Shadow fork?

[Anonymous No.56410325]

https://www.dtcc.com/news/2023/october/19/dtcc-signs-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-securrency-inc?utm_campaign=Corporate+2023&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Twitter

[Anonymous No.56410329]

>>56410325
Why does it look like a hexagon?

[Anonymous No.56410337]

>>56410329
Popular Jewish symbol?

[Anonymous No.56410346]

>>56410325
looks like theyre just tech nerds that will enable tokenization of a bunch of DTCC stuff, they will still need to play the game through CCIP like everyone else

[Anonymous No.56410437]

Maybe check how many coins have one of the following in their logo:
- A reference to the number 6 (like LINK or QNT)
- An occult symbol
- A pyramid
- A cube

Ignoring the schizo namecalling, just have a look. These all fit together into a product suite.

[Anonymous No.56410449]

>>56410329
a jew draws a hexagon on the ground and steps into it in order to curse or hex you. do you see?

[Anonymous No.56410533]

Even better, let me show what I mean

[Anonymous No.56410558]

>>56410346
You guys are starting to look like xrp schizos. There are plenty of ccip altwrnatives

[Anonymous No.56410569]

>>56410325
THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THIS INVOLVES CHAINLINK
I HATE ADVOCATES
LONG LIVE THE ANTICHRIST

[Anonymous No.56410613]

>>56410533
I see, though the actual substance of your image is low iq.

[Anonymous No.56410618]

>>56410558
https://twitter.com/CatfishFishy/status/1715077140608094646

[Anonymous No.56410628]

>>56410613
Its a sketch dumbass, intended to demonstrate

[Anonymous No.56410636]

Oh I see, you're shilling LINK. Makes sense now.

[Anonymous No.56410668]

>>56410325
>DTCC not using chainlink
Linkcels on suicide watch!

>>56410569
No need to hate them bro, they already hate themselves kek

[Anonyous No.56410671]

>>56410329
why indeed

[Anonymous No.56410686]

>>56410618
>Chainlink isn't doing the tokenizing nor managing counterparties.
Kek why do linkniggers think they’re “eating XRPs cake” what a bunch of fucking retarded niggers. “DECO” is not needed/unregulated/essentially non existent. XRP is the elimination of counterparty risk and the tokenization of assets.
DTCC also has XRP and XLM partnerships, and reffed to XRP as a supranational current I never understood why you literal retards always squealed at how booolish it was when we did it half a decade ago.
Also >>56410533 thank you for finally acknowledging this piece of shit is EVM only. Only big brains know financial institutions don’t actually give a shit about half the stuff on here and will not be using EVM.
>Captcha: STAYM
Stay mad faggots.

[Anonymous No.56410699]

>>56410671
Is this like that time when larpers said chainlink was partnering up with hex and Richard Hart because the project’s symbol was an hexagon?

[Anonymous No.56410705]

>>56410686
source on dtcc?

[Anonymous No.56410711]

>>56410686
Really big brains know that the end goal is tokenization of EVERYTHING. You won't get that in a fully closed model.

My diagram is only using public cryptos for the fun of assembling them and if I was a bank I sure wouldnt want filthy plebs holding my coins hostage or sharing my design. But the answer won't be fully closed either, it will be blended.

But you have hit on my major issue with things like LINK: Why would they involve plebs? Look at plebs as more like software testers before a closed production run for some of the trickier issues.

[Anonymous No.56410713]

>>56410618
>catfishfishy the advocate posted bullish news!
Waowwwww!!! $1000 EOY linkmiawines!

[Anonymous No.56410714]

>>56410628
Perhaps you don't understand. The only project in that image that isn't a scam is chainlink.

[Anonyous No.56410717]

>>56410699
chainlink is also partnered with beehives

[Anonymous No.56410722]

>>56410699
That was most likely fudders acting like retards like they always do. Hex is a scam...
>>56410686
>>56410711
Banks aren't using xrp. They have their own chains...

[Anonymous No.56410727]

Nonetheless they need the other functionality. Nothing is stopping them from using these to test capabilities before launching closed startups like Securrency. Then they can go convince other banks with a track record of millions of users.

[Anonymous No.56410728]

>>56410705
Literally half a decade old news. Was posted many times before but just like the 100000 different XRP partnership announcements it’s just lost somewhere on the internet, only the people who matter are knowledgeable enough to remember and act upon it. This board literally rolled over their puddle of drool and farted while clinging in to a cube as the fucking United Nations announced they were building their carbon credits solution on the XRPL kek

[Anonymous No.56410738]

>>56410717
Ohhh WTFWTFWTF bullish!

>>56410722
Nigger how can you call hex a scam when you’re getting dumped on by your own CEO? Lmfao

[Anonymous No.56410746]

>>56410711
> Really big brains know that the end goal is tokenization of EVERYTHING.
We already knew this in 2018 and Ripple said this was the future in 2013 literally as they started, except the word tokenization was exactly the word used to describe it.
>You won't get that in a fully closed model.
You don’t understand the XRPL
>>56410722
Banks are using XRP, you can seethe all you want, this will not change and will only be more painful for you.
No, not all banks have their own chains. Yes, you can hook up other chains onto the XRPL.
It’s 2023 and people still don’t under XRP yet they fud it everyday even when it’s the only non-security crypto that’s been advocating for regulations and is exponentially much more ahead than absolutely every single digital asset that exists (99% of zero value scams or EVM patches for low liquidity, centralized retard chains.)

[Anonyous No.56410751]

>>56410711
Tokenizing everything is legit the dumbest idea in the history of dumb ideas.

[Anonymous No.56410755]

>>56410751
Omisego already tried this and they failed miserably. You were supposed to be able to trade wow items for chickens in real life with tokenization.

[Anonymous No.56410772]

>>56410746
Banks will not use someone else's settlement layer.

[Anonymous No.56410778]

>>56410751
>tokenize everything
>use as collateral for loans or delegate it’s value to liquidity pools.
You’re too retarded to understand.
>>56410755
>Muh ERC20 shitcoin
Into the trash it goes.

[Anonymous No.56410781]

>>56410772
XRP is more decentralized than bitcoin and every L1 is more decentralized that ETH. ETH value is pegged to a personal opinion.

[Anonyous No.56410783]

>>56410778
Loans distort markets and make the vast majority of people poorer via the creation of debt based demand. Loans are a huge portion of the reasons why the world is such a fucking shithole and you're too blind to see it.

[Anonymous No.56410798]

You misunderstand the push for tokenization of everything. It is not because we want it. It is because others want to gamble with it and use international laws and agreements to claim it once they deliberately implode the derivatives bomb.

[Anonymous No.56410857]

>>56410533
fuck off ugur you sociopathic scammer faggot, you're the dumbest fuck in crypto, and that is saying a lot

[Anonymous No.56410864]

>>56410783
Ok goyim

[Anonymous No.56410885]

>>56410778
>Muh ERC20 shitcoin
>Into the trash it goes.
Yup, link goes into the trash along with omisego

[Anonymous No.56410892]

>>56410533
>using shapes and geometry in your logo means you're part of the illuminati bro, trust me

[Anonymous No.56410907]

>>56410892
And yet none of those items overlap in functionality. Weird isn't it?

[Anonymous No.56410922]

>>56410857
And yet here I am managing to spell and use punctuation. Don't worry, put it down as one of your long term goals.

[Anonymous No.56410924]

>>56410907
>Weird isn't it?
no, it's not

[Anonymous No.56410931]

>>56410924
Newsflash: If you randomly pick 26 projects on Github they don't assemble to a coherent end to end product. Thats what happened here though.

[Anonymous No.56410961]

>>56410325
>In addition, DTCC will lead the industry’s development of a robust, global digital infrastructure by licensing the Securrency technology and offering professional services. Firms will be able to leverage the technology to transform and evolve their operating models and to create innovative, new digital asset services alone or in collaboration with other market participants – similar to how WisdomTree licenses Securrency’s software as part of the infrastructure for its WisdomTree Prime™ offering that provides tokenized assets and funds via digital wallets for retail investors and consumers.
nice

[Anonymous No.56410991]

>>56410961
Stop advocating advocate, you suck and everyone hates you.

[Anonymous No.56411019]

>>56410991
DTCC sucks and everyone hates it?

[Anonymous No.56411035]

>>56410907
Nope because chainlink in that image is completely wrong. The others aren't even needed.

[Anonymous No.56411039]

>>56411019
No, everyone hates you advocate. This has nothing to do with DTCC, chainlink could go to $1000 and everyone would still hate you for being an attention whore.

[Anonymous No.56411050]

>>56411039
>everyone hates you advocate
>This has nothing to do with DTCC

But DTCC is an advocate

[Anonymous No.56411055]

>>56411050
don’t think so advocate

[Anonymous No.56411076]

>>56411055
kek they’re quite literally shilling Chainlink

[Anonymous No.56411085]

>>56411035
Got it. Buy only Chainlink. Chainlink does all. Hey, you wouldn't happen to own Chainlink would you by any chance?

[Anonymous No.56411141]

>>56411076
They’re trying but these advocates fucking suck. Sergey attacks once again with his shitty marketing hires. I wouldn’t be surprised if this guy >>56411050 is one of Adelyn’s chink cousins or something. They should definitely get better marketing people.

[Anonymous No.56411142]

>>56411141
DTCC sure is trying to shill Chainlink yes kek

[Anonymous No.56411158]

guys have you heard of chainlink? it's the new interoperability layer for the verifiable internet. I think I will buy some now. make sure to check out the website at chain.link and join the community

[Anonymous No.56411170]

>>56411142
I’m not even sure if you’re trying to fud or shill chainlink, you advocates fucking suck kek

Hey Chris, pay me $200k a year and I’ll run circles around these retarded nigger advocates. I’ll control the narrative more effectively than these clowns using nothing more than a few cellphones and a couple of 100 iq hobos.

[Anonymous No.56411175]

>>56411170
you have a peculiar means of resolving cognitive dissonance

[Anonymous No.56411197]

>>56411170
>I’m not even sure if you’re trying to fud or shill chainlink
Like DTCC, I’m shilling

[Anonymous No.56411206]

>>56411175
OMG! You’re the third person that tells me the same thing today

[Anonymous No.56411210]

https://securrency.com/2023/07/11/securrency-core-team/

[Anonymous No.56411221]

>>56411055
You're not an advocate if you shill?

[Anonymous No.56411308]

>>56411210
John "jackson" müller roman number four

[Anonymous No.56411376]

>>56411308
JJM4?
10+10+13 and 4

[Anonymous No.56411479]

>>56411197
Surely the fudders are in discord/telegram groups?

[Anonymous No.56411506]

>>56411085
Yes, only buy chainlink and maybe sdl. But prioritise chainlink.

[Anonymous No.56411531]

>>56410329
>>56410337
>>56410449
>>56410671

because a hexagon is a 2D cubes and cubes are blocks
BLOCKchain, you absolute retards

[Anonymous No.56412299]

>>56410325
hahahaha chainlink bagholder faggots fucked again

[Anonymous No.56412918]

>>56410713
How many times has he personally blow you the fuck out on twitter? Be honest.

[Anonymous No.56412976]

>>56410728
>it’s just lost somewhere on the internet
Get a load of this jackass.

[Anonymous No.56413123]

>>56410329
>global liquidity
Ripple connection confirmed

[Anonymous No.56413133]

>>56410783
That’s why tokenization enables collateralization based loans, where the loanee must present and commit something of value in exchange for a loan instead of loaners “trusting” their customers with a credit score.
>>56412976
Look it up yourself then stupid nigger all of you link cuckold connections are recent and recalling them especially when your sad community clings on to images of cubes on PDFs is pretty easy. For ever 1 linknigger “bread crumb” there is 20 XRP bread crumbs. For every 1 linknigger direct mention/presentation on integration/trial there is 10 for XRP
This will never be you, SIBOS was a literal nothing burger, XRP has one of those every single month except they actually meet with central banks and global financial entities instead of nothingburger commercial banks.

[Anonymous No.56413759]

>>56411376
Yes sir, redeem

[Anonymous No.56413874]

>>56410533
Looks like a lot of bullshit.

[Anonymous No.56414164]

>>56410329
Because judaism is very prevelent in the banking sector

[Anonymous No.56415095]

>>56411141
>>56411055
>>56411039
>>56410991
Lol, this nigger is absolutely deranged, like the rest of them. Look at how much energy they spend anti-shilling. They're exactly what they claim to hate so much

[Anonymous No.56415180]

>>56410781
>XRP is more decentralized than bitcoin