DTCC ends partnership with Chainlink over costs

[Anonymous No.57595136]

>Yesterday, Jennifer Peve, the DTCC‘s Global Head of Strategy & Innovation, said that she doesn’t believe blockchain is a solution to help with the U.S. transition to one day (T1) settlement that will happen in May of this year.

>“If you’re speaking about U.S. public equities markets, there is a disconnect because of the performance and scale component,” she said.

>However, other sectors, such as private stocks, are a different story. She referred to “other markets that are probably not as high volume, low value, then I think you’ve got opportunities to really explore this concept of on chain, real time settlement, which I think is very interesting.”

>During the last couple of years, the DTCC has introduced several blockchain initiatives. In 2022 it launched a DLT-based stock settlement system for bilateral transactions that uses R3’s Corda DLT. It went live with the Trade Information Warehouse system for derivatives, which had a blockchain and conventional version.

https://www.ledgerinsights.com/dtcc-blockchain-t1-tokenization-potential/

[Anonymous No.57595152]

token not needed

[Anonymous No.57595160]

>However, overall her tone was cautionary. There’s the challenge of interoperability with legacy systems. And slow adoption by financial institutions. “we’re talking about a technology that has not been proven at scale in our markets for the assets that we serve,” she reiterated, saying it will take time.

[Anonymous No.57595194]

I unironically sold. Swift is next

[Anonymous No.57595223]

I guess that’s it link bros. We’re never going to make it

[Anonymous No.57595267]

Haha LINKtards actually thought the DTCC was going to make Chainlink a standard

[Anonymous No.57595356]

Link xisters.... I don't feel so good.... It's so over....

[Anonymous No.57595364]

they've been acting a bit desperately lately on social media... posting 2022 quotes from "partners" as if trying to bully them into keeping their promises.

[Anonymous No.57595389]

>>57595136
Blockchain was never intended to be implemented in the T+1 settlement transition. The blockchain one was T+0

[Anonymous No.57595401]

it's over linkies you shoulda sold when you had the chance

[Anonymous No.57595490]

>>57595364
That's why they post all the vague bullshit about "exploring" "imagining" "fantasizing" "pondering"

[Anonymous No.57595497]

Is this gonna be another one of those super bullish threads that you paint as bearish?

[Anonymous No.57595520]

Shit this is actually bearish. But thinking about how (((they))) operate this might also be a final attempt at a shakeout.

[Anonymous No.57595575]

>>57595267
yeah they prob paid that fat guy from DTCC $100k to come on stage and say "quadrillion dollars" at SmartCon

[Anonymous No.57595586]

In reality they’ll do anything to use the tech without having to make you rich in the process. That’s why they won’t use chainlink. They are trying to figure out how to do it without the token even if it means starting from scratch and finding a new solution.

[Anonymous No.57595614]

>>57595586
Linkies really held back the elites plans for 7 years. That’s pretty based

[Anonymous No.57595740]

>>57595614
That's what he's saying. Total victory for BRICS too, since they aren't going to wait a decade to figure their shit out and they need a trustless solution more than (((they))) do.

[Anonymous No.57595758]

>>57595497
>One key takeaway was that the DTCC will only address opportunities that can work within the current regulatory framework. And current regulatory requirements reinforce the role of the DTCC.

>Adding that we need to have “people that are willing to stand up and take the risk to say, I recognize that by changing this, I might lose out here. But if I lose out here, perhaps I can build something else over here that actually generates replacement revenue or brings other opportunities.”

[Anonymous No.57595772]

>>57595136
This is literally the end. I won't even bother selling, it's straight to the rope.

[Anonymous No.57595798]

Yesterday, Jennifer Peve, the DTCC‘s Global Head of Strategy & Innovation, said that she doesn’t believe blockchain is a solution to help with the U.S. transition to one day (T1) settlement that will happen in May of this year.

that will happen in May of this year.

this year.

[Anonymous No.57595803]

>>57595586
The fact that people unironically believe bitcoin and crypto couldn't be destroyed in a day and replaced with a ready made solution is the funniest part of the psyop, I fully believe 99% of crypto bagholders will never be able to sell, crypto is a WEAPON against YOU.

[Anonymous No.57595812]

gg thanks for playing

[Anonymous No.57595841]

>>57595740
BRICS are a fucking joke. Russia is completely done for, Brazil is no longer in the right wing dictator camp, India and China hate each other and South Africa is niggers.
They wouldn't even know how to build on a blockchain. Muh multipolar world, haha.

[Anonymous No.57595926]

>>57595758
Literally
>this is the way we've always done it
tier
Humanity is a fucking meme I swear man

[Anonymous No.57595929]

>>57595841
>the world will remain static forever the end of history and all that
dont be foolish the winds are a changing

[Anonymous No.57596035]

>>57595798
Exactly, T+1 never had anything to do with blockchain

[Anonymous No.57596068]

Alright, retards. Let me enlighten you. She is talking her current book. Read the whole thing.
What this means is - she realized if Link takes over, her whole industry is gone - with all its jobs too.
The closer we get to D-Day, the harder they all will fight.

[Anonymous No.57596081]

in this thread, people who didn't read or understand the article

[Anonymous No.57596095]

peace...at last... at least we have some nice memories to look back on

[Anonymous No.57596104]

>>57596068
Explain in more depth smart anon! I demand you to spoonfeed me. I will give you one good meme in return.

[Anonymous No.57596115]

>>57596081
I am person type #1. Normally by reading the comments I feel I can fill in the blanks, but on this occasion I am incorrect. If I do read the article I may be type #2.

[Anonymous No.57596120]

>>57595136
>blockchain is not a solution to help with the US transition to T1
>Chainlink is not a blockchain
>Chainlink solves this
>mfw

[Anonymous No.57596176]

>>57596120
I am here to remind everyone that if commercial bank CBDCs are ever implemented in the near future, Chainlink will set you free

[Anonymous No.57596233]

I knew the Davos elites wouldn't simply bless us autistic dissidents with untold riches in the new world order.

[Anonymous No.57596240]

>>57596176
sorry I meant commercial bank digital currency acting similar to a CBDC

[Anonymous No.57596290]

did you retards even read the article? It simply says they won't use it by May for T1. It was never slated to do so. Nothing has changed and you are all dumber for participating in NuBiz

[Anonymous No.57596325]

>>57596290
the comments really glow of NuBiz, but the concern posting FUD is good ol' biz

[Anonymous No.57596365]

>>57596081
>in this thread, people who didn't read or understand the article
I'm staking 60k link and the only thing that could get me to sell is if we reach $1000 I'm not sure why people are so obsessed with the technical aspect

[Anonymous No.57596583]

>>57595841
cope
BRICS > USA

[Anonymous No.57596601]

>>57596290
>you are all dumber for participating in NuBiz
also this

[Anonymous No.57596616]

>>57596365
the important thing is that you aren't lying online about having a lot of money. that would be utterly pathetic, right? just imagine: you are not only poor but also insecure about it. pretty embarrassing, that's why you should be proud that you have that amount of money. well done, anon

[Anonymous No.57596740]

thanks for posting article
if you read it properly it isn't at all bearish
amazing that it is actually happening

as she says it will first be used with smaller use cases then broaden in time

anz and carbon markets are the perfect example

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-hxya9rZ4U

no it's not going to take over everything instantly and certainly not this year. still far too immature for that

[Anonymous No.57596784]

>>57596616
does nubiz actually believe anons don't have 50k+ stacks of link? fucking kek this is why there's so much seethe in these threads, imagine being a tourist newfaggot wasting their time in /ptg/'s on /pol/ instead of getting rich over here, wandering over in 2021, buying the top, and unable to accumulate even a suicide stack of link. couldn't be me.

[Anonymous No.57596821]

>>57595136
>If tokenization achieves its potential, there are questions about the roles of central securities depositories (CSDs) and central counterparties (CCPs). The blockchain takes on the role of the registry, and smart contracts can automate much of the servicing functionality.

>At best, CSDs will evolve or alternatively be disrupted. Last year three of the world’s largest CSDs, the DTCC, Clearstream and Euroclear, published a paper arguing for their role in this tokenized future, which we explored.

DTCC not needed.
Please do not redeem your tokens Sir!

[Anonymous No.57596839]

>>57596616
>that's why you should be proud that you have that amount of money
No lmao I did nothing but hold no reason to be proud, I do enjoy the absolute seethe I know a lot of people on this board have just because they missed out

[Anonymous No.57596843]

>>57595586
>>57595614
It's the Assassination Smart Contracts. Do some game theory on it and the effects it has on existing/legacy power structures, especially in a collapsing global world order.
The effects are similar to the invention of iron at the end of the bronze age (during a collapsing global world order).
MAD (mutually assured destruction) on an individual level.
Literally everybody with the brains could wield this weapon and use it against ANYONE, no one safe. It would force (currently) powerful actors to behave like a little bitch.

The funniest thing is, that they are trying to work against this tech, but this only makes it worse.

[Anonymous No.57596852]

>>57596784
i remember being like this in 2017 with btc and eth holders (who were still around then), just couldn't believe their stacks or how casually they talked about their money
after this bull run, link holders will likewise become rare here

[Anonymous No.57596856]

>>57596068
Maybe Sergey can hire her as HR staff.

[Anonymous No.57596973]

>>57595614
watching them constantly distort reality to try and avoid the singularity is very entertaining. it's one of the most compelling reasons to hold link desu. unfortunately for them, what's coming is inevitable.

[Anonymous No.57596979]

>>57595136
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/analysis-dtcc-clearstream-euroclear-be-digital-asset-coordinators/
>Earlier today the DTCC, Clearstream and Euroclear argued that they should play a major role in institutional digital assets.

>One of the efficiencies of blockchain is the reduction in the number of intermediaries. The only intermediary that’s relatively easy to remove is the central securities depository (CSD) (depending on a jurisdiction’s legal framework).

kek
So that's why we got the bear market and the slower adoption.
They are fighting to keep their parasitic power before being made obsolete by Chainlink's CCIP functionality.

Imagine all the Big Macs Sergey will get to eat when he takes their business!

[Anonymous No.57597056]

>>57596843
this.

"The conventional army loses if it does not win. The guerilla wins if he does not lose."

[Anonymous No.57597058]

>>57596839
exactly, there are so many poor anons that have to pretend to have a lot of money online. it's absolutely pathetic, just like you said. haha, imagine them seething about the big stack of tokens that you have whereas they just lied about it. these liars have probably very small penises as well, don't you think? must feel pretty terrible, lol

[Anonymous No.57597220]

>>57596616
>>57597058
the only thing higher than my link gains is your level of cope

[Anonymous No.57597227]

thanks everyone, just unstaked 50K and insta market sold, thanks again

[Anonymous No.57597266]

>>57597058
lol it's so funny dude these poor anons are totally lying about being rich and have like super small penises it must be very sad to have a tiny penis which is why i have a horse sized one and am richer than all of them which must make them super mad they must be crying into their small penises while typing their lies

[Anonymous No.57597302]

>>57597058
>>57597220
>>57597266
Aaaaaaaaand just like that, the thread is ruined.

[Anonymous No.57597318]

>>57597302
have sex

[Anonymous No.57597449]

BASED LPL CHUDDIE KIDDOS HOW YOU DOING BASED KIDDOS POOLS CLOSED HA HA HA

[Anonymous No.57597474]

>>57595614
The few, the proud, the link marines.

[Anonymous No.57597486]

>>57595136
LINKMARINES, JUST HOLD FOR THE NEXT 8 YEARS, THAT'S THE MAGIC FORMULA TO FINANCIAL FREEEDOM
ahahahahaahahaha
agagagaga
xxaxaxaxaxaxaaxaxax

[Anonymous No.57597548]

>>57597486
I'll hold till I'm fuckin dead. Just to spite you. Specifically you, the anon reading this right now.

[Anonymous No.57597559]

>>57596240
Sergey already said at a discussion he was in last year that it doesn't really matter whether it's CBDC's or independent digital currencies that LINK will facilitate either.
He did however say that he would prefer independent digital currencies for ethical reasons.

[Anonymous No.57597580]

It’s over

[Anonymous No.57597602]

>>57597580
>muh cycles
link is beyond cycles now
link will just chad fad forever

[Anonymous No.57597654]

>>57597548
See if I care, I made 3 millies last cycle and cashed out.
You will die poor.

[Anonymous No.57597692]

>>57597580
>Whilst
stopped reading there

[Anonymous No.57597717]

>>57597692
lmao what a bunch of cucks all i care about is 4chan and my huge cock i'm a honey badger and i don't give a fuuuuck i have more money than you could possibly imagine so keep dreaming peasant go jerk your small dick off to your favorite anime character lol

[Anonymous No.57597831]

>>57597580
>look mom I did a fud

[Anonymous No.57597879]

>>57597580
>telegram/discord post is clear evidence that Chainlink is scam.
Well damn, I've been holding for 7 years and even I can't excuse something this huge.

[Anonymous No.57598072]

>>57597580
someone post the fud from the kleros telegram

[Anonymous No.57598097]

>>57598072
4chin is full of cucks lol they can't even get a chick because of their tiny dicks they should just go to the gym and hit leg day so they can actually lift their own weight instead of having to spend all day jerking off to their favorite waifus

[Anonymous No.57598157]

It's almost as if I wasn't lying when I made this post back in October:

>>/biz/thread/56347150#p56349184

Imagine getting information 5 months after people who aren't even getting this information as early as it is available and thinking you're "early."

There is a reason no one wants to share info here anymore to at least bring you 5 months ahead.

[Anonymous No.57598171]

I could unironically provide you all with some terrible news on which I have some insight. But it's just tiresome posting here anymore. I'll just let you all find out in due time.

[Anonymous No.57598196]

>>57597580
Oh no guys it was a json parser all along

[Anonymous No.57598198]

>>57598171
:^(

[Anonymous No.57598241]

>>57598171
ccip delayed.
we know.

[Anonymous No.57598272]

>>57597831
You literally have no idea. I honestly want to share info here but don't want to leak information that could negatively affect my own professional situation.

It is quite literally the meme "If only you knew how bad things really are". No one here would even believe me if I shared it anyway. Maybe once some public data gets shared about who is about to come on to head CCIP, I'll share some fun background info :).

[Anonymous No.57598301]

>>57597580
>EnigmaDevFudding.png
The clowns change, the circus act continues.

[Anonymous No.57598304]

>>57598272
>>57598171
But maybe you could post some price predictions as you seem knowledgeable on this whole matter?

[Anonymous No.57598307]

>>57598272
have sexual relations with a consenting human adult female

[Anonymous No.57598309]

>>57598272
(You)

[Anonymous No.57598317]

>>57598272
I believe you anon, I am mostly a lurker & I don't usually post to avoid the shitshow /biz/ has become (and I think there are many like me). But I still take notice of important info

[Anonymous No.57598340]

>>57598272
You were the kid in school that would pretend to know a big secret, gather everyone in the broom closet and then divulge that you saw the janitor spit gum on the ground during recess earlier.

[Anonymous No.57598385]

they know that it needs scalability of the hashgraph, blockchain is insufficent. hbarbarians keep winning

[Anonymous No.57598404]

Here's your breadcrumbs:

CLL is very close to bringing on someone who I can only describe as a Mashinsky-type character to head a major aspect of CCIP. Idk if they'll make any fanfare about it or not. This person has had an illustrious career at MLM software companies including not one, but two against which the SEC has had to take action (for fraud).

Won't give any more info now, but I'm supposing there may be more info available unironically within two more weeks (I believe a major decision is happening later this week) at which point maybe I can provide some breadcrumbs.

Regarding this thread itself, the DTCC and major banks are SO tenuous in their willingness to actually use any blockchain (including their private quorum instances) for anything that I imagine many people feel the clock ticking down to siphon as much money as possible out of this market.

[Anonymous No.57598423]

>>57598404

[Anonymous No.57598438]

So link fails because Eth is a pile of shit that can't scale and no one wants to accept that alternatives like AVAX could be used TODAY instead because the industry really really really wanted Eth to work and now think all crypto is stupid because it failed?

[Anonymous No.57598458]

>>57595772
kek

[Anonymous No.57598477]

She's literally saying "it's not proven yet", not "no" lmao

[Anonymous No.57598491]

>>57598477
But its not "not proven". Only ETH is proven to have failed. I wish these niggers would be a bit faster at trying some alternatives

[Anonymous No.57598492]

>>57598404
>This person has had an illustrious career at MLM software companies including not one, but two against which the SEC has had to take action (for fraud).
:^(
>clock ticking down to siphon as much money as possible out of this market.
So short lived giga bull & dump to make everyone rope?

[Anonymous No.57598511]

>>57598492
top kek lol you're right bro i mean its obvious that's what's happening you're a smart dude and i bet you've got a huge cock you should go all in on shib because we're about to have a giga bull run in no time

[Anonymous No.57598530]

>>57598491
I'm sure if you sent them an email expressing this sentiment they'd be sure to get right to work at building a system to relinquish power and pump your bags. Pumping the bags of poorfags should be their main motivation in life.

[Anonymous No.57598537]

>>57595136

[Anonymous No.57598554]

>>57598404
if the banks, DTCC, etc. don't come on board then we go all in on our little parallel economy outside of their direct control. tradfi doesn't get to dictate the terms of their own obsolescence, the genie is out of the bottle at this point.

[Anonymous No.57598559]

>>57598530
Or maybe they could find out that oh wow lo and behold it does actually fucking work and we can now revolutionize world finance basically overnight but yeah whatever some peasants might happen to get rich in the meantime so we better not

[Anonymous No.57598573]

>>57598404
>Mashinsky-type character
Volodymyr Zelenski ?

[Anonymous No.57598647]

>>57598554
>In our little parallel economy
>Police show up and evict you
NOOOO!!! YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO KICK ME OUT OF THIS HOME! I PURCHASED THE TOKENIZED DEED FROM HOMEDAO ON THE AVALANCHE BLOCKCHAIN!!! THIS GOES AGAINST OUR GOVERNANCE CHARTER

Good luck with that parallel economy that is based on artificial value fren.

>>57598559
>Revolutionize world finance
Yea, the world of finance will be much better when every pajeet, chong, and jose can create fake securities and sell them 24/7 and take advantage of aging boomers.

[Anonymous No.57598684]

Its OVER. i sold

[Anonymous No.57598686]

>>57598647
ok, Mr LARP
>the world of finance will be much better when every pajeet, chong, and jose can create fake securities
oh no, we can't have the goyim know about how our fugazi works. and we especially can't have them copy our way!
fuck off "insider"

[Anonymous No.57598696]

>>57598647
You started out as a super important insider working for big banks or CLL or whatever your original larp was about. (I didn't read it.) And now you're making the same type of post that standard kekfuddies make day in and day out.

I think we deserve better than this shoddy work.I am ashamed for you.

[Anonymous No.57598726]

>>57598647
i don't give a fuck about tokenized homes and neither do 99% of people in crypto, stupid example.

being able to freely transact p2p is crypto's main usecase. as failures continue to pile up in the traditional economy this usecase will become more and more apparent.

[Anonymous No.57599242]

>>57595136
>However, other sectors, such as private stocks, are a different story. She referred to “other markets that are probably not as high volume, low value, then I think you’ve got opportunities to really explore this concept of on chain, real time settlement, which I think is very interesting.” In 2021 the DTCC explored something similar as part of Project Whitney.

>low volume, high value stuff is what will be moving forward first

>https://blog.chain.link/smart-contract-use-cases/
>ctrl + f Project Whitney

good reverse fud thread OP, love to see em

[Anonymous No.57599491]

>>57595841
>BWICCS A JOKE!!!
>DAS Y YM SO SKAWD OF DEM!!!

[Anonymous No.57599653]

>>57595841
Holy shit you really stirred up the seething brown niggers lmao.

Russia is losing to Ukraine because they got lend leased 80s era tech lmfao.

[Anonymous No.57599732]

>>57596365
Wtf are you going to do with 60 million after taxes? Can you even buy a good house with that? I mean 100 million is the bare minimum to have pre covid millionaire status.

[Anonymous No.57599731]

What an abhorrent thread

[Anonymous No.57599923]

>>57598171
They found a nigger in the chainlink oracle blockchain didn't they... it's over

[Anonymous No.57600127]

Remember you fucking idiots thought dtcc sending their coffee boy intern to a conference was some huge occurrence? You know who was also there…SBF

Chainlink team are fucking frauds. Cant wait to see them all rotting in prison

[Anonymous No.57600249]

>scam based out of the Bahamas is a scam

[Anonymous No.57600288]

>>57598647

Insider anon. I really want your opinion. What you think will happen with this market and with bitcoin in the next 3 years?

Do you think we are approaching a make it or break it scenario for this tech?

Good scenario: ccip works and some decentralized blockchains are used around the world?

Bad scenario: cbdcs + bitcoin controlled by big banks and the elite. And that's it. Everything else banned worldwide?

Or
Something in between?

[Anonymous No.57600389]

>>57595520
surprised it took this long in the thread to come to the obvious solution
imagine taking anything the thing in pic rel says seriously
50% chance she believes it

[Anonymous No.57600418]

>>57595841
BRICS makes all of everyting
NATO makes less than half of what it consumes
Sure there are great minds in the dying west, many, and the system stops them from being productive.
I bet thats not true in Russia or China, i wouldn't know though.

[Anonymous No.57600429]

>march of 2018
holy shit I am retarded

[Anonymous No.57600462]

>>57595586
this is the truth. if only we keep quiet we could have made it

[Anonymous No.57600768]

>>57600429
we know, brics supporters are the dumbest pieces of shit to walk the earth

[Anonymous No.57601112]

BRICS kicks ass

[Anonymous No.57601133]

>>57595586
dude, the fucking code is on github. they don't need scamlink to use the tech. it's free for the taking retarded niggerfaggot.

[Anonymous No.57601138]

>>57595841
Incredibly based
China is in deflation and wealth destruction will continue until the currency gets devalued.
Russia has (((official))) inflation at 7% and central bank interest rates at 16%. You can judge yourself which of those numbers is closer to reality.

[Anonymous No.57602044]

>>57595136
whats up Mikey you stinky asian schizo?

[Anonymous No.57602174]

>>57598171
Thanks, just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.57602811]

>>57598647
So what exactly is your motivation to post extreme doom and gloom on biz about LINK? You've just made some proclamation, refused to elaborate or give evidence, and now you're revving the fud engine around it. What's it to you how people interpret your post? How would just sharing the person's identity possibly fucking reveal who you are anyway? You've made a contribution which will be proven in "unironically two weeks" yet you're acting like you're trying to compel people to feel a certain way. If it's true, ty for sharing and I hope you have more for us, but this is absolutely unactionable information.

[Anonymous No.57602843]

>>57595136
It's funny how some half decent PA swings sentiment. Look at the number of anons itt just not buying the fud anymore, not biting. Not very long ago every thread was like therapeutic self-fud where anons would basically larp as though they were or had just sold, to test themselves. Now anons on balance are shutting down fud as old news. It's stupid, but feels like the turning tide.

[Anonymous No.57603844]

>>57602843
The chart. You’re missing another bull run as we speak

[Anonymous No.57603864]

>>57595136
>DTCC didnt pump the price, but watch the lack of DTCC fucking tanks the price.

Gonna happen, just you watch. Fucking Link man.

[Anonymous No.57603866]

>>57603844
anon you're the one missing another bull run as we speak

[Anonymous No.57603882]

>>57595136
>it doesn't scale
Kaspa fixes this.

[Anonymous No.57603927]

>>57603844
It's been outperforming the market since June. Yes, it's had a terrible few years, but you're wrong on that point as a matter of fact.

[Anonymous No.57604152]

>>57603866
Seems to me LINK is now fully detached from Bitcoin and has been out performing it. The low of LINK was around $6 and it has since more than 3x whereas Bitcoin went to what like $25k and just now went 2x from there?

It’s scary to be detached from Bitcoin but the LINK price action has been wholly independent since the first climb to like $9 or whatever and it’s kind of exciting at the same time. The bots are no longer in any control, nobody is selling (only dumping on extremely low volume) and big buys are coming in from time to time.

I’ll concede if CCIP general access does nothing for the price and if we really do “miss” another bull run but for now things look great.

[Anonymous No.57604248]

>>57604152
what's your price prediction this bullrun anon ?

[Anonymous No.57604304]

>>57603927
if you choose June as the reference point, you're right. thing is, you could choose other months, many many other months, and you'd be wrong.

as i'm sure you well know, if at the beginning of February 2022 you'd have swapped half of your link for btc and kept the other half in link, then now in February 2024 the half you put in btc would have outperformed the half you kept in link.

i'm one of the guys who got in relatively early (still late compared to some) and have kept it all in link and roundtripped.
it's a great team working on difficult products and i believe they are ahead of everybody else. i'm not selling. price action has improved of late. but outperforming the market isn't 'really true'.

[Anonymous No.57604345]

>>57604152
CCIP gen access won't do anything for the price, well maybe it will pump a few dollars on hype but thats it. CCIP isn't connected to staking yet, the transaction volumes won't translate to rewards for stakers or into token price until two are connected.

[Anonymous No.57604376]

>>57595136
>ctrl+ f chainlink
> 0 results

this cultist erc-20 coin is so fucking pathetic

[Anonymous No.57604419]

>>57597580
I've literally said this fucking half a decade ago. it's just an erc-20 shitcoin drawer company "located" in a known tax haven led by RUSSIAN conman

[El Arcón No.57604425]

Ongoing round of nose amputations?

[Anonymous No.57604468]

>>57603866
only for the Link I'm holding. Not for everything else.

[Anonymous No.57604471]

>>57603927
so what? it's not even at 40% of ath while btc is at 70%. That's the relevant measuring stick since everyone on this site bought before last cycle

[Anonymous No.57605224]

>>57604304
>>57604471
I find it extraordinarily obvious how you rats skirt and obfuscate a conversation. It's exceedingly pathetic. The point was made that we are "missing another bull run as we speak", meaning we are IN THE PROCESS of that happening. I pointed out in contest to that the direct evidence which exists to the direct contrary. That specific point is provably wrong and complete bullshit, which would be known if you had a basic unbiased picture of things. LINK breaking out of its 500+ day range was the dial-mover and since then everything has heated up. Since the bull started, for which LINK was a first mover, it has continued to outperform. The point is wrong, you are wrong, shut the fuck up.
"As I'm sure you well know" kek fuck off

[Anonymous No.57605509]

>>57604152
this. there's a small handful of tokens that are uncorrelated from BTC (and the rest of the crypto market) and they're the only protocols worth investing in. signal in a sea of noise.

[Anonymous No.57605528]

>>57595136
this is bullish for link

[Anonymous No.57606954]

>>57595136
AHAHHAHAAHHAHAHA DUMBFUCKS TOLD YOU IT WAS A SCAM LOL AHAHHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.57606971]

>>57595586
its called a private white label you fucking retard. same product as link, licensed under their own name fucking retard. you cant make money off a private blockchain.

[Anonymous No.57607177]

>>57605224
They really want me to sell my link. Too bad I’m just not going to.

[Anonymous No.57607228]

>>57605224
no one is skirting.... Link was $20 in 2020 and 4 years later is $20. If that's a success in your book, then I guess we're playing a different game.

As a comparison, BTC was $11k and is now $50k.

One route makes you money whereas one doesn't.

[Anonymous No.57607254]

>>57607177
in reality no one cares what you do personally but whatever works for you

Michael Jordan used to create narratives in his head that people were shit talking him to motivate himself further and stay focused. The only difference here is he was good at something whereas you're just in a gamestop cult

[Anonymous No.57607295]

>>57607228
>>57607254
absolutely seething

[Anonymous No.57607791]

>>57598404
>CLL is very close to bringing on someone who I can only describe as a Mashinsky-type character to head a major aspect of CCIP. Idk if they'll make any fanfare about it or not. This person has had an illustrious career at MLM software companies including not one, but two against which the SEC has had to take action (for fraud).

A major aspect? I imagine this isn't developer related.

[Anonymous No.57607941]

>>57607254
>in reality no one cares
Except for you since you’ve been in this thread for over five hours.

[Anonymous No.57608003]

>>57597266
kek