Sergey is suppressing the price

[Anonymous No.56952838]

Here they say it themselves - if chainlink price gets too expensive too quickly banks will say fuck you were not using your prepumped garbage

[Anonymous No.56952845]

>>56952838
make a containment bagholder general you stinky

[Anonymous No.56952854]

>>56952838
30 yr hold

[Anonymous No.56952864]

Release the sharpies

[Anonymous No.56952890]

we know they are containing it.
7.77.
they tell us in many ways they are containing it.
it is only going to stay ranging within certain sats until end of q2 2025 when there's no more linkies to dump.

inb4 but Sergey will still have 350 million more to dump.
those are supposed to be to 'incentivise the ecosystem' , so they might get dumped by providers / 'stakeholders' but not by cl themselves.
but yeah price obviously manipulated.

tldr;
to bring about transparency and trustless markets chainlink first needs to obfuscate behind legal speak and suppress and manipulate markets.
you might say it's ironic, it isn't. there are other words to use.

never selling though.

[Anonymous No.56952905]

>>56952890
but is chainlink team really responsible for 14.88 range? i feel there may be couple actors in play. 6.66 , 7.77, 11.11 14.88, this feels like whale edgelords

[Anonymous No.56953230]

>>56952905
Yes, whale edgelords named Sergey and Ari.

[Anonymous No.56953247]

>>56952838
>Sergey is suppressing the price
So the Sergey Betray memes are true

[Anonymous No.56953365]

>>56953247
Yes but he's betraying us in an unfathomably based way, like how Snape 'betrayed' Dumbledore in Harry eyes, iykwim

[Anonymous No.56954342]

>>56952838
Doesn't Sergey live in New York? I'm surprised no one has found him and roughed him up a bit over this bullshit. There was that photo an anon took of him wandering the streets of NY. Francisco turned out to be a complete pussy.

[Anonymous No.56954619]

>>56954342
Honestly deserves to be paid a visit for what he's done

>>56953230
I have it on good word that they're doing it, but more players involved like Jonathan's group at SWIFT, bigger banks, Eric Schmidt, big tech, etc. Reasons vary, but all roads lead to shaking out holders. You're being targeted on here since you hold the majority of the retail stack

[Anonymous No.56954657]

>>56954619
Good word from my ass

[Anonymous No.56954688]

He's walking a tight line, I understand he's price manipulating so that Chainlink can take the fuck off big time when everything is in place and motion but he's risking alienating baggies and new-coiners when they see the trendlines.

It's definitely going to be millionaire status on anyoying holding 500 coins until 2030 but thats a long time to wait especially when so many other alts are performing well.

I think it would be best in Sir Gays interest to not supress the next bullrun so that Linkies can take some profit and incentivise new baggies but I have a gut feeling he's going to supress yet another bull because of delays in their projects.

[Anonymous No.56954701]

>>56954657
Nope this person has a legit track record, about as insider as it gets. Serg thinks he's preventing a pump and dump (which would piss off his customers), by strangling price action. Legitimate retard

[Anonymous No.56954720]

>>56954688
It's not just him. Every single experiment you've read about, the parties involved are participating in suppression. SWIFT has no need for an expensive token, and they forced Sergey to remove adding extra feeds to staking v0.2

[Anonymous No.56954752]

>>56953365
>it's just like heckin harry potterino!
This was the sell signal I needed.

[Anonymous No.56954754]

>>56954701
Anything else? Can you share more without compromising your "insider"? It's far more believable that Sergey/Chainlink is responsible for the price suppression instead of whatever boogeyman of the week schizos come up with.

[Anonymous No.56954769]

>>56952890
>until end of q2 2025 when there's no more linkies to dump.
I understand this is an estimation, but is it bullshit or not

[Anonymous No.56954823]

>>56952838
Its literally just an excuse for him and his fat fingers to dip into the pool of winnings and stack cash before it all comes tumbling down (which it will)

[Anonymous No.56954824]

>>56954720
>>56954701
Ok but why the banks and swift painted the perfect 2 year wyckoff?

[Anonymous No.56954873]

>>56954824
The price IS going to go up regardless, by 2030. That also means being priced out quite literally forever at THESE prices.

>>56954688
Interesting, there is no saying he won't let it rip in price during the next bull run. But it is more than guaranteed going to be priced in as a cup of coffee by that road mark. Staking rewards will be the only way normies are going to make money though

[Anonymous No.56954905]

>>56954873
If we are talking about trillions being placed in the LINK ecosystem by 2030. With the current market cap of just under 10 billion. It is comfortable to say that this next bull run has the potential to hit triple digits sometime in the future. After the Chainlink team does sell all of their tokens which will happen.

Who do you think is going to keep suppressing the price of the token after that?

[Anonymous No.56954957]

>>56952838
the ideal max cost of link for businesses is the price of one quality cup of coffee

[Anonymous No.56954964]

Maybe Sergey put in place the Build program to give us a bone since the price will not increase by much?

[Anonymous No.56955009]

>>56954964
sergey would personally spit in every one of our faces if he had the time and means for what we've done to public perception of his token he'll do everything in his power to torture us, still never selling never unstaking :^)

[Anonymous No.56955049]

>>56952890
Thank you Sergey for giving us late fags time to accoomulate

[Anonymous No.56955061]

>>56952838
So, like Hbar?

[Anonymous No.56955063]

>>56952838
Sergey isn’t the one dumping BTC on all Link news, fuck off.
That’s a boilerplate disclaimer.

[Anonymous No.56955110]

>>56955063
Its a big pill to swallow anon but everything leads to this.
Eric Schmidt even complimented sirgay in the weird smartcon talk about how link was able to stay relatively stable in Such a volatile market.

They dont want link to Look like an overpumped pnd when Banks finally enter the chat.

[Anonymous No.56955141]

>>56955110
I just want it to hit triple digits till 2025

[Anonymous No.56955162]

>>56955141
Me too anon. I got 15k link and its my entire networth. I need to make it this run of have to get a job.

[Anonymous No.56955191]

>>56955162
Once upon a time there lived a poor single mom and her adult son Chudjack. One day, Chudjack’s mother told him to get a job. Chudjack went to the job market and on the way he met a man who wanted to sell his bags. Chudjack asked, “What will you give me in return for my neetbux?” The man answered, “I will give you five magic internet beans!” Chudjack took the magic internet beans and gave the man his neetbux. But when he reached home, Chudjack’s mother was very angry. She said, “You fool! You were supposed to get a job not some fake internet money!” She threw the magic internet beans out of the window. Chudjack was very sad and went to sleep without masterbating.

The next day, when Chudjack woke up in the morning and looked out of the window, he saw that a huge green candle had grown from his magic internet beans! He climbed up the candle and reached Chainlink Labs. There lived a fat giant all by himself. Jack went inside the house and found piles of garbage strewn about.

While he was crying, the giant came home. The giant was very fat and looked very gay. Jack was terrified and went and hid inside. The giant cried, “Fee-fi-fo-fum, I smell the stench of a stinky linky. Be he alive, or be he dead, I'll dump 700k tokens on his head!” Then Chudjack screeched, “There is no bagholders in here!” So, the giant ate his food and then went to his room. After raping his pillow the giant took out his sacks of gold coins, counted them and kept them aside. Then he went to sleep. In the night, Chudjack crept out of his hiding place, took one sack of gold coins and climbed down the candle. At home, he gave the coins to his mother. His mother was very happy and they lived well for sometime.

[Anonymous No.56955204]

>>56952845
This. But they wont. Chainshits arent exactly "doers". Theyre the type of people who take the path of least resistance. Making a containment thread would require initiative, something the chainshits dont have. You gotta remember, this isnt a community of creaters, this is a community of people who will eat catfood in order to become the new jews. There will never be a containment thread for chainshits because they are the laziest, most worthless group of people on earth. Theyre lower than niggers
>inb4 "pools closed"
Nobody wants to swim with you in your shit water pajeet. Nobody cares your shitty ass little pool is closed. Stockholm syndrome weirdo

[Anonymous No.56955278]

>>56955110
> Its a big pill to swallow
Not really.
The absolute primary reason for Link’s performance is excrutiatingly uncanny Bitcoin dump timings.
And Sergey obviously has nothing to do with that.

[Anonymous No.56955298]

>>56955191
Thanks for the laugh friend. This story actually is very close to my life. Only the beans that i got grew into a little straggly tree and has Been refusing to grow since the last three years. My mom is not pleased and i just want to make her happy.

[Anonymous No.56955307]

>>56955191
Nobody is going to read this

[Anonymous No.56955318]

>>56955278
Sergey IS the biggest btc whale

[Anonymous No.56955326]

>>56955278
>sirgay obviously has nothing to do with that
lol sir gay has been in this space for ages and people are speculating he is part of satoshi.

why do you think its farfetched that he, ari and their friends are initiating the dumps`?

>>56955307
i read it and it was worth it

[Anonymous No.56955364]

>>56952838
they're telling you the plan. those in the know accumulate LINK, once the switch is flipped those who don't own this resource are priced out and go out of business, power consolidates into the hands of the few.

they didn't hide any of the information and you had 7 years to figure it all out after all.

[Anonymous No.56955378]

>>56955063
method? got you. dump btc.
motive? half got you. suppress link. but as to the why 'they' would do this depends upon the who..

so, who?
let's say you're right, although between you and the post before yours you've both disagreed while thinking you've agreed, without actually realising.

so, let's say 'somebody' doesn't want link to look like a pnd. ok. i can buy that.
somebody doesn't want link to look like a pnd. let's work on that basis.
and you're saying they make it not look like a pnd by dumping btc. ok, a little out there but i'll buy it too. let's roll with it.
somebody dumps btc so link doesn't look like a pnd.

>>56955063
this anon says it isn't Sergey doing it.

>>56955110
this anon says Eric Schmidt complimented Sergey on the price stability (true, he did, in the long distance fireside chat) , does telling us that suggest you think Sergey is doing it?
you say 'they' don't want link to look like a pnd, so presumably the 'they' is chainlink. alternatively, who else wouldn't want chainlink to look like a pnd? or is it the same banks who haven't 'finally entered the chat' (as you put it) which have pre-empted their entering the chat?
Chainlink don't want their coin to resemble a pnd, ok, am still with you, so you are saying that it's Sergey or one of them doing it?
one of you is saying it isn't Sergey, ok, so who?

...allowing for the possibility that somebody is dumping btc to suppress link, some say it is and some say it isn't Sergey doing it...
now if it is Sergey or maybe it isn't Sergey and it is link, ok, then they are suppressing the price, and if it isn't Sergey or link, then who? and 'why' would 'they' if 'they aren't in the chat' ?

the way i see it is this.
if you have the wherewithal to suppress the price of btc, regularly, then does it matter if you're picking up link at 15 or at 12 oGr at 7?

the price IS being suppressed and manipulated, but basically is just link token releases which is fair enough.

[Anonymous No.56955380]

>>56955278
Everyone altcoiner thinks bitcoin's dumps are timed around suppressing their coin, that's just cognitive biases in action. The actual question is why Link can't become more uncorrelated to it by now.

[Anonymous No.56955388]

>>56955380
>Everyone altcoiner thinks bitcoin's dumps are timed around suppressing their coin, that's just cognitive biases in action
kek

[Anonymous No.56955415]

>>56955380
you're new arent you

[Anonymous No.56955416]

>>56955380
yeah, still following btc and not much else.
even allowing for the possibility they dump btc to suppress link, i mean, could be, there is a tenuous connection (most certainly not a unique one though) , so allowing for the possibility they dump btc to suppress link, that's essentially confirmation that the link price is attached to the bitcoin price.
up and down.

[Anonymous No.56955451]

>>56955388
>>56955415
XRP schizo tier cope. "Sergey is actually Satoshi" is another laughable cope as well, and another thing other altcoiner groups do with their dear leader. If Link is central to your worldview/perspective, you'll find ways to make other things revolve around it.

[Anonymous No.56955458]

>>56955451
>XRP schizo tier cope
lol

[Anonymous No.56955487]

>>56955451
it's almost as though anons recognise that 4chan attracts a type who tends towards certain mental behaviours (narcissism, paranoia, schizophrenia) but then forget to consider this when reflecting upon their reflections.

somebody is doing it.
but ask them who and they won't answer (''they'' are dumping btc)
ask them why and it's an unjustified answer (''they'' dump it so it doesn't look like a pnd. ok, but who is doing it and why would they want it to look like a pnd?)

[Anonymous No.56955491]

>>56952838
noob we explained this a year ago and suppressed is the wrong word, but the price has to maintain certain limits in order to acquire mass adoption. chainlin is not supposed to be speculative but noobs won't listen, like polygon will never go too much higher. anyway we knew it was a 20-25 year hold in 2017 only noob newcomers are stuck with not knowing anything and too lazy to research from inception.

[Anonymous No.56955499]

>>56955416
>there is a tenuous connection
"Tenuous" he says.

[Anonymous No.56955504]

>>56955487
>but ask them who and they won't answer
Why would anyone know?
All we know is it's happening.

[Anonymous No.56955558]

>>56955499
ok, i said i'll go with the idea.
anon, it could well be.
but play the game with me.
we don't need to be Raymond Chandler, but who is doing it and why?

the who might not tell us why and they why might not tell us who, but getting to know one is likely to help with understanding the other.
if they are suppressing the price, who is they and what do they gain? by understanding this we might figure out when the manipulation and suppression stops...

because i reckon it stops q3 2025 and any significant price action before that is just satsumas found in the shadows.
that might have implications for the bull run.

on top of that, might the 'they' suppressing the link price have a motive beyond just keeping the price down? as i've tried to get people to realise on this forum many a time, just because Sergey says link is going to be what he says doesn't mean link is going to be what he says. I hope it does become what he says, have been with him for a long time and think he's a good guy and the right guy, clever and interesting too, but i have a family to take care of , and although i am not selling, i certainly don't want to keep dca'ing if we are going to miss another bullrun. would rather keep my stack and pick up something else.
so every time you tell us the price is suppressed and manipulated, who is really disagreeing with you? i agree, the price is manipulated.
i think we just disagree on the method and neither of us can answer whom.

[Anonymous No.56955563]

>>56955504
this. the anon your replying to is equivalent to the "gonna need a source for that" redditors.

[Anonymous No.56955610]

>>56955563
ok lad.
ask a question that isn't appreciated and the ad hominem's begin again.
anon your response could have gone many ways, but reasonably, it was only ever going to have gone one of two ways.

1. you could have said something along the lines of
''i dont know WHO is manipulating the price and i dont know WHY they are manipulating the price, but there is evidence that indicates the price is being manipulated. That being said, there is also evidence that other tokens are being manipulated so it's best to take it with a grain of salt, but i still maintain it is being manipulated.

2. what you did say which was attacking me
'' the anon is x y z '' therefore implying that what anon has said in response is bla bla.

good stuff lad. good stuff anon. about as helpful as an anon in a bar full of chicks.

[Anonymous No.56955614]

>>56955487
they = sirgay himself or clabs

they dont want it to look like a pnd because trad finance fags need to get a new pacemaker when they look at crypto charts

[Anonymous No.56955643]

>>56955558
>i reckon it stops q3 2025
why?

[Anonymous No.56955692]

>>56955643
that's when the token dumps stop.
unless they change their plan, which they might.
they might reallocate the 'incentivise the ecosystem' linkies for something else, or they might spread out the distribution of the next 75 million or whatever, or they might bring it forward and dump what remains at the top of the next bull and keep us all in our pens. When it's ranging at 77.7.

[Anonymous No.56955697]

>>56955378
Yes, i believe sirgay or clabs is doing it (price manipulation) because it aligns with their Goal (keeping price stable)

[Anonymous No.56955699]

>>56955610
Are you denying that it happened or is happening? Because if you've been here for a while then you would have seen countless of examples of bitcoin dumping right after link was pumping (solo against the whole market). The one fucking knows who or why, they can only speculate. But everyone knows it has happened

[Anonymous No.56955707]

>>56955610
Anon the reason you're not getting answers to your questions is because this shit has been discussed ad nauseum on biz. You're 2-3 years late. We don't care about the who or why because the system is set up to obfuscate those things. A relentless focus on what is happening is why we're all here. It's the signal in a sea of noise.

[Anonymous No.56955775]

>>56955699
Of course it is being manipulated.
7.77.
can't be sure but probably been here a fair bit longer than you anon. but whatever.

look, for all of links pumps they aren't really pumps because it's just another wave being carried by a tide bigger than itself in an ocean grander than it itself recognises.
you know how that's indisputable? because of the sats. it might be that btc is dumped to keep link in track, or it might be that link leads where btc follows, neither are conclusive arguments but each has its merit, anyway, point is, they go hand in hand and because they go hand in hand and for as long as they stay going hand in hand then link can't really go anywhere until btc hits 150.
we are down in sats and until we break that we aren't going anywhere until btc hits 150.
of course, one day the manipulation might stop and we can fly solo, but that's an if, and if you're counting on just that one if, well, our case for winning becomes a lot weaker while the fuddies case for us being just another coin slowly dripping away into significance gains traction.

[Anonymous No.56955788]

>>56955707
>we

[Anonymous No.56955805]

>>56955775
unfortunately you'll be ridiculed for that post

[Anonymous No.56955822]

>>56955788
If you're not INTJ then wtf are you even doing here.

[Anonymous No.56955972]

Hey can't keep getting away with this

[Anonymous No.56956084]

>>56955558
I really can't be bothered to read all that shit.

I'm a simple man; I see big Chainlink news, I open the BTC chart and observe the inevitable.

[Anonymous No.56956133]

>>56955451
There’s hundreds of examples at this point. If you’re incapable of drawing your own conclusions then you are probably vaxxed.

[Anonymous No.56956233]

>>56955388
>>56955458
@chainlink tweets a lot. They have 6,451 tweets, at a glance it looks like they average about 3 a day, and of course most of them will be saying something positive about their project. So odds are yeah many of their tweets will cluster around volatile moments for bitcoin which also happen with regularity. To me this is not too different than if you were to point out a cloud formation and say it reminds you of Sergey. Not trying to troll you.

[Anonymous No.56956253]

>>56956233
This isn't about tweets, it's about major news items.

[Anonymous No.56956288]

>>56956084
>news
Muhhhh experiment

Link cultists are stuck in 2017 where “partnerships” used to pump price. The whole conspiracy to suppress their special altcoin is basically just an altcoin ebbing and flowing w btc. Same as every other alt except Link’s “pumps” are weaker. You lose credibility when you claim its a conspiracy in situations where the entire market sells off. Of course linkies have very little investing acumen and experience so dont really follow the macro ie interest rate announcements.

Most of you are simply losers who bought a winning lotto ticket and never cashed it. In order to cope with this painful reality you had to construct the conspiracy angle to save your ego. You see this with basically every investment group on the internet

[Anonymous No.56956300]

>>56956288
Doesn't change how Bitcoin reacts.

[Anonymous No.56956334]

>>56956300
>gamestop short squeeze imminent

[Anonymous No.56956370]

>>56954619
That’s why chainlink was listed on robinhood, so the price could be more easily suppressed

[Anonymous No.56956374]

>>56952838
chainlink token will be worth $8,000 in 5 years...but a loaf of bread will be $100

[Anonymous No.56956380]

>>56956253
I think it is moving goal posts where they need to be after the fact to support the thesis which the observer wants to believe in.

For example I guess @docXBT could have done leveraged trades based on this observation, and it would have been predictable "suppression" until it suddenly no longer held true:
>>56955499
Of course when a thing stops, there is some rationalization as to why "they" stopped the suppression and allowed LINK to move higher. Link's price is correlated to BTC, in the way the majority of all crypto is rather than it being some super special conspiracy. But when Musk sold Tesla's BTC holdings, I'm sure they went out of their way to fuck over chainlink though /s.

[Anonymous No.56956399]

>>56955775
the thing is, you can play the shitcoin casino if you want, and you have pretty shit odds at doing well. or you can bet on the winner, and accept its going to happen at some undetermined time likely in the next 5 years, possibly much sooner than that. the sorts of autist who still frequent a minimalist imageboard and discuss these sorts of things, is going to be low time preference. someone with low time preference is going to play the odds. the rest of this market is a shell game, musical chairs, everyone here knows it, and they desperately want you to play. nobody talks about link outside this shithole because they all know its probably the only long term bet worth making, and nobody with any real capital wants to see retail losers win.

[Anonymous No.56956442]

>>56956399
>likely in the next 5 years
yeah kek lol lets wait another 6 years HAHHAHZAZAZAZA

[Anonymous No.56956452]

>>56952838
I’ve noticed the FUD has progressed from being funny and easily deboonkable if you dyor into the project to intense attacks that are legitimate criticism.

>Sergey planning to dump 14% of the supply in the next couple of years, even when he already has at least 3 billion dollars in his treasury, which is at least a decade of runway
>price suppression being a legitimate concern due to rapid price appreciation being undesirable (it’s in the terms of service)
>radio silence about build drops / build projects possibly being worth next to nothing. This hits hard because it’s true, if BUILD projects were so good they wouldn’t need to apply for subsidization.
>Sergey rubbing elbows with known scammers and people that were actively shorting link. Bankman from FTX, Nexo Bulgarians, shit, they almost lost their entire USDC treasury by using Celsius.
>Extremely low revenue for all their products, at least from what we can see on chain
>Sergey admitting that he doesn’t know when adoption will take place. Going as far as to say that it’ll either take a crash (which would obliterate the token value) or slow adoption (which would make the token go up in a decade or two) to make chainlink successful.
>Two of their key technical advisors quit, Evan Cheng and Hudson Jameson. They went on to work for SUI and MATIC respectively. Your advisors don’t quit if they see a future for your company.
>Massive HR bloat and negative reviews on their glassdoor profiles.
>Kushti caps where he mentioned Sergey just wanted to make a quiet exit. By all means he would’ve accomplished this by now, he already has multiple billions of dollars in his treasury. Enough to last a lifetime spending multiple millions per year.
>Sergey firing Adelyn the marketing director for underperforming and hiring an arguably worse head of marketing that keeps posting about his runs

[Anonymous No.56956464]

>>56956442
nobody said you have to wait, go play the shitcoin casino and show off your gains. that’s why I see people showing off 6 and 7 figure portfolios of bnb, sol and dogcoins all the time on here, its actually that easy.

[Anonymous No.56956507]

>>56952838
It's literally in the whitepaper that it should cost the same as a cup of coffee.

[Anonymous No.56956620]

>>56956507
it isn't.
we both know that.

or why don't you just link to the pdf and the page number.
oh wait, it was edited.

but yes, the price is manipulated.

>>56956399>>
anon, been in on link for sometime. it's all green. not sure why you're talking about the shitcoin casino. it isn't a case of one or the other and to make it seem so is to miss the point.
correlation both is and isn't causation but making that necessary connection isn't something that's going to happen on this board despite the low time preference ajnal line onanistic entreaties.
you talk about low time preference. hubris my man, hubris. fortune brings in some boats that are not steered. not everything that looks like it will come to pass will come to pass and some things which look like they won't happen do. you say
''betting on the winner, accepting it is going to happen'' and it is devoid of all modesty anon.
in other words, you're so certain the ship is coming in that although each passing day it doesn't come in is simultaneously a day closer to it coming in and also a day closer to it wrecking and not coming in, you've forgotten the play here, which is for us to make it as 'ethically' as we can. isn't that what we want? to make it and do right having made it knowing we made it by trying to help, in our own small way, to get rid of some of the middlemen's work. ok, but we remain a long way from making it so so long as it isn't certain and until it has happened it's befitting to ask questions of it on here, a link board, without ad hominem attacks for asking them.

[Anonymous No.56956626]

>>56952838
>caring about blockchain oracles in 2024

wow you guys are either delusional or paid shills

[Anonymous No.56956975]

>>56956620
you said nothing of substance anon. this is a low effort bait thread, there are thought provoking link threads with legitimate questions and this isn’t one of those, it wasn’t made in good faith, you going to bat for supposedly good faith discussion here says all anyone needs to know about your intentions. the rest of what you said is as full of assumptions as what you quoted. that said if it is your intention to start a good faith discussion on fundamentals, feel free to start a thread, you know everyone will be there, after all its the same 5 posters just constantly swapping ids.

[Anonymous No.56957723]

>>56956370
>>56954754
>>56954824
Same person here, the reason according to insider is simply because once 80% of the supply is staked, normies buying a single cube becomes laughable. Banks can't all in now because of existing agreements, NDA, and OTC purchases from Sergey. It's an elaborate strangle, but yes they all know /biz/ holds the lion's share of the public's tokens. They want those back.

[Anonymous No.56958110]

>>56957723
If they wanted them back they'd pump the price do people take profits instead if buying more cheapies

[Anonymous No.56958128]

>>56954720
are the nft scams that used vrf once for exposure on twitter also participating in this conspiracy?

[Anonymous No.56958262]

>>56958110
No. You pump the way I'm talking and the world becomes aware. Notice there are no mentions of Chainlink anywhere but from their mouth? by design

[Anonymous No.56958375]

>>56952838
The chainlink team cannot talk about the price too much because they do not want to seem like a Ponzi scheme (like certain other coins where this does happen). They are a serious tech company that builds technology of real utility. The price is irrelevant, only the product matters (e.g. see Amazon in its early days where Jeff Bezos dismissed stock price performance and reinvested constantly instead of paying out dividends).

This is ultimately bullish and shows that chainlink is as far from a scam as you can get. As for bitcoin dumps, I would wager that they are smart money who bought BTC early or Sergey/Satoshi himself, (yes Sergey is in all likelihood Satoshi, anons in the know will verify). Smart money knows bitcoin is a relic, it knows that POW is inferior to POS, it knows that it has no utility beyond just tokens and it knows that halvenings will make mining increasingly unprofitable, rendering the network less secure. Its price rests not on its intrinsic value or utility, but its first movers advantage and relative fame. They are dumping bitcoin for chainlink, the next number one. Citibank's report backs this up. Seethe fuddies

[Anonymous No.56958453]

>>56958110
It's the hiding strategy. They will not let it pump until chainlink's products are complete and are fully working. They cannot afford to allow speculative price action otherwise they get SEC'd not to mention their reputation is permanently ruined. The product always comes first

[Anonymous No.56958455]

Seriously it's legit insane, the breakout pump completely annihilated by this garbage action. Meanwhile shit like avax pumping without resistance

[Anonymous No.56958472]

>>56957723
BS. Biz is a drop in a pond. The banks are probably node operators themselves so they don't need retail IPO link, they get the 350 million dedicated to node operators.

[Anonymous No.56958496]

>>56956288
Why do you care so much about anonymous strangers on the internet who lose money then?

[Anonymous No.56958664]

>>56957723
>They want those back.
Why the fuck did they then come here to talk us into buying it in 2017 in the first place?

[Anonymous No.56959010]

>>56956975
i hear you anon.
would even agree that i said nothing of substance.
that's not to say i said nothing of relevance.
but between the hubris of some and the fudding of others, where is there to go in order to have a good faith discussion about the manipulation?

[Anonymous No.56959043]

ICP fixed this issue and also makes your piece of shit token not needed garbage obsolete.

Enjoy bagging while Sergie dumps 500 million tokens on your head.

[Anonymous No.56959074]

>>56954619
I've seen so many cryptos fuck over their bagholders by printing more tokens, issuing a secondary token for reasons, or announcing a merger with another crypto and diluting bagholders that way, and in none of these case were there any legal consequences for them. Why doesn't Sergey and friend just take one of these tried and tested easy routes if they want to reduce the amount of the total supply held by /biz?

[Anonymous No.56959077]

>>56958664
Look at you, with your logic and reasoning. Gtfo

[Anonymous No.56959138]

It's true. All if it.
https://youtu.be/8nEPWUFgfvk?si=vLzPfqvh2ZyNgAmZ

[Anonymous No.56959184]

>>56952838
refute me if im wrong but arent the price of services flat and the price of the link token doesnt affect how much you pay for services even if the price goes higher (18 decimals) . So it would make sense for all the various counter parties to accumulate as much as possible before pumping the price? And then even though new users will have to pay a higher price for accumulating as many link it will make sense for them to use the service if theyre able to offset lets say 10 to 20% to their current operating model by using chainlink?

[Anonymous No.56959188]

>>56958472
>Biz is a drop in a pond.
If that were true, you wouldn't be here, glownigger, you suck at your job.

[Anonymous No.56959197]

>>56959184
correct. though you make it overly complicated. in simple terms: why aren't banks securing their future usage at a significant discount right now?

[Anonymous No.56959202]

>>56959197
what makes you think they are not? The chart shows a clear wyckoff accumulation pattern . The concentration of links are more and more being concentrated in the whales hand .

[Anonymous No.56959326]

>>56959197
there is a wallet set aside since ico with 350 million link earmarked for “enterprise node operators”, who do you think that is. banks won’t have to buy it, they’re going to be the ones profiting off it, they will be the largest nodes, it was always going to be this way.

[Anonymous No.56959409]

>>56952890
>>56955378
>>56955416
>>56955487
>>56955558
>>56955610
>>56955692
>>56955775
>>56956620
>>56959010

I read all of this anon's posts, and my conclusion is that he's retarded (maybe ESL), but definitely a midmit larping as cryptic/high IQ. Gives off a hint of disingenuity/bait as well

[Anonymous No.56959480]

>>56959188
Kek, speak for yourself. Banks aren't setting up metamask wallets and buying spot off coinbase or kraken. They probably did UTC deals with chainlink directly. Why would a bank advertise its position openly for all of retail to see on some orderbook?

[Anonymous No.56959536]

>>56959409
a midmit.
right.
larping as high iq. because iq can be role played.
right.
a hint of disingenuity. because being genuine isn't either / or but is a spectrum.
right.

anon. kudos for reading.
keep at it.

[Anonymous No.56959542]

>>56957723
I doubt we collectively hold more than 10 millions at the absolute highest.

[Anonymous No.56959595]

>>56958262
this anon gets it. pumping the price means that anons take profits but that profit taking is completely offset by normies now buying in because line go up. it's a real pickle.

[Anonymous No.56959646]

>>56959536
This isn’t 2017 retard these silly cryptic messages won’t work on anons getting angrier by the day due to shit price action.

Fuck your riddles, fuck you and FUCK CHAINLINK

[Anonymous No.56959690]

>>56959595
so looks like a few people agree with what we got at earlier then.
after the remaining coins are out and circulating be it q2 or q3 2025, provided the then remaining 350 million aren't sold like those before it but actually used to incentivise the ecosystem, then link is likely to go solo. until then we go where btc goes. fair enough.

>>56959646
is it actually a riddle if it's only you who is confused?

[Anonymous No.56959717]

>>56959690
And fuck your samefagging too

[Anonymous No.56960446]

>>56959690
Christ your gay

[Anonymous No.56960850]

>>56952838
They should have a meeting with all of us where we all sell 80% of our link at say 500$…. We still get to keep roughly 1-6k tokens for when it goes to like $10,000 per coin. So we get new rich but not like wealthy…. Then we have enough link where we can stake for a nice income when the price is super high while they get a more distributed holding count without /biz/ holding 10%.

Motherfukerss on here holding to try and enact change and change the world with fuck you money wealth. Fuck all of you. I don’t give a shit about any of that crap. I just wanna do my thing. If anything we all should have not staked… now that would have been funny and maybe that would have made them do something like Jack the price up to get us to sell so staking could commence.

We all should have protested and not staked our link. That was the only leverage we had. But all you stupid faggot paypigs lined up to stake like at a breadline in the Great Depression. I will never stake… and I ain’t even mad at Sergey… but you assholes could have fucked with them and it probably would have benefited us.

[Anonymous No.56960913]

>>56959542
You must be kidding? Early access would've filled up if it was 100 million strong. Many on /biz/ got in at ico, imagine 10 anons got 50k-100k tokens. Now, imagine how many non /biz/ got 50k-100k. See where I'm going? They aren't pumping it until they announce everything at once, and by then I'm afraid most of you will have sold for other shinier objects. Staking is the de facto litmus test by Sergey where you're essentially forced to ride on the bus until he reaches his destination. He's assuming many (most) will get off along the way.

My insider told me this a few different times, but seeing the years go by and to still be at a point where the public has no clue, makes it all the realer. Sergey is a fag for suppression though. Makes the truth > trust thing seem so phony

[Anonymous No.56960923]

>>56952838
How am I gonna see this bullshit after I finally staked after like a fucking decade. Goddamn man can I catch a fucking break?

[Anonymous No.56960951]

>>56960913
>My insider
Nigga cmon

[Anonymous No.56960999]

>>56960951
Choose to scoff at it, your choice. It's reality and why link isn't $120 with a top 3 rank. Totally obvious that's where it belongs

[Anonymous No.56961000]

POOLS CLOSED BASED LPL KIDDOS CHUDDIE STAY WINNING

[Anonymous No.56961064]

>>56960999
Can you please ask your boyfriend how high is link pumping this run? Thanks.

-John from Arizona

[Anonymous No.56961122]

>>56954769
Nah maybe even q4 2025

[Anonymous No.56961152]

If this doesn't make it to 100 in 7 months time im just going to kms. This price action compared to the absurdly bullish news is just so unbelievable.

[Anonymous No.56961954]

>>56961152
It’s why Sergey and every single Chainlink team member who has explicitly made the decision for things to be this way needs to be roughed up a bit. Obviously part of it is yeah we want number to go up, but what pisses me off so much is just how fucking retarded the whole thing is. They don’t want the price to pump now… because they want it to pump later? It just makes no sense. The price going up is objectively in their best interests as they’re able to position themselves in a stronger and stronger position.
>inb4 muh hiding strategy
Fuck off. It’s complete bullshit. The problem Chainlink has is it’s too complicated for most retards to understand, and they’ve barely started correcting these mistakes. The usual cope is “they don’t need retail”. It’s not so much about needing retail bagholders, but I think it’s absolutely in Chainlink’s best interests to become known as *the* key pillar in blockchain technology. The same way every retard knew what it meant to “Google it” is the same way Chainlink needs every retard to understand what it means to use a good oracle like Chainlink. They’ve absolutely fucked that up over and over again for years now. Without that, Chainlink is just slowing the retail adoption of blockchain technology which is weird because Sergey claims to want the TradFi to converge with the shit retail retards are doing in DeFi. Without retail understanding that Chainlink is the standard there’s ultimately less demand from users, and that ultimately hurts the Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.56961973]

>>56961954
Dude make no mistake if he wasn’t doing what he was doing, $200 was easily achievable. He has rekt link in ways that shouldn’t be possible. Sats attacks, supply dumps, algos, he worries more about price than releasing new updates

[Anonymous No.56961982]

>>56959480
There's never been any evidence of institutional accumulation. Exchange supply keeps trending up, it keeps dropping rankings and there are no suspicious huge wallets.

[Anonymous No.56962007]

>>56961982
All I have to respond with is lol

[Anonymous No.56962014]

>>56961973
It amazes me that Sergey was able to show himself at SmartCon and no one beat the shit out of him. That copy pasta that shows the prices of stuff from 2020 compared to now is absolutely brutal. There is no way ANYONE can spin that in a positive way. That level of fucking up shouldn’t even be possible. He’s always been such a pussy around the price thing. Not to mention the weird Nexo shit, Celsius, Bancor etc.

[Anonymous No.56962016]

When will u guys get the hint and become a KNS Ken Chad

[Anonymous No.56962107]

>>56956380
You're babbling.

[Anonymous No.56962421]

>>56954688
Baggies and new-coiners are so fucking irrelevant to LINKs success, what they fuck are you talking about

[Anonymous No.56962445]

>>56954905
If it doesn't break 100$ this run I will go berzerk

[Anonymous No.56962534]

>>56952838
Where?

[Anonymous No.56963658]

I don’t agree.

[Anonymous No.56963663]

>>56963658
Why?

[Anonymous No.56964019]

>$100

Bahahahaha you’ll be lucky to see $50. With the massive token inflation, returning to the $30s will be equivalent to prior ath from market cap perspective. Imo thats best case scenario this run.

Keep tagging SEC on chainlink posts so we can get them to look at the scam. And yes I realize its not a security per se but that doesnt make them immune to fraud charges. Chainlink essentially sells the key to mansion after sending you 50 pictures of it ie a Zillow listing. Then you go to the actual house and walk in and its hollow like a movie set. You then ask the team about it and they say legally they’re not a real estate company.

Anyone who doesnt see where Im going here probably doesnt have an understanding of how US courts work. In before muhh Caymens, thats a negative as well…nexus / substance over form

[Anonymous No.56964060]

>>56964019
>With the massive token inflation, returning to the $30s will be equivalent to prior ath from market cap perspective
Market cap has virtually zero impact on price.
It’s always the other way around.

[Anonymous No.56964086]

>>56955278
While I don't think the BTC dumps are timed to suppress LINK (LINKBTC charts confirm my stance), Sergay is absolutely positioned to dump BTC. The whole reason he was able to build his business (and many other businesses) was because he was an early BTC adopter.

[Anonymous No.56964257]

>>56952838
>banks will say fuck you were not using your ... garbage
They will say that regardless of price action

[Anonymous No.56964384]

sergeys dad already has a lambo, where is ours? its been 6 years of bag holding...6...fucking...years...

[Anonymous No.56964404]

>retail not needed
>creates a big mac event to relate to le epic community maymay

pick one

[Anonymous No.56964415]

>>56952838
>if the system gets too popular too fast, businesses may not want to use it

That's like saying if everyone suddenly bought GPUs and their price skyrocketed, companies just wouldn't use GPUs anymore

[Anonymous No.56964561]

>>56959480
>UTC deals
lol

[Anonymous No.56964641]

could you imagine if you invested in a company and after a decade they still have no product and no revenue, but instead are spending time hosting free camps to teach poor Africans how to code

[Anonymous No.56965508]

>>56955110
Fuck me, I said all this, here on this Icelandic Paper Plane Evaluation Forum, in a post no more than a year ago. My theory was the banks won't want to deal with some hugely volatile token so Link needs to present as something steady. Nice to know I was on the right lines.

[Anonymous No.56965788]

>>56952838

[Anonymous No.56966560]

We have come full circle with the cope.
>its da jooz
>its da bots
>its da bulgarians
>ita da suppressors
>its da exchanges
>its da elites
>its klaus schwab
>its nexo
>its alex mashinksy at celsius
>its cz and binance
>its da whales
>no its Ackshually sergey!!!
Cope the token is simply not needed therefore nobody wants to bid a high price for it.

[Anonymous No.56966633]

>>56954905
It's not even close to 50% of its ATH while BTC is over it, shut the fuck up with your hopium.

[Anonymous No.56966673]

>token crabs
>it's bullish you guys
every token, every time

[Anonymous No.56967037]

>>56964561
>its le SECRET

I can't believe they're still trying this angle. What is this 2021?

[Anonymous No.56967063]

>>56952845
This is a LINK board, fuck off back to /LGBT/ where you belong.

[Anonymous No.56967102]

>>56964019
>massive token inflation

Are you guys even trying anymore?

[Anonymous No.56967725]

>>56967102
>14%
>not massive
meanwhile the US scrambled to destroy its economy to fight 7% inflation.
There are third world shitholes with less inflation than chainlink, let that sink in.

[Anonymous No.56967810]

>>56967725
Don't look at Solana, Avax, Fantom, ... bro.
Just don't do it.

[Anonymous No.56968232]

>>56967725
Imagine being this much of a fucking retard comparing the US Dollar to a token with 1b total supply.