[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 87 KB, 759x1024, IMG_7713.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56905510 No.56905510 [Reply] [Original]

If you could make $100k passively vs $250k at a 9-5, which would you choose? And how would you invest the money?

>> No.56905592

>>56905510
100k passive, no question. I would invest in a house and chainlink. Which is basically already my situation

>> No.56905609

>>56905510
250k 9-5

all in index funds, etfs, reits, and a tad bit in crypto and private eqiuty

>> No.56905610

>>56905510
250k, no question. that's plenty of starting capital. i would be at 100k passive within a few years.

>> No.56905623

>>56905510
100k passively

I would invest in a team of troons to promote Chainlink online

>> No.56905636

>>56905610
How would you do that? Seems impossible.

>> No.56905676

100k passive. Fuck work

>> No.56905794

>>56905676
But how do you invest it to grow it?

>> No.56905830

>>56905636
>>56905794
coal miners. they literally print money

>> No.56905860

How much do I need to fuck her?

>> No.56905883

>>56905830
You can buy a coal mining machine for $100k?

>> No.56906322

>>56905510
Bump

>> No.56906325

>>56905510
$100k in passive income, please; I will then get a job that pays more than $250k, and have the best of both worlds.

>> No.56906347

>>56906325
Can only choose one

>> No.56906358

>>56905510
If I can make $35k passively I'd be retired

>> No.56906368

>>56906358
How would that work?

>> No.56906399

>>56906368
Only spending 35 k a year if I do the math correctly

>> No.56906414

>>56906368
Basically >>56906399

>> No.56906483

>>56906347
>can only choose one
...from you; who's to say that, a year after settling into a busy city with my $100k/y passive income, I can't apply for a job at a top tier firm? I'd be doing that on my own (although my modest $100k/y affords me enough luxury latitude for an edge rubbing elbows with the big dogs).

>> No.56906494

>>56906483
Because it’s a thought experiment

>> No.56906542
File: 28 KB, 480x472, 8e71d739da1c2b7091e7c53a3369a14c881ac4b7_00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56906542

>>56905510
Choosing is for conformists. Think about how you can continue to generate income forever, buy a house, lend money to a friend and charge interest, rent NFT in IQ, start a new business. That's the way real men work, not like you fucking faggot KEK

>> No.56906556
File: 529 KB, 754x710, 112351.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56906556

>>56905510
it's over for me guys, I can't even raise more than 100 bucks anymore without thinking of buying another konata figure or the cute marie rose from $SPX (the cum muse)

>> No.56906558

>>56906542
that's the attitude, you just read like a fitness guru motivating people to get up at 5am to run.

>> No.56906562
File: 34 KB, 600x696, 478409def43f32d482f52764bd3deb33 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56906562

>>56906542
Fucking BASED

>> No.56906567

>>56905592
CHAINLINK? ahsdhadhssdhah FAGGOT

>> No.56906577

>>56905610
250k is a reasonable amount to start a new business and then earn that 100k passively.

>> No.56906582
File: 26 KB, 243x207, 1679360612001598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56906582

>>56905510
I don't know, I'm not interested. I earn 5 figures a year as an employee at whataburger.

>> No.56906586
File: 295 KB, 500x500, 1401456583450.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56906586

>>56906556
I would go for Marie Rose since $SPX is bullish as fuck and Konata turned out to be mid

>> No.56906593

>>56906556
>the cum muse
MARIE IS MINE BITCH, NO CUMMING ON HER UNLESS YOU PAY ME FOR MY AEON

>> No.56906595

>>56906586
>"Konata turned out to be mid"
>no pedo weeb
ngmi

>> No.56906596

>>56906582
Why would you not be interested then..??

>> No.56906615

>>56905510
passive duh, you can work something else what you get that for free

>> No.56906713

>>56906615
You can only choose one though

>> No.56906733

>>56906542
>Choosing is for conformists.
i it wasnt for the context that point would be so tranny lol

>> No.56906751

>>56906347
thats unrealistic, realistically

>> No.56906754

>>56906751
That’s the point of the experiment

>> No.56906788

>>56906577
Checked. What kind of business

>> No.56906807

>>56905636
my annual expenses are only about 30k and a supremely conservative estimate for the CAGR of my investment portfolio would be 8%
which means i'm banking 220k in year one and earning 17,6 on it over the 2nd year while banking a second 220k, etc. so you're looking at reaching 100k passive in about five years with that estimate.
the actual CAGR i've printed is 12% but my income isn't that high. it doesn't need to be. just cut your expenses.

>> No.56906820

>>56906807
>my annual expenses are only about 30k and a supremely conservative estimate for the CAGR of my investment portfolio would be 8%
>which means i'm banking 220k in year one and earning 17,6 on it over the 2nd year while banking a second 220k, etc. so you're looking at reaching 100k passive in about five years with that estimate.
>the actual CAGR i've printed is 12% but my income isn't that high. it doesn't need to be. just cut your expenses.

>> No.56906918

>>56906807
Hmm interesting

>> No.56907023
File: 68 KB, 1453x809, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56907023

>>56906820
problem?
>>56906918
simple compound interest. pic related.
8$ of 1.33m is around $106k. five years, mission accomplished.

>> No.56907049

>>56907023
But why not just take the $100k in the first place instead of having to work and wait all those years?

>> No.56907114

>>56907049
because i'm not a retard.
30k in expenses out of 100k and the 30k will necessarily grow over time, but the remaining 70k barely grows.
my job is easy, working is rewarding, and incidentally if no one works then there is no passive income.
only losers put themselves on de facto welfare. in reality, they quickly burn through all their passive income by eating into the principal, and go right back to being poor.
it's the wrong answer because it's the wrong attitude.

>> No.56907192

>>56907114
Good argument

>> No.56907210

Did you think about how ridiculous this question was before you hit the post button? I suspect not

>> No.56907220

>>56907210
Huh? How?

>> No.56907326

>>56906820
?

>> No.56907431

>>56905510
Help me bump every thread other than /bbby/ and push it out of the catalog.

>> No.56907796

>>56905510
Bump

>> No.56907802

>>56905510
100k passive. I hate working so much it’s unreal.

>> No.56908170

>>56907802
Time is money

>> No.56908212

>>56905510
$100k passively, I already make $150k at a 9-5 so it'd be the same income with the highly tempting option of early retirement.

>> No.56908232

>>56905510
$100K passively. Would chill work on music and play vidya all day. Invest maybe $20K-30K into LINK a year. Set for life.

>> No.56908250

>>56905860
Nothing, if you are a powerful politician.

>> No.56908355

>>56908232
Based answer

>> No.56908440

>>56905510
100k passively, I make $130k now; I can't buy time though.

>> No.56908461

>>56908440
Based. Time is better than money without a doubt.

>> No.56909115

>>56905510
Anon, it's a cool 250k for me, with a sweet extra 100k to toss into the crypto market and let it ride passively. I will throw it into some altcoins like ETH, QANX, and SOL. Gonna stake a chunk for that extra cheddar.

>> No.56909669

>>56905510
250K, so simple.
25K in cash, 100K in stablecoins staked on Spool, rest all in crypto

>> No.56909676

Go fuck yourself

>> No.56909694

>>56905510
100k invested with compound interest.