[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 196 KB, 1980x986, F8pp2XvXQAAOYVN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56390091 No.56390091 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.56390109

zuh?

>> No.56390112

>>56390091
already invested ready for that liquid link staking, I'm not waiting a month to unstake with the community pool

>> No.56390114

>>56390091
The team owes you nothing. This isn't an investment. Don't come crying if the dilution continues

>> No.56390120

>>56390114
youre the one that will be crying..

>> No.56390121

nothing funnier than a link flowchart. shit is maximum incomprehensible bullshit. obviously the real one at Sir Gay HQ is your united states dollars to Mr. Nazarov's bank account.

>> No.56390125

>>56390114
most of supply is locked away for some time

>> No.56390130

>>56390121
This

>> No.56390196

>>56390091
Can someone give me a qrd on what's going on with sdl? I did the 1:0.5 migration from lpl to sdl, then got the airdrop so it was back up to 1:1. What's happened since then?

>> No.56390198

>>56390121
stake link -> get stlink + airdrops

>> No.56390219

>>56390196
part of the reason everyone was so fucked off was that we got diluted hard AND the returns were nothing
slurp-3 gave a airdrop so everyone got the same about of sdl as lpl
slurp-8 then completely redid the tokenomics and shifted fees heavily towards sdl holders rather than the node operators
now 7.5x more fees go to sdl holders
they also added good features like this priority pool
the more link they get into the community and node operator pools, the more fees go to sdl holders
of course it's still ruthless how they removed the lpl revenue stream BUT the platform still has a lot of potential just acting as a LST

>> No.56390234

>>56390219
also should say that slurp-8 also reduced and fixed the supply at 100m, just like lpl
everyone is so fucked off with them that they've missed these significant changes

>> No.56390242

>>56390219
Thanks, anon. If I have all my sdl staked already is there anything I need to do? I thought I remember them saying something about an NFT.

>> No.56390246

>>56390234
>everyone is so fucked off with them that they've missed these significant changes
Yeah after getting rugged I followed enough to get the airdrop, but kind of stopped paying attention.

>> No.56390262

>>56390242
that should be in the airdrop section on stake.link after connecting your wallet

>> No.56390264

>>56390234
Did you listen to the ltoad space? They were planning to fuck over lpl holders for a long time. Sdl is what lpl was supposed to be. They are doing everything in their power to rope people back into goving them their money with a four year lock up.

>> No.56390272

https://mirror.xyz/stakedotlink.eth/mtryE1A2pojFKwlI1X-eXZckYOeH4hekRLbeH6Z_ouc

this has all the info you need of whats happened in the last year

>> No.56390279

>>56390264
wrong

>> No.56390360

>>56390279
What happend?

>> No.56390374

>>56390242
if you have stsdl then you need to migrate to their new nft system, they now have curve style locking
>>56390264
read this:
https://medium.com/linkpool/lpl-migration-update-c3708dec38e4
according to that they were trying to funding as they were bleeding money through the 25% rev stream to lpl holders
they were then going to have sdl and lpl exist side by side
with ftx everyone jumped ship
BUT i do suspect that them getting rid of lpl was partly driven by legal concerns as it was an out and out security, or at least that was a positive side effect
who knows, maybe that is good long term for the project
basically they were dumb and naive back in 2018 and gave up way too much revenue to bagholders

>> No.56390394
File: 61 KB, 2000x1663, 48349.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56390394

>>56390374
DO. NOT. TRUST. SDL.

i repeat to all linkies

DO. NOT. TRUST. SDL.

ogs will never trust their hard earned linkies in the hands of filthy jews.

i think enough is enough, after celsius,nexo,bancor, lpl, the only contracts you should trust your chainlink with are the official chainlink contracts, that's where our linkies belong.
>but muhh sdl was code was written by linkpool
fuck linkpool and fuck jonny the scammer.

WE ARE NEVER TRUSTING THOSE FAGS

>> No.56390404

>>56390360
after doing lots of research, the new stake,link model is very well thought out with whats coming with the Chainlink network

>> No.56390406

>>56390394
popo translates to shit in mexican, are you brown?

>> No.56390408

>>56390394
bitter faggot alert

>> No.56390420

>>56390406
>>56390408
sup kikes

>> No.56390425

Imagine falling for this obvious scam and not being all in LPL. Once you have enough LPL you don't even need LINK to stake LINK. LPL reduces all that friction to zero. Buy LPL and reduce your seethe levels today

>> No.56390428

>>56390420
So… are you brown?

>> No.56390430

>>56390394
i think it's important to separate how their technical expertize and their business sense
they have never had any technical mishaps, they run one of the biggest nodes, sdl has been secure and stable, all that has been flawless
what was a problem was their naive decision to give up 25% of their node's revenue back in 2018 and then to not raise cash during the bull run
that is very different to bancor where their whole system collapsed, and celisus etc where they out and out stole money

>> No.56390455

>>56390430
this

>> No.56390457

>>56390430
it's not about the tech, i can guarantee you 100%, that everyone who puts his link in SDL, will eventually lose it all.

nothing is free, chainlink yield is 4.75% if someone offers you more than 4.75% it's a scam. PERIOD.

never forget, sdl holders are lpl holders who got btfo, and SDL was given for free to fucking kikes, this shit is a ticking bomb. get out of it before it's too late. allso i will never support a kike piggy back riding shitcoin built ontop of chainlink.

>> No.56390472

>>56390457
LPL guarantees you a share of the revenue. Read the white paper.
Don't fall for SDL its a classic crypto migration scam.

No more spoon. Pool's closed.

>> No.56390558

>>56390472
Based SDL chad how you doing kiddo?

>> No.56390562

>>56390558
*LPL chad

>> No.56390566

>>56390374
No you type out what happend

>> No.56390601
File: 109 KB, 1280x720, ChainlinkgodWeb3ATL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56390601

GM based kings Based king Chainlinkgod will speak tomorrow please tune in pretty please

>> No.56390629

>>56390457
important to do your research first if you're new to chainlink
the higher rate is due to sdl having 750k capacity in the node operator pool:
https://chain.link//economics/staking#what-are-the-rewards-for-staking-link-and-helping-secure-the-network-in-v0-1
they are getting another 375k capacity in v0.2 and whatever they can get into the community pool too

>> No.56390710

>>56390394
Based. LPL fags were so smug, only to get reemed by a horse kisser.

>> No.56390728

>>56390374
Shithead. A medium article is not the truth. They are trying to act like they didnt rob from lpl holders. They admitted to it

>> No.56390754

>>56390558
Based LPL chad doing great fully staked with premium access to nodes something SDL won't allow you to do
>>56390562
Haha bro great catch yeah best not to confuse them

SDL = Scam
LPL = Based and comfy

>>56390710
Look at this bullish seethe LPL chads

Pool's closed

>> No.56390769

>>56390710
they were insufferable, but now we have even worse, goat rimming sdl holders, history repeats itself, low iqs will be btfo

>> No.56391107

Why not just try to get into general access? It’s not like everyone is going to fill it up quickly or anything

>> No.56391113

>>56391107
Who will you stake with??? You need LPL to stake fren otherwise the nodes will reject your LINK

>> No.56391195

>>56390091
Link is losing it, at this point i'd rather wait for the SUPRA tge to start afresh with a based oracle project.

>> No.56391280

>>56390728
obviously they wouldn't want this to happen... the hit to credibility has been severe for them
i am still angry with them but there's a clear opportunity with them as the only chainlink LST

>> No.56391289

>>56391113
based and redpilled logic. JUST sold my SDL to ape into LPL

>> No.56391967

>>56391280
They took 50k from me. When link has a eun uo this cycle im paying a web3 dev to put out a competing product. If jhonny “is here to stay” im going to make something better then run his name through the ground every chance i get

>> No.56392052

>>56391195
If you want to stake your SUPRA on trusted nodes they you're going to need to buy SUPRApool (SPL), get in before it's too late.

>> No.56392157

>>56391967
i think it would be great if the Link community got themselves together and lobbied Chainlink to disassociate from this crowd of con men once and for all. They could easily get rid of them with a well worded tweet which would put anyone off investing in them. I'm amazed it never happened already. Instead they chose to just ignore them.
Not god enough desu

>> No.56392168

>>56390091
>priority to be rugpulled like LPL

>> No.56392188

>>56390196
what airdrop?

>> No.56392222

>>56390728
lpl was just a token. it was never a good buy. many such cases. that doesn't make it a robbery

>> No.56392296
File: 2.34 MB, 1489x1005, 1656083732611.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56392296

>>56391113
please keep taking the piss out of them lmao it cracks me up every time I see you

>> No.56392504

>>56391113
https://staking.chain.link/

Either which way, the pool you're staking with is going to rapidly be filled up. In other words, you have a limited time frame to get into either Linkpool's staking pool or Chainlink's community staking pool. There's no point in buying SDL to stake Link if you can stake Link directly with Chainlink.

Later down the road when Chainlink's pool opens up, then sure, shill SDL if you guys have space. But there's no incentive right now to vie for it.

>> No.56392611

>>56392504
And I see I fell for a sarcastic post. Whoops.

>> No.56392635

johnny, eric, sylvarant, and mathias deserve everything that is coming to them

bet they will be one of the first victims of aris special smart contract

i will never forgive them for what they did

>> No.56392646

>>56392504
available capacity was still in the millions when GA opened in round 1, you don't think that will happen again?

>> No.56392680

>>56392635
what becoming billionaires?

>> No.56392689

>>56392635
get over it you bitter idiot, its the wild west days of crypto

>> No.56392817

>>56392680
no, being shamed out of the industry and possibly killed

>>56392689
thats not an excuse to rob the people that made your project possible. Its very unethical what they did.

>> No.56392825

>>56392689
We're coming for you bitch, if you think it's water under the bridge you are delusional.

>> No.56393050

>>56392825
you certainly sound delusional

>> No.56393606

>>56393050
you certainly sound scared shitless, you little bitch

>> No.56394807

>>56390114
the team owes us nothing
but they will get actual fuck you rich from LINK pumping
so I will get rich with them holding the token
ya dumb cunt

>> No.56394828

>>56393606
kek lick muh balls

>> No.56394920

>>56390262
I haven't claimed my NFT, is that even worth anything?

>> No.56396099

>>56390428
I am brown and I hold sdl and held LPL, so what? Everyone in Mumbai love Jonny get over it.

>> No.56396276

I only have 100K SDL which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these sistas with 25k stacks singing about stLINK rewards are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. LINK staking is a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. I need to make it to 300k before NOPs having on chain reputation for fucks sake. SDL is only going to $1 max. Right now I might make some money before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 1MM into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to unlock any SDL. In 1/2/4 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 2MM, but more likely 3MM to make it. The upper predictions for sistas were about $10 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble. All of that isn't going to happen anymore.

pooling LINK is essentially cancelled. Now we will have a slow growth to $1 at best. And the sad but ironic thing is most people on this chat will hold from 10 cents, to $10 and then hold all the way back to sub $1 again because you all believe the stLINK 1K apy% memes, and just like the retards who held BTC and didn't sell at 69k, you will do the same with SDL at $1. Looking at the current charts depresses the fuck out of me when I know I only have 100k SDL, nowhere near enough to make it.

At best I will have 1-2 sweet years, and then return to wagecucking after that. But it will be worse because I will have tasted freedom and know what I am missing out on.

>> No.56397529

>>56392689
>get over it
Hi Johnny. You're fucked.

>> No.56397748

>>56394920
no

>> No.56397815

>>56392646
I do think it'll happen again, hence why I made my post. Last time window was 4 hours. I don't believe Chainlink gained any real popularity this year so it might have a longer window.

>> No.56397831

>>56397815
the priority pool dumps all of its LINK into staking as soon as GA opens

>> No.56398279

>>56390457
hey moron, on SDL everything is liquid so you have stLINK kept on your ledger, with Chainlinks community pool your signing your LINK over to them..

>> No.56399194

>>56390121
This. It’s all convoluted pilpul to try and give token value when it’s not needed and things could be much more simple

>> No.56399208

>>56394807
No they do not owe you anything if they get rich they can cut you out stop whining

>> No.56399687

>>56390091
I remember when /biz/ used to help each other. Now they just fud instead of explaining things to new fags...

Lido did well, SDL will do better as link staking is not simple.

>> No.56399690

>>56390091
has it opened yet?

>> No.56399778

>>56399687
this

>> No.56399874

>>56399690
yes, already 587,000 link in the priority pool waiting to be staked
https://dune.com/stakedotlinkofficial/stakelink
>>56399687
people are rightfully angry about the lpl situation but there's a very good opportunity here

>> No.56400360

>>56399874
Except they literally airdropped.to us our halved tokens. Yeah the team changed things last minute, but this is crypto...

>> No.56400596

>>56400360
they permanently removed the share of the node's revenue
people will always be angry about that
but that revenue share was a big drain on the team, everyone can understand that

>> No.56401542

>>56400596
That is true, the team should have thought of that to begin with, fortunately liquid link staking is not something others can just copy. So SDL has a prime position in the market. Hopefully more node Ops will join.

>> No.56401715

>>56400360
>LPL holders now have the same amount of SDL
>LPL price before the snapshot: $2.40
>SDL price now: $0.24
Wow so lucky that LPL holder have ONLY lost 90% of their value instead of 95%

>> No.56401782

based lpl chads how you doing kiddo?

>> No.56403606

>>56390394
This.
>giving link or any money to these scumbags after their track record

>> No.56403798
File: 60 KB, 1000x667, 1697729308113.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56403798

>>56390121
>You want to stake LINK. Staking LINK will give you more more LINK to stake. The pools full. Don't worry we're dumping more LINK so that you can stack more LINK before the next staking release which will let you stake even more LINK to get more LINK which you can use to stake more LINK to make more LINK.

>> No.56404014
File: 30 KB, 816x542, Jonny scammer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56404014

>>56390091
Rug pull priority lane!

>> No.56404116

>>56390114
The team owns us the unpaid 25% of income generated by Linkpool.
They cannot cancel a contract on their own terms without an agreement of both parties.
If unable to pay that money, a bankruptcy will eventually be triggered upon which the investors will take back all the unpaid money they can get from the company which includes the company ownership.

The payment will decrease to 0% at the same time as the investor company ownership increases to 100% and Jonny will be removed from the company.
There is only one way to change this outcome, and that is by stopping this scammy behavior and repairing everything.
However the longer this goes and the further Jonny goes in his rug pulling antics the less likely this will be.

>> No.56407022

>>56404116
so what are you doing to achieve this?
this is the issue for retail i guess, can't do much
best option is just to hope that SDL will do well as regain value
with same token amount, same supply, if they get back to $2+ then they'll be partially forgiven

>> No.56408025

>>56390457
The 4.75% comes from the fact that .25% of it is getting directed at node operator staked LINK.
Node operators are making more than 5% because they don't need to give up .25% and get to leech off of the community pool, just as Chainlink Labs intended.

>> No.56408679

>>56407022
Wait for the perfect timing to attack and take everything when there will be value to take.

>> No.56408794

>>56408679
yeah i agree
so it's clearly in our interests for SDL to succeed and then for legal action to come to reclaim losses from the removal of the revenue share
look at the stats:
>LPL Staked: 96,027,459.37
>Total LINK earned per year: 468,082.41
>LINK per LPL per year: 0.004874
>LINK per 1,000 LPL per year: 4.87
so 25k LPL was getting 120 LINK per year
i'd be happy with a payout for 15 years worth or something
in LINK though of course not USD value at the time like they'd want to pull

>> No.56408904

>>56408794
You guys should talk to the anons in the /GME/ general, they too are waiting for a fantasy legal miracle to make them gorillionaires. Set a doomsday date and prepare a narrative to spin after nothing happens. You could really get this going.

>> No.56408918

>>56392188
Probably best you don't know since we missed it by 4 days :'-)

>> No.56408958

>>56408904
>GME
...
have a look at this bancor class action as an example:
https://rosenlegal.com/case/bancor-v3/

>> No.56408968

>>56408904
>/gme/
>totally real anons
>he doesnt know
>he thinks they are anons
kek

>> No.56409568

Why are we pumping bros?
>>56408918
You guys had months... Do you not pay attention to your investments?

>> No.56409584

>>56409568
SDL/LINK is now 0.04, up over 100% from bottom
LPL/LINK was 0.4 for a good part of 2022 though

>> No.56411130

>>56409584
>LPL/LINK was 0.4 for a good part of 2022 though
in a 3rd party pool with less than $100k liquidity

>> No.56411455

>>56411130
Yeah LPL was very illiquid, when chico shilled it it pumped to $20..

>> No.56411633

>>56390091
To think this was just 10 cents a few months ago....

>> No.56411925

>>56411633
wgmi SDL sistas

>> No.56411964

>>56390114
EL GRUPO DE CHAINLINK ME DEBE SEXOOOOOOOOO

>> No.56411998

>>56408958
holy fuck what can they expect to win? I can join this

>> No.56412282

>>56399687
lido didnt intentionally rug their previous project

>> No.56412284

>>56401715
you forgot the part where they gas list holder in the telegram while also selling their lpl at the same time

>> No.56412546

>>56412282
Lido won't be able to do link liquid staking

>> No.56412880

>>56411633
To think LPL was $2.40 a year ago....

>> No.56413538

>>56412880
to think 1 LP was 100 ETH just 2 years ago...

>> No.56413597

>>56412546
okay, so another staking project will pop up.Fuck SDL

>> No.56413611

>>56413538
eth was 400$ at the time of lpl ico

>> No.56416461

Just popping back in to say I have not voted on the community council seat yet, but is there any feasibility of anonymizing votes?

I've been a unioner for a while, and I've accidentally done something to reveal that I voted against a winning steward in my union and he kind of acted like a dick for his whole term.

>> No.56416505

>>56411998
the legal firm will take at least a third of what they get from them + "disbursements"
have a read through the legal document, looks good

>> No.56416520

>>56416461
no one cares who you vote for

>> No.56417960

>>56416520
That's what the incumbent union steward said before I dropped my ballot behind the desk and he copped a look and I didn't vote for him

>> No.56420066

>>56390091
Ooooooo

>> No.56421072

When will coingecko update the total supply and circulating supply