/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.57308758]

Chainlink is going to make us so incredibly wealthy. CCIP General Access is only AT MOST a couple of months away. Probably much less. So fucking bullish.

[Anonymous No.57308804]

probably true but was told something similar for two years now.
22' has gone and 23' with it and it still isn't here.
they didn't keep to their word then why should i be certain this time is different?

fool me once, shame on you.
fool me twice....

what if 24' passes by too?

[Anonymous No.57308813]

>>57308758
How are you coming to that conclusion? Is it to do with that 'CCIP commit' date we saw recently? Think that's in Feb, right? Any other insights? Oh there was also Kemal's comment about 'soon' the other day

[Anonymous No.57308821]

>>57308758
what about LPL...?

[Anonymous No.57308823]

>>57308804
>probably true but was told something similar for two years now.
really? I've never seen Sergey give specific date to anything since he doesn't believe in those because security trumps all.

[Anonymous No.57308872]

>>57308758
it would be smart for them to release within the next months during the upcoming bullrun
but we will have to see, I only trust my eyes

[Anonymous No.57308878]

CCIP will be overshadowed by the release of LayerZero's token.

[Anonymous No.57308895]

>>57308823
are you lying anon? are you fudding anon? are you shilling anon? are you a post 19' linkie anon?

go watch it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YShbzR7mlog&ab_channel=Chainlink

or go read it.
https://chainlinktoday.com/january-2022-recap-staking-and-ccip-set-for-2022-release-vrf-takes-australian-open-to-the-metaverse/

Sergey's a very smart guy and it's a very impressive team working on difficult things. I'm not really complaining, i'm ok with it taking time because they have to get it right and so far they always get everything right. It's the best team in crypto with the best ideas.
But i'm talking to the OP about the point of this thread. Why get our hopes up that it is about to come out when it's been 'about to come out' for years now?

[Anonymous No.57308896]

>>57308758
What the fuck is Ccip general access even? Is chainlink going to turn into uniswap or something?

[Anonymous No.57308905]

>>57308758
ICP makes chainshit obsolete

[Anonymous No.57308912]

>>57308905
>>57308903

[Anonymous No.57308919]

>>57308895
>are you lying anon? are you fudding anon? are you shilling anon? are you a post 19' linkie anon?
I bought in 2017, I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Sergey doesn't really believe in roadmaps since you can't really put a timeline on security or some shit, it's possible its just something I made up in my mind.

[Anonymous No.57308947]

>>57308912
>Seething

[Anonymous No.57308948]

>>57308823
It is true that Sergey usually does not give out any timelines for releases. He did actually mention back in 2022 that they were aiming to release CCIP by the end of the year, but some time after that the team clarified that it will be postponed to 2023 for security reasons. And no wonder why, CCIP is literally the most important product of Chainlink by far. First you gotta draw all web3 dapps in with CCIP, make them addicted to and dependant on it, then give them other tools like chainlink automation, data streams and functions and the rest is history. Not to mention what will happen when tradfi comes on board with their closed chains to benefit from DLTs - the tradfi people who only trust their own connections, which Chainlink has established since 2016. Can't imagine what they've achieved with the help of Eric Schmidt too.

But anyways, been here since 2018 and yeah I have to admit it's taken much longer for bullish price action than I would have ever guessed but here I still am. And enjoying staking gains with multiple wallets which gives me more patience.

[Anonymous No.57308960]

>>57308948
I disagree. As a based LPL chuddie kiddo I am guaranteed by Jonny to receive full revenue sharing and early access to BUILD drops. This has all been SEC approved. Now you understand why the pools closed and no one wants to discuss LPL...

[Anonymous No.57308962]

>>57308895
As I said here >>57308813 Kemal said the other day in a Twitter/X spaces Q&A 'soon' in regard to CCIP so i'm guessing that means this year, if not the coming months

[Anonymous No.57308981]

>>57308758
ITT: Chaintrannies coping hard

[Anonymous No.57308984]

>>57308962
Yeah that's bullish I guess but meanwhile I enjoy full revenue sharing and early access to build drops so I am very busy dumping my build drops and checking my LPL balance

[Anonymous No.57308997]

>>57308984
Nice parody posting. You have a GSOH.

[Anonymous No.57309004]

>>57308997
You type like a filthy no LPL pooler...

ANON WE FUCKING TOLD YOU BUY LPL STAY CHUDDIE KIDDO PILLED

!!!

[Anonymous No.57309017]

>>57308962
link ? sounds bullish

[Anonymous No.57309024]

>>57308758
How many years has it been that LINK was supposed to make you rich? How many times has another subpar shitcoin has actually made other people rich than linkbaggies?

[Anonymous No.57309034]

>>57308948
Anon explained it nicely here. Brainless shills ignore stuff like these, and the fact that they postponed it doesn't make it less bullish. Cost of opportunity is a real thing too, you gotta do what feels right for you, in case anyone reading this is thinking about whether to buy LINK or some vc-backed overhyped coin like Solana.

Rushed product releases are project killers. CCIP release has to go exactly right the first time because TradFI ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT bridge billions, even less trillions if there is even a slight amount of uncertainty regarding their funds getting lost or hacked.

Elon Musk once explained that for the electric car to replace petrol cars they will have to be better in every way, not just slightly better. This is what traditional finance world expects from Web3 and especially from Chainlink, the key to bridge these two together. Let them take their time. Chainlink will change the world if they do this right.

[Anonymous No.57309045]

>>57308895
It's a valid point what you said. It has taken longer than we expected and very likely also what the team expected. Brainless shills ignore stuff like this and it just makes the community seem retarded when that happens. IMO, the fact that they postponed it doesn't make it less bullish because it really is that important to get it right on the first try. Cost of opportunity is a real thing too, you gotta do what feels right for you, in case anyone reading this is thinking about whether to buy LINK or some vc-backed overhyped coin like Solana.

Rushed product releases are project killers. CCIP release has to go exactly right the first time because TradFI ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT bridge billions, even less trillions if there is even a slight amount of uncertainty regarding their funds getting lost or hacked.

Elon Musk once explained that for the electric car to replace petrol cars they will have to be better in every way, not just slightly better. This is what traditional finance world expects from Web3 and especially from Chainlink, the key to bridge these two together. Let them take their time. Chainlink will change the world if they do this right.

[Anonymous No.57309063]

>>57309017
It was on a Twitter spaces and i'm not sure it's able to be played again, or even who hosted it, though i think it was Chainlink's account. I'll keep looking. Did anyone else hear that?
This actually happens a lot; a twitter spaces pops up becasue someone you're following is listening to it, then it finishes and you navigate away from the host's page and forget to note who it was. Would be good if you could look at your 'spaces attended' history.

[Anonymous No.57309083]

>>57309063
He said soon last year too

[Anonymous No.57309089]

>>57309063
A very convenient story anon please go on... while I enjoy a mid thread snack and check on my LPL revenue share and early access drops huh looks like another early drop notification just went off. Let me check the email I just received from based LPL chuddie kiddo Jonny...

[Anonymous No.57309096]

>>57309024
Many of the oldfags of /biz/ have been in link since 10 to 30 cents. All of the high quality discussion is 90% of oldfags. Unfortunately it's less and less common to see that nowadays. I rarely post here anymore but I'm glad you care about my financial well being anon. Take care of yourself

[Anonymous No.57309108]

>>57309089
This is unhealthy anon, LPL seems to be a bit of an obsession to you. You wouldn't try to ruin threads on purpose with these posts would you?

[Anonymous No.57309135]

>>57309108
LATEST NO LPL POOLER COPE JUST DROPPED BASED CHUDDIE KIDDOS CHUDDIE

POOLS CLOSED PLEASE SEETHE QUIETLY NO LPL POOLER...

[Anonymous No.57309159]

>>57309045
It'd be nice if they just gave out quarterly updates to the wider community on their big features. I know they love the silent approach. Kind of like Gabe Newell not talking about HL3 due to the hot mess of that games development potentially creating more information management issues.

[Anonymous No.57309161]

Kek baggies

[Anonymous No.57309205]

Interesting about the supply on the exchanges being lowest since feb 2020. If we get some positive news this could push the price up quickly. Graph here:
https://thecryptobasic.com/2024/01/15/chainlink-prints-mini-breakout-as-rare-on-chain-metric-emerges/

>>57309159
>I know they love the silent approach
I don't mind this. It helps prevent volatile swings with people frontrunning and dumping. It rewards the patient/loyal. Must annoy the fuck out of opportunists.

[Anonymous No.57309539]

>>57309205
Exchange supply is very low as you said which is good but I think that might contribute to the reason why it's so easily manipulated with the dumps and pumps of bitcoin. Takes almost nothing for a link pump to stop because it's mostly small amounts of link that switch hands. Some people out there do not want link to moon. I would like to know why but I doubt we'll ever find out. LINK will pump when they let it pump or when it sees major use and/or big news get released.

[Anonymous No.57309575]

>>57309539
>Some people out there do not want link to moon. I would like to know why but I doubt we'll ever find out.
Pretty sure it’s just exchanges fucking around

[Anonymous No.57309578]

Several projects have been hinting that it's coming soon. My entire Chainlink investment thesis is predicated on my belief in the value of a protocol that will link all blockchains. Many years of waiting to test that thesis. We're almost there.

[Anonymous No.57309591]

>>57309578

[Anonymous No.57309605]

>>57309578
>>57309539
where do oldfags exchange information nowadays? Is there anything like REDACTED in terms of R/R to think about out there?

[Anonymous No.57309652]

>>57309591
what is thales? sounds like Mike Tython trying to pronounce sales

[Anonymous No.57309673]

>>57309205
>If we get some positive news
As if. Pretty much everything related to Chainlink is stuck in development hell.
Even the shit that is already out, like how price feeds and CCIP are still in restricted access.
Even shit as simple as build airdrops.

[Anonymous No.57309687]

>>57308758
Every cycle you retards say something like this and every cycle you stay poor

[Anonymous No.57309977]

[Anonymous No.57310023]

>>57308758
>4 digits by 2040.
>My life can begin at 65
>Thank you Sergey

[Anonymous No.57310039]

>>57310023
That would mean you're already 49 browsing this fucking board. I don't know how to say this nicely but it's essentially already over for you spending money on anything besides survival.

[Anonymous No.57310043]

>>57310023
you're so new you don't know about the 2026 time traveller

[Anonymous No.57310639]

>>57309159
>It'd be nice if they just gave out quarterly updates

lol, there are no updates. CCIP has been coming soon since 1/1/22

>>57309205
>If we get some positive news this could push the price up quickly.

spamming partnership announcements doesn't work on dead alts... this isn't 2019 anymore


It's going to be 2030 and people here will still be holding onto "next year's" big feature release and THEN the token will accrue value. Sad...

[Anonymous No.57310663]

>>57310039
ffs we all bought into LINK because it was hailed as the new ETH, which essentially means extraordinary gains in a very short timeframe
by that metric alone LINK has failed spectacularly
NOBODY thought back then that by 2024 LINK would struggle to regain it's 2019 ATH in sats
grow up and stop coping
>>57310043
you're so new you didn't even realize that was inspect element
you can even see BAT and other shitcoins close to LINK's ranking around spot 25, when the shoop was made
hell, it even uses the old CMC website format

[Anonymous No.57310742]

>>57310663
I did make extraordinary gains in a very short timeframe. Maybe you're just some combination of impatient or got a terrible entry.

[Anonymous No.57310988]

>>57310742
the gains were incredible for sure but not on the scale of ETH which is what many here claimed would happen. There are still people here saying it's going to do an ETH style run but that's improbable given the alt space now versus 2017.

[Anonymous No.57311023]

>>57310742
anon Chainlink managed a ROI of 32,000% in around 1340 days, meanwhile ETH managed a whopping 300,000% in LESS than 900 days, there is simply no comparison
my entry is $0.27, holding 6+ years
calling me impatient is insulting desu

[Anonymous No.57311030]

>>57310988
I believe it will do an Eth type run. That’s the thing, Chainlink is not an alt. It’s a project whose scope is as wide as bitcoin’s and ethereum’s. The fact that Chainlink tokens are on ethereum natively is largely irrelevant. The thing is, I don’t know when this run is going to occur. I’m starting to think it really might not be until 2030 or later. Chainlink now is all about missed opportunity cost. It really fucking sucks.

[Anonymous No.57311042]

two more weeks

[Anonymous No.57311048]

>>57311023
Then what the fuck are you complaining about? You already have unimaginable gains and you and I both know this shit is hilariously undervalued ensuring you even more filthy rich money so why be butthurt?

[Anonymous No.57311052]

>>57308758
can't wait for this piece of shit to make me lose all my money. WAGMI!!!

[Anonymous No.57311100]

>>57311048
>already have unimaginable gains
>this shit is hilariously undervalued
I'm talking to a brick wall
no, anon, if anything, the entire market is hilariously OVERVALUED, including LINK
they literally do nothing, all of them
and LINK is still a "POTENTIAL" game changer until it finally ships anything meaningful
that's my POV, feel free to seethe, call me bulgarian etc

[Anonymous No.57311162]

>>57311100
>they literally do nothing, all of them
>and LINK is still a "POTENTIAL" game changer until it finally ships anything meaningful
Ok I see the problem now, basically you are deeply invested in terms of capital but not sufficiently invested in terms of time spent investigating development. Doing that is the only way to secure conviction in something this complex.

[Anonymous No.57311164]

i was excited about 'ccip in 2 months' 3 years ago, now whatever drips out of sergey's loose cunt for a mouth doesn't excite the same way for some reason

[Anonymous No.57311679]

you chainlinkers are alright
but ICP is the one for me
it makes CCIP obsolete

[Anonymous No.57312076]

>>57310039
That was a typo actually,silly me. I'm turning 39 this years.

[Anonymous No.57312108]

>>57310043
I know about it. I frequent this hellhole on the toilet, not kidding.

[Anonymous No.57312402]

>>57311048
Why shouldn't he complain? I've watched shitcoiners pass me by and buy homes and boats but I'm still here holding this "truth > trust" shitcoin that can't release a single fucking thing because of "security"

[Anonymous No.57312471]

>>57312402
if you couldn't buy a house from link than ur a newfag. kys

[Anonymous No.57312732]

>>57308758
no thanks, ill keep using vea bridge

[Anonymous No.57312776]

>>57309159
>hl3
Fuck you, anon. Don't give me hope.

[Anonymous No.57312886]

>>57311162
There's nothing complex about chainlink, it's just another altcoin. Cardano is arguably more complex than LINK.

[Anonymous No.57313129]

>>57312076
Are you seriously embarrassed and lying about your age on fucking 4chan? Just tell him to fuck off, old timer.

[Anonymous No.57313290]

>>57312402
Anon, they're blowing their money on homes and boats. When Chainlink takes off and reaches its stride, you'll be able to buy a fucking yacht and the entire police force your own district. And the lifetime salary of a real estate manager to handle your 3rd, 4th, and 9th homes.

STFU

[Anonymous No.57313305]

retards on biz still think they'll get rich holding a 15B market cap utility token

[Anonymous No.57313446]

>>57311030
>I believe it will do an Eth type run
I admire your conviction but I can't say I share it.

>Chainlink is not an alt. It’s a project whose scope is as wide as bitcoin’s and ethereum’s
If you say so

>>57311048
>hilariously undervalued
Lol. It's market cap is $8.5B and there's no working products, revenue, etc., and cash burn is prob like $100M per year minimum.

[Anonymous No.57313447]

>>57313129
Ok, it wasn't a typo. I fucked up the math because I'm either retarded (guess that's why I come here) or it's because I barely slept last night (work related)

[Anonymous No.57313486]

>>57311100
exactly. I try not to harp on it too much but man If I had gotten into crypto a single year earlier and jumped on ETH in '16 I would've never had to work again. Instead stuck on the Link torture chamber ride. I doubt it even breaks ath at this point

[Anonymous No.57313933]

>>57313486
none of your whining means chainlink is a bad investment though

[Anonymous No.57315470]

>>57308960
kys

[Anonymous No.57315583]

>>57308758
What's the relationship between chainlink and R3?

[Anonymous No.57315605]

>>57313447
>work
retard

[Anonymous No.57315611]

>>57315583

[Anonymous No.57315661]

>>57315611
heh
chainlink is hiring women
that means chainlink bad :}

[Anonymous No.57315912]

>>57310043
someone please fill me in on this

[Anonymous No.57315931]

>>57308758
>2 MORE WEEKS

[Anonymous No.57315951]

>>57309578
>"my" thesis

[Anonymous No.57316305]

>>57311162
it you that is horribly uninformed. how much revenue does chainlink generate? how much of that revenue do token holders have exposure to?

chainlink is just another ponzi thats overinflated by at least 10x. its fine to buy ponzis, any of them can still pump 10x from here, but you're absolutely clueless if you think 8b mcap has anything to do with "tech" or actual delivered products. it's all a fugazi, dont drink the koolaid that will tell you you should hold through a 90% drawdown AGAIN

[Anonymous No.57316476]

>>57308758

[Anonymous No.57316501]

If CL wants to make it they should create good and easy to use UIs. Nobody gives a shit about quantum technology behind it.

[Anonymous No.57316590]

>>57308804
You're not wrong, but remember,
>don't underestimate how long it can the market to work out what you already
know
Just because wevunderstood Chainlink's destiny doesn't mean we understood how long the path to implementation can feel. I also feel as I've been waiting forever.
Inb4 two more weeks tonight

[Anonymous No.57316642]

>>57308758
nobody even believes in 1k anymore
the magic is gone

[Anonymous No.57316681]

>>57309159
Nah, the more Chainlink engages with the """community""": the more I dislike said """community""". They're filled with retards that know very little, have done nothing in their life, and somehow think they know better. If they did: they would've made a shitcoin of their own and rode off into the sunset.

Nobody ever gave two single fucks about "communication" until Nulinkers appeared and it was better that way. I prefer total and complete radio silence until they have something to unveil.

[Anonymous No.57316955]

>>57308758
>a couple of months away

[Anonymous No.57316959]

>>57315611
I absolutely would

[Anonymous No.57316988]

>>57316642
LOL CHOP YOUR PENIS OFF AND JOIN THE LPL TRANNY DISCORD IF YOU WANT MAGIC BASED CHUDDIE KIDDO

[Anonymous No.57317411]

>>57316681
>stockholm
Yeah we get it, you’re a spineless sycophant. Some of us with balls would like to see accountability

[Anonymous No.57317425]

>>57317411
The way any sane and rational individual would look at this current situation is through a lens of reason logic and facts.

Now either you are a filthy thirdie from Bukgaria or you are a Based LPL chuddie kiddo 186 pools closed. Now which is it???

[Anonymous No.57317439]

>>57316642
Link hit $1000 very briefly on the PAX pair on Binance years ago. the prophecy was fulfilled

[Anonymous No.57317450]

>>57317411
I think this is literally how some seethelords think. That constantly whining and moaning is actually a sign of "balls" for holding the team to account, instead of what it actually is, which is an endless, useless, childlike tantrum.

[Anonymous No.57317451]

>>57317425
The irony of writing your second paragraph after the first. Almost like it was two different people. What do they call that again

[Anonymous No.57317464]

>>57310663
>you're so new you didn't even realize that was inspect element
how new are you? who cares if it was inspect element. it will be memed into reality and there's nothing that can be done now to stop it.

[Anonymous No.57317469]

>>57317451
You leftists have a billion genders and two political views radical left or nazi so for us linkies its
>seething thirdie from Bulgaria
>based LPL chuddie kiddo 186 pools closed
Now which are you???
t. based reason facts logic poster

[Anonymous No.57317479]

>>57317450
I can’t explain balls to someone that doesnt have them. It’s like trying to teach a dog to read. Guys like you could have buckets of shit poured down your throat by Sergey and you’d convince yourself how great it tasted.

[Anonymous No.57317498]

>>57317469
bro you REARRANGED that seething thirdies brain LMAO

[Anonymous No.57317508]

>>57317469
The rambling schtick is beyond cringe fyi. Be better than that

[Anonymous No.57317512]

>>57317479
How has constant whining worked so far? Do you feel better for it?

[Anonymous No.57317520]

>>57316501
functions.chain.link
automation.chain.link
vrf.chain.link
staking.chain.link
ccip.chain.link
docs.chain.link
faucets.chain.link
etc

What more do you want, retard?

[Anonymous No.57317681]

>>57317520
Chainlinkgod has to say nigger live at SmartCon

[Anonymous No.57317806]

>>57315912

[Anonymous No.57317832]

>>57317806
Price should be $20,000. Debunked

[Anonymous No.57317846]

>>57309605
We get one informative LINK thread per month. So that's like 1 outta 90,000 jeet fud threads...

Can't wait for a verified make it stack only Link community to happen...