/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.56753287]

Will you be restaking for v.0.2 considering they've lowered APY to 4.3%? Unbounding period of one month so what's likely to happen is when it hits $50 again, a lot of people will try to unbound to take in some profit but will only be able to do so a month later. It's literally designed so you cannot sell the top and remain shackled in the cuck cage. 4.3% is pathetic but they keep dangling the carrot of more fees like BUILD airdrops and GME revenues (although they don't even use the eth/usd feed). The only reason to keep staking is because it's guaranteed grandfathered in priority slot.

[Anonymous No.56753313]

>>56753287
Yes I will be restaking. Very happy with the new terms, the unbonding period doesn’t enter the equation for anyone who isn’t a degenerate gambler

[Anonymous No.56753319]

>>56753313
But you don’t understand if I dont at least leverage my entire portfolio on 100x once a day I start itching. It’s not gambling if you win?

[Anonymous No.56753324]

>>56753287
Only a small amount because they didn't mention the promised BUILD rewards

[. No.56753331]

>hi Sweetie, are you "dabbing on the normies yet?
>is my little Machiavellian genius ready for his tendies?

[Anonymous No.56753381]

Yes. I stake link and eth because it makes it too inconvenient to sell and I want the link I bought at $7 to enter long term capital gains without any temptation.

[Anonymous No.56753404]

>>56753287
Obviously restaking. What else are you going to do with it before it hits $1000?

[Anonymous No.56753731]

>>56753287

>unbonding
nigga im liquid with stlink, kys

[Anonymous No.56753828]

How ya doing kiddos?

[Anonymous No.56753846]

Considering market top is in 2025 it's a no brainer, staking as much as possible.

Also if you're a paranoid swingie you can keep perpetually unbonding and not withdrawing

[Anonymous No.56753886]

>>56753846
where'll top?

[Anonymous No.56753892]

>>56753287
>4.3%
Source?

[Anonymous No.56753903]

>>56753287

> when it hits $50 again

lol, lmao even

Idiots, idiots everywhere

[Anonymous No.56753920]

>>56753324
This. They keep supplying hopium by not directly addressing the lack of build rewards. Look at this shit:
>Additional upgrades currently being worked on for Staking are new tools that enable BUILD projects to make Chainlink BUILD rewards available to stakers. We anticipate continued momentum around great teams joining the BUILD program over the coming months. The rollout of both user fee rewards and BUILD claiming tools within the Staking platform will be based on user fee volumes and BUILD participation continuing to accelerate and reaching high enough levels to meaningfully contribute to additional security for the network. More information around Chainlink BUILD rewards and eligibility for v0.2 stakers and historical v0.1 stakers is planned to be provided in the future.

What the fuck kind of doublespeak is this? They wrote a shitload of words just to say they won’t give you shit but more information in the future. Nah man, they won’t trap me, fuck them this is the last run and I won’t miss it because Sergey is trying to be le ethical CEO. Also, as soon as they start dumping link I’ll short it, dgaf.

[Anonymous No.56753931]

>>56753287
>he's so poor he can't even max out early access in v.02 and still have a fat stack left over to sell at the top

[Anonymous No.56753948]

>>56753920
>More information around Chainlink BUILD rewards and eligibility for v0.2 stakers and historical v0.1 stakers is planned to be provided in the future.
>to be provided in the future.

Conveniently in the future doesn’t mean before rolling out staking 0.2 kek

[Anonymous No.56754040]

>>56753920
>we promise guys, the shitcoin airdrops are coming in two more weeks! just lock up your LINK for 4.75% while we periodically dilute you at a much higher rate!

[Anonymous No.56754087]

>>56754040
>lock up your LINK for 4.75% while we periodically dilute you at a much higher rate

I love when retards like you think every % of "supply dilution" directly translates to price reduction.
Just love it, oh my god.

[Anonymous No.56754089]

>>56753287
>they've lowered APY
No they haven't.
It was a fixed 4.75% in v0.1, and it's variable with a FLOOR of 4.5% in v0.2

[Anonymous No.56754165]

https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-v0-2-overview/

Why is it so difficult for you neanderthals to link things?

[Anonymous No.56754227]

>>56754087
Link dumps are literally sell pressure which translates to lower price and dilution of market cap per link you massive retard. To put things in perspective, ATH last run would’ve been around $28 instead of $50 with the current circulating supply. Dumb nigger.

[Anonymous No.56754237]

>>56754227
>ATH last run would’ve been around $28 instead of $50 with the current circulating supply
That's not how any of this works lmao

[Anonymous No.56754244]

>>56754227
Oh by the way, chainlink will have a 700 million circulating supply in 2025. Which means LINK has to increase its market cap almost double to what it was in 2021 JUST to reach $50. Fucking bonkers, fuck this shit.

[Anonymous No.56754259]

>>56754237
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.56754261]

>>56754227
>>56754244
This is why I come here; pure uncut idiocy.

[Anonymous No.56754279]

>>56753920
BUILD, staking V0.2, POC with bank #349, it's all small fry stuff in the end.
CCIP and real staking with decentralized oracles network is what matters.
When I bought in 2018 I sincerely expected we would have true DONs by now. Instead we have this frankenstein helicopter money for nodes while at the same time providing oracle services for the vast majority of DeFi.

Worse is that we don't really have true engineering insight on which step they're currently at and left to guess.
In comparison DeFi protocols or L2s are fairly transparent and precise with what's next. The fact they launch a new feature every 4 months doesn't help with clarity.

I had a friend discuss with Marc Zeller recently and Chainlink is easily among the projects in DeFi with the most street cred and many people are waiting for CCIP but it's like they hesitate to start decentralizing for 3 years now.

[Anonymous No.56754288]

>>56754259
Who lowers the price according to circulating supply?
The police?

[Anonymous No.56754289]

>>56754237
>>56754261
>anon provides logical arguments
>street shitting pajeets reply with pure shit
Are you both mentally challenged?

[Anonymous No.56754292]

>>56754289
see >>56754288

[Anonymous No.56754339]

>>56754288
>what is supply and demand
Can’t believe I have to explain this on a business and finance board, but here’s an extremely dumbed down and simplified explanation for a dumb and simple person like you.

>100 normies want to spend $10 each on X
>$1000 bid pressure (basically market cap)
>Only 1000 X available
>You can sell, in average, market cap/available supply
>$1000/1000 X = $1 per 1 X

If you increase the number of X available, the normies bid pressure remain the same, but due to the increased number of X in circulation the bid per a single X goes down.

This is basic supply and demand, why are linkers so retarded?

[Anonymous No.56754365]

>>56754339
>due to the increased number of X in circulation the bid per a single X goes down
lmao, the money from a buyer does not get distributed across the circulating supply you absolute retard.
If one X token costs $10, then each will buy one X token. Regardless of whether there are 1000 tokens or 1,000,000,000.

You are legit retarded.

[Anonymous No.56754379]

>>56754279
Yeah, it’s sad. At this point I’m really starting to wonder if Sergey really just wanted to make a quiet exist and is basically stalling the chainlink network. He already has billions of fiat in his treasury which is enough for a comfy life of gaming. He doesn’t strike me as particularly ambitious and last smartcon he looked like he was basically mocking the audience so I’m losing hope.

Sergey has at least $5 billion in his treasure. That’s enough to pay 500 employees $150k per year for 30 years and pay himself 50 million per year for the next 50 years.

The lack of revenue information and updates are not reassuring either. 7 years to ship CCIP? C’mon dude

[Anonymous No.56754395]

>>56754365
Overall buying pressure does get distributed across the available supply. Stop being dumb.

[Anonymous No.56754461]

>>56754395
>be token
>have 1 trillion tokens in circulation
>market price is $1 per token
>market cap is $1 trillion

with me so far?

>token project goes to shit
>volume is zero
>one person buys 1 token for $100 by mistake
>???
>market price is now $100 per token
>market cap is now $100 trillion

That $100 does not get distributed across the 1 billion circulating tokens, it gets distributed to that ONE token.
Market cap is adjusted according to market price, NEVER the other way around.

[Anonymous No.56754561]

>>56754395
You think entite floating supply is on active order books to be traded? lamo
Absolute state of this board

[Anonymous No.56754566]

>>56754461
Disregard the concept of market cap fren. Let’s use first principles.

>Normie retail has a total of X amount of dollars to buy Y numbers of tokens
>Price of token = Z
>2021
>Z = X / Y (extreme oversimplification)

>2025
>Z = X / 2Y (doubled the supply of tokens)

It is obvious that if the number of tokens in circulation increase, the supply increases. More supply = less demand per token, UNLESS you can double the demand at an equal rate than the supply.

So, if you want Z to keep the same value as 2021, you have to double Z at ATH, which is extremely hard for a top 20 token, and that’s just to achieve the same value per token of 2021.

[Anonymous No.56754574]

>>56754566
Correction:
So, if you want Z to keep the same value as 2021, you have to double *X at ATH, which is extremely hard for a top 20 token, and that’s just to achieve the same value per token of 2021.

[Anonymous No.56754575]

>>56753287
I'm not selling until link hits $1000 and becomes at least top 3 (where it should be)

[Anonymous No.56754587]

>>56754566
Anon, when you buy tokens, your bid does not get distributed across the entire available supply.
Your money goes DIRECTLY towards the tokens YOU are buying, and nothing else.

Stop posting.

[Anonymous No.56754639]

>>56754587
>Your money goes DIRECTLY towards the tokens YOU are buying, and nothing else.

You’re thinking on a single transaction basis. What do you think determines the price at the time you buy your tokens? The total market bid and the supply of the tokens. Stop thinking of the market as millions of people trying to buy an asset, and start thinking of it as a wave of capital trying to overcome a wall of supply.

[Anonymous No.56754653]

What % are you staking?

[Anonymous No.56754658]

>>56754639
>You’re thinking on a single transaction basis
A market price of an asset is quite literally a snapshot of the latest single transaction.

>What do you think determines the price at the time you buy your tokens?
Whatever you're willing to pay. Literally.

[Anonymous No.56754696]

Whats there to even debate? My Linkies will be safe and collecting more Linkies, and you will be able to sell so there is no reason not to. How does an unbonding period suprise anyone, and two weeks is short for one too.

[Anonymous No.56754707]

>>56754658
>A market price of an asset is quite literally a snapshot of the latest single transaction.
>Whatever you're willing to pay. Literally.

And what do you think determines the price you’re willing to pay?

[Anonymous No.56754728]

>>56754707
Anon, if you have $10 to spend on an asset, that $10 is not getting distributed across the entire fucking circulating supply.

Stop posting and go outside.

[Anonymous No.56754772]

>>56754728
I’ll ask again. What do you think determines the price you’re willing to pay?

[Anonymous No.56754786]

>>56754707
buy and sell orders are two ranges and inbetween you have a probability cloud of intersections, with the latest transaction being the market price. Marketcap means absolutely nothing and has no worth. I can sell you 1 Link for 1 Trillion dollars, this doesn't do anything to the intrinsic value of the network though. volume and volumebalance is much more important. Chainlink needed a volume of between 2-4 billion to reach it's ATH, we already had 1 billion

[Anonymous No.56754803]

>>56754772
I unironically recognise you from your seething. Aren’t you the guy that came clean a while ago and said you fud because you can’t stand anyone with less than 10,000 link or anyone who doesn’t fully understand it etc

[Anonymous No.56754844]

>>56754772
Also link supply increases at the monetary inflation rate and anyone with half a brain values an investment based on fully diluted value

[Anonymous No.56754868]

>>56754786
Technically right, but wrong in the grand scheme of thing.

People as a group were willing to spend X money on link in 2021. If in 2025 people are willing to spend the same amount of money (X), that means links price will be half what it was in 2021. Not because of market cap, but because the demand is the same as it was in 2021, but now split across double the supply of link.

This is why, for link to be $50 this next run, given that the supply has increased almost 2x, you have to increase the demand for the token by 2x.

This is not very likely, as only a few projects have done this in the last 10 years (eth, doge, bnb), and the projects that have done this have been extremely focused on pumping the token price, which is something chainlink doesn’t really care about.

[Anonymous No.56754876]

>>56754803
I don’t even hold Iink, just here for the keks

[Anonymous No.56754883]

>>56754868
>This is not very likely, as only a few projects have done this in the last 10 years (eth, doge, bnb), and the projects that have done this have been extremely focused on pumping the token price, which is something chainlink doesn’t really care about.

Anon, the past few years Chainlink has been subsidizing their oracle services. Now they're making people pay up.

[Anonymous No.56754896]

>>56754883
>Now they're making people pay up.

Hey that sounds great! Could you please show me where are the fees from people paying up?

[Anonymous No.56754934]

>>56754896
Sorry bro, don't know their wallets.

[Anonymous No.56754961]

>>56754896
>where are the fees from people paying up?
In the case of the price feeds, end users don’t pay the nodes directly.
For nearly everything else (VRF, keepers, …) the fees are all on chain.

[Anonymous No.56754973]

>>56754868
The supplies exposure rate is not maximum though, like you are assuming, just how resources like cobalt theoretically have a big supply somewhere on earth, the actual access and exposure constricts.

[Anonymous No.56755016]

>>56754227
>ATH last run would’ve been around $28 instead of $50 with the current circulating supply
Nearly all cryptos increased their supply. Many of them by a lot more than Chainlink.
By your logic all of them would have had much lower ATHs with their current supply.

You are the dumbest blackest gorilla nigger imaginable.

[Anonymous No.56755057]

I was wondering when we’d see the fud threads with 20+ pbtid again

[Anonymous No.56755097]

>>56753287
The price of Link has doubled in the last month so that's the equivalent of your 4.3% being 8.6% in USD value. We (myself and other Link holders) expect the Link price to rise considerably more, going forward. That 4.3% is going to make me obscenely rich, without even touching my principle stack. Hope this info is useful.

[Anonymous No.56755106]

>>56754961
https://dune.com/linkpool
$1.2 million in fees this month. Is that all?

Assuming $2 million in fees per month and $15 per link thats 1.6 million link per year in fees. Why the fuck does the team need to dump 70 million link per year for this? Even if they’re subsidizing the network the dumps are 44 times larger than what they need to subsidize the node operators. What the fuck.

>>56754973
Are you assuming the circulating supply chainlink has on their own website is false? https://chain.link/circulating-supply

>>56755016
>By your logic all of them would have had much lower ATHs with their current supply.

99% of tokens have never recovered their ATH once they’ve gone through a previous bullrun. Give me a few tickers that aren’t doge, bnb, eth or neo, I’ll show you nigger clown.

[Anonymous No.56755128]

>>56753287
>4.3% risk free LINK is pathetic
ok

[Anonymous No.56755165]

>>56755106
>99% of tokens have never recovered their ATH once they’ve gone through a previous bullrun.
>Give me a few tickers that aren’t doge, bnb, eth or neo

Link

[Anonymous No.56755176]

>>56755165
Wait that’s true

[Anonymous No.56755187]

>>56755106
99% of tokens are completely useless and/or scams too. i guess you're too retarded to pick good ones

[Anonymous No.56755204]

>>56755165
I’d say LINK has only gone through one bullrun in 2021. Were yet to see if they can recover in 2025. 2017 wasn’t really representative of its performance as it came out right on top of the bull.

[Anonymous No.56755222]

>>56755187
Why u mad bro? Im not the one dumping millions on link on the open market making the price go down.

Take your complaints here:
[e-mail]

[Anonymous No.56755241]

>>56755204
>as it came out right on top of the bull.
ICO was 3 months before the top friendo

[Anonymous No.56755246]

>>56755204
>I’d say LINK has only gone through one bullrun in 2021
You'd say wrong. Link did a x10 in sats in the January 2018 bullrun.

[Anonymous No.56755303]

Can any bros give me some advice, guidance?

I have 1,570 Link and 2.3 ETH. If I swap my ETH for Link, I'll get about 300 more Link.

Is this worth it/a good trade? my original 1.5k stack is in staking v0.1; so if I buy more, I thin I shall still be able to add it all to v0.2.

Or should I stay diversified with my 2.3 ETH in the event it moons?

If I swap to link, I'll get 80 Link per year staking, if I keep my current stack its about 67 Link per year (if APY is 4.3%) help appreciated..

[Anonymous No.56755352]

>>56755165
kek instantly BTFO

[Anonymous No.56755384]

>>56755222
>dumping millions on link on the open market making the price go down
You mean like he literally said he would back in 2017?

[Anonymous No.56755458]

>>56755106
Retard

[Anonymous No.56755506]

>>56755384
>>56755458
Chainlink employees doing damage control KEK!

Sergey will keep dumping 70 million link per year while the network only makes 1.6 million link per year in fees.

Sorry linkers, you can either debunk this or I will I G N O R E you! Protip, you can’t debunk this. Sawwy!

[Anonymous No.56755509]

>>56753287
>>56753892
>>56755097
>>56755128
>>56755303
>they've lowered APY to 4.3%
Incorrect, this is the base floor rate i.e. the rate can go higher

[Anonymous No.56755531]

>>56755509
>the rate can go higher
Only if the pool isn’t 100% filled up. Are you implying the staking pool won’t be completely filled up? Because I agree desu.

That’s probably why the Chainlink team is currently running ads to incentivize people to stake. Because NO ONE wants to stake hahaha

[Anonymous No.56755543]

>>56755128
>crypto
>risk free
hahahahahahahahaahhahahaahahahaaa some twitter clown can vomit out a tweet and flip the market upside down you fucking retard

>he actually said risk free
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.56755701]

>>56755543
Over the top, but i agree. There's a certain risk sergay will betray

[Anonymous No.56755710]

>>56755531
this is pretty funny, I do this to other tokens too

[Anonymous No.56755814]

>>56755701
>oops sorry we didnt catch this one in time and the community pool got drained, thanks for beta testing goy!
>as consolation we've airdropped you an Epic Early Staker Monkey NFT (rare)!

[Anonymous No.56755878]

>19pbtid concern fud

[Anonymous No.56756062]

>>56755509
Wait so the reward is higher if the pool isn't full?? Also... Should I swap my Eth for link?

[Anonymous No.56757807]

>>56756062
nta
yes but i think it will get filled almost instantly

[Anonymous No.56759478]

>>56754279
>CCIP and real staking with decentralized oracles network is what matters.
Real staking yes. Decentalised oracles? wtf do you think the "DON" everything currently runs on is jeet.

[Anonymous No.56759666]

>>56755878
>company states APY
>company slowly lowers APY
>no reason why
>"gUyz tHis IsnT FuD LoL!!"
fuck off retard if you like making less money this isnt the place for you

[Anonymous No.56761005]

>>56753920
it means that such a tiny % of overall chainlink participants stand to gain from BUILD tokens (congrats if thats one of you) that its taking a bit of a back seat in favor for developing in other areas

[Anonymous No.56761240]

>>56755531
I don't stake tokens with uncertainty rewards like this. I stake RIDE and EGLD, and they offer a decent 18% APY.

[Anonymous No.56761413]

>a dozen verbose 1pbtids fudding + that 19pbtid with the same writing style as all of them

hello, fulltime fudcuck!

fudcuck
noun
fud-cuck
plural fudcucks, kekfuddies

1: a misguided, unpaid, and disgruntled personal assistant to link holders and stakers
"I just woke up! I could clean up the smegma scented basement I live in, but today I need to spend 8 hours angrily keeping biz up to date on my latest headcanon!" - your average fudcuck
2: an angry retard who lives on biz and is bitter about selling at a loss / gambling it all away on a lending platform: person affected with extreme intellectual disability or emotional instability
3: a mindbroken, low testosterone ESL "male" - usually from a third-world country, who found biz after 2021 and is obsessed with the investments of other men and feels a need to always post about it

The terms fudcuck, kekfuddie, and their derivatives are currently used as technical descriptors in medical, educational, and regulatory contexts. These uses are broadly rejected by fudcucks, mostly because they find them incredibly offensive and upsetting

[Anonymous No.56762026]

Keep trying fuddie, surely the 15 people here will definitely give up their early access staking spot, just so you can get in :^)

How does it feel to know we have been kingmade, and you have not?

[Anonymous No.56762066]

>>56759478
It's not decentralized if the incentive isn't you stupid nigger.

[Anonymous No.56762254]

>>56753287
look into stake.link priority pool, they have higher apy and no ramp up period

[Anonymous No.56762523]

>>56762066
This is the dumbest thing ever.
Chainlink feeds are paid to a huge extent by end users, and secondary products like VRF, functions, keepers, etc. are all paid directly by end users.

Meanwhile Bitcoin mining rewards are still 97% inflationary subsidies to this day

[Anonymous No.56762541]

just lol at this trash

[Anonymous No.56762691]

>>56753287
>Unbonding period is 1 month
There's no timelock to claim your rewards. So if you have enough staked you can just "unstake" your rewards at any time and sell them off, while your actual stack continues accumulating LINK.

[Anonymous No.56762744]

>>56754227
how did some people even find biz...

are you on your brothers computer?

you talk about ''basic supply and demand'' but don't understand supply, don't understand demand, and i'm beginning to doubt you even understand 'basic'.

i mean, i get how it makes sense to you, but, i mean, you're joking, right?

[Anonymous No.56762779]

>>56753886
anons expect q3-q4 run culminating in 2024 q1-q2 of 2025 are just going directly off past performance, not a terrible call but ETF's likely gonna change this timeline and the dump may be less violent due to this as well

[Anonymous No.56762804]

>>56753846
>Also if you're a paranoid swingie you can keep perpetually unbonding and not withdrawing
only every 90 days, if you don't want to lose rewards.

[Anonymous No.56762838]

>>56762691
At what point do the rewards begin earning interest, ie become part of the stack, then?

[Anonymous No.56762841]

>>56762541
Looks exactly like an early restricted access product should.

[Anonymous No.56762883]

Yes, I'll be restaking my 2000 link that I have left since ICO in 2017 because I'm mentally cucked by Sergey.

Meanwhile I'll throw an equivalent amount into some retarded animal coin going 100x to keep my sanity.

[Anonymous No.56763031]

>>56762691
Wait wtf? Lmao then this is the best staking I've ever ever heard of. It's a no-brainer because it's the most secure/legit project, all these other things are a bonus

[Anonymous No.56763094]

>>56762523
Well that's wrong, since price feeds are heavily subsidised. Many were so unprofitable that Chainlink had to deprecate over 200+ of them in the last 18 months. Hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies squandered on price feeds that generated almost no outside revenue. Amazing financial responsibility shown by Chainlink Labs and its supporters, bravo!

[Anonymous No.56763348]

>>56763094
I forgot about this. There's literally no demand for their services, what an elaborate scam

[Anonymous No.56764336]

>>56753287
> unboun
sorry didnt get further
DRNS

[Anonymous No.56764353]

>>56762838
Remember there's a cap of 15K link. So I suppose you can claim your reward to restake it, but the other issue is finding out if there's space in the community pool to stake your newly acquired link. You'd have to write a bot to continually query the pool size to snipe the moment someone unstakes their Link. Or get lucky.

[Anonymous No.56764467]

>>56755106
Why has no one addressed this?

>Assuming $2 million in fees per month and $15 per link thats 1.6 million link per year in fees. Why the fuck does the team need to dump 70 million link per year for this? Even if they’re subsidizing the network the dumps are 44 times larger than what they need to subsidize the node operators. What the fuck.

Why does the chainlink team need to dump 44 times as many link as needed to subsidize the node operators when they already have billions of fiat in their treasury? The fiat they’re holding is enough to pay for their employees and services for 30 years too.

Why do they need to keep dumping their *extremely valuable* link token???

This shit looks like a quiet exit from Sergey.

[Anonymous No.56764523]

>>56753324
>>56753920
>This. They keep supplying hopium by not directly addressing the lack of build rewards. Look at this shit:
ive noticed the turning point in the wording when the white paper 2.0 bullshit started happening. i looked past that and some other pilpul garbage. The last straw was sergey straight up lied about staking and ccip in 22. Im staking half my staking and unloading the rest. Plus with the whole link pool thing it feels like they are trying to be kikes but with out spooking the community. There is no way sergey didnt okay what they did with LP and SDL

[Anonymous No.56764559]

>>56754772
you're arguing with a retard. if supply and demand didnt work then why is BTC valued so high compared to dodge. Its crazy that you have midwits (that take ideas from that retard fishycatfishy) posting stupid shit here

[Anonymous No.56764578]

Keeping my 60k link staked forever desu, not joking.

[Anonymous No.56764597]

>>56764523
>There is no way sergey didnt okay what they did with LP and SDL
Joneh the horse rimmer keeps getting invited to smartcon and his talks are still getting uploaded to the official chainlink youtube channel.

If Sergey is okay with Jonny fucking over the whole chainlink community with linkpool I can only guess what he himself would be okay with doing to linkmarines, besides dumping hundreds of millions of link of them of course.

The reality that Sergey might just want to make a quiet exit by dumping link dawned on me when I saw his quora profile and his response on slave vs master mentality opened my eyes.

He thinks he’s the master and linkmarines the slaves, chained by chainlink.

I was a fool for believing in him.

[Anonymous No.56764601]

>>56755384
>You mean like he literally said he would back in 2017?
he also never said anything about a white paper 2.0, he also said staking and ccip in 22

[Anonymous No.56764669]

>>56764597
>response on slave vs master mentality opened my eyes.
yep, this comes to mind aswell. I'm not trying to fud. i want the price to go up so i can get out but i have looked past a lot of shit that in any other scenario i would have not. Like when rory decided to post in the discord about selling more tokens like a fucking kike instead of twitter.

[Anonymous No.56764688]

>>56754339
I love that your version of dumbing things down is to use Algebra as if that’s going to help normies understand anything lol

[Anonymous No.56764872]

>>56764669
>Like when rory decided to post in the discord about selling more tokens like a fucking kike instead of twitter.

What a scummy cunt

[Anonymous No.56765349]

>>56764353
So what happens to your rewards? They just sit there, not earning any interest until you take them out? Don't we have the option to compound them?

[Anonymous No.56765945]

>>56765349
Probably just sit there like V0.1. I know they didn't specify but with 15K max wallets and a capped pool at whatever the image has >>56754165
; if 15K wallets can't compound their link, then I don't see smaller wallets getting the chance too.

[Anonymous No.56766432]

>>56765945
Maybe if we don't take them out we'll get priority access for them in further iterations. This would make sense as it would incentive us to leave them. This is a good one to ask the team if they don't offer any clarity on it soon

[Anonymous No.56767140]

>>56766432
I mean incentivise

[Anonymous No.56767152]

chaincucks we no u r fudding everest id threads

stay out of our threads and stop paid fud

[Anonymous No.56768031]

>>56755509
>the rate can go higher
As someone 95% in on Link. We both know it wont

[Anonymous No.56769142]

>>56768031
The 4% is meaningless if the token price is rising. Why is it only me itt who seems to get this?