonymous No.57752307]

>>57750206
Tell me why CCIP would pump the LINK token? It would increase LINK fees a bit, okay, still to a level that is fucking nothing compared to the normal trading volume. And it would be a USD -> LINK -> USD Swap anyways 90% of the time

[Anonymous No.57752327]

>>57752307
>It would increase LINK fees a bit, okay

[Anonymous No.57752337]

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHASHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA look at all these desperate losers

>if
>hopefully this year
>deco
>q1 a a actually doesnt mean q1 h heh

2020
BTC $11,000
Link $20

2024
BTC $59,000
Link $19.30


THE Cuckolds of crypto

[Anonymous No.57752344]

>>57752327
Yeah, and? Fees flowing to node operators, not token holders. Fees that get turned into fiat to pay for electricity, infrastructure and a fat fucking wage

[Anonymous No.57752347]

Stinky Linkies starting to sound like XRP schizos

[Anonymous No.57752378]

>>57752344
>Yeah, and? Fees flowing to node operators, not token holders. Fees that get turned into fiat to pay for electricity, infrastructure and a fat fucking wage

[Anonymous No.57752468]

>>57752291
You didn't even read it cause if you did you would realize it was a Bloomberg interview with Sergey that happened yesterday you. KYS.

[Anonymous No.57752817]

>>57752468
>it was a Bloomberg interview
That's exactly what I'm talking about: empty blabla tweets.

>>57752344
>Fees flowing to node operators, not token holders.
lmao, because Bitcoin mining fees flow to BTC holders?
What the fuck is wrong with you

[Anonymous No.57752864]

>>57749401
only 5 more years until banks are using this tech in their systems! lets go!!! facts!!!!

[El Arcón No.57752935]

Are there seven, or nine?

[Anonymous No.57753047]

>>57752280
you have to say sergey never badmouths someone in the crypto sphere, he always tries to see the positive impact
he has a insane chad energy
might be because SN = SN