Bitcoin is about to change forever

[Anonymous No.57358283]

For years Grayscale has been the second largest holder of BTC (number one being satoshi himself), now that is very quickly changing to the ESG loving BlackRock.
Bitcoin will become proof of stake before 2030.

[Anonymous No.57358298]

>>57358283
so satoshi is just the CIA, right?

[Anonymous No.57358299]

>>57358298
Satoshi is Hal Finney (IRL it's Hal Finney's neighbour)

[Anonymous No.57358306]

>>57358283
Doesn’t Coinbase technically have the most bitcoins?

[Anonymous No.57358377]

>>57358283
no shit they are coming down
stinky shameless dumpers

[Anonymous No.57358440]

>>57358306
they're custodying BlackRock's coins, they're not Coinbase's coins

[Anonymous No.57358445]

>>57358440
Lmao not your keys not your coins

[Anonymous No.57358458]

>>57358445
This

[Anonymous No.57358526]

>>57358283
>Bitcoin will become proof of stake before 2030.

150 IQ

[Anonymous No.57358637]

>>57358298
doesn't satoshi nakamoto roughly translate to central intellect?

[Anonymous No.57358672]

>>57358299
It is too easy to think there are no coincidences in life

Satoshi could have used Finneys death as cover to "fake" his own

After all if he created bitcoin hes smart enough to do that

[Anonymous No.57358982]

>>57358637
>central origin intelligence history.

Literal translation yeah close enough to be something a glowie would do.

[Anonymous No.57359169]

>>57358440
>>57358445
>>57358306
Binance has more then?

[Anonymous No.57359222]

>>57358298
Okay, here’s how it is. The CIA needed a method of bringing down activities such as Silk Road so they used the NSAs newly developed sha-256 hashing algo to create Bitcoin. They marketed it as “totally anonymous” back then knowing the retards will fall for it and successfully use it. It’s the same reason why I don’t trust monero. It is “crypto note v2” and just the same ploy by glowies.

[Anonymous No.57359238]

>>57359222
Checked and true.
Trustless and decentralized cannot be anonymous.

[Anonymous No.57359289]

The amount of Bitcoin a single entity holds doesn't affect the underlying protocol, dipshits. This isn't a PieceOfShit token

[Anonymous No.57360566]

Dorks

[Anonymous No.57360578]

>>57359289
fork to PoS, kikebase is paid off and agrees
BTC is now PoS

[Anonymous No.57360587]

people who think that bitcoin cash creator is satoshi are completely retardo patronum

[Anonymous No.57360596]

>>57360587
Roger Ver ?

[Anonymous No.57360598]

>>57360587
Hal Finney would prefer BCH

[Anonymous No.57360617]

>>57360596
>Roger Ver
oh, I mean the Craig Wright schizo

[Anonymous No.57360665]

that's the point of proof of work, brown, you don't control it just because you own some. ethereum is the only thing at risk of complete ownership by legal staking entities.

and proof of stake isn't esg compatible by the mental illness it's defined by.

[Anonymous No.57360695]

>>57358283
>retard thinks that owning more bitcoins = more governance
KEK THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF THIS BOARD

[Anonymous No.57360708]

>>57358283
This is correct. Anyone who can amass at least 51% of all BTC will control the coin and can fork it at will.

[Anonymous No.57360789]

>>57358283

Bitcoin fundamentally is dead. It is still good as a store of value, but ACTUAL cryptocurrency is monero.

[Anonymous No.57360808]

>>57359222
SilkRoad was created in 2011. The fuck you are talking about.

[Anonymous No.57360827]

>Bitcoin will become proof of stake before 2030
How exactly? Could you please describe how this is implemented?

[Anonymous No.57360845]

>>57360827
blackrock has to pay for every miner and every trader
they are fed up with losing money
muh nature co2, pay off 5 big exchanges to keep the btc ticker, fork to pos

[Anonymous No.57360951]

I'm Satoshi

[Anonymous No.57360971]

>>57360951
urgay

[Anonymous No.57361936]

>>57360578
>the network rejects fork
>no value in the PoS fork since it’s centralized censorable garbage run by blackrock
>old chain keeps humming along
Forks can’t be forced on the network

[Anonymous No.57361979]

>>57361936
>old chain keeps humming along
like bitcoin cash

[Anonymous No.57362000]

>>57361979
Yeah bitcoin cash was arguably hostile new fork off the old chain which didn’t gain traction. Perhaps like what would happen with a PoS fork.

[Anonymous No.57362088]

>>57358299
nobody clever would take all those precautions to stay anon and use a neighbours name

[Anonymous No.57362639]

>>57360617
Ah you meant BSV not BCH

[Anonymous No.57363142]

>>57358298
or DARPA or a half dozen egg heads in anyone of a dozen different agencies working on black projects.

[Anonymous No.57363594]

>>57360578
>fork
we have issues soft forking a batch transaction output
if you're out of your zone lol

[Anonymous No.57363607]

>>57360598
Hal is the one that implemented blocksize constraints for fear of chain-size
you're just a bagholder trying to lure in retards to your shitty fork
monero made you guys utterly irrelevant

[Anonymous No.57363616]

>>57361979
>like bitcoin cash
bcash does not connect to old nodes
they are the fork sweety

[Anonymous No.57363688]

>>57358283
16,000+ nodes said no

What now OP?

I hope they try I need another form to sell into, my last distribution from 2017 is running out.

[Anonymous No.57363696]

>>57363616
around 45k i sold out a bunch of bitcoin and im now thinking about accumulating bitcoin cash. i realized that it just works as p2p cash. When I have a bunch of bitcoin i never want to move it or use it to pay cause the fees are high. BTC feels subverted as fuck. and bch seems bottomed out.

[Anonymous No.57363713]

>>57358283
I know it's really hard for you to think about how anything works with your fried attention span, but no amount of massive BTC holdings can force consensus.