[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 609 KB, 905x1010, Chainlink JUST.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56829732 No.56829732 [Reply] [Original]

Daily reminder that once a crypto has gone through a bullrun it can never again recover its dominance against bitcoin. There doesn’t exists a single example of this rule being broken. Chainlink unironically going to $27 next run but not a single dollar higher once bitcoin is at its peak.

Sorry linkers, if the circulating supply hadn’t increased by 40% (and up to 70% by 2025) and Sergey hadn’t suppressed the bullish news $140 would be possible. How sad.

>> No.56829748

>>56829732
I sold my link into BTC yesterday. It was a small bag of 1234 link. Now 65/35 btc to shitter ratio

>> No.56829757
File: 141 KB, 1073x1759, 2b10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56829757

this board has stockholm syndrome-like attachment to its link bags

>> No.56829788

>>56829757
All 'Link holders' are larpers
They only bait fools to lose their money
Grow up

>> No.56831065

>>56829732
the betrayal was real

>> No.56831166

>There doesn’t exists a single example of this rule being broken
This guy again. BNB already did that. ETH will do that this run too.

>> No.56831191
File: 115 KB, 1024x998, 6F00BFCC-A5E6-4872-8B5D-F14BDE38F368.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56831191

>>56829732
>There doesn’t exists a single example of this rule being broken.
That is an interesting hypothesis, anon. Let’s do some digging and see if it holds true, shall we? Your post mentions the decentralized oracle network Chainlink (ticker: LINK). Let’s look at some price data for LINK, shall we?
2017 LINKBTC peak: 0.0001044
2020 LINKBTC peak: 0.001611

Contrary to your thesis, there is at least one example of a token setting a high against BTC in one bullrun, then setting a higher high against BTC in a subsequent bullrun. The fact that you put forward this thesis, then mentioned by name one project that unambiguously debunks it, shows that you did not do adequate research. While I appreciate your efforts to provide alpha to the /biz/ community, kindly do five minutes of googling before posting your next brilliant theory here. Thank you.

Sincerely,
A LINK marine

>> No.56831206

>>56831191
SHUT UP

>> No.56831271

>>56831206
Ah, it appears I have touched a nerve. Let me guess, you lost your LINK stack on Celcius? Or perhaps you attempted to short LINK before the run up to $15 and got liquidated? In either case a most unwise decision, my good fellow.

>> No.56832493

>>56831271
how much are you down from '21