[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 75 KB, 684x1024, 1679977296958605.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56506493 No.56506493 [Reply] [Original]

Will bitcoin reach 300k next year?

>> No.56506496

>>56506493
3mil*, and yes.

>> No.56506582

>>56506493
Maybe.. There definetly chance but i would think it would happen in 2025.

>> No.56506586

100% no

>> No.56506588

>>56506493
Won’t go close to that

>> No.56506606

>>56506493
It will if you're delusional enough.

>> No.56506607

>>56506493
It will peak around 110k in Q2 2025. Look up previous diminishing returns op.

>> No.56508280

>>56506493
high this peak is 185k - followed by dump to 80k trading range.
however 1m will happen before 2033.

>> No.56508299

>>56506493
teat

>> No.56508517

>>56506607
There is a fucking chart that tells you that BTC did a larger % delta from halving to ATH last cycle compared to the previous one. Stop spreading bullshit.

>> No.56509454
File: 973 KB, 768x731, 0269_BEARI3Z_76390B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56509454

>>56506493
no, impossible. The Jews wont let it.

>> No.56511296

>>56506586
Why?

>> No.56511443

>>56508517
?
June 2016 halving, btc at $800
Dec 2017 ATH, btc at $20k
2166% increase

May 2020 halving, btc at $10k
April 2021 ATH, btc at $64k
640% increase

That's a smaller % delta

>> No.56511486

>>56506496
That's not until 2025

>> No.56512250

>>56511443
Is this true?

>> No.56512269

>>56506493
She could reach my bits, if you know what I mean

>> No.56512272

Bitcoin has a higher chance of going to 0 (governments ban bitcoin) than going over 100k.

>> No.56512291

>>56508280
by 2033 we will be working 23 hours a day in an underground factory with a vr helmet on

>> No.56512608
File: 119 KB, 680x680, Divine Light Severed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56512608

>>56506493
Goddamn I'm really hoping for that to be the case so I can place a leveraged long on Kinetix and finally stop fucking gambling with BTC. I need that badly. That BTC halving better deliver + the SEC jews approving that accursed ETF at long last. Goddamn it's so close I can almost taste it.

>> No.56512682

are these retarded "will X reach $999 gazillion in two months" threads bait or something?

>> No.56512683

>>56512608
You had your chance at longing btc and you didn't take it. It's too late now. Now you short with leverage.

>> No.56512688
File: 45 KB, 400x388, 1675524720721412.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56512688

lmao
we'd be lucky if we see 46k or so

>> No.56512693

>>56512683
>he still thinks that we're going to 12K

>> No.56512710
File: 154 KB, 1024x985, 1698209796056672.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56512710

>>56512608
perp short x20 until next year then you can long stop being a faggot

>> No.56512725
File: 31 KB, 1070x773, ELRjvR1U0AAUtnn.png-large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56512725

>>56511443
>>56512250
it is.

>> No.56512753

>>56511443
That looks very grim...

>> No.56512936

>>56512753
It makes sense that we'd see decreasing returns from ATH as we get to higher prices because it becomes harder to move the market.
Also it's clear that there would have been an even higher blowoff top last cycle but FTX were selling customer's BTC, which undoubtedly hurt the speculative portion of the run. We would have gone to 80k-100k last cycle if they hadn't done that, which is a 800%-1000% increase from the halving price.
If we assume the same 50% decrease, then we can assume a 400-500% increase from the halving price.
If we enter the halving with 34k that's 136k-170k.
Who's to say how high it will when an ETF is approved though, that's a completely different beast and could move it quickly to 200k+

>> No.56512978

>>56506493
No way in hell
Each cycle, the amount btc pumps gets smaller and smaller.
It might hit $150k, but $100k is more realistic

>> No.56513328
File: 1 KB, 126x85, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56513328

is this number going to 10x you fucking moron

>> No.56513364

>>56511443
based on that I would expect a 200% increase in price (based on the 2 prev halvings)

>> No.56513382

>>56513328
Easily could for "digital gold" when gold has more than double that MC.

>> No.56513399

It might make a new ATH by 2025/2026, but I don't think we're going to $300k in the next cycle. Would love to be wrong however.

>> No.56513456
File: 110 KB, 1024x1023, DFAE19E9-D0F3-42D0-8D6B-995113FBA2C7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56513456

>>56511296
Nibba WWIII is happening right now.

>> No.56513466

>>56513382
Not when Jews have 100x more than you could ever afford getting ready to dump it on you the moment it goes up a little. I've been seeing this posts for years, it's never going to happen. There's going to be mass dumps at 60-70k and even more so if it ever reached 100k.

BTC is valuable, but it will never be that valuable at least not for a very long time. At least.

>> No.56513550

>>56506493
I fucking love her

>> No.56513579

>>56513328
Why couldn't it? Money is fake and gay.

>> No.56513581

>>56513466
>tripfag
>Pass user
Opinion discarded.

>> No.56513586

>>56506493

No.

>> No.56513985

>>56513579
Doesn't mean it doesn't have value. Maybe when fiat devalues to the point that the price of an average house is 10-12m and a big mac costs $200 will BTC be worth 300k

>> No.56514051

>>56513985
Good point chad, till then it is wise to accumulate. I'm doing that on Tap where I on-ramp for low fees.

>> No.56514095

>>56513466
Keith shut the fuck up you blithering retard

>> No.56514099

>>56512936

I want to live in a world where you're right.

>> No.56514291

>>56514099
I've been thinking, the ETF really feels like a big game changer.
Imagine the biggest investment companies using their entire sales force to push "getting off 0% crypto allocation" and telling everyone that "holding at least a 1% allocation of BTC" to every retail investor, every pension fund, all the dumb money, is the financially responsible thing to do.
Some will stay at 0, some will do 2%, some will do 5%, but if it averages 1% that's a minimum of 100 billion flowing in.
19.5 million circulating, 29% of BTC is presumed lost, 50% hasn't moved in 2 years. That leaves 21% or ~4m actively available for trade.
So $100 billion fighting for approximately 4 million BTC. Of course more people would sell, but if everyone sees big institutions and pensions going 1% in, is everyone going to be left behind? Or will we see $100 billion being just the beginning?
Also, BofA claims that a further $93 million poured into Bitcoin could trigger a 1% price increase. So 100 billion would be a ~1000% price increase, which alone is $344k, assuming that remains constant.
And again, that's just the ETF. If we consider the halving, and the US potentially lowering interest rates, could we even see a 500k BTC in the next 2 years?
idk maybe it's just hopium and I've been listening too much of btc perma bulls, but I'm already seeing some buttcoin tier fud around - which is a pretty good signal that someone's trying to accumulate.

>> No.56514322

>>56514291
Pretty measured take actually.

>> No.56514352

I bought a shit ton of BITO 1/17/25 calls. Im betting that the ETF in <80 days is going to speed up the cycle. What was supposed to be a 2025 top in the 4 year cycle could now plausibly be in late 2024 as everyone goes crazy a bit earlier trying to frontrun it.

>> No.56514500
File: 33 KB, 462x416, 1695059380808158.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56514500

>>56509454
It's designed to not let (((the world's central bank owners))) fuck w/ the price.

cool it with the reptilian propaganda

>> No.56514662
File: 370 KB, 2000x1331, Apple think different 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56514662

>>56514291
Thanks for the thoughtful shit.

>> No.56515375

>>56512978
The number of retards selling at 69k and then again at 100k then being forced to buy back in at 120k+ and then 200k. We might actually make it to 300k.

>> No.56515381

>>56514662
He just regurgitated Raul Paul

>> No.56515390
File: 132 KB, 390x390, 1615273815277.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56515390

ETFs buying up swathes of BTC is going to send the price to the fucking moon if they go through with it before the next golden bull. You faggots aren't nearly bullish enough

>> No.56515451

>>56508280
A 5.4x means 3.3 trillion mcap. 2% of that mcap is 66,000,000,000 which is a 10x from current link price. So basically what you’re saying is chain link will be 3 figures in less than a year and a half?

>> No.56515464

>>56515451
Stinkbros we’re going to be so rich…I’ll be in 6 figure hell but if I hit that by my 20th birthday who gives a damn I’ll drop out and minimize my expenses to the absolute lowest possible.

>> No.56515482

>>56515390
Soon, my brother. I unfortunately bought a couple thousand stinkies and only have 0.15 BTC. Buying a 200 dollars a week but that’s not enough. God I wish I wasn’t such a youngfag collegecel so I could’ve accccoomed more money

>> No.56515726

>>56506493
Kek too early for them to expect such a boom next cycle. But it will go wild along XTP, INJ, and XLM. Theyre the things that will actually boom the cycle after the next cycle

>> No.56515733

>>56515390
Etfs will likely consist of btc, btc cash, etc

>> No.56515768

>>56514095
Hey, calm down, Anon. Normies get all twitchy when they come across gold, and Bitcoin's like pure gold. Toss in some utility assets, especially XTP and INJ, and you've got yourself the perfect combo.

>> No.56516489
File: 8 KB, 249x226, 4chan19.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56516489

>>56506493
No one has the answers for this, we can all just speculate... but when I wait for BTC, I have a certain amount in stables staked through SpoolFi, where I get to enjoy passive yields.

>> No.56517015

>>56512683
Can't afford to play with leverage at the moment, i would rather just go into alts like NXRA, FET and OCEAN ahead of the AI conference.

>> No.56519060

>>56506493
doubt it but I could see 100K 2 years from now

>> No.56519424

>>56506493
its not, silly