LinkChain

[Anonymous No.56690871]

I found this (don't ask). Can any big brain anon analyze it and vouch for its accuracy?

[Anonymous No.56690891]

>>56690871
White Spiritual Boy is that you?

[Anonymous No.56690901]

>>56690871
$800 per link? Quite bullish, the securable value seems to be consistent with super linear staking too.

Where did you find this? It reads confidential on the tab name

[Anonymous No.56690923]

>>56690871
>securing the entire TAM at 100% only gives you $781 LINK

[Anonymous No.56690925]

>>56690871
>>56690901
>Screenshot 5011 Jean S
Also is this assuming that ONLY 35% of the total supply gets staked? What happens when that approaches 100%?

[Anonymous No.56690931]

>>56690891
Who’s that lol

>>56690901
Thanks anon. What about links price? Does it make sense?

[Anonymous No.56690938]

>>56690923
Check the Supply Staked column
>>56690931
Not who, but what. Oldfags know

[Anonymous No.56690942]

link price 7.82 by 2025 kek

[Anonymous No.56690968]

>>56690923
I'm tired of this grandpa.

[Anonymous No.56690976]

>>56690891
You’re gonna get this thread nuked by mentioning that

>>56690923
It seems chainlink might have other markets to dominate judging by the 2nd row “market priority”. Its price could probably go higher.

>>56690931
Considering a yield of 4.75% per link, yeah, it makes sense if you compare it to traditional telecommunications/finance yields. It’s also interesting that if you go a bit higher in yield the total secured value is not enough to cover the total securable market, that’s probably why Sergey set the intitial staking yield at 4.75%, to set a precedent.

Motherfucker is truly playing the long game

[Anonymous No.56691006]

>>56690976
It’s also interesting that the node operators are set at 10k, basically the same number of banks swift has on their network.

Swift is a cooperative and not a for-profit corp, so it’s possible that the banks will become node operators and the yield will be sent back to them, effectively replacing the current system, reducing costs and making the system 10x more secure. Truly the banking coin .

[Anonymous No.56691010]

>>56690976
>You’re gonna get this thread nuked by mentioning that
I know, bad goy. At least then it would be confirmed after all these years.

[Anonymous No.56691015]

>>56690976
>>56690968
>>56690938
So in the best case scenario where all value in this particular market is secured and the entire LINK supply is staked, you’re getting $2.2K LINK by 2035. Brutal for anyone hodling under 10K Linkies looking for real gains this next cycle

[Anonymous No.56691034]

>>56691015
>you’re getting $2.2K LINK by 2035
Wouldn't it increase exponentially as the amount staked approaches 100%

[Anonymous No.56691047]

>>56691015
There was also a web3 document that showed $120 by 2025 but I couldn’t save it. There were 5 docs, web3, swift, dtcc, derivatives and a total one. Derivatives being the biggest one and web3 the smallest one. I couldn’t access the total one.

>>56690976
Thanks for chiming in anon, appreciate the spoonfeeding

[Anonymous No.56691062]

>>56690871
>>56690891
>>56690901
>>56690923
>>56690925
>>56690931
>>56690938
>>56690942
>>56690968
>>56690976
>>56691006
>>56691010
>>56691015
>>56691034
>>56691047
Your posts are boring and repetitive

[Anonymous No.56691068]

>>56691047
Wait wait wait so web3 was the smallest? But this is the swift doc and it says $7.82 by 2025. Where are these from?

[Anonymous No.56691078]

>>56691015
Chainlink will probably allocate different portions of their supply to different sectors, see >>56691047. If there were multiple docs the most important one would be the total one, as it’d show the total price of link, probably using some weighted average. It shows swift is their priority #2, I’m unsure if 1 is the most important one but considering DTCC and derivatives are bigger than swift, I’d say you can safely multiple link’s value shown in OP’s table by 3 and that’d be a pretty good estimate of link’s value.

[Anonymous No.56691079]

>>56690976
>>56691010
Who's spiritual boy REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.56691080]

>>56691047
Nice find, interesting stuff for sure. It’s kinda hard to predict price here because you’ve got so many variables. Staking supply, amount of value captured, both of those can hurt the valuations here, but this is only one piece of the pie. So who knows what other value can boost the price. There’s also obviously the time factor. I think the world in 2035 will be virtually unrecognizable due to AI and technological advancements and these kind of predictions are made by fin normies who can’t think outside the box like that.

Either way I’m definitely going to take some profits at some point before 2026 but keep the majority of my Linkies staked because anything deep into the three figure per LINK range sets me up for life.

[Anonymous No.56691087]

I’m not gonna (you) your mass reply nigger. Get fucked

[Anonymous No.56691105]

>>56691079
It was the name of a bank account that somebody found like 15 years ago that had an amount attached to it which was similar to that Total Securable Value amount. Something in the quintillions or sextillions or something. I have it saved somewhere but it would take me forever to find it. I'm sorry I can't remember more specifics, and I'm retarded and don't know any of the official lingo for what it was. It was like they knew the routing number for this account or something and were able to get back info about it from some kind of automated bank system. We're talking like 2010.

[Anonymous No.56691107]

>>56690871
>$7.82 per link
wtf is this shitty ass fud

[Anonymous No.56691120]

>>56691068
> Wait wait wait so web3 was the smallest
Yeah in regards to total value securable, but if I recall correctly the fees were much higher than the swift doc and the link staked was 50 million link or so vs 350 million in the swift doc. I think more fees for a smaller pool of people make the price go higher but I’m not really sure how it works

[Anonymous No.56691128]

>>56691107
The web3 doc showed a price of about $120 for 2025

[Anonymous No.56691133]

>>56691128
And this is just fair value estimates, ignoring link exists on an open market and will always be subject to speculation.

[Anonymous No.56691136]

>>56691120
Oh shit, I see. Do you remember the prices/amount staked for the dtcc and derivatives docs?

[Anonymous No.56691159]

>>56691078
>>56691120
If they're ranked by Total Value Securable, should we try to guess the order? We know swift>web3, and swift is 2. How about
>derivatives>swift>dtcc>web3

[Anonymous No.56691165]

>>56691105
Hmm I see, I’ll try to find more info about it

[Anonymous No.56691176]

>>56691159
Oh yeah! That was the order. The total doc was above the derivatives one

[Anonymous No.56691189]

>>56691165
I found it on yandex, I searched
>white spiritual boy account
I don't want to link it in case that paranoid anon was right and they shoah the thread. Which considering what you've posted already I'm surprised hasn't happened.

[Anonymous No.56691197]

>>56691176
Do you remember any details from the derivatives doc?

[Anonymous No.56691248]

>>56691120
>>56691128
>>56691133
Ok here’s some math.

>current crypto market cap = 1.5 trillion (total securable market)
>% of crypto market cap secured by link = 20%
>Fees to secure value using link = 0.01% ($1k per million, a bit expensive but fair, this is crypto and you don’t want to get hacked. You can also just apply to the BUILD project)
>link staked = 45 million
>yield = 4.75%

All in all, using tradfi methods to evaluate stocks dividends, it’d make total sense for link to be about $140 RIGHT NOW.

Not even considering that they’ll keep gaining market dominance and the web3/crypto total securable market will keep growing during a run.

Fuuuuuuuckkkk, why is link $14, it doesn’t make any sense…

[Anonymous No.56691275]

>>56691248
>why is link $14, it doesn’t make any sense…
You forgot to scale all your calculations by the Total Honkable Value (THV)

[Anonymous No.56691286]

>>56691189
I can only find info about the ex president of the Philippines being the richest man on earth and Hitler stepbrother being japanese and his dad being from the Philippines kek.

>>56691197
Uhhh.. let me try to remember, I think the supply staked was 200 million and the fees were considerably higher than the swift doc. $200 dollars fee per million secured if I recall correctly but my memory is a bit fuzzy since I focused mainly on the swift and web3 docs as I don’t really think I was supposed to find that info in a shared folder lol

>>56691248
So $120 is realistic after all? oh yeah baby

[Anonymous No.56691313]

>>56691286
>https://ronaldwederfoort.wordpress.com/2017/03/04/white-spiritual-boy-aka-wsb-accounts/
Yes it's schizo, it reminds me of the Hidden Hand interview when he said their money would make the world's billionaires look like pocket change.
>>56691286
>supply staked was 200 million and the fees were considerably higher than the swift doc. $200 dollars fee per million secured
If that's true then boy oh boy

[Anonymous No.56691327]

>>56691286
>>56691313
I’m telling you boys, you’re really going to get this thread nuked once the jannie is up

[Anonymous No.56691336]

>>56691327
We're all getting banned when they wake up, might as well get our hands dirty while we can

[Anonymous No.56691339]

>>56690925
>Screenshot 5011 Jean S
Huh… interesting

Could it be? https://ca.linkedin.com/in/eleonore-jeanjean

>technical sourcer at chainlink labs

[Anonymous No.56691348]

>>56691339
Yeah I was wondering who the hell it was. Seems like a candidate there.

[Anonymous No.56691360]

>>56691348
Maybe her middle name starts with an S?

Also, the tab on OP’s pic seems to be called 11-REV 3 47 SN CONF.

Maybe SN = Sergey Nazarov? It’d make sense for him to have a high level view of what’s going on with the different sectors they’re trying to gain market share in.

[Anonymous No.56691372]

>>56690871
Fake ass LARP, you posted the same thing with a shitty story yesterday and then deleted your thread when it didn't catch. Fuck off.

[Anonymous No.56691373]

>>56691360
>SN [Conf.]
Oh man he is gonna be so pissed tomorrow. I'm sorry, Lord Nakamoto.

[Anonymous No.56691391]

>>56691372
Fucking lmao

The numbers check out though, link could easily be above $100 right now with the fees being received by web3 protocols

[Anonymous No.56691393]

>>56691372
Ah great, pack it in boys. OP, did you fuck Eleonore?

[Anonymous No.56691420]

>>56690871
>>56691373
put me in the screencap niggers

[Anonymous No.56691428]

>>56691420
>somebody is screencapping link larp threads at 3am
Alright, bud, we'll get you in there

[Anonymous No.56691457]

>>56691393
>OP, did you fuck Eleonore?
I remember when a marine started stalking chainlink roasties and inviting them out for dinner so he could get some alpha, how time flies

>>56691420
Are those Sergey’s shoes in the reflection?

[Anonymous No.56691491]

>>56691360
rev2 imho

[Anonymous No.56691685]

>>56690871
Based

[Anonymous No.56691826]

>>56691248
>Fuuuuuuuckkkk, why is link $14
well that problem got fixed real quick didnt it, it aint 14 dollarinos any longer

[Anonymous No.56691879]

>>56691826
haha fuck yeah, link is going to $0

[Anonymous No.56692514]

>>56690871
>bro just wait 10 more years
lmffffao

[Anonymous No.56692578]

>>56691420
why does sergey give his dad a lambo but not us?

[Anonymous No.56692670]

Bumping because I haven't seen this posted on CT yet.. we need some normoid hype.

[Anonymous No.56692708]

>>56691248
Because that nigger Nazarov is using our liquidity for his gain, and the banks gain. He doesn't give a fuck if LINK is $1 or $13, he gets paid and we don't. He's playing with fire fucking autists over for so long

[Anonymous No.56692744]

Also, if LINK is back to single digits in two years, they are 100% suppressing it and this is the proof we'd need that Chainlink Labs was 100% behind it

[Anonymous No.56692754]

>>56691248
the tokenomics are so bullish but the price per link is literally clown tier retardation

also good post of OP
imagine the revenue of SWIFT, web3, derivatives etc together
we speak of 4 to 5 digits per link this is insane

[Anonymous No.56692836]

>>56692708
yah pretty much this. he doesnt care either(master slave morality)

[Anonymous No.56692885]

>>56692754
>>56692514
>>56692754

>https://youtu.be/sFLegmNTq84?si=9wGQKjPUQxrFquqX

>”They’ll understand it when we power everything”

Maybe this is what Sergey means, extremely stable increasing revenue year after year when chainlink starts processing swift’s transactions

>>56692578
What if the real lambo is the friends we made along the way?

>>56692670
Send a dm to an advocate on X, they’re in desperate need of attention/engagement

>>56692744
Checked. Although 10 years for a 50x doesn’t really sound too bad, but yeah, they might be suppressing the price. I’ve been thinking and chainlink is known for working with shady characters, what if any of them figured out OPs pic and they’ve been suppressing the price on purpose to accumulate link? 50x in 10 years would basically make you a superstar on the investment world

[Anonymous No.56692904]

>>56690931
>Who’s that lol

Tell us the source of your pic in the OP (and I have a hunch of where it came from but want to confirm) and I'll give you the deets on that.

[Anonymous No.56692925]

>>56692885
>Although 10 years for a 50x

It's not about that. Crypto moved mountains and when I could've turned $0.01 into $0.90 in 3 years with Matic, I start to wonder just how deep the suppression goes. It's yet another shady part of crypto that we aren't at $40+

[Anonymous No.56692957]

>>56692904
you are chriss or part of the team and are trying to fuck over the source of the leak
>>56692925
holding link has been made me lose so much on other opportunity its unreal

[Anonymous No.56692997]

>>56692885
yes sergey is obviously waiting for the right moment
but even now link should be around $100 and based on OPs leaked information the company itself values the token at this price level
I can only imagine the sincere fuckery of the big dogs, they still accumulate

[Anonymous No.56693005]

>>56692957
Not just that, I am a link og since day 1 and I am still not a millionaire. I have more link than most and I hitched my wagon to the wrong horse. Solana was one or two fucking dollars a couple years ago and now it's approaching $100. Sergey best let us get a run soon

[Anonymous No.56693022]

>>56692997
fact is that CLL is still selling tokens to keep themselves afloat so 100$ valuation is more realistic when they can generate revenue with out tanking the price.
>>56693005
same, bag holding since ico. I got fucked when the fat ass announced staking and ccip in 22. i never fucked with defi because i was a die hard link baggie, all while sergey is living it up throwing rooftop parties with bankers.

[Anonymous No.56693114]

>>56692957
>>56693022
You are not an OG. No OG's hate Sergey like you. You're a 3rd world nigger with a double digit Link stack that you bought at the peak and now you seethe all day in Link threads.

[Anonymous No.56693126]

>>56692997
>>56693022
For what it’s worth, they haven’t dumped in months now, but once they start doing it again it’s going to dump so fucking bad

>>56693005
Hopefully they either destroy the people suppressing link’s price or the company/people suppressing it let it run this upcoming halving

[Anonymous No.56693162]

>>56690871
>centering numbers in cells
if i found the person that made this i'd beat them

[Anonymous No.56693163]

>>56693114
sergey fucked his community over so much that they had to beg to bring back the "meme magik" publicly
>>56693126
>For what it’s worth, they haven’t dumped in months now, but once they start doing it again it’s going to dump so fucking bad
. another CLL employee
next dump will be into market wide bull market. Shill team six will nip the bearish narrative fast on nufags before it takes root

[Anonymous No.56693203]

>>56690871
i hope this is demoralization propaganda

[Anonymous No.56693315]

>>56693114
Why would OG's respect a guy that has prevented them from making money? It should literally be $100 just from their own numbers, it's proof that they want the token price low if 2025 is "$7"

[Anonymous No.56693360]

>>56693315
Cuz he cute

[Anonymous No.56693434]

>>56691372
OP btfo once again

[Anonymous No.56693441]

>>56693005
>$55
>approaching $100
yeah you aren't biased at all

[Anonymous No.56693459]

God damn OP actually took time to make this silly spreadsheet JUST to post it here for attention. What a weird world.

[Anonymous No.56693469]

>>56693114
Everyone I know who bought before 2019 fucking hate Sergey lol. Between Celsius, lies about staking, the dumping and all that shit all the goodwilk has been burnt. Most of them are waiting for ath yo break and then it's ciao.
Only turbofags still suck his dick.

[Anonymous No.56693494]

what a shitty thread

[Anonymous No.56693505]

>>56693469
blaming sergey for celsius just outs you as a dumbass newfag

[Anonymous No.56693539]

>>56693434
Doesn’t that just mean OP dated a Chainlink hoe?

[Anonymous No.56693544]

>>56693494
Go back

[Anonymous No.56693596]

>>56693469
He's pissed off a lot of people just by going out of his way to not "hype" the token while also putting shit out there about quadrillions and banks and "lots of money, like a lot a lot" almost a slap in the face to people who watched $52 to $5 while BTC is simply 35% off its ath

Sergey is suppressing the token and my assumption is the banks are acting like kikes again, just like the suppression of silver

[Anonymous No.56693609]

>>56693469
I know you're lying. Attended the past two Smartcons and everyone loves Sergey. Your bags are heavy and you're a 3rd world nigger. This is your last response. Have fun fudding to the void.

[Anonymous No.56693691]

here's the pic from yesterday's thread

[Anonymous No.56693724]

>>56693691
>Total column
>$50325 cell selected
>LINK price in 2034

Get fucking real

[Anonymous No.56693814]

>>56693691
Huh, that seems to be a different table altogether.

>$50k link

Wtf

>>56693724
Maybe that’s the goal for a couple of decades into the future? The “year” column is blacked out, I remember watching a video where Sergey supposedly had a multi decade plan due to his experience working with startups. The derivative market is much much larger than Swifts or Dtcc too

[Anonymous No.56694038]

is this shit real?

[Anonymous No.56694059]

>>56694038
No, this is a work of fiction by OP. >>56691372

[Anonymous No.56694330]

>>56694038
It’s real, Sergey told me

[Anonymous No.56694356]

>>56693505
You're the newfag, he literally promoted at Smartcon them and they even announced when they gave them their treasury to manage lol.

>>56693609
Make whatever story in your retarded mind, dumb cock gobbler.

[Anonymous No.56694544]

>>56693609
>. Attended the past two Smartcons and everyone loves Sergey.
wow people who paid to see sergey talk love sergey. you cant be this fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.56694632]

>>56694356
Esl

[Anonymous No.56694819]

>>56693609
I was there too and literally the only people excited to be around him were cult members such as yourself, and devs who want to use him to get rich with their own projects. You're retarded if you think people love a guy who refused to let LINK run with everything else during the last bull market

>I LOVE the guy who caused $52->5

[Anonymous No.56694838]

>>56694632
Tunte

[Anonymous No.56694894]

>>56691079
here newfag

[Anonymous No.56695033]

>>56694894
.

[Anonymous No.56695074]

>>56694894
..

[Anonymous No.56695080]

>>56690871
This is beyond fud. Well done pajeet

[Anonymous No.56695084]

>>56694894
...

[Anonymous No.56695099]

>>56694894
....

[Anonymous No.56695168]

>>56694894
>>56695033
>>56695074
>>56695084
>>56695099
So what does this mean for link? Also is the chart in the OP really just a larp?

[Anonymous No.56695219]

>>56695168
>So what does this mean for link?
Sirgay = White Spiritual Goy

[Anonymous No.56695260]

>>56695219
...elaborate please

[Anonymous No.56695293]

>>56695219
Also, I don't see how this relates to link or Sergey...

[Anonymous No.56695384]

>>56695260
>>56695293
Clue n°1 : Sirgay is White
Clue n°2 : Sirgay did a philosophy master, so he's Spiritual
Clue n°3 : Sirgay is a Boy
White Spiritual Boy = SIRGAY

It all adds up when you think about it.

[Anonymous No.56695454]

>>56695384
The dates don't faggot, some of this stuff he would be too young

[Anonymous No.56695469]

>>56695454
>some of this stuff he would be too young
So you mean, he would be a BOY rather than a man?

[Anonymous No.56695579]

>>56690871
It's kinda nonsensical and shouldn't be taken seriously because it's too basic and doesn't take any serious outside occurrences into account.

If LINK were to gain that kind of market dominance there would be heavy speculation and investor buy in which would drive the prices up.

The 4.75% returns we are currently getting in the staking BETA is just a placeholder. We are being subsidised by CLL to participate in the process of staking.

When they actually release a more substantial product and it starts getting institutional usage turnover, stakers will be paid based on network usage.

This chart is meaningless and probably FUD.

[Anonymous No.56695665]

>>56695579
Is it retarded to stake 100%?

[Anonymous No.56695774]

>>56695665
Depends on whether or not you're planning to sell in the near future.
I'm personally staking 100% and will be increasing my stake during the early access period.
You can't lose it in v0.2 so it's free LINK.

[Anonymous No.56695900]

>>56695579
>This chart is meaningless and probably FUD
>over $100 in 5 years is fud
>over $700 in 10 years is fud
Lmao

[Anonymous No.56695940]

>>56695900
>Just wait three and a half years to reach previous ATH bros.
Definitely FUD.

[Anonymous No.56695944]

>>56691136
There was an OG 17/18 meme, a wall of text over an image of the earth from space, (I obviously don’t have it saved.) The wall of text described the idea of an interconnected interoperable world. In this wall of text it said if chainlink could capture the entire derivatives market the price would be worth $10,000 for one link

[Anonymous No.56695987]

>>56695940
>Almost a 100% sure 10x in 5 years from a company that has a 10 year plan and has one of the richest man in the planet as technical advisor and the most cited cryptographer in the crypto space is FUD
Nigger u retarded

[Anonymous No.56696437]

>>56691457
Yes, newfag

[Anonymous No.56696595]

>>56695987
At the current rate of inflation in the US that should just about cover the cost of a cup of coffee.

Like I said, retarded.

[Anonymous No.56696640]

>>56695469
kekkkkk

[Anonymous No.56696661]

>>56691248
this assumes the network earns that much revenue which it obviously does not

[Anonymous No.56696754]

>>56695944
I remember that one

[Anonymous No.56696759]

>>56696661
>this assumes the network earns that much revenue which it obviously does not
How could you possibly know? Maybe the node operators are earning that right now. The dashboards don’t really show what they’re getting paid since it’s basically a centralized process as of now.

[Anonymous No.56696932]

>>56696759
>how could you possibly know
given what we know about all the link payments across all chains, they aren't even subsidized at a rate that justifies his valuation. also, given what we know about how much they charge for price feeds (it's on the order of 4 figures monthly), the network doesn't earn close to the notional value of token subsidies to node operators.

[Anonymous No.56697411]

>>56696932
>given what we know about all the link payments across all chains, they aren't even subsidized at a rate that justifies his valuation.
Source?

>given what we know about how much they charge for price feeds (it's on the order of 4 figures monthly)
Source?

Those are some bold claims without any sources to back them up

[Anonymous No.56697888]

Newfag poorfag here
Buy link now
Inb4 oldfags say nething kys

[Anonymous No.56697900]

>>56695944
checked

[Anonymous No.56697902]

>>56690901
>super duper top secret excel file that OP made himself

[Anonymous No.56697944]

>>56695900
>just wait 15 years for a return on investment in crypto

this isnt fucking real estate you retard.

[Anonymous No.56698038]

>>56697411
on chain data for the former, makerdao forums for the latter. chainlink quoted $3.5k per feed per month when they were voting to use cl feeds

[Anonymous No.56698039]

>>56697900
checked

[Anonymous No.56700178]

>>56695384
bruh the amount of stretching youre doing is INSAAAAAANE

[Anonymous No.56700192]

>>56692885
>Although 10 years for a 50x doesn’t really sound too bad
bro are u ok?

[Anonymous No.56700866]

>>56697888
Checked

[Anonymous No.56700887]

>>56694894
I saw someone post about this a couple years ago and have been asking for a long time if anyone knew about it. Thank you very much anon. The last thread I saw about this got absolutely nuked.

[Anonymous No.56701115]

>>56690938
People don’t even know about that.
We never even figured out who owned it.
But that was a shitload of money in Hong Kong

[Anonymous No.56701791]

>>56690901
don't think so. good if it happens though, better to look at other super amazing but new oracles like SUPRA.

[Anonymous No.56701892]

Wait a damn minute, are you telling me that the entire 2024 chainlink will cost $7?

[Anonymous No.56702369]

>>56701892

>>56691047
>There was also a web3 document that showed $120 by 2025

[Anonymous No.56702404]

>>56691015
This calculation doesn't take speculative value into account, if the market figures out that $2k is likely to happen in 2035, it will get "priced in", and the price will rise accordingly much sooner than 2035

[Anonymous No.56702718]

>>56702404
Didn’t assblaster say the speculative pump was about 5-10x from the fair value?

[Anonymous No.56702817]

>>56702718
Assblaster was a LARP and no one in the world is able to say how high speculation can push a specific asset.
Nvidia stock is more than 100 times above its fair price based on dividend, and it's still getting higher

[Anonymous No.56702877]

>>56702817
>Assblaster was a LARP
He said link was going to $50, dumping to $10 and then going to $200. That’s a pretty darn accurate prediction imo. We’re on the final stretch of his prediction.

[Anonymous No.56702933]

>>56702877
Assblaster's understanding of chainlink, along with everyone else including the Chainlink labs team, is rudimentary compared to what we understand Oracles can accomplish and how big the blockchain world will be.

[Anonymous No.56703148]

>>56702933
His prediction was on point tho

[Anonymous No.56703156]

>>56703148
its sad that he got doxxed, would've been fun to hear from him after so many years

[Anonymous No.56703295]

>>56702877
That way his price action prediction for 2018

[Anonymous No.56703546]

>>56703295
No need to lie tren

[Anonymous No.56704878]

>>56703156
>he