[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 26 KB, 420x400, IMG_7153.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56675241 No.56675241 [Reply] [Original]

Be honest with me anons how high will link realistically go

>> No.56675270
File: 48 KB, 680x605, ogre.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56675270

$999.99

>> No.56675274

>>56675241
very

>> No.56675275

>>56675241
You don’t have enough.

>> No.56675289

Realistically like $90-$100 by 2035. Need to be realistic

>> No.56675314
File: 283 KB, 738x705, 1700087302759.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56675314

As long as he doesn't betray, the sky's the limit.

>> No.56675436
File: 138 KB, 1170x1778, 1700087872457.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56675436

$35 while bitcoin reaches $100k
Link has absolutely atrocious tokenomics, probably even the worst tokenomics in crypto.

>> No.56675446

>>56675436
Link is the only project with actual “tokenomics”

>> No.56675450

>>56675436
>Link has absolutely atrocious tokenomics, probably even the worst tokenomics in crypto.
Lets see how you came to this conclusion. Please elaborate.

>> No.56675468

>>56675241
Supa high

>> No.56675482

>>56675241
You didn't give a timeline, so I'm assuming you mean this bull run. $500. $220-$230 will probably be the top this cycle though.

>> No.56675508

>>56675446
But it doesn't need a token

>> No.56675511

I'd definitely sell some if it hits $82,000

>> No.56675514

>>56675436
Link tokenomics are the result of Satoshi's desire to replace Bitcoin's proof-of-work with actual useful work.

>> No.56675516
File: 200 KB, 750x1115, D_c7OwKVAAA1DU2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56675516

>>56675508

>> No.56675527

>>56675241
419M to 557M circulating supply since 2021
so...32% inflation since ath...it's tough to give a realistic prediction if you account for that and the constant selling of the foundation...maybe $35? I'm sorry if this isn't what you wanted to hear.

>> No.56675545

>>56675241
realistically we are never seeing $10 link again so go ahead and open 3x longs using your entire portfolio.

>> No.56675614

>>56675527
Multiple absolute shitcoins have had market caps of 75+ billion, but sure Link can't go past $35.

I don't even know why I'm responding to you. I'll just post a fucking screenshot when Link passes $100.

>> No.56675661 [DELETED] 

Let's see, last time LINK was at ATH it had a 419M circulating supply. So taking into account the new token releases this puts it at 557M circulating supply. Meaning at most LINK will reach $35.

>> No.56675673

>>56675527
>>56675661
Does your employer know you 2 used the same script within minutes of each other?

>> No.56675692

>>56675241
>>56675289
>>56675436
>>56675446
>>56675482
>>56675661
Daily reminder that once a crypto has gone through a bullrun it can never again recover its dominance against bitcoin. There doesn’t exists a single example of this rule being broken. Chainlink unironically going to $27 next run but not a single dollar higher once bitcoin is at its peak.

Sorry linkers, if the circulating supply hadn’t increased by 40% and Sergey hadn’t suppressed the bullish news $140 would be possible. How sad.

>> No.56675704

>>56675314
>As long as he doesn't betray, the sky's the limit.

Sergey can no more fail to betray than a fish can fail to swim. It is in his nature.

>> No.56675707

>>56675692
Nice pasta but you won’t ever be a real woman brah

>> No.56675749

>>56675527
>>56675692
Yup, these guys are telling the truth. So, 35$ best case scenario, 27$ most likely, 20$ worst case.

>> No.56675762

>>56675692
>>56675707
Is there any possible way LINK can still go to $140?

>> No.56675808

>>56675762
No. As long as they don’t hype the token, show that they care about link’s price and get their shit together in the marketing department the token is not going to pump despite whatever number of partnerships they get.

This next run is a once in a lifetime opportunity and the fatman is about to squander it by playing the goody two shoes ethical ceo and pumping the token to $50 in 20 years instead of $200 in a year, what a retard.

>>56675707
Don’t care bro. And by bro I mean never my fukken bro, bro. Phaggot.

>> No.56676577

400$ next bullrun minimum

>> No.56676716
File: 2.51 MB, 4032x3024, bookrec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56676716

>>56675241
every time bitcoin crashes, the whales accumulate Link on shadow wallets. when all the Link has been supplied, Sergej will stop betraying. he will finally reveal his real form

>> No.56676782

>>56675808
nigger just say faggot you stupid zoomer

>> No.56676787

>>56675241
2024 - $100
2025 - $250
2026 - $500
2027 - $700
2028 - $1500
2029 - $3000
2030 - $10000

>> No.56676806
File: 257 KB, 1170x2532, IMG_3524.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56676806

Fudders eternally btfo.

>> No.56676832

ROSE is the new /biz/ coin, LINK has sailed and will get a 2x at best from here. At best.ROSE is for true oldfags and its 400m market cap and lower than ICO with tons of reasons I'm not going to list as to why it's going to be worth 100x in a decade (crypto is only getting stronger, plan for your future anon)

>> No.56677035

Is Chainlink even being used for its intended purposes yet? Seemed like a speculative asset, just remember Citi hyping it up a few years back

>> No.56677063

>>56675692
ETH has had two major bullruns and the second one was 4x more. So that's bullshit straight away.

>> No.56677091
File: 163 KB, 1125x360, B8EB3804-E15C-432C-9CFC-4237206A85DD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56677091

>>56676806
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuude my SPECIAL altcoin is the next BTC/ETH

Hmm that seems delusional

>DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE UR A FUDDDDDDER!!!!

>> No.56677120

>>56676832
>>56677035
>>56677063
>>56677091
your posts are boring and repetitive.

>> No.56677133

>>56675241
>without a doubt: $50
>likely: $100
>not out of reach: $150
>unlikely, but possible: $200
>max: $400

>> No.56677368

>>56677133
Wrong, for what its capable of, $1000 in a few years can happen very easily

>> No.56677464

>>56677120
I don't know why you quoted me, I'm saying that the idea that altcoins don't pump twice is dumb. I think that LINK is going to do very well this bullrun.

>> No.56677465

>>56675241
It's already topped for this market cycle.

>> No.56677549

>>56677063
the eth/btc top was in june 2017 at 0.15. but it's a retarded metric because the only months you would have underperformed btc until now buying eth was may/june/july 2017. and january/february 2018. that's 5 months out of 96.

>> No.56677570

>>56677549
wanted to quote this retard -> >>56675692

>> No.56677623

>>56675692
you also can't compare previous shitcoins that were just scams and btc forks. those newer tokens have real world use

>> No.56678157

>>56676716
Give me the qrd on your book rec.

What's the hidden message? A lot of shit goes over my head even though I'm 130IQ... So I don't want to read a 400 page book and completely miss the point...

>> No.56678180

>>56675241
based on other successful non-eth, non-xrp alts like ada, bnb, and sol, to around 100B marketcap or 150-160 a linkie. Of course it could drag its feet during the real pump phase again and limp to 72 dollars instead

>> No.56678219
File: 1 KB, 296x329, b r.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56678219

>>56677120

>> No.56678228

The correct play now is to dump LINK because it probably won't even 2x from here on out and spend your investment on ROSE and shill it for a 100x moonshot. 400m market cap vs. 8b, both have solid tech and aren't scamcoins. Do the math.

>> No.56678535

>>56676577
checked

>> No.56678583

>>56675450
>65% premine
>massive dumps while theres 0 demand
>no use for the token whatsoever
for reference, the eth foundation only gave themselves 10% of the supply. The fat fuck link guy gave himself 65%

Please name one time where anyone anywhere in cr ypto has ever said "wow i need link tokens for x to do x"
Contrast that with ethereum, which you LITERALLY need to do anything. You need eth tokens just to move your chainlink across wallets, let alone defi. while you dont need a single chainlink token to do anything.
The normal cr ypto user can live their entire lives without ever having to buy, let alone touch, a chainlink token.
Its funny how /biz/ got stuck bagholding the most useless token with the worst tokenomics, its poetic irony really.

>> No.56678597

>>56678228
Hi Oddgems, we see you

>> No.56678843

1 link = 1 house in the future.

>> No.56678859

what is the value of securing truth transmission divided by one (1) billion?

>> No.56678967

>>56678859
About the price of a cup of coffee

>> No.56679014

>>56675241
This run I think $100-150 and the slump won't be that bad. Probably a $50 bottom.

Things are generally getting less volatile from here.

>> No.56679021
File: 39 KB, 480x480, 9f1f74f0750db271bc39f458aad96cab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56679021

I'm holding this shit for too long, it would be kinda odd to not hold link anymore so I'm never selling.

>> No.56679039

>>56675436
holy kek, what an inflationary piece of trash. why is this shitcoin shilled here 24/7?

>> No.56679085

>>56675692
Disagree with that price ceiling but I do think folks are too casual about what it takes or means for LINK to do triple digits. It's very revealing how often the $100 target is thrown around. Common sense and the laws of sell pressure say we have to conk out before that. Or smash right through it I guess to tempt people to hold, but I give that lower odds.

>> No.56679165

>>56679039
why didn't you buy it 2 weeks ago when it was $7, retard

>> No.56679169

>>56679085
you can sell at $100 if you want. i will not be

>> No.56679186

>>56679169
My point is whether or not it gets there in the first place is less likely every time yet another post is made about how inevitable it is, "no respect until $100", etc etc. It's every man and his dog's target.

>> No.56679274

>>56676782
N-word detected

>>56677063
ETH never recovered its dominance against BTC. Read my post again sweaty.

>>56677623
>newer tokens
Huh? Link is a new token? Nigger it’s almost a decade old at this point. It’s a dinosaur coin at this point, get on with the time grandpoo.
>real world use
haha

>>56679085
Yeah, if your token can’t get to a high dominance vs bitcoin its first run it’ll basically never become a bluechip. That’s why XRP has stayed in the top 10 while link fell to 20. XRP had about a 40% dominance at some point, link only achieved a 2%.

Cardano, Doge, etc have achieved an over 5% dominance, which is why people are hopeful it’ll happen again and keep buying them.

Again, how sad, LINK could’ve been a top 3 coin but Sergey fumbled the play by trying to be le ethical CEO and not market the project.

SAD!

>> No.56679332

>>56679274
Oh look! Link is dumping while everything else pumps, wow, how strange!

>> No.56679413

I only need link to be at 125b mc to live off very comfortably off the staking rewards. Thats like a 15x from now, or barely half of eth mc, and its not even a bullrun.

>> No.56679476

>>56675289
NEO did it twice over a period 9 years.

>> No.56679490

>>56675545
> Kwai Chang Kain steps out of the past, gets drunk and forgets how to avoid looking like a massive faggot.