TESLA x LINK

[Anonymous No.56565696]

TESLA
>TESLA
TESLA
>TESLA
TESLA
>TESLA
TESLA
>TESLA
TESLA
>TESLA
TESLA
>TESLA

[Anonymous No.56565703]

yes imagine

[Anonymous No.56565704]

>>56565696
>not having any privacy is a feature bro

[Anonymous No.56565706]

>EV faggotry
bearish

[Anonymous No.56565751]

Whenever Musk unironically starts talking about smart contracts and oracles is the point where I market sell everything

[Anonymous No.56565836]

>>56565696
>link advocating for the planned obsolescence glownigger spying botnet EV

Wait, are the fuddies right? Are we the bad guys?

[Anonymous No.56565855]

>>56565704
99% of normal fags think that if you're not a criminal you shouldn't need to have any privacy, so it's perfect

[Anonymous No.56565902]

>>56565696
>imagine

[Anonymous No.56565939]

>tfw have a Tesla and own lots of LINK

[Anonymous No.56566035]

>>56565696
hedera would be perfect for this

[Anonymous No.56566074]

TESLA X LINK + Staking v.02 and $200 EOY

[Anonymous No.56566086]

>>56565696
This would be nice for Rolex or other luxury brands, having a service history of the watch and verifiability.

[Anonymous No.56566092]

>>56565696
>What if you had no privacy ever and every time I ever took a dump it was recorded by a fat 30 year old Russian scammer
Yeah, fuck off.

[Anonymous No.56566202]

>>56565696
So why bring up tesla if there's nothing going on?

[Anonymous No.56566221]

>>56565704
>>56565836
>>56566092
>DECO
Kek fuddies.

[Anonymous No.56566262]

>>56566092
Poojeet shitting in his car

[Anonymous No.56566272]

>>56565704
>>56565855
It’s cute you think you have privacy now

[Anonymous No.56566289]

>>56565696
elon knew

[Anonymous No.56566307]

>>56565696
I remember ftm + tesla shills. It was the pico-top.

[Anonymous No.56566434]

>>56565704
Never bought a used car I take it

[Anonymous No.56566466]

Remember used cars on blockchain?

I member

[Anonymous No.56566632]

>>56565704
>basic car info
>muh privacy
calm down, there is no personal info on that dnft. it may be stupid but i dont really see a privacy violation here. another thing is that where i live i can already get that info for any car online for free. just need the license plate and i can get milage, service history and other basic info.

[Anonymous No.56566685]

>>56565704
Tesla films you 24/7 when you drive and the employees watch the videos.
Recording basic informations for resale or insurance really is nothing in comparison.

[Anonymous No.56566773]

We'll get an Elon tweet and instadump 10%

[Anonymous No.56566788]

>>56565696
>DUDE TESL-ACK

[Anonymous No.56566837]

>>56566773
>>56566773
Not in a bullrun, an Elon tweet was responsible for a 300% in the DOGE times

[Anonymous No.56566852]

kids in the future are going to have their moms and dads find out if they knicked their vehicle because of chainlink lol

[Anonymous No.56567303]

>>56565704
Nobody will know it's your car, since you'll be mapped via an address.
The owner of the car will be recognized via ZK proofs and only by entities, that are allowed to check.

>>56566837
This
(Unironically, Doge is at bottom, I hope you losers got a moonbag before he'll integrate Doge into the conversion of X as a financial hub)
But it will take a while until Elon is gonna tweet about it.
Since Elon would also be hyper bullish on cryptographic truth and AI guardrails, a cooperation is inevitable.

[Anonymous No.56567426]

>>56565696
On one hand I know link is the real deal and will change the world, but on the other hand I see cringe shit like this and it makes me feel like crypto as a whole is useless.

[Anonymous No.56567440]

>>56566632
Unless an owner hid it by working on it himself, or having a friend do it. This would make that impossible. The car would report the work being done to it to the blockchain.

[Anonymous No.56567444]

>>56567426
we complained about adelyn's marketing
she got fired and this is what we get
it might be obvious to us but stuff like this helps them understand

[Anonymous No.56567497]

>>56565696
>carfax
>but with extra steps and gas fees
truly the future

[Anonymous No.56567538]

>>56567444
>we complained about adelyn's marketing
>she got fired

Imagine thinking you’re making a difference by posting on 4channel.

[Anonymous No.56567858]

>>56565696
so many buzzwords in that tweet

[Anonymous No.56567880]

>>56567538
kek biz is dead
ct is where it's at now

[Anonymous No.56567933]

>>56567880
CT?

[Anonymous No.56567941]

>>56565704
>being able to lie about a cars history is "privacy"

Yeah okay. Tell me why you would ever need to hide any of that information for any reason that protected you aside from scamming someone on a second hand purchase? This information I'd already theoretically available with any honest purchase anyway, and is information that anyone who isn't stupid is expecting as a minimum from a second hand car anyway.

[Anonymous No.56567966]

OK, but what does the NFT add to this?

Imagine if every Tesla car was an entry in Tesla's database woah.

[Anonymous No.56567976]

>>56567966
verifiable web
you will see this term everywhere in a couple of years

[Anonymous No.56567979]

>>56567933
Crypto Twitter

[Anonymous No.56567986]

>>56565696
Why the fuck do I need any of that when carfax already does this
Token not needed

[Anonymous No.56568001]

>>56565836
yes

[Anonymous No.56568002]

>>56565696
stack up all the worst companies into some kind of mechazord abomination

[Anonymous No.56568060]

>>56567986
>carfax
>some centralized local service
This feature can be enabled globally, anywhere.

[Anonymous No.56568068]

>>56567880
>ct is where it's at now
its been like that for like 5 years what you mean now

[Anonymous No.56568078]

>>56566035
Why is that?

[Anonymous No.56568184]

>>56568068
yeah have no idea what that guy is saying
the twitter stuff definitely does filter through to the team and people were going on about the lack of marketing for years
also clg talks direct to team

[Anonymous No.56568194]

>>56568060
lmfao so it's centralized because it all comes from a single entity?
i'm sure if it all came from chainlink it's magically not a single entity anymore right baggie?

[Anonymous No.56568242]

>>56568194
we are discussing the same topics as in 2018
so surreal to see

[Anonymous No.56568261]

>>56565696
Please explain in fortnite terms what blockchains bring to this that isn't already possible and more efficient with a normal webserver. Extra hard mode: explain how LINK could possibly be even remotely relevant to it.

[Anonymous No.56568313]

>>56568194
>it's centralized because it all comes from a single entity?
Yes and nobody in Germany ever heard of carfags.
Good luck rolling out a service on a global scale for every car company in existence.
A car company would need to put their off-chain vehicle data on-chain.
They either would have to create an own API or use any other service, that reliably transfers vehicle fleets data to the destination chain, to process it further.
Luckily, Chainlink is about to be a go-to service conglomerate regarding oracles, off-chain data and computation, so anybody that wants to go premium & reliable, is gonna pick them.

[Anonymous No.56568408]

imagine a shitcoin backed by my car maintenance schedule?

[Anonymous No.56568420]

>>56566685
Yeah sounds like something that should be done manually, by humans lmao

[Anonymous No.56569451]

>>56565704
It’s non-PII you smoothbrain

[Anonymous No.56569752]

>>56568060
>break down in bum fuck nowhere
>uncle buck's backwoods bar and mechanic fixes yer car
>"yeeah lemme beeot up my here peecee and sign this here contract with my mee-chanic license to update yer dNFT with the damages and ye'll be gewd to go!"

[Anonymous No.56569840]

>>56569752
>>56568194
How the actual fuck am I still this early?

[Anonymous No.56569852]

>>56569840
its 6 years in

[Anonymous No.56569858]

>>56569852
Thats cool I’m willing to wait 30 more.

[Anonymous No.56569864]

>>56565696
>IMAGINE TESLA!!!

[Anonymous No.56569869]

reminder that sergey never needed decentralized insurance for his bi-weekly binance (bisexual finance) dump deliveries
he just has allstate

[Anonymous No.56569890]

>>56569869
epic meme my friend, mind if I save it :^)

[Anonymous No.56569891]

>>56569840
Can you explain how it would work? Not a Fudder, just a brainlet newfag. I hold like 6000 link accuumed from the last year or two

[Anonymous No.56569899]

Love how in the past the fud would have been
>ha, more imaginary partnerships from literal mentally ill people with their Internet chuckecheese tokens
And now the fud is
>oh but tesla bad so chainlink bad!
Kek fuddies are a dying breed

[Anonymous No.56569901]

>>56569858

[Anonymous No.56569927]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.

[Anonymous No.56569965]

>>56569840
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude its LE STHHHHHECRETTTTTTTT

[Anonymous No.56570005]

>>56568242
>>56569840
>no bro it's not centralized if it all comes from different nodes under the same singular umbrella of chainlink
Lmao link baggies are fucking morons

[Anonymous No.56570085]

>>56570005
node diversity
source diversity

[Anonymous No.56570161]

>777 miles
What does it mean

[Anonymous No.56570265]

>>56569927
>Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL

do you even know what trustless means you fucking retard

[Anonymous No.56570349]

>>56569927
Jfc I’m selling everything

[Anonymous No.56570381]

>>56565696
Im actually not down with smart contracts. It leans towards that vaxxie giga-chipped, Yuval Noah eat ze bugs big brother shit reddıt scum cheers for. White replacement technology

[Anonymous No.56570402]

>>56570381
It's the inevitable

[Anonymous No.56570416]

>>56565696
Jesus fucking christ.

[Anonymous No.56570420]

>what if carfax -- on da blockchain!
11/5/20 link $12, BTC $13k
11/5/23 link $12, BTC $35k

[Anonymous No.56570444]

>>56568184
>
clg?

[Anonymous No.56570458]

>>56570420
Lol Link fags BTFO

[Anonymous No.56570503]

>>56569840
>+6 years
>ATH that was never seen again
>No revenue, no viable product

You're a fucking bagholder from 2021. I can smell your desperation and virginity.

[Anonymous No.56570586]

>>56565855
And that’s based. Fuck criminals aka niggers.

[Anonymous No.56570604]

>>56569965
Dude poster you're back! I'm surprised you haven't killed yourself yet. You know, it's never too late.

[Anonymous No.56570778]

>>56565836
>are we the bad guys
the shit I will do post singularity (out of boredom) to the nufudder stacklets that shat up biz from 2021 onward would make Phalaris recoil

[Anonymous No.56570794]

Lmao fucking pathetic baggots
this shitcoin will never hit ATH again.
Keep holding heavy bags while BTC and shitcoins keep moggin' you
baggie cuckholds

[Anonymous No.56570803]

>>56570794
The nigger above holds link kek fuddie

[Anonymous No.56570827]

reminder that fudcucks are called fudcucks for a reason
>obsessed with strangers investments
>search for gay porn and sissy coomer shit to use in memes constantly
>constantly samefag to give the illusion of numbers when its just 3-4 fulltime fudcucks at most
>never post their supposed gains, and cannot even imagine what it feels like to have bought link under $50, let alone $0.50
>waste literally thousands of hours of their lives posting on here
>cry and screech at jannies (who dominate them) when their low quality posts get deleted
>cry and screech at linkies and pretend they're surrounded by "avocados" when they get laughed at, saged, called faggots or get just straight up ignored
>most of them are proven to have crippling porn and drug addictions

[Anonymous No.56570832]

>link baggies flood the board constantly when their shitcoin makes paltry gains
>LOL WHY ARE U OBSESSED WITH MY INVESTMENT???
kys asap nobody wants your single point of failure carfax lmfao

[Anonymous No.56570920]

>>56565704
Ate you a Tesla?

[Anonymous No.56570997]

>>56565704
link has always been the NWO coin

[Anonymous No.56571068]

>>56570503
Did you get liquidated during that pump bobo?

[Anonymous No.56571904]

>>56565696
imagine there's no niggers. it's easy if you try

[Anonymous No.56572009]

>>56565696
So they're literally using vechain scam strategies now? What the fuck is this shit

[Anonymous No.56572023]

it's not real retards

[Anonymous No.56572048]

>>56567440
>working on it himself
I'm not a mechanic but I do know my way around cars (its a hobby). They have made it almost impossible to do the smallest bit of work on newer cars without needing some special tool. Also, buying these newer POS cars will already have privacy related issues with all the electronic tracking built into these cars. Putting basic info of these cars (which most people don't really own) on the blockchain should be the least of your problems.

[Rosenmond !D5sSYVl36E No.56572149]

>>56565704
what is oasis privacy layer?

[Anonymous No.56572269]

>>56569927
Thanks, just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.56572286]

>>56565696
The perfect partnership.
Both way too expensive for what they offer and when they fail they explode burning the poor soul that put his trust in them.

[Anonymous No.56572423]

>>56567966
>OK, but what does the NFT add to this?

it means that if someone wants to sell the car they can't make fake info about the car and a system like that could become the standard way for buyers to verify if a car isn't a hunk of shit. its very attractive for buyers and for insurance companies if someone can prove the car doesn't have some damage. the worst thing that happens to people if they buy a used car is if there is some problem with it that was not declared that ends up costing them more money in the future.

[Anonymous No.56572441]

>>56567966
>databases are better than immutable ledgers, guys

/biz/ always has the hottest takes

[Anonymous No.56572561]

>>56565696
Come on gents, the LINK community is not known for desperate "reaching" when it comes to partnerships since there's plenty of legit partnerships and breadcrumbs. This tweet means nothing and has no indication towards a partnership with Tesla.

[Anonymous No.56572992]

>>56570604
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude if YOU dont join a cult then YOU’RE the suicidal one

Bahahahahahahahahahahahaahaha

[Anonymous No.56573012]

>P p p puhhhhhhhhleaaaaaaaaaaze Elon just t t tweet about us

Pathetic

[Anonymous No.56573072]

>>56565696
Someones wife is going to see 50 extra miles on their husbands Tesla, realize hes over "that whore's" house again and when he comes home she'll have a pistol waiting for him.

The future is going to be fun.

[Anonymous No.56573093]

>>56565939
Wow double gay

[Anonymous No.56573101]

>>56566092
But the quality of your shit and real-time metadata of your asshole would be easily accessible via a dNFT on chain. Super handy I'd say

[Anonymous No.56573117]

>>56565704
This is not privacy but transparency for honest contracts in the free market

[Anonymous No.56573172]

>>56572561
>plenty of legit partnerships

Name one revenue-generating business partnership that isn't a blog post or some fraudulent "pilot"...

[Anonymous No.56573761]

>>56573172
here's one

[Anonymous No.56574181]

>>56565696
>real-time metadata updates
so it's a record in a database, but the link to the webpage that displays that record is pointlessly taking up space on the ethereum blockchain? good job, not cringe, great use case

[Anonymous No.56574200]

>>56573172
there isnt one.The real question to ask in these threads is when will sergey bring value to token holders?

[Anonymous No.56574221]

>>56573761
Fudsisters, our response?

[Anonymous No.56574245]

>>56574221
the response is why is chainlink being dragged up by btc like every other shitcoin project out their? why couldnt sergey create enough value for the token so holders wont have to be subject to the same market swings as BTC

[Anonymous No.56574256]

>>56574245
>chainlink being dragged up by btc
other way around

[Anonymous No.56574259]

>>56574245
I get that but as a fuddie I want to know what I should reply when actual partnerships are brought up. Falling back on your argument can be construed as moving the goalpost at best or complete non sequitur at worst.

[Anonymous No.56574277]

>>56574259
sergey has done nothing to bring value to token holders. That not a none sequitur its a fact.
>>56574256
this is fan fiction. BTC was going to rip before link was. I check the charts daily on both pairs

[Anonymous No.56574291]

>>56574277
>BTC was going to rip before link was
But it didn't
Link broke out first, and Bitcoin followed two days later.

[Anonymous No.56574294]

>>56574277
>BTC was going to
Pinky swear?

[Anonymous No.56574311]

>>56574259
why are you trying to fud link? are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.56574501]

>>56574277
>That not a none sequitur its a fact.
He showed an actual, materialized partnership. "Sergey has done nothing to bring value to token holders" does not make sense as a rebuttal.

[Anonymous No.56574521]

>>56565751
this. he scammed me before. i don't trust this mentally ill narcissist.

[Anonymous No.56574551]

Imagine if every white person was tokenized as an nft and had to have a 666-hash number on his right hand or forehead in order to buy and sell. He’d have to show his biological nft just to even talk to a woman, and incels would be completely shut out.

[Anonymous No.56575338]

Imagine charging your child's Tesla toy car with IOTA

[Anonymous No.56575381]

>>56574277
>posts visual proof
>this is fan fiction
Hahahaha lmao

[Anonymous No.56575525]

>>56574291
>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude just join le cult

11/5/20 link $12, BTC $13k
11/5/23 link $12, BTC $35k