/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.57641114]

> "How do the AI agents from Tau ( $AGRS ) differ from those at Autonolis ( $OLAS )?"

>Well the so called agents of TAU are vert different on anything out there. In TAU you have certain language, whatever you say in this language is going to happen. Now, it sounds like programming in a way that it is not, because on programming languages and in many other formal languages either, you cannot ask questions about the consequences of what you say.
>So, for example if you write a smart contract, a complex smart contract in ETH, and you want to ask, "will it ever try to spend more coins than it has?" generally speaking there is no way to answer such questions to get guarantees for code and things like this.
>This is something that is called undecidability. There are decidable logical languages. We don't have the first one but, only our languages is able to constraint itself.
>So you are able, for example in the TAU blockchain to give constraints on all future blocks. Where each block is also constrained on future blocks. Such language, logical language, that is able to speak about its own sentences, and moreover is powerful enough to describe its software and blockchain and things like these in a precise manner are very new, and only we have such technology. And therefore as we stated no AI agent in the world is similar to what we do.

There you have it blokes, pioneering tech right here.

[Anonymous No.57641129]

Im not reading all that

[Anonymous No.57641138]

>>57641114
so basically an ai that is conscious of itself and can describe itself... great, amazing, now what do we do with that shit

[Anonymous No.57641198]

>>57641114

[Anonymous No.57641201]

>>57641114
come on op as if autonolis needed more slander i get that we all hate the devs and the code in github was allegedly stolen but this seems like a bit of an overkill

[Anonymous No.57641206]

>>57641114
Okay you cached my interest OP. So this means that the AI is able to write smart contracts that will be automatically limited according to the devs input without any way to circumvent that right? If its true, and its legitimately possible then they solved the scam issues right there. I hope they actually launch then, it would be interesting to see the market react to a token that can't be misused

[Anonymous No.57641213]

>>57641114
It probably will dissapear like the rest of the tokens that strive for good

[Anonymous No.57641221]

>>57641213
wdym

[Anonymous No.57641236]

>>57641221
Read into the "disappearing tech on crypto" rabbit hole. It is a long read, but basically, since the first alts started releasing, there has been a noticeable pattern of projects just stopping midway, and coincidentally, all of those were projects that the community held in very high regard, with reputable devs and consistent development. It is a conspiracy, sure, but weirdly, we are in more than a decade of crypto development and are still dealing with the same issues we have had since the first paper by Satoshi was released. Its just weird is all.

[Anonymous No.57641250]

>>57641236
Yeah thats nothing most of those projects were bought out by bigger companies not a big deal

[Anonymous No.57641312]

>>57641250
Not a big deal? So it doesnt feel weird to you that projects that had a bright future just decided to sell out? "Misteriously bought" would be a better decriptor for that

[Anonymous No.57641314]

>>57641312
whatever pal having a good idea and implementing it are two different things

[Anonymous No.57641319]

>>57641236
>>57641312
>anon discovers how companies work

[Anonymous No.57641324]

>>57641319
>>57641314
Whatever go fuck yourselves. If TAU suddendly stops development and gets bought by OpenAI remember me kek

[Anonymous No.57641339]

>>57641138
Think for a second. Imagine the potential of having an AI that can set limits for itself, that can create contracts and assure without doubt that none of the parties will break it, and itself wont be able to break its constraints. Think how it could fundamentally change not only crypto as we know it, but society itself

>>57641201
Theoretically it should. If it works exactly as the devs are saying it works, then yes we are about to experience a new wave of unbreakable smart contracts

[Anonymous No.57641341]

>>57641114
okay then lets say we implement this for... congress for example (i haven't read about the project so correct me if im wrong bc im kinda spitballin) and we make a smart contract that monitors when political figures abuse their power or break laws
could we do that? can the ai really say "yeah this dude broke the law" and stuff like that?

[Anonymous No.57641350]

>>57641341
Well the short answer is yes and the long answer is yes but. You would have to define what the laws are first and what "breaking the law" means first, which opens another can of worms where you need to teach the AI to have its own concepts of morality and "abuse of power" because those concepts are malleable, more than you probably expect. But sure, in a cyberpunk future where somehow congress aproves the use of AI to monitor itself then sure, we could use logical ai for it.

[Anonymous No.57641362]

>>57641350
>OH BREAKING THE LAWWWW
>BREAKING THE WOOOOORLD
KOWASEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.57641367]

>>57641350
damn