ROSE

[Anonymous No.57411059]

in this thread, we discuss the Oasis Network (ROSE) as we all reassess our place in the market post-ETF altcoin dump

[Anonymous No.57411069]

>>57411059
Who?

[Anonymous No.57411092]

>>57411059
Look I hold ROSE but it's a fucking failure.
I also hold ICP and XRP so just look at yourself in the mirror if you think you want to buy this.

[Anonymous No.57411109]

>>57411069
>>57411092
lads it's the perfect storm of market events this year, I am not selling my bags at 10 cents just so Grayscale can buy them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puGA2N5pxeI

[Anonymous No.57411125]

>>57411059
>>57411069
>>57411092
>>57411109
chuds

[Anonymous No.57411128]

>>57411092
We could be drinking buddies. Still never selling.

[Anonymous No.57411184]

>>57411128
it'll be very obvious when it does happen, in hindsight

[Anonymous No.57411198]

>>57411184
>if only we could get that sweat chainlink price action

[Anonymous No.57411224]

>>57411109
Grayscale is literally still accumulating btw (the time this whale started accumulating coincides with Grayscale filing privacy ETF and they're clearly an institutional investor

[Anonymous No.57411277]

>>57411224
you still think etfs are bullish, you silly rosechud?

[Anonymous No.57411305]

>>57411277
the rumour is

[Anonymous No.57411314]

>>57411277
and also long term it is extremely bullish

you are probably aware of the gold etf already

[Anonymous No.57411424]

>>57411059
Someone should force those lazy slovenian fat asses to work more.

[Anonymous No.57411531]

>xe didn't buy SCRT instead of this shit coin

LMAO enjoy staying POOR

[Anonymous No.57411610]

>>57411531
I was wondering when I was going to see you again, I remember you're the guy who always types those words in caps and posts that weightlifting baggot photo.

I remembered you because you told us to buy SCRT.

How do you feel that you bought SCRT instead of ROSE LMAO, I mean seriously, what a dumb faggot. I was honestly thinking of this anon last night while pondering laughing at this shithead who relentlessly shilling ROSE threads in favour of SCRT.

Just know this buddy. Sometimes I think of you, and it's always schadenfreude.

[Anonymous No.57411621]

>>57411610
not instead of ROSE*, just how do you feel buying SCRT at all.

Ohhh it feels so good

[Anonymous No.57411752]

>>57411610
This is the first time I have posted in a ROSE thread you schizo

Anyway, I will buy a suicide stack of 10 million at 0.1 and sell when it peaks at 15c

[Anonymous No.57411774]

>>57411752
No it isn't faggot, we all remember the fud from the SCRT guy.

And no one on this board buys SCRT or talks about it. Except you. Nice try though.

[Anonymous No.57411903]

The project is run by a bunch of third-worlders. Dawn has virtually no involvement with the project now. There is a reason she hasn't mentioned it in like 2+ years now.
Dawn's lack of involvement wouldn't be too bad if not for the inadequacy of the third-worlders running it. Rose looks like a total shitcoin - un-chainlinked and flaunting "partnerships" with literally whos. Oasis will stay a shitcoin until it integrates Chainlink services.

Even look at OP pic >>57411059
>deltaDAO are building a custom paratime on Oasis Network
>"our next grant recipient: @deltaoDAO"
Stupid bagholders think this is bullish for the ecosystem. OASIS IS LITERALLY PAYING THEM TO BUILD ON THEIR PROTOCOL. IE. OASIS IS BUILDING IT FOR THEMSELVES =/= ECOSYSTEM ADOPTION.

[Anonymous No.57411939]

Dawn has virtually no involvement with the project now; there is a reason she hasn't mentioned it in like 2+ years... her Smartcon 2023 presentation on Oasis was even cancelled literally last minute for unknown reasons.
Her lack of involvement wouldn't be too bad if not for the inadequacy of the third-worlders running it. Rose looks like a total shitcoin - un-chainlinked and flaunting "partnerships" with literally whos. Oasis will stay a shitcoin until it integrates Chainlink services. Dawn leaving and third-worlders taking over and running it into the ground is like that documentary "Empire of Dust" - the africans had great infrastructure built for them by foreign saviors, but left to their own devices the africans ran that shit into the ground. This is Oasis.

Even look at OP pic >>57411059 (OP)
>deltaDAO are building a custom paratime on Oasis Network
>"our next grant recipient: @deltaoDAO"
Stupid bagholders think this is bullish for the ecosystem. OASIS IS LITERALLY PAYING THEM TO BUILD ON THEIR PROTOCOL. IE. OASIS IS BUILDING IT FOR THEMSELVES =/= ECOSYSTEM ADOPTION.

[Anonymous No.57411968]

>>57411939
>Oasis will stay a shitcoin until it integrates Chainlink services.

Chainlink is unnecessary. A worlds first crosschain private DEX launches in 3 days on the Oasis Network with the first liquidity starting in less than 24 hours.

Sorry linkcel, Chainlink was pretty cool in 2017 (7 years old) but it's not really unique in 2024.

KYCless too. IX launch is what most of us have been waiting for.

[Anonymous No.57411983]

>>57411939
and yes it's fully cross-chain compatible so curious as to why LINK is necessary in 2024. (it isn't)

I sold LINK for ROSE btw about 3 months ago, so I am well aware of what goes on in both projects.

[Anonymous No.57411985]

>>57411968
>Chainlink is unnecessary. A worlds first crosschain private DEX launches in 3 days
Where is it getting price-feed data from? If it's unreliable it'll get hacked. This is a matter of natural selection - anyone fit for survival will naturally avoid risky protocols.

[Anonymous No.57412008]

>>57411985
You will know soon anon.

[Anonymous No.57412032]

>>57412008
the third-party audit is done but I can't find it, it might be on the medium

>Over 20,000 private cross-chain transactions on the testnet instance

>Working and ready to go product covering many EVM chains and assets with flexibility to bring even more coverage for cross-chain private swaps and bridging, as well as non-EVM networks such as Bitcoin shortly after the launch

>Successful IDO with $550,000 raised across private and public rounds, with the public round sold out in under 1 minute

[Anonymous No.57412037]

>>57411983
>and yes it's fully cross-chain compatible
This isn't the flaunt you think it is if it's using anything but CCIP for cross-chain. You do know there have been $2.8bn worth of cross-chain exploits so far? What makes you think that illuminex won't contribute to that? Do they have a track-record of stellar security?

>>57412008
So they haven't shared how they get price-data. Great, this is not a red-flag at all.

[Anonymous No.57412119]

>>57412037
>anything that doesn't support my LINK bags goes right into the rubbish

How about just don't use it and wait until Feb 3 like everyone else lol.

You're going to find any reason you can to disagree despite the fact it's audited. Is that a good use of your time as a LINK baggie? To me it comes across as a bit desperate, no?

[Anonymous No.57412182]

I remain comfy in the prospects that a silicon valley blockchain company will be worth more than 0.6b given time

[Anonymous No.57412225]

>>57412119
So many shit "literally who" projects have been audited and then proceeded to get exploited.
illuminex might do well for Oasis in the short-term, but medium/long-term it will falter unless integrating Chainlink.
>>anything that doesn't support my LINK bags goes right into the rubbish
Yes, since using Chainlink is at the moment the only way to be secure in defi. Just the other day Wormhole showed its unreliability and went down for a while; keep in mind this is one of the "top" cross-chain solutions.

[Anonymous No.57412269]

>>57412225
>anything that doesn't support my LINK bags goes right into the rubbish

>but medium/long-term it will falter unless integrating Chainlink.

>unless integrating Chainlink.

>Chainlink.

how convenient for you chainlink navigated its way back into this discussion

Even so I still wouldn't go back to LINK since it's 8b marketcap vs. ROSE 600m and I've done good in the past on bets like this backed by groundbreaking tech.

As I said, LINK was my biggest bag until I sold it 3 months ago for ROSE (sold LINK after a pump and researched a few assets and ROSE was the one I settled on rotating into). It's not a bad project, just not a great investment anymore imo. It's very unlikely LINK grows beyond 10b after it pumped during a bear.

[Anonymous No.57412278]

>>57412225
>So many shit "literally who" projects have been audited and then proceeded to get exploited.

I guarentee you can't mention a project that was made by an American company that follows US regulations as your example.

[Anonymous No.57412376]

>>57412225
btw, what is your reasoning behind LINK being a good asset? If the product is launched and working, what's to stop it becoming the next XMR/LTC etc, a stable and useful utility coin but it never pumps because it's used for trading.

And put it this way.

LINK = 8b Market cap
ROSE = 600m market cap

for LINK to get a 2x ROI it would have to go to 16x, yet ROSE would only be 1.2b from here.

I think one of those is far more likely to happen than the other and I can totally see a future where LINK slowly falls out of relevance like it has done countless times before (ROSE has too, I will admit, but again the marketcap just is more bullish).

I've been good with these types of calls in the past and have timed the market correctly with LINK, and I wouldn't buy it now desu among other projects.