[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 57 KB, 976x850, 1560942389986.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56666487 No.56666487 [Reply] [Original]

why aren't elections held with the help of blockchain technology

>> No.56666510

>>56666487
schizo answer: it would make them too hard to rig
actual answer: tens of thousands of fat black women would lose their jobs

>> No.56666517

>>56666487
Why arent they just held on paper with a chain of custody?

>> No.56666536
File: 32 KB, 1024x937, 1681741789551655.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56666536

Because then ((((they)))) couldn't steal the elections so easily

>> No.56666538

>>56666487
Because token not needed

>> No.56666543

Can someone just post the Chainlink and AP shit already and end this quasi shill

>> No.56667327

>>56666487
Creating an inclusive voting software is the hurdle. And by inclusive I mean one that allows voter id to be ignored.

>> No.56667352

>>56666517
paper and ink are expensive. Pixels on screen only require electricity. But like others have said,they[the old crooks still in control] would never do it since they can't control it. Wait for younger generations to take control [10 more years]

>> No.56667364

Once everyone has a digital id they will.

>> No.56668456

>>56666510
Nice try glowie
They would never put elections on a blockchain because it would show their fraud
Acting differently here gives you away officer
Go back to Facebook

>> No.56668469
File: 314 KB, 756x407, 3eht1c.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56668469

If something isn't needlessly complex and expensive, no one will believe in its security.

>> No.56668515

>>56668469
Bullshit
Transparency builds more confidence

>> No.56669007
File: 60 KB, 720x720, consider.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56669007

>>56668515
To you and I, anon, obviously... but we're talking about normies, here.
Even most politicians see "free" as a note of bad quality, rather than liberation.

>> No.56669068

Because transparent immutability is racist, sexual, and transphobic.

>> No.56669073

>>56666510
based and adult-pilled

>> No.56669080

>>56666487
It's new

>> No.56669100

>>56669068
Don’t forget, VERY antisemitism as well.

>> No.56669103

>>56666487
>non meme answer
its a tougher question than it initially appears. there are multiple avenues in how elections can be corrupted and its hard to design a system that is resistant to all methods.
case in point:
* "total transparency" - will just give rise to massive vote buying and political retribution
* "total anonymity" - will just give rise to fake votes
so ultimately you need a scheme that mandates that voters are registered, id verified, and certified that they voted - however their actual votes need to be anonymous.
its hard to imagine how doing this digitally would improve upon simple paper ballot.