Have you woken up yet?

[Anonymous No.57458691]

One of the biggest partnerships that is currently powering visa

https://cointelegraph.com/news/visa-crypto-withdrawals-cards-145-countries

[Anonymous No.57458700]

>>57458691
SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK SHUT UP ABOUT STINKLINK

[Anonymous No.57458736]

>>57458700
no

[Anonymous No.57458766]

>>57458691
the only application I can see here would be price feeds, in the weird off-chance that transak/visa don't just use their own price monitoring

[Anonymous No.57458767]

>>57458691
Unironically a huge deal and none of the linkies on this board are talking about it. Only fud

[Anonymous No.57458778]

>>57458766
Checked sixes

[Anonymous No.57458791]

>>57458766
Checked holy sixes

[Anonymous No.57458794]

>>57458691
>ctrl + f : Big Mac
>8 results found
Holy fucking shit it's actually happening

[Anonymous No.57458975]

>>57458691
Ha, as if Chainlink could ever partner with Trans...... AK!

[Anonymous No.57458980]

>>57458691
Doesn't this just sit on the pile of ramps like ramp, moonpay, banxa, bitpay. Do we really need more.

[Anonymous No.57459076]

>>57458691
Great.
Except the Transak / Chainlink connection was four years ago:
https://transak.medium.com/transak-integrates-with-chainlink-to-connect-smart-contracts-with-fiat-crypto-payment-gateways-4cd7c54ab3c4

Are they even still using Chainlink?
Ctrl-F in their documentation doesn't mention Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.57459201]

>>57459076
>transak integrated chainlink specifically for “fiat-crypto gateways”

Holy mother of god

[Anonymous No.57459203]

>>57459076
What documentation?

[Anonymous No.57459225]

What a nothingburger

[Anonymous No.57459278]

This is actually not a nothingburger, nice OP

[Anonymous No.57459468]

>>57458980
Good point, and i'd never really looked at these before, but the ones you mentioned seem to all be good for buying crypto but compromised in some way on the spend side. The Transak thing sounds like you can just swap crypto for fiat on the platform and credit your visa card with the corresponding fiat. That's new, as far as i can see. No fucking about with exchanges and particularly banks, whom we all know are making things tougher and tougher for us all on the cashout side. If this works it'll change the game a bit.
Disclaimer: maybe i'm missing something but i'm all ears

[Anonymous No.57459546]

https://www.chainlinkecosystem.com/ecosystem/transak

This is the website that's just bullshit right?

[Anonymous No.57460119]

>>57459076
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2024/01/30/web3-payments-firm-transak-joins-visa-direct-to-streamline-crypto-to-fiat-conversion/
wakey wakey, you brownoid faggot

[Anonymous No.57460233]

>>57459468
I've used them and there's no limits as far as I ever encountered, you just have poor rates.

Frankly i don't see the point in them - anyone starting out in crypto will use an exchange long before using browser wallets and by the time you're using browser wallets you'll know to use exchanges for lower fees than these direct ramps. They have basically no purpose.

If i recall i think i only ever used them when an exchange was temporarily down.

[Anonymous No.57460330]

>>57460233
Bitpay has limited list of retailers
Moonpay seems to be online and limited to certain brands/apps
Banxa is buy only
Which services have you used?
Why are you saying no limits?
Which (if any) have you used that allowed you to load up your visa card and use it anywhere in the real world or online (which it looks like this does)?
Good convo. Let's keep it going

[Anonymous No.57460341]

>>57460330
Are you sure you weren't BUYING, rather than spending? That's the difference here. This is spending

[Anonymous No.57460386]

This is the best Chainlink thread in months. Nice job op.

[Anonymous No.57460581]

>>57460330
I've just used ramp and banxa. Think i used it for onramping and offramping. I used them when doing some shitcoin bridging for airdrop hunting, not sure why i didn't just use an exchange as normal.

[Anonymous No.57460651]

>>57458691
>Create a taxable event to buy groceries
How do we fix the retarded government problem?

[Anonymous No.57460661]

>>57460581
How did they work? Were you able to apply fiat directly to a visa-linked account (still unsure about this part) by exchanging crypto for fiat in metamask or some other HW? Shitcoin bridging sounds like a different usecase entirely

[Anonymous No.57460669]

>>57458691
>Transak’s marketing head and investor relations lead Harshit Gangwar noted
>Harshit Gangwar
The funniest name I've ever seen, holy shit

[Anonymous No.57460672]

>>57460669
Harsh shit: gang war

[Anonymous No.57460690]

>>57460661
Yeah you just used a card as if you were making any regular purchase. Likewise for selling it would bank transfer it back. As for how it worked under the hood i have no clue but aside from high fees I saw no problems.

[Anonymous No.57460732]

>>57460690
why don't you find one now that you think offers a comparable service, and post a link here? Then we can compare the two

[Anonymous No.57461661]

>>57458700
Fudcucks triggered lmao

[Anonymous No.57461726]

LINK $1K EOY

[Anonymous No.57461955]

Imagine if this news came out for another coin.

[Anonymous No.57462004]

>>57461955
imagine if anything actually linked this to chainlink instead of a blogpost from 4 fucking years ago

[Anonymous No.57462154]

That's cool but everyone stopped caring since none of this matters if the price doesn't move

[Anonymous No.57462568]

>>57462154
it's not released yet, anon. also, it is but one of many applications which (if indeed it uses chainlink) will generate revenue, ultimately benefitting LINK token holders. It's a fascinating voyage of discovery, and it's great that you're on board with us all.

[Anonymous No.57462826]

>>57458691
ICP makes chainlink obsolete lmao. Imagine needing oracles instead of directly querying the data instead. newfags dig into ICP.

Largest R&D operation in crypto, with the largest team of cryptographers. Blockchain singularity

[Anonymous No.57462906]

>>57462004
>imagine if anything actually linked this to chainlink

"Transak Integrates with Chainlink to Connect Smart Contracts with Fiat / Crypto Payment Gateways"
Zoom and enhance: "Fiat / Crypto Payment Gateways"

[Anonymous No.57462920]

>>57462568
>it's not released yet
that's Chainlinks products snd services in a nutshell those past 7 years
10 years if you count the actual foundation date of the company
really makes you think

[Anonymous No.57462921]

>>57462826
>directly query the date
From fucking where chang? You need to trust something somewhere and your nigger shit is getting nowhere

[Anonymous No.57462928]

>>57462920
Then who's been powering nearly all of defi for the past 3-4 years?

[Anonymous No.57462987]

>>57462928
Oh you mean the single service they've been able to ship successfully 5 years ago? what about staking, DECO, mixicles, town crier, fss, por etc etc
it's all vaporware yet here you are, running victory laps over a single product that's not even relevant anymore
tell me, when was the last time you used defi for anything?

[Anonymous No.57462990]

>>57462987
>when was the last time you used defi for anything
lmao, ETH btfo

[Anonymous No.57462995]

>>57462987
>mixicles guy still says mixicles even after I've pointed out 20 times that it doesn't belong in that list
are you just a new jeet every week reading from a script, or do you just have some weird thing where your mind blanks out every time I point out that mixicles is literally just a smart contract structure that anyone can build

[Anonymous No.57463009]

>>57458691
TRANS-ACK!

[Anonymous No.57463072]

>>57458691
Still won't pamp StinkLink, Pyth and Supra will bury that shit

[Anonymous No.57463261]

>>57462995
>ignores the entire post and focuses on muh mixicles
thanks for conceding I guess

[Anonymous No.57463268]

>>57458691
Token not needed

[Anonymous No.57463522]

>>57463009
>>57458975

[Anonymous No.57463540]

>>57462920
>it's not released yet
Keep up, anon. I was referring to the Visa/Transak product. Visa just announced it. That's what this thread is about icymi kek

[Anonymous No.57463636]

>>57463540
>they just announced it
Isn't that every Chainlink breadcrumb, ever?
to be more precise:
>visa just announced the preliminary statement about the imminent launching of a product that is connected to Chainlink with a 4 year old blogpost
the absolute state of (you)

[Anonymous No.57463668]

>>57458691
Nothing has come from anything like this since 2019. It’s over for the rest of the decade, the market is fucked and it will take years to fix. In your heart of hearts you know this to be 100% true.

The 30s will be the decade of the marines. Few will make it.

[Anonymous No.57463695]

>>57463636
Literally every single breadcrumbs turned out it be true. Every single one of them. Not even memeing

[Anonymous No.57463711]

>>57463695
Digital asset turned out to be a dud
And oracle
And open law
And docusign
And bsn
And trade lens
should I go on, shillfag?

[Anonymous No.57463790]

>>57463711
>should I go on
please do I hold seven figures in link but you seem more invested in it I'd like to see what I have to read up on since I don't frequent this shite hole much anymore

[Anonymous No.57463806]

>>57458691
1k eoy

[Anonymous No.57463865]

>>57463636
>they just announced it
You're missing the point. This was Visa's announcement, not Chainlink's. So you're using the fact that Visa's new product they announced yesterday isn't actually available today, and that it's somehow the fault of Chainlink lololol that's actually quite funny anon

[Anonymous No.57463989]

>>57458691
all this link shilling here from you low iq faggots made me hate it and i just sold everything. Guess your strategy of non stop shilling this shit here is working huh you goddamn fucking retard

[Anonymous No.57464054]

HARSHIT

GANGWAR

[Anonymous No.57464324]

>>57458691
Partnerships don't mean shit if they fail to implement token use + if you haven't noticed by now we've been acting as Sergey's pockets for the 4-5 years.

[Anonymous No.57464326]

>>57463790
why do you keep id hopping though?>>57463865
the point is that the product is vaporware and this amazing Chainlink connection is from a literal blogpost published 4 years ago
this is what we call "grasping at straws"

[Anonymous No.57464337]

>>57464324
>if you haven't noticed by now we've been acting as Sergey's pockets for the 4-5 years
why didn't you just throw 5 fig in link back in 2017 like I did and you would sit at 7 figure right now

[Anonymous No.57464349]

>>57464326
>why do you keep id hopping though?
take your meds lmao
>>57463865
>the point is that the product is vaporware and this amazing Chainlink connection is from a literal blogpost published 4 years ago
>this is what we call "grasping at straws"
who is "we" you fucking discordcuck way to out yourself

[Anonymous No.57464362]

>>57464349
kek, is this really all you got?
retarded shills btfo

[Anonymous No.57464370]

>>57464349
also wtf is this screenshot supposed to prove? I was clearly implying you were the previous poster I quoted you literal imbecile

[Anonymous No.57464380]

>>57464370
>also wtf is this screenshot supposed to prove? I was clearly implying you were the previous poster I quoted you literal imbecile
you just outed yourself as an id hopping infidel stop projecting

[Anonymous No.57464387]

>>57458767
>https://cointelegraph.com/news/visa-crypto-withdrawals-cards-145-countries
>throw it on the unbelievably huge deal pile
not gonna bother checking the price

[Anonymous No.57464406]

Has a company ever advertised this much for products that aren't real?

Did Amazon have to pay community advocates

[Anonymous No.57464433]

I bought most f my chainlink at .28 cents og 10000 suicidre stack. I don't own any crypto directly today. I own oil(xom, shell, pbr) bershire b, msft, intel, dividend aristocracts and mining. You're all tarded not just late but trains don't even run from the station anymore. link never came true during scams like shib and ada killed crypto years ago. Coin at 45 was worth a look and you all missed that too. This used be a big brain board, its full of retards and spastic spam reddit crap like gme now and should be deleted. It died a LONG time ago with prawn farming spam eth pyramid schemes
>muh link

[Anonymous No.57464725]

>>57464380
kek, he's right though, you are a fucking retard

[Anonymous No.57464763]

>>57464725
>kek, he's right though, you are a fucking retard
kek if I'm a retard what does that make you? I really feel bad for you people

[Anonymous No.57464854]

>>57464349
This guy is an actual retard. Wow.

[Anonymous No.57465255]

>>57458766
Yea but chainlink price feeds are free for devs

[Anonymous No.57465319]

>>57465255
No they aren't.

[Anonymous No.57465357]

>>57462921
In 5 years you are going to go damn that anon really was trying to help but I'm too much of a fucking retard to do my own research

[Anonymous No.57465438]

>>57465319
>much twitter screencap

What are they gonna do, upgrade the aggregator contracts to blacklist contract addresses that they think arent (((sponsoring))) price feed dons? Lmfao

You don't even understand how price feeds are read by other contracts, shut the fuck up you mindless baggie

https://docs.chain.link/data-feeds/using-data-feeds#solidity

Oh, no function for token transfer to pay for data on chain in the interface? That's because its FREE (aside from base layer gas costs obviously)

[Anonymous No.57465469]

>>57465438
Triggered hard

[Anonymous No.57466167]

>>57465319
>>57465469
>Chainlink blackmailing
how? is Sergey refusing stop banging your mom unless you pay him or what?

[Anonymous No.57466388]

>>57465469
>no argument
No surprise, this point of discussion always leads to the same conclusion.

The absolute state of baggies

[Anonymous No.57466487]

>>57463668
I agree that 2030s will be our decade. It’s a long road until then, but then again how many chads do you meet who bought and held Microsoft since the 80s. Right?

However, don’t be too negative about things. Expecting news and breadcrumbs for crazy short term rallies is typical in crypto but not a healthy sign for long term growth. LINK arguably has had one of the steadiest and healthiest charts other than Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.57466543]

>>57458691
>You have how many Link!?

[Anonymous No.57467267]

>>57466487
>Microsoft

bad comparison...Microsoft, similar to Amazon, had actual products and revenues. Also neither hired massive workforce pre-revenue which is always a startup killer. You should do more research before embarrassing yourself.

For example, by its third year Microsoft was already taking off and had sales rev > $1m (so like $9M today). They had 13 employees at the time. Fast forward to their 7th year, they had $25M in revenues (~$200M today), and 200 employees.

Bill Gates went to Harvard back when that meant something (obviously not now given all the forced diversity) and would often go on 24 hour+ work sessions learning everything about computers. He then dropped out to tirelessly pursue creating one of the greatest companies of all time.

Sergey Nazarov on the other hand got a philosophy degree from NYU, where he spent his days sitting around eating, playing video games and reading useless quotes. After graduating he wormed his way from investment banking into the easiest money grab in modern times (scam altcoins). His crypto experience prior to Link was helping rugpull NXT and failing to create another version of Ethereum.

And on and on it goes. Two completely different roads

[Anonymous No.57467299]

>>57458691
Nice announcement you have there, it would be a shame if it had no positive impact on the price of LINK.

[Anonymous No.57467409]

>>57465438
I'd imagine there are different contracts for the pricefeeds they're personally integrating into other projects beyond the free data feeds.

They were charging $1500 a month previously and promoted doing personal integrations of price feeds.

[Anonymous No.57467544]

>>57467267
Im not comparing the two as companies, I’m comparing the rare phenomenon of an investor buying and holding for decades because of extreme conviction

[Anonymous No.57467789]

>>57458766
>price feeds
lmao ,biz really is this retarded now isn't it

[Anonymous No.57468291]

>>57467409
You guys are resorting to imaginary things now?

[Anonymous No.57468429]

>>57464349
Okay it was quite funny for a while, i admit. Seriously though, anon. You're going to give yourself cancer, if you go on like this too much. I know my limits and i'm out. Whatever is wrong, you can fix. No need to make yourself ill for nothing. Peace.

[Anonymous No.57469781]

>>57458691
just wondering why I should care if not a single partnership, even with swift, hasnt moved the price at all? serious question...

[Anonymous No.57470312]

>>57469781
Yes. Best to wait until the price is high then cleverly begin buying-in. Like you, I could never get the hang of it.

[Anonymous No.57470492]

I look forward to the gargantuan revenue in our near future marines
I will continue to buy until I retire

[Anonymous No.57471130]

>>57470312
invest when product comes out and hold. chainlink doesnt have a single product that brings revenue. blogposts and youtube videos is the same thing as the bitconnect conference. learn to invest dumbfuck.

[Anonymous No.57471843]

>>57471130
>flagrant lies
>insult intelligence
>I'm intelligent

[Anonymous No.57472879]

>>57458975
KEK

[Anonymous No.57473143]

>>57468429
>i admit defeat
np anon I'm here to set you on the right path, reach out to your family if needed they miss you.