Litecoin

[Anonymous No.57284317]

Why does nobody discuss this gem?

[Anonymous No.57284455]

>>57284317
Because shitcoins are only valuable when they're new, and this is literally the oldest shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.57284570]

>>57284317
Litecoin etf soon

[Anonymous No.57284635]

>>57284317
It's an ancient Bitcoin fork. Use the archive and check discussions from 2014 if you want to read current news about it.

[Anonymous No.57285399]

>>57284317

It's dead in the water and more of a transactional currency than an investment. Similar to Monero.

[Anonymous No.57285892]

>>57284635
mweb is recent and popular among users

[Anonymous No.57285910]

This is getting an ETF in the next two years. It’s an obvious chain to base financial products off of.

[Anonymous No.57285917]

>>57284570
>>57285910
Cope.

[Anonymous No.57286308]

>>57284317
all the same scaling issues as the other segwit coin and no active development

[Anonymous No.57286340]

>>57285917
Grayscale literally just switched it's Bitcoin trust to an ETF. It's second biggest trust is litecoin

[Anonymous No.57286353]

>>57284455
It's anything but a shitcoin. It's fast, cheap and reliable as a payment option.

[Anonymous No.57286362]

>>57286353
Only because nobody actually uses it.

[Anonymous No.57286366]

>>57286362
No it always has been.

[Anonymous No.57286375]

Because it's underperformed for two entire cycles so far

[Anonymous No.57286393]

>>57286366
Isn't Litecoin only like 7 tps? It's not scalable enough to be a global payment system. It only seems fast because it doesn't get any load

[Anonymous No.57286443]

>>57286393
It's over 50 per second.

[Anonymous No.57286471]

>2017: $70
>2024: $70
shitcoin gonna shitcoin

[Anonymous No.57286535]

Shitcoin not needed. NEXT!

[Anonymous No.57286563]

>>57286443
50 isn't shit either kek