/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.57488603]

Daily reminder that The Bitcoin Halving is an IQ Test.

[Anonymous No.57488619]

>>57488603
Cycles don't exist

[Anonymous No.57488628]

>>57488603
it works until it doesn't.

[Anonymous No.57488675]

>>57488603
>that curve
owari da...

[Anonymous No.57488774]

>>57488603
32k july 50k eoy 120-150k ath

[Anonymous No.57489213]

>>57488603
What date is the cycle top?

[Anonymous No.57489239]

>>57489213
October 2025

[Anonymous No.57489240]

imagine drawing some squares on a chart and thinking that you're smart to predict the price. LOL L.

look how at the 3rd halving the price chart didn't actually hit the top line, but did actually hit the bottom one LOLLL. this is shit.

btc will most likely grow again at the halving, but not the way you think for sure.

[Anonymous No.57489242]

>>57488619
>Cycles don't exist
Look at this retard right here

[Anonymous No.57489251]

>>57488603
Why the fuck did the cubes change from rectangles to squares, lmao

[Anonymous No.57489298]

>>57489251
and even with that, the shit didn't work properly for the 3rd halving, just look at the lines

[Anonymous No.57489414]

>>57488603
more like 300k

[Anonymous No.57489443]

>arbitrary axis scaling until i get the picture i want

[Anonymous No.57489462]

if its an IQ test, the test is to see who is low IQ enough to believe that known established information will somehow move price.

Halving should not affect price, and it only does because retards and technical traders have a self fulfilling prophecy thing going on. But you can also observe that it moves less and less on every halving. Hopefully this one is when this cycle retardation stops.

[Anonymous No.57489537]

>>57489462
>>57489240
>>57489251
>this time it's different
Shit eating retards made these same exact points in 2019.

[Anonymous No.57489552]

>>57488603
nobody here read the whitepaper. The halving is supposed to be that way until its stable.

[Anonymous No.57489560]

>>57489537
I've never said "this time it's different", you better learn to read first and then try to shitpost something at 4chan

[Anonymous No.57489563]

>>57488619
So what you're saying is this time is different?

[Anonymous No.57489611]

>>57489560
Aren't you tired of eating shit every cycle?
Do feces taste that good?

[Anonymous No.57489622]

>>57489611
ok you've just turned the troll mode on. bye.

[Anonymous No.57489626]

>>57489622
Go eat shit,retard.

[Anonymous No.57489649]

>>57488619
If that's what you conclude from OPs pic I have bad news for you

[Anonymous No.57489714]

>>57489537
And the points were true in 2019 as well as being true when bitcoin was 1 dollar.

[Anonymous No.57489749]

>>57489251
>average bear iq

[Anonymous No.57489769]

>>57488603
It's funny how you get all these posts predicting how the entire cycle will play out, yet nobody is showing their trades to back up their claims.

The only thing that you can be almost certain about is that Bitcoin is trending upwards and the overall sentiment is bullish. That's it.

[Anonymous No.57489836]

>>57488619

[Anonymous No.57489885]

>>57489462
Only known information can move price, if no one knew it, they would never negotiate prices based on it.
>I meant past information
Lawyers lead you to believe this is true, but past information is the best model for the future. Futures being entirely random as if trends don't exist is not a hard rule, it's really a disclaimer taken too literally
Halving does affect price because of the marginal supply shock, it's simple miner economy. Though it should not be so extreme.

[Anonymous No.57489969]

>>57489769
BTC $150k 1Q25

[Anonymous No.57490167]

>>57489885
Its known in the sense that we know years ahead that it is going to happen, and therefore it would be priced in if the market was not full of TA fags and retards.

A supply shock that is broadcasted years ahead of time is not a supply shock in any meaningful sense.

[Anonymous No.57490443]

>>57490167
Of course it is, because until it actually happens there is no reason to adjust.
We can reasonably say bread will be $10 some day. You wouldn't start paying it now!

[Anonymous No.57490530]

>>57490443
wait are you actually suffering from down syndrome?

You think if the bread production of the world would cut in half next year, and everyone knew it, that the price would remain low this year?

[Anonymous No.57490591]

>>57490530
I think there would be a noticeable effect on or about the time that production outputs change.

[Anonymous No.57490606]

>>57488628
whenever this pair starts "doing cycles" (this guy >>57488619 is partially right, net liquidity is the real indicator) that means fiat is dead
fiat dead means this "cycle" doesn't matter anymore and crypto goes up even higher
in both scenarios you lose, fiatcel

[Anonymous No.57490759]

>>57488619
>>57489563

[Anonymous No.57490782]

>>57488619
the final redpill

[Anonymous No.57490844]

>>57489462
>t. retard

[Anonymous No.57490904]

>>57490759
Kek

[Anonymous No.57490908]

>>57490606
NL is a factor, not the sole factor. NL coincides with everything, oil, gold, equities, lumber, nonfarm job openings, bond market options volatility, and a random coin called poopsicle I just looked up. It isn't really that insightful. It's sort of just illustrating the relationship between fiat money and assets. The idiosyncrasies of different assets produce different results for them at the extrema.

[Anonymous No.57490919]

>>57490530
It depends on the demand. If a known shortage is projected in the future and a plurality of people decide to buy more bread because of it (kinda dumb sounding in this example because bread perishes), then price would increase ahead of the shortage. If not, then bakers/grocers would have to collude to increase the price. In a free market this shouldn't happen because anyone of them could at any time undercut the others and take their business, which keeps the price low. When the supply shock happens, they're forced to increase prices to cover their operating costs or they go out of business. Same with miners, all of their operating costs go up, forcing them to hold BTC and sell high or go out of business. Less supply on the market and constant/increasing demand implies number go up.

[Anonymous No.57492105]

crab zone

[Anonymous No.57492129]

Cycles aren't suppposed to look exactly, but similar. We will keep poompan until bobo dies out

[Anonymous No.57493586]

>>57492129
bobo will never fully die
it has to be balanced

[Anonymous No.57493617]

>>57488603
yeah but would keep earning more btc till that time is right with btcdragon

[Anonymous No.57494162]

>>57490759
Pretty much

[Anonymous No.57494172]

>>57488619
Fpbp. Midwits are seething.