/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.56753370]

>Hardforks Bitcoin
>Nothing personal kiddo

[Anonymous No.56753378]

And before somebody says how nobody will use the new fork, pic. related.

[Anonymous No.56753385]

>>56753370
In 2016, Bitcoin BTC was taken over by the Bilderberg Group.

Bitcoin BTC was originally hailed as a way to take power away from banks & governments.

The Bilderberg Group represents the banking & political elite.

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group


The Bilderberg Group funded Blockstream (which does the programming for Bitcoin BTC). On February 3rd, 2016, AXA invested $55 million in Blockstream. At the time of that investment, Henri de Castries was the head of both AXA and Bilderberg Group.

- http://www.coindesk.com/blockstream-55-million-series-a/

- http://blockstream.com/2016/02/02/blockstream-new-investors-55-million-series-a.html

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_de_Castries


Blockstream crippled Bitcoin BTC, to push people towards the Lightning Network & sidechains:

- http://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoins-possible-privatization-has-blockstream-created-problem-to-provide-solution

- http://blockstream.com/2018/01/16/lightning-charge.html


The Truth About Lightning Network:

- http://youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g [Embed]


Why Blockstream Destroyed Bitcoin BTC:

- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BZoKH-hX_o [Embed]


Blockstream crippled Bitcoin BTC with high fees, so that people will have to use Blockstream projects (Lightning Network & sidechains) for everyday transactions.

Result: The Bilderberg Group - which represents the banking & political elite - has taken over Bitcoin BTC, crippled it, to turn it into a currency system that they control & profit from.


SUMMARY:

- Bitcoin BTC was originally hailed as a way to take power away from banks & governments.

- The Bilderberg Group represents the banking & political elite.

- So the Bilderberg Group threw some money at Blockstream, to take over Bitcoin BTC.

- Strategically, it was a logical move on their part. If you represented the banking & political elite, you would have done the exact same thing.

[Anonymous No.56753395]

>>56753378
so nobody is using eth vs etc? makes sense yes, etc is the top29(sinking to irrelevance) meanwhile eth is only th,e second.

[Anonymous No.56753412]

>>56753385
>Blockstream crippled Bitcoin BTC, to push people towards the Lightning Network & sidechains
that's cute however
>whirlpool has more volume and size than ln
>state channels do not work well
>liquid is a ghost town
>meanwhile taproot projects are popping off

cope
seethe
dial 8

[Anonymous No.56753418]

>>56753395
ETH is the fork

[Anonymous No.56753450]

>>56753418
yes, but eth was 1-2 years old with quite small userbase, core crypto believers(not these 4-5 years old faggotts) wont touch that shit with a ten feet pole!

[Anonymous No.56753501]

>>56753450
Once MacOS, Android, Windows, Linux distributions, etc. start updating your software you are going to wake up in the US crypto controlled era.
>core crypto believers
Even if there are the price is going to surge a lot since USA will always find shit excuses to sanction and fuck with the ones using the old chains.

I mean now I am determined more than ever to fight for the old chains and invest money, time and code into them but let us be honest, Blackrock has the resources to fuck us quiet bad and is a fight we probably won't win.

[Anonymous No.56753507]

>>56753370
>none of the miners move
>gets double spent like BSV
kek

[Anonymous No.56753514]

>>56753507
Take a look who is taking a part of the cake in big numbers
https://finbold.com/blackrock-is-a-major-shareholder-in-4-of-the-5-largest-bitcoin-miners/

[Anonymous No.56753580]

>>56753514
>6% of shares in the top two
>less than 3% in all the others
WOW oh no I am shaking

but WAIT. Maybe Riot owns disproportionally much of the total haspower??

Riot top hash of all time: 10 EH/s
BTC total hashpower: 500000 EH/s

WOW I AM SHAKING

[Anonymous No.56753890]

>>56753385
is there any new coins as decentralized as BTC that scale better? Every single project that claims to scale has to become more centralized in some way or another to achieve it. If there was an actual solution to the fee/scaling issues, it'd either be more valuable than btc, or btc would finally have a method and scale and use it.

[Anonymous No.56753941]

>>56753370
>Hardforks Bitcoin
>It's just more FIAT currency

[Anonymous No.56753945]

>>56753385
So the free market is a lie and it's just another oligarchy?
I agree. Rope them all.

[Anonymous No.56754248]

>>56753370
whats this about?
got a link?

[Anonymous No.56754323]

>>56754248
fiatcel is trying to cope with the fact that his shitcoin (USD) has no bottom and no collateral
at the end, he's going to pretend like it was all CIA and that he wasn't stupid

[Anonymous No.56754337]

>>56753378
Go back

[Anonymous No.56754921]

>>56753378
If they kept the old chain "Ethereum" and the new chain "New Ethereum", the old chain would be more popular, because people just look at the ticker and buy what they recognize and think is the best official ethereum.

[Anonymous No.56755670]

>>56753370
Jews just can't leave anything alone can they? Daily reminder
>good times bring jews
>jews make bad times [you are here]
>bad times make dead jews
>dead jews bring good times

[Anonymous No.56755677]

>>56754921
whats wrong with ethereum classic?

[Anonymous No.56755683]

>>56753370
>nodes simply refuse to use inferior software