Ready for an AI God?

[Anonymous No.57665723]

It's been a while since a new religion dropped. What are the financial implications of AI worshippers & how to profit.

[Anonymous No.57665996]

>>57665723
I'm a developer, I've thoroughly reviewed the Internet Computer white paper and documentation, along with various blog posts, including those from notable tech companies. Here are a few reasons why I would hesitate to use ICP for my applications:

The current state of the "mainnet" lacks true decentralization. There's no effective decentralized method to evaluate the performance or reliability of a node provider.

The development progress has been slow, taking them years to essentially create centralized nodes, which is not particularly innovative since such systems already exist. This casts doubt on the future prospects and the capabilities of their engineering team.

The white paper fails to clearly outline a viable transition from a centralized framework to a decentralized one. They touch on "decentralized" reputation systems in a superficial manner, as though the challenge of creating a Sybil-resistant decentralized reputation system is a secondary concern, despite it being a significant, unresolved issue in computer science. With years of development time and substantial funding, the lack of detailed technical specifications for this aspect is concerning. It reminds me of promises from other projects that claim they will solve centralization issues in the future, which often remain unfulfilled.

There's a lot of media buzz about partnerships with major tech firms, but a closer examination reveals that these are often overstated. For example, a tech giant's blog post might be misconstrued as a partnership when it's merely a demonstration of how ICP could potentially integrate with their services. There's no evidence of these companies committing to use ICP themselves. Moreover, if such companies decided to enter the node service market, they could likely replicate ICP's functionalities without much difficulty.

[Anonymous No.57666631]

>>57665723
Can you please put ICP in your text next time? It would make my job easier when I cnrl+f /biz/ in search of of ICP posts to fud

[Anonymous No.57666972]

>>57665723

[Anonymous No.57668113]

>>57666972
At first I thought this had be a joke lmao. It's so shit. It's.. It's just so fucking horrible hahaha fuckkkkk rajesh there is no way you think this is good right? Like, actual tech aside (which RLC gets btfo in btw) you looked at this after creating it and thought to yourself, hmm, yup, this is it, my mangum opus... What's it like being a retard?

Newsflash, not every token gets to the top based on memes, it has to have the fundamentals. ICP is leagues above everything in the crypto space, revolutionary tech

[Anonymous No.57668133]

>>57668113
I dont get that pic

[Anonymous No.57668141]

>>57668113
Jews?

[Anonymous No.57668171]

>>57668133
It’s Jews.

[Anonymous No.57668200]

>>57668113
ICP is centralized, went from 2500 to 3$, and has shit tokenomics.

LEAGUES ABOVE HE SAYS

[Anonymous No.57668766]

>>57668113

What >>57668200 said

CENTRALISED VC PUMP AND DUMP PONZI SCHEME

[Anonymous No.57669342]

>>57665723
This is just embarrassing at this point.

[Anonymous No.57669393]

>>57665723
You guys should better jump ship and go into RLC. This is and always has been a RLC thread

[Anonymous No.57669542]

>>57668766
>>57669393
Did you niggers not sell your digital oil bags for $18 last cycle? Are you guys retarded baggies? I'm up 650% on my piss bags

[Anonymous No.57669703]

>>57666631
Can we make 30 icp shill threads a day like you?

[Anonymous No.57669718]

>>57666972
>>57669703

[Anonymous No.57670887]

>>57669703
No, this is a RLC board. Jannies will ban you if you make too many ICP threads

[Anonymous No.57670920]

>>57665723
Pyramid schemes. Get as many people to subscribe to an A.I service using your discount code and the A.I pays you dividends every 10 subscribers you get.