[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 34 KB, 480x269, overoverover.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57251602 No.57251602 [Reply] [Original]

It's unironically and fully, over.

>> No.57251647

no one asked

>> No.57251682

>>57251602
He was bullish just last week and dead wrong at that time too. We can always count on good ole Cramer for a nice big dump.

>> No.57251684

>>57251602
A broken cock is hard twice a gay.

>> No.57251690

>>57251602
This is bad

>> No.57251693

>>57251684
Jim Crammer being giga innaccurate is just a meme, his accuracy is 46.8%.
Sure worse than random but still not a guaranteed fuck up like most people assume.

>> No.57251701

>>57251693
so he's just close to maximally worthless

>> No.57251717

>>57251701
He's worthless but not in a "contrary indicator" kind of way

>> No.57251718

>>57251693
>46.8%
that's awful
why is he even relevant?

>> No.57251741

>>57251693
that number applies to all his stock predictions though, in crypto he's much worse and basically a complete meme

>> No.57251892

>>57251693
>>57251718
The inverse Cramer index nets nearly a 30% yield annually.

>> No.57251909

>>57251693
>Jim Crammer being giga innaccurate is just a meme, his accuracy is 46.8%.
That's literally an average trend follower accuracy rating - a system of prediction that even the biggest retard can master lmao.

>> No.57251940

Can't he just shut up for once? Actually, permanently?

>> No.57251943

>>57251602
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. alright i'm actually scared now.

>> No.57252027
File: 36 KB, 340x466, 1631995421518.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57252027

>>57251602
No one asked jim, he's already been taken out by the viralx marketers who are far better at documenting the news, these so called influencers will get a kick in the balls and be thrown into the dirt. The ETF approval is positive, move on

>> No.57252080

>>57251693
>Jim Crammer being giga innaccurate is just a meme, his accuracy is 46.8%.
46.8% accuracy is horrible because the markets typically go up. If someone just was bullish 100% of the time for every stock, he would be right > 66% of the time.

>> No.57252202

>>57251693
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZJSpVb6uFg

>> No.57252410
File: 113 KB, 832x902, IMG_1686.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57252410

How much alcohol do you think he drinks daily?

>> No.57252549
File: 53 KB, 155x126, 34563456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57252549

>>57251693
>Jim Crammer