Ends 2023 with not a single paying enterprise customer

[Anonymous No.57115730]

These faggots literally have accomplished nothing since ICO. Imagine working as a company for 7 years and you can't convince anyone to take an Uber or stay at an Airbnb. This is essentially what Chainlink Labs is. Sergey is a giant sleazy con artist and it's incredible people can't see this. He chose to avoid VC's because they would've had demands by now, retail got robbed and the backdoor is still open.

[Anonymous No.57115737]

>>57115730
pools closed fuddie dilate seethe and cope

[Anonymous No.57115738]

oh shit check the github

[Anonymous No.57115743]

Uh oh stinky

[Anonymous No.57115764]

I think it's incredible that Sergey talked about early Uber as a platform that combined GPS (Google Maps), Payments (Stripe), Connectivity (AWS) and Drivers (Uber) and yet when it was first started, they had immediate success and showed amazing growth early on.

These grifting retards have had 7 years and the only enterprises involved are simply trying to sell their data (AP, Accuweather, etc.) Not one company uses Chainlink in a meaningful way. DeFi protocols are not enterprises. VC's would've had Sergey's head on a stake by now

[Anonymous No.57115768]

>>57115730
Technology not needed OP.

[Anonymous No.57115785]

>>57115730

[Anonymous No.57115800]

>>57115764
VCs wouldn't care because they would've dumped already at $20 up 100x, the entire point of crypto from a VC perspective is being able to dump early on retail

[Anonymous No.57115809]

>>57115764
lel at taking him seriously. Comparing himself to Uber is exactly why he’s not taken seriously. Uber made sense because it immediately communicates its value and purpose. He can’t do that so he brings up other, successful startups. Remember when he started shilling AI because OpenAi took off? He is that guy on the corner preaching to himself

[Anonymous No.57115825]

>>57115764
I am deeply afraid for my wealth. Which model crypto project should we invest the products of our labor into?

[Anonymous No.57115860]

>>57115825
L1s with a good shitcoin ecosystem like SOL, ETH and AVAX, or new to this cycle like INJ and SEI. Also Celestia for the modularity meme. L2s when they release tokens.

[Anonymous No.57115868]

>>57115860
>desperate VC shill trying to astroturf le new narratives across social media
sad

[Anonymous No.57115870]

>>57115764
They went from tvl to tvs to tve because they couldn’t tell their story, and each value got btfo when defi died. Early startups like Google, Uber and Airbnb had mega VC’s because they knew these were cash cow businesses that would scale. Chainlink has no big investors because it’s a stupid unnecessary idea and the lack of success is a huge red flag, hence the amount of tokens they dumped in the last few years. Surgay isn’t someone to take seriously, as (Lady) Luck would have it

[Anonymous No.57115873]

It's literally not needed and the holders/fanatics are on par with GME, BSV, and the like for delusion.

[Anonymous No.57115935]

>>57115868
VCs need to pump their bags before they can dump them. Support VCs. Embrace VCs. Promote VC narratives. Buy VC-backed L1s. Earn low risk 10x gains. Reject Chainlink Advocate narratives about SWIFT adoption, real world assets, smart contracts etc. that are never coming. Profit.

Chainlink is literally a bigger scam than any VC scam L1. At least VC scam L1s go up in value and generate SOME revenues even if they trade at absurd multiples. Chainlink has shit revenue generation, there was an article posted from Blockworks the other day about this. Of course advocates rushed in to deboonk it because they're paid to do so.

[Garibaldi No.57115948]

>>57115935
Yeh think I'm just gonna go wth what Eric Schmidt and all the big brains say, and ignore you.

[Anonymous No.57115953]

>>57115873
Starting to look like that's essentially what this was, /biz/ pushed this since ICO but the team wrote checks they couldn't cash

>>57115870
The TVL/TVS scam was incredible because they essentially said this metric only works when line goes up

>>57115809
I noticed over the years they always latched onto what was actually popular. NFT, AI, Layer 2's, and people always ignored their 'involvement', now it's starting to look like desperate people clinging onto the popular people for validation

[Anonymous No.57115955]

>>57115935
not buying your bags sweetie. you had your chance to buy chainlink and you failed

[Anonymous No.57115970]

>>57115948
>Eric Schmidt

The guy who sent in a pre-recorded talk instead of showing up as the headliner to Smart Con? The guy distancing himself from the project? Again, latching onto popular people for validation. Sergey is desperate and pathetic

[Anonymous No.57115999]

>>57115948
>Schmidt

You are lower than dirt, fucking wef shill. Eric hasn’t been seen with chainlink since 2022

[Anonymous No.57116003]

>>57115948
Suit yourself, even a 3x on BTC will serve your portfolio better than LINK in all likelihood. Not my problem if you want to stay poor because you've married your bags because they're le 4chan coin.

>>57115955
I owned it in the past and dumped in 2021. No reason to buy it again. I learned my lesson from last cycle, own L1s not utility tokens. Crypto is still far from any use-case that would matter for Chainlink.

>>57115953
It's not about writing checks they couldn't cash. The reality is that the technology is not particularly relevant for the real use case of crypto - generation of animal coins and NFTs, so it should not be valued above any L1 that has these things. A price medianizer isn't worth tens of billions of dollars, a platform that can generate dog coins that might go 1000x in a month might not be either but it certainly has a stronger case for its valuation.

[Anonymous No.57116018]

>>57115730
They needed to vax everyone before they let chainlink moon. Now the world has been vaxxed chainlink adoption will be rolled out and the new age ushered in.

[Anonymous No.57116085]

>>57116003
It is about writing checks they couldn't cash. They first started talking about securing billions, and then trillions, and now quadrillions with staking. Two years later and they secure one price feed with 40 million tokens, pants on head retarded when they offer so many other price feeds and services that aren't secured with staking.

[Anonymous No.57116122]

>>57115955
This sounds like a jeet wrote it, why would anyone be mad about not buying this stablecoin? Chainlink has underperformed everything for years

[Anonymous No.57116128]

>>57115764
Sergey also explains how chainlink is laying down the infrastructure for apps like Uber to spring up in web3.

[Anonymous No.57116148]

>>57116018
Thats probably part of the reason they wanted to crush LINK, many holders are unvaxxed chads. Jump Trading probably hires faggots to FUD all day as well.

[Anonymous No.57116166]

Whole thread is full of brain dead redditors whom have no idea of what Link is or how it works. Poorfag no coiners and Xrp/Ada holders kek

[Anonymous No.57116181]

>>57116085
I still don't really understand why staking was so hard to implement, unless they aren't really working much at all. But given all the fake partnerships this seems likely kek

[Anonymous No.57116248]

>>57116166
>Link shill comes in thread, doesn't read the logic, and resorts to juvenile screeching

We're sorry you can't read English, Raji

>>57116181
Yeah, it's fake kek. There's still no reputation, slashing or unrestricted staking. Why would you need to provide a maximum cap if yield was higher at lower staking amounts? Seems the demand was there to offer 2% for 80 million tokens, etc. They have no business acumen or economic brains working at this company and it shows. Sergey is also a massive fucking retard, makes sense a guy who can't code or get a finance degree sucks at running a business

[Anonymous No.57116265]

>>57115730
What is the point of this thread? Bag holder therapy? Sorry, I bought at 11 cents and I’m not selling. Sorry if you bought at $50 or whatever. If you had patience you would see a profit, but you don’t so you shit on your own holdings or maybe even more pathetic you sold for a loss and still haven’t recovered elsewhere.

I don’t see any reason to make these posts if you’re not some baggie coping. If you sold LINK and got into “better” tokens what do you care what the performance is?

Anyway, sorry, I’m just not going to sell and I’ve made over a million dollars even at these prices and I frankly just don’t get affected by your weird lies. I really just wrote this to insult you because I find it amusing to kick people like you while you are down.

So, yea. Sorry your pussy hurts, OP.

[Anonymous No.57116283]

>>57115730
DR;NS

[Anonymous No.57116291]

>>57116265
>Writes an essay about how he bought at the exact ATL and screeches for another 3 paragraphs

kek, you're too obvious shills

[Anonymous No.57116338]

>>57116265
>11 cents

Why do you freaks lie so much? Chainlink hit an all time low of $0.1263 on September 23, 2017. There was never a lower price on any dex including etherdelta. And hate to break it to you, but tokens have gone from $0.12 to $12 as recently as this past month, this is not special

[Anonymous No.57116407]

>>57115730
>Sergey is a giant sleazy con artist and it's incredible people can't see this. He chose to avoid VC's because they would've had demands by now
Ohhhh noooooo because then sergey would have to actually make the token needed and pump ico investors (our) bags.
This greedy fat fuck wants to be the only one dumping his premined coins.
Whales notoriously avoid chainlink because of this reason, they want to be the ones dumping not getting dumped on

[Anonymous No.57116409]

>>57116248
Do nodes even require LINK to be paid out for function calls yet? That should've been one of the earliest features and yet I'm pretty sure it's only been partially implemented. Why?

[Anonymous No.57116453]

>>57116338
kek got em

>>57116407
Exactly it, he wanted to be able to dump with no regard for anyone else. He answers to no one and that's why he must be cut down at his knees

>>57116409
Nope, the twitter shills even had to walk back on that one

[Anonymous No.57116483]

>>57115730
>it's incredible people can't see this.
He looks like Albert Poke, the black and white freemason. That's the whole draw of his shitcoin: people in cults like his Poke coin.

[Anonymous No.57116612]

>>57116453
Why wouldn't that be implemented from the start though? It should be trivial.

[Anonymous No.57116637]

Please buy my bags, the thread. Remember crypto is a zero sum game, for VC's to win you HAVE to lose. I allow all the losers in this thread a chance to prove me wrong by posting a portfolio mid 6 figures or higher composed of shitcoins. Ready, go.

[Anonymous No.57116854]

>>57115873
I thought the fud was a meme. I thought a bunch of shit since 2020. I am not an og holder. I bought at 6.50. But I became enamored with the idea of it. Then I come to notice the constant dumps. High market cap with shit price. No demand for it. And the biggest red flag, the cult. I sold my shit days ago and never looked back. I didn't even fomo seeing this last pump, i knew it would sink back down. The fucking pool morons the whole thing is clownish. I have never felt as relieved to let go of a bag.

[Anonymous No.57116880]

>>57116637
>VCs winning
>Link holders losing

Ok what’s your point? Link is not a VC coin so it won’t be pumped

[Garibaldi No.57116905]

>>57116003
>sell your Link
Thanks for your concern, but i'm enjoying my 60k staked Link rewards from here. And there's not
a thing you can do about it. Ha ha.
>>57115970
>please sell your Link
see above
>>57115999
>please sell your Link
see above
Kek

[Anonymous No.57116914]

>>57116880
Point is people on this board knew about link in 2017 and are up 30x+, with large sums invested (4/5 digits at least in many cases). You can't pick a random L1 and throw $10k+ confidently because half of them rug before they even get started. And if you could you would have done it. Hence, a lot of link "baggies" with 6/7 digit crypto portfolios, and a bunch of butthurt newfaggots crying about it.

Fundamentals don't matter, until they do, and then all the shit gets flushed down the toilet.

[Anonymous No.57117009]

>>57115948
Similar to how people followed kevin oleary with FTX. Psa to newer folks, when your bull case becomes appeal to authority, take caution.

>>57115999
Correct, nor has he invested his own money. Bagholders pay him millions via donations to zoom in and ramble for 45 mins once a year

>>57116128
Meaningless buzzwords

>>57116166
>le secret
>misses bull run
Congrats, you “won”

>>57116265
>gamestop advocate rushes in
>hodl the line my fellow apes
How many coins, I’ll calc your massive loss from 21.

>>57116407
Good point. Ive always laughed when people brag about it being non VC. Sergey absolutely despises his investors. They are merely a stepping stone for that psychopath

[Anonymous No.57117018]

>>57116003
At some point I thought CL would be relevant because everyone would want to put traditional transactions on the blockchain. Then I realized nobody wants that. People want centralized, comfortable experiences that can be worked out with customer service.

[Anonymous No.57117022]

Really looking forward to seeing the team in court soon. This upcoming year would be ideal.

[Anonymous No.57117025]

wow the coin trying to solve a 2017 problem is under-performing?
oh no
anyway

[Anonymous No.57117029]

>>57117009
>Meaningless buzzwords
I'm sorry I didn't realize I was talking to a retarded.

[Anonymous No.57117034]

>>57116854
You outta keep a few coins just in case they ever release a product and b) so you can participate in the class action once whistleblowers come forward

[Anonymous No.57117109]

>>57117029
Dont marry investments chief

PSA to new cult members:
Screeching how everyone else is a retard while missing a bullrun is not a good investment strategy

Web3, AI, RWA, etc are all meme buzzwords. An investor would be much better off buying sub $100M market cap new alts that throw these terms around. % gains will far outweigh monolithic Link with its massive operational costs given hundreds of high salary employees and lack of revenue. Not to mention the massive legal fees that will be incurred when the emporer is revealed to have no clothes.

Its going to get so ugly on biz when they miss the next run

[Anonymous No.57117130]

Anon will post 80 times in a thread seething at his own investment instead of working on himself.

[Anonymous No.57117328]

Still waiting on the chad who cycled his cash into sol and is sitting on 7 figures now, obviously someone must have done it since its so easy. Please post portfolio and shut everyone up.

[Anonymous No.57117372]

>>57117109
>>57117034
>>57117022
>>57117009
Thats cool and all but the pool is still closed and you will never be allowed entry.

[Anonymous No.57117642]

>>57117018
Yeah the real revelation is that blockchain tech is mostly not needed and actively worse than centralized institutions at least if you don't live in a third world country. Bitcoin has value as an SoV in the long run but L1s only real value proposition now is gambling. Chainlink meanwhile has basically no value proposition. Unironically anti-crypto people are mostly correct about it but they don't appreciate the value proposition of questionably legal gambling or scamming via dog coins and NFTs.

[Anonymous No.57117711]

>>57117372
this. based LPL chuddie kiddos rise up!!!

LPL early access to BUIDL tokens and SEC approved revenue sharing, LPL EFT coming soon!

Jonny has been in srs talks with the SEC and their next meeting is scheduled for two more weeks!

BUT given that the SEC has already approved LPL for revenue sharing... and the FACT that SIR GAY has already allowed based LPL chuddie kiddos early access to BUIDL tokens... the future is bright for LPL holders...

YOU DID LISTEN DIDNT YOU ANON???

HUH???

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU!

LPL BUY IT NOW

BUT...

there just one small problemo...

POOLS CLOSED HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAH

>he didnt fucking listen
LPL

[Anonymous No.57117775]

Ok, ok
I can now see the error of my ways
what's the best exit strategy?
given the feeble performance I've had to endure over the last couple of years there is zero chance this lacklustre token will stay long at the mediocre spot it's managed to stagger up to.
It's poised for another plunge
I can feel it in my bones

[Anonymous No.57117784]

>>57117109
It's a damn shame anon, you're better than this.

[Anonymous No.57117908]

>>57117775
... LPL???

WE FUCKING TOLD YOU

[Anonymous No.57117951]

>>57117372
No one is swimming, congrats on the team filling the pool themselves lmao

[Anonymous No.57118029]

>>57117951
LPL...????

[Anonymous No.57118170]

>>57117908
I haven't been paying attention for quite a while. At least back before the last quantum captcha leap. Oy vey. I will look into that.

[Anonymous No.57118202]

>>57115825
market sell me all your link you weak handed faggot

[Anonymous No.57118226]

>>57116003
>A price medianizer
lmao my ass off the absolute state

[Anonymous No.57118366]

>>57116483
Holy botpost.

[Anonymous No.57118480]

>>57115737
You locked your tokens for 4% apr, it dumped 10% in a day.

[Anonymous No.57119054]

>>57118480
That’s the joke. $17.50 to $15.50 in less than a day. Sergey is a clown and his circus is here on /biz/

[Anonymous No.57119127]

It smells like 3rd worlders leaching of western countries in here.

[Anonymous No.57119168]

>>57115730
I held LINK between 2017-2021 and this is nothing but a game of stick and carrot by Sergey.
He brings in celebrity endorsements and fraudulent partnerships to feign enterprise legitimacy, but their only source of revenue is literally dumping premined tokens on bagholders in the spot markets.

[Anonymous No.57119194]

>"""Genuinely""" believe Link is a scam and Sergey BAD
>Still hold Link and post about it 24/7
Really makes you think, huh?

[Anonymous No.57119277]

>>57119168
The phrase “kick the can down the road” fits them perfectly. They keep setting themselves up for failure, the ceo said “release of ccip in the coming year” way back in ‘21. I’d reckon releasing it in ‘24 is less than ideal. These people will feature a protocol or person, only to call them fraudulent and “paper promisers” in subsequent slides. Someone should make slides of Chainlink’s past statements in the same format

[Anonymous No.57119557]

>>57116338
>>57116453
>>57116291
11 cents was the ico price, newfaggots

[Anonymous No.57119605]

>>57119557
So unless you bought day 1 you got fucked, is that the moral of the story? Solana went from $8 to $120, link has been between 6 and 17 for over a year now. You’d think link went from 0.12 to 120

[Anonymous No.57119799]

>>57115825
With ETH ETF approvals just around the corner, LSDFi Is looking really juicy atm. You can never go wrong owning a blue-chip. A plus would be utilising an institutional grade Defi platform for your ETH staking so you can also benefit from institutional liquidity flowing into that platform.

[Anonymous No.57119923]

>>57115870
Defi died? So who's doing stuffs now in the market?

>>57116003
These sort of smarties are now scarce on biz. Sad stuff

[Anonymous No.57119937]

OP ends 2023 making new threads about an ERC20 that he doesn't own and is not interested in owning.

[Anonymous No.57119983]

imagine a tech startup that already raised BILLIONS for funding, currently is making about 25m/yr and is saying "dont worry guys, we just need another 750m in funding this year" (which they will repeat every year in the next decade)

linkies will defend this because they have never learned how to evaluate a business before(their entire purpose is to generate revenue, if they cant do that in respectable quantities it is a FAILURE)

enjoy funding sergey's 10th mansion and a very comfortable life for dozens of hr roasties

[Anonymous No.57120007]

to the current holders that drank the koolaid: step 1 is realizing link makes functionally zero revenue. you're holding the midwit version of shiba. that's not necessarily bad, shiba went to 50b mcap. just dont get caught holding the bag when the music stops playing(likely anywhere from 1 to 6 months from today).

link WILL have another 90% or greater drawdown, do not believe the narrative. it's just another ponzi, like 99% of all other coins in the market

[Anonymous No.57120240]

>>57119799
Is Maker now venturing into LSDFi? Last time I checked, they're probably the only institutional grade around.

[Anonymous No.57120410]

>>57119923
Don't mind that fag; Defi has been soaring. There was probably a short hibernating period but outside that, we're good innit.

[Anonymous No.57120418]

>>57120007
thanks just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.57120470]

LINK partnered with Solidly SolidSync fidger toy ? feeling maxicomfy

[Anonymous No.57120504]

This appears to be an organic thread full is insight and wisdom. Also the participants are extremely concerned about my financial well-being.

Taken these aspects into consideration, I will market-sell my unstaked 5 digit LINK stack immediately. The 15k stacked LINK shall be surrendered as soon as possible.

I'm going to market-buy Solana because it doesn't matter if I buy at 90, 100 or $120 since IT will Break through $10.000 in the short-/midterm.

Solana is the premiere L1 solution and will revolutionize the cryptospace bringing it into the 22nd century.

The open token cap is irrelevant because everyone should have the chance to own as many SOL as possible.

Thank you, /biz! I am saved and absolved.

[Anonymous No.57120545]

>>57115730
yet sergey's quite transparent with that in mainstream news interviews who keep asking him to come back. this makes me way more bullish for LINK. go ahead and fall for the SOL VC incoming pump n' dump or when charles hoskinson "team" is exposed as a webcrawler bot that gives him issues to rant more BS about on blewtube

[Anonymous No.57120581]

>starts off with a legitimate frustration: "why not a single enterprise customer yet?" >>57115730

>quickly devolves into "token not needed" >>57116453

OP you huge vagina, what the fuck are you doing holding this token when you can't stop badmouthing it 24/7 year in year out?

[Anonymous No.57120587]

third worlders working overtime rofl

[Anonymous No.57120624]

>>57115730
Also, why are you so obsessed with fundamentals? They hardly matter at all.

Look at Solana;
>token inflation rate is way higher than Chainlink's
>network is 99% subsidized
>the actual chain breaks down constantly
>???
>pumps

Look at Tellor;
>barely used at all
>during the little use it does get, it fails and gets exploited (see pic)
>???
>pumps from $9 to fucking $233 in four months

FUNDAMENTALS DON'T MATTER
Get it through your thick skull. Stop obsessing over nuts and bolts.

[Anonymous No.57120713]

>>57120007
Why do all of you faggots talk the exact same and use the same talking points as if using a script?

[Anonymous No.57120750]

>>57120713
Link is worthless, just accept it. CCIP is useless, as bridges akready exist between these chains. Token not needed.

[Anonymous No.57120757]

>>57120713
same talking points like
>"SWIFT POC"
>"supply dumpiny doesn't matter, SOL does this as well"
>so what if Link doesn't have revenue, what about muh BTC"
yeah I get you dude

[Anonymous No.57120760]

>>57120713
Because it's the same guy samefagging.
Here he is again: >>57120757 >>57120750

>>57120757
See >>57120624

[Anonymous No.57120792]

>>57120757
Why are you keeping tabs on linkie talking points if you hate link?

[Anonymous No.57120834]

>>57120713
jeets have gotten lazy. they use an automated bot text fudboard, much like in the old days of the net when you can punch soundboard buttons of arnold schwarzenegger movie soundbytes to prank call retards

[Anonymous No.57120850]

>>57120240
Not just Maker, Pendle and Spool(especially since their v2 launch) are also institutional grade platforms. The latter even has regulatory compliance in the EU. Expecting more Defi platforms to become institutional grade in the near future.

[Anonymous No.57121002]

>>57120713
They all come from the same little gay discord

[Anonymous No.57121021]

>>57120792
Because you literally cannot escape it if you're regularly browsing this board
are we now pretending that Link spamming is not a thing?

[Anonymous No.57121036]

>>57121021
>are we now pretending that Link spamming is not a thing?
Fud spam sure is a thing. Just look at the OP of this very thread.
Retard.

[Anonymous No.57121072]

>>57120850
>Spool(especially since their v2 launch)
More stables supported for staking now or what?

[Anonymous No.57121190]

>>57115730
LINK and AVAX were the only things pumping earlier and is still pumping while SOL is slowly bleeding to death. i fucking called it mere days ago. it's over for you, poobots LMAO

[Anonymous No.57121207]

>>57115764
>>57115730
What the fuck are you rambling about? Uber is a customer to customer app, because drivers are basically also Uber customers. It is the furthest from Chainlink that a company could be. What corporate clients does Uber have? None. It's designed for indians like you to drive drunk people home. Chainlink is digital infrastructure that serves banks, DeFi, every blockchain, eventually every financial institution or company. They have completely different product life cycles. If a country wants to buy a road, it doesn't buy it on an app. It has to plan it, exactly describe its demands, its usage and so on and then cooperate with the building company to actually build it. This is what's going on right now with Chainlink and virtually every financial institution that matters worldwide.

[Anonymous No.57121224]

>>57121036
Dude, the fudspam is thinly vailed shilling spam, I mean you absolute mongoloids even shill this trash on completely unrelated threads and when someone tells you to fuck off you respond with
>Hurr durr this is /link/ board
unironically kys

[Anonymous No.57121235]

>>57119983
>>57120007
Tell me how to value an economic game-theory network for information and computation with your first semester DCF model for companies that you use with an online calculator

[Anonymous No.57121243]

>>57121224
>the fudspam is thinly vailed shilling spam
So you're a Link shill.
Got it.

[Anonymous No.57121257]

>>57121243
When did I fud your bags? I simply pointed out that both of you sperglords repeat the same shit ad nauseam

[Anonymous No.57121265]

>>57121257
You're complaining about Link "shill spam" in a thread that's 90% fud spam.
You're being extremely obvious.

[Anonymous No.57121355]

>>57121265
You've been spamming the entire board for 6 years, kys

[Anonymous No.57121365]

>>57121355
If you're upset about fud spam, then why did you deboonk someone who was legitimately complaining about fud spam?
see >>57120757

[Anonymous No.57121385]

>>57121365
Because the shilling talking points are always the same shit you mongoloid, that's my entire point, you keep sperging out on each other while having the same conversation over and over again
The notion that shills are "better" is retarded, you have collectivelly turned this entire board into a massive Link echo chamber
Retard

[Anonymous No.57121393]

>>57121385
>Because the shilling talking points are always the same shit
And the fud talking points aren't?

[Anonymous No.57121405]

>>57121393
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.57121411]

>>57121405
Answer the question.
You claim to be upset about all the spam, but for some reason you feel the need to deboonk someone complaining about fud spam.

[Anonymous No.57121545]

>>57121411
The post I originally replied to said that fudsters are reading from a script
the exact same thing can be said about (You)
I stated multiple times itt that you're both doing the same thing
Now answer me this anon, are you genuinely retarded?

[Anonymous No.57121553]

>>57121545
Yet you're only upset about the shilling spam.

Did you notice that in the ocean of fud points that is this thread, you're literally the only one who brought up those shilling points?
You're complaining about shilling spam that only you posted itt.

[Anonymous No.57121576]

>>57121553
What are you even sperging on about, all I said is that you've been repeating the same talking points, doing the same thing you're accusing the fudders of doing you literal imbecile

[Anonymous No.57121583]

>>57121576
Judging by this thread, the fud talking points are repeated dozens of times more than those shilling points you brought up.

[Anonymous No.57121592]

And to my eyes there's absolutely no distinction between fud posts and shill posts, you're all advertising this shitcoin

[Anonymous No.57121600]

>>57121583
Cool keep pretending to be retarded

[Anonymous No.57121603]

>>57121592
>there's absolutely no distinction between fud posts and shill posts
There's a big one: repetition.
Fud posts outnumber shill posts something like 100 to 1.

There's also the fact that those shill points are direct reactions to fud posts. So without fud spam, those shill points you brought up would barely even exist.

[Anonymous No.57121620]

>>57121072
The protocol has been expanded to support all Ercall ERC-20 tokens and not just stables. Apart from the support of other tokens, v2 came with a whole lot more features for users to leverage on. Call it a total package

[Anonymous No.57121632]

>>57121603
That's very cool but doesn't explain the fact that shill posts always seem to find their way into completely unrelated threads all over the fucking board
that's how I ended up paying attention to that shitcoin in the first place
It also does not account for the inexplicable stance of the board's moderation towards Link threads specifically, for example you cannot have more than one thread about xrpeepee or gme but multiple Link threads are allowed at all times
Really makes you think

[Anonymous No.57121647]

>>57121632
>but multiple Link threads are allowed at all times
No shit. See pic.

Not to mention the fact that you can't say "to be honest", but you can spam "token not needed" all you want.

[Anonymous No.57121667]

nobody in the real world owns or cares about this shitcoin
the biz obsession is a mistery

[Anonymous No.57121690]

>>57121553
>Did you notice that in the ocean of fud points that is this thread, you're literally the only one who brought up those shilling points?
>You're complaining about shilling spam that only you posted itt.
kek, classic whatcha doin’ rabbi moment

[Anonymous No.57121701]

>>57121647
You also cannot say chainst1nk but I don't see you questioning that particular filter, disingenuous shill

[Anonymous No.57121716]

>>57121667
If not complaining about the chainst1nk ban makes me a shill, then complaining about it makes you a fuddie.

[Anonymous No.57121724]

>>57121716
You literally whined about token not needed not being filtered you nigger

[Anonymous No.57121728]

>>57121724
You whined about about Link "shill spam" first.
Reality is that Link fud spam greatly outnumbers it, see pic >>57121647

[Anonymous No.57121735]

>>57121553
Also gonna point out he used another fud spam of “we only fud because you shit up the board for 6 years!” Thats another one they use.

[Anonymous No.57121737]

>>57121735
>“we only fud because you shit up the board for 6 years!”
I swear I've seen that line used way more than "1k eoy"

[Anonymous No.57121745]

>>57121632
It’s also because anyone with a triple digit IQ that has been here for more than a year understands Link is a much better choice than literally any other investment on the planet right now you street shitter. Sorry jannies won’t let you spam your rugpull shitcoins or EggsArePee.

[Anonymous No.57121746]

>>57121257
>you sperglords repeat the same shit ad nauseam
t. spends 14 posts and over four hours expoumding the old “linkies spammed the board too much” mantra

[Anonymous No.57121748]

>>57121724
>>57121701
Look at this little pilpul rat kike with his 14 pbtid

[Anonymous No.57121762]

>>57121737
>>57121746
>>57121748
I’m just glad I’m not the only one seeing this right now haha. Now anyone browsing gets to see this maniac going rabid over 10 ID’s on this thread.

[Anonymous No.57121764]

>>57121207
Always with the metaphors. This works when you’re talking to idiots but not people with actual business acumen.

[Anonymous No.57121770]

Watch this thread is going to die now that fuddies got BTFO. You’ll see 15 more fud threads made in the next couple of hours and an exact replay of this thread will happen in one of them. For the rest of time…. Oh God I’m in Hell aren’t I?

[Anonymous No.57121773]

>>57121762
That id is burned so he will be appearing later with a different id, meanwhile he will spam the 7 other fud threads on the catalog or make another one rofl
RAT KIKEs

[Anonymous No.57121777]

>>57121762
>Now anyone browsing gets to see this maniac going rabid over 10 ID’s on this thread
He’s most likely OP to begin with, and already way beyond that id count.

[Anonymous No.57121801]

>>57121667
>the biz obsession is a mistery

As Ive mentioned, you have to realize this place is full of absolute losers that have never been good at anything in life, awkward socially, horrific with women, etc.

Chainlink gave them an identity, just like Gamestop did for a lot of redditors. Finally something tangible they could point to and say I am special and talented. Obviously with this being a life first, they didnt know how to manage these emotions, and after the last few years, well, you can see why things are now the way that they are

[Anonymous No.57121824]

>>57121801
EXACTLY this.
They made Chainlink their whole personality, and fudding was a very big part of it from the very start, because they just couldn't stand the idea of anyone else being as smart as them and actually buying Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.57121835]

Solidly v3 usecase with SolidSync is making LINK PUMP

[Anonymous No.57121904]

>>57120624
Solana has better fundamentals. It can be used to mint animal coins and NFTs. See >>57116003
If enough money pours in to gamble then it can offset token inflation. LINK isn't an L1 and as far as I know LINK function calls aren't even required to be paid in LINK, so there's nothing to get money flowing in.

[Anonymous No.57121910]

>>57121904
>Solana has better fundamentals.

KEK

[Anonymous No.57121919]

>>57121910
Money is still flowing in to buy memecoins and NFTs though. Obviously downtime isn't putting that much of a damper on SOL.

[Anonymous No.57121922]

>>57121910
You just converted another anon to the fud religion by BTFO’ing his shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.57121931]

>>57121919
>Money is still flowing in
Not really. The absolute vast majority of network revenue comes from the massive inflation Solana has.
Actual user feels (i.e. "money flowing in") make up like 5% or so.

[Anonymous No.57121963]

>>57121931
Price is up bigly on the year, we just had a memecoin mania on Solana, obviously money is coming in kek

>Actual user feels (i.e. "money flowing in") make up like 5% or so.
People are also buying because they're optimistic about the SOL ecosystem based on seeing memecoin mania happen. There's nothing going on to drive similar optimism about Chainlink, they have even worse revenues and have become a running joke for constantly delaying releases and still don't have basic functionalities like charging for function calls in LINK. Almost every narrative about real-world, enterprise need for blockchain oracles has proven false so far.

[Anonymous No.57121971]

>>57121963
>obviously money is coming in
Yes, through good old fashioned speculation.

[Anonymous No.57122004]

>>57121971
Right, that's the *purpose* of non-BTC cryptocurrencies as I said in multiple posts ITT. They're either speculative assets or platforms for creating speculative assets, or lending protocols I guess. The point I am trying to make is that platforms like SOL that enable low-fee speculation are inherently deserving of a higher valuation than LINK, which only enables the lending protocols. No one is using LINK oracles to connect blockchain to the real world, which was the entire narrative of LINK back in 2017. Like someone else ITT said, they've rotated from narrative to narrative without turning it into significant usage. Blockchain is just not there yet and there's a strong case that it never will be.

[Anonymous No.57122013]

>>57121235
its not that you're wrong, but its literally all about revenue which is the real-world demand for that network. you could use this same argument if link had 1mil revenue and was 100bil mcap. the fact is when the real world demand is like 0.01% of the reason people buy the token and the other 99.99% is people speculating on the hope that the real world demand might increase in the future then it's functionally no different than a ponzi with no real world demand(like shiba)

if "the narrative" ever becomes true and banks require this network to manage trillions of dollars of tokenized assets there's going to be a very slow ramp up of this demand. there will be plenty of time to do a proper evaluation of what this demand might look like in 10 years time. the train is going to slowly crawl out of the station, there will be massive profit taking and bear cycles in that time until the REAL demand starts to outstrip speculators that are just trying to sell the next green candle.

the game is real simple: dont get caught holding the bag. if you dont know that you're playing this game you're going to get FLEECED

[Anonymous No.57122020]

>>57122004
>platforms like SOL that enable low-fee speculation are inherently deserving of a higher valuation than LINK, which only enables the lending protocols
Except L1 platforms are a dime a dozen, and they're all incredibly cheap because nearly all of them run almost exclusively on subsidization.

[Anonymous No.57122025]

>57115730
>57115764
>57115953
>57115970
>57116085
>57116248
>57116291
>57116453
>57120757
>57121021
>57121224
>57121257
>57121355
>57121385
>57121405
>57121545
>57121576
>57121592
>57121600
>57121632
>57121701
>57121724
>6 gorillion pbtid

[Anonymous No.57122031]

>>57122020
>Except L1 platforms are a dime a dozen
Yeah and many of the ones from last cycle will go 10x and new ones will go 100x this cycle.

>they're all incredibly cheap because nearly all of them run almost exclusively on subsidization.
Yes, but speculative money will flow into them which will drive price gains. LINK is also massively subsidized by Sergey dumping every week, except network adoption hasn't grown beyond supporting lending protocols, whereas SOL is onboarding new degenerate gamblers daily. It's already leading the recovery from the latest dump.

[Anonymous No.57122060]

>>57122031
>LINK is also massively subsidized by Sergey dumping every week
Arguably a lot less so.
Price feed users are paying handsome sums according to public governance votes, and if you're using something like VRF, Keepers, ... then you're the one paying nodes full price with 0 subsidization involved.

>adoption hasn't grown beyond supporting lending protocols
Chainlink is adopted by Solana. Is Solana a "lending protocol"?

[Anonymous No.57122081]

>>57122060
It has lending protocols built on it. That's the beauty of L1s, everyone gets together to promote degenerate gambling with leverage and drive the token up.

[Anonymous No.57122094]

>>57122081
>It has lending protocols built on it.
And NFTs, and stablecoins, etc.
All of which rely heavily on price feeds. In and across all chains.

[Anonymous No.57122114]

Zach at it again with 22pbtid

[Anonymous No.57122117]

>>57115737

[Anonymous No.57122126]

>>57122114
put this man on oestrogens, he would make a good trap

[Anonymous No.57122138]

>>57122114
Gotta earn that advocate paycheck

>>57122094
The platform is more valuable than the price feeds, as I said above. If you disagree and go all in on LINK, good luck, but your portfolio will probably underperform bigly.

[Anonymous No.57122142]

>>57122094
and how much revenue do those price feeds generate in a year? i know you dont know, because no linkie understands that revenue is EXTREMELY important and you would never argue this flimsy narrative if you actually looked at the data.

the price feeds are great, if link was like 100m mcap it would make sense to buy some because theres real demand for the price feeds(even if most of it is subsidized at this point). at 9b the price feeds become completely irrelevant to the link token price, just the same as if it was 100B or 3T.

[Anonymous No.57122162]

>>57122138
>The platform is more valuable than the price feeds
But there are so many platforms lol, and they're all mutually interchangeable.

>>57122142
>how much revenue do those price feeds generate in a year?
Well they charge relatively minor users nearly $1 million per year, and there are like 1500 projects using the price feeds.

[Anonymous No.57122201]

>>57122162
Zachary Rhines and Tim Bryant are wanted for crimes against 4chan neckbeards
what do you have to say about that?

[Anonymous No.57122224]

I will never forgive myself for buying this shitcoin. I have missed out on so many good pumps because of that fat fuck russian

[Anonymous No.57122254]

>>57122162
knew it, you dont know. linkies never look at the data, they just repeat the narratives. you can look up dune dashboards with the revenue that price feeds generate. they generated about 30m in 2023.

so you were off on your estimation by what, at least 30-50x? or in other words they do about 3% of the revenue that you thought they did(because you never bothered to actually look at the data)

[Anonymous No.57122265]

>>57122254
>knew it, you dont know
But I do know.

>you can look up dune dashboards with the revenue that price feeds generate.
That's node revenue, not price feed revenue.

[Anonymous No.57122326]

>>57122265

so your position is that the dune dashboards that say chainlink price feed revenue are not reporting accurate data? and its actually 30x higher than the reported data, but its all hidden and nobody can ever look at the real data?

[Anonymous No.57122362]

>>57122326
that's our Zach, anon, that's what he does best, gaslighting and semantics arguing
tik tok Zachy and Timmy

[Anonymous No.57122364]

if the real revenue was anywhere near what you think it is, it would literally be plastered everywhere. everyone in crypto would know about it, because it would be one of the biggest revenue generating platforms in crypto. you could not hide such a monster.

the fact is 99% of linkies dont know what the revenue is because its obfuscated(sergey is very smart NEVER mentioning it). and the 1% that do know would never mention the dreaded R-word because they understand links token price is 99.9% speculation and NARRATIVE driven(just like shiba, and all other ponzis)

[Anonymous No.57122400]

>>57122362
Who is Timmy? Is that the real name of fishycatfish or whatever his handle is?

[Anonymous No.57122414]

>>57122326
>so your position is that the dune dashboards that say chainlink price feed revenue are not reporting accurate data?
Of course.
The only thing you could hope to track is how many Link are being sent to nodes, because that's a functional requirement of the feeds.

[Anonymous No.57122489]

>>57122400
yes, notice how the advocatoor who cannot stop replying to every post itt suddenly ignores mine cause I'm name dropping them kek
>>57122414
>what's the revenue Zach?
>well, some literal who's are allegedly paying Chainlink for price feeds, so revenue does exist
>so you don't know
>but I do know
>where is the evidence then?
>well we don't have any evidence but revenue exists
come on, Zachary, you are the frog version of Ari and Sergey after all, surely you can do better than this!

[Anonymous No.57122498]

>>57122364
>>57122489

You realize a lot of the projects using Chainlink price feeds have public governance votes, right?

[Anonymous No.57122503]

>>57115743
stinky linkies will say

[Anonymous No.57122518]

>>57122498
you realize that having a public governance vote does not constitute as evidence of projects paying Chainlink, right Zachary? how about some on-chain verified payments?
Zachary Rhines ladies and gentlemen

[Anonymous No.57122539]

>>57122518
>a public governance vote does not constitute as evidence of projects paying Chainlink
lmao so they're lying?

[Anonymous No.57122624]

>>57122518
>>57122489
>>57122362
>>57122201
Also, you know you can just go on twitter and talk to Zachary, right? You don't have to fantasize about meeting him here, live your dreams anon!

[Anonymous No.57122749]

>Come back a day later
>Not one anon can refute Chainlink's lack of a single paying enterprise client

[Anonymous No.57122848]

>>57119605
How are we still the 13th biggest marketcap in crypto if the price action is so horrible?

>but [shitcoin x] did better in [arbitrary timelime]
So? You think people who held nvidia stocks since 2013 are mad about their 500x because bitcoin performed better in a shorter timeframe?

[Anonymous No.57122911]

>>57122224
You don't have money that's not in chainlink? Why would owning link stop to invest in other projects?

[Anonymous No.57122944]

>>57122911
What the fuck does marketcap got to do with price action you moron? Xrp has been in the top 5 for years yet its price action is horrendous

[Anonymous No.57123006]

>>57122944
Not a hard concept; the more projects outperform you, the more ranks you’ll drop.

[Anonymous No.57123035]

>>57122944
Being and staying in the top 20 shows that the price performance of LINK is at the very least ok compared to the rest of the market.

If LINK pumped the least and dumped the most it would be much much lower than it is

[Anonymous No.57123244]

if the revenue was real, even if it was paid off-chain(which would be ridiculous for a true web3 company), autists would collate all the data from the governance forums or wherever you think it is(the data MUST be somewhere)

i only make investments based on data, not trust. if you genuinely think link is making 1bil in yearly revenue from price feeds with no hard data to prove that idk you're just a cultist and are not able to think objectively.

wish you the best, but even if link goes to 50-100 you're going to roundtrip the entire move if you actually drank the koolaid and get psyop'd into holding. hope all my /biz/ bros get rich glgl

[Anonymous No.57123517]

>>57123244
Mainnet has been out for over 4 years now, and we’ve never really known much about how users are paying for them.

If that’s really such a concern for you, then you’re either a newfag whose idea of due diligence is crying on 4channel, or you’re a chronic retard who should’ve sold years ago but refuses to for some deranged reason.

[Anonymous No.57123534]

>>57115730
scam

[Anonymous No.57123637]

>>57117009
>Sergey absolutely despises his investors.
NO HE LOVES US
>another $18mil dumps
HE IS TESTING US LIKE GOD TESTED JOB