New idea for LINK FUD

[Anonymous No.56377063]

Do we even know the company structure of Chainlink? Who owns it? Who has a say in it? Who actually owns the LINK supply? What's SmartContract.com, what is the Chainlink Foundation, what is Chainlink Labs - and how are they all connected? Who is working for who? What's the mid term business plan? How is the token legally connected to these companies? How is it accounted for?

You might say these questions are irrelevant, but in the real world they are actually the only relevant questions when it comes to investing. If you don't know your position in the equity/debt structure, and your legally enforceable rights and claims, you have nothing but hope and good will. I hold LINK but I seriously don't know the answer to this, and it's kinda odd how opaque the legal/ownership side around Chainlink is. A few years ago I checked out AVAX on this and they provide every detail on it.

[Anonymous No.56377068]

>>56377063
poopbutt haha

[Anonymous No.56377073]

Who is the Russian mobster 'SN'?

[Anonymous No.56377140]

>>56377063
>the only relevant questions when it comes to investing
Wait- is Chainlink a publicly-traded company now? Or what the fuck are you talking about, "investing?"

Buying a crypto utility token is not an investment in the company.

[Anonymous No.56377297]

>>56377063
It's all connected. The only think left to do is disconnect this globohomo shitcoin and send straight to zero.

[Anonymous No.56377345]

>>56377063
Why is CLL focusing so much on RWA now? I thought we were going to build CCIP into a monster. Are we being lead with carrots like donkeys?

[Anonymous No.56377596]

>>56377063
>who owns it?
I do

[Anonymous No.56377624]

Token not needed

[Anonymous No.56377648]

>>56377063
Two words that will tell you all you need to know: Cayman Islands

[Anonymous No.56377733]

>>56377345
>focusing so much on RWA now?
>build CCIP into a monster
These are related.

[Anonymous No.56377745]

>>56377624
I need it

[Anonymous No.56377753]

buy chainlink

[Anonymous No.56377844]

>>56377745
What do you need chainlink tokens for?
You need eth for example, to move any erc coins, to participate in defi, to trade on uniswap.
I cant think of anything which would need you to buy link tokens.
This is probably why it cant pump

[Anonymous No.56378391]

>>56377063
Chainlink is extremely opaque.
Many crypto projects have at least a yearly trasnparency report on how much assets they're holding (including ICO funds) and how they spent it.

[Anonymous No.56378516]

>>56377063
why can't he behave like a regular person for once?

[Anonymous No.56378529]

>>56377063
>masonic handshake
its over for Nazarovski

[Anonymous No.56378834]

>>56377140
>Buying a crypto utility token is not an investment in the company

this is possibly the most annoying thing I see parroted over and over in the crypto space. Complete bullshit wordplay used by scam artists to dance around having to be accountable. It is absolutely an investment. Every single person here who owns Link bought with the expectation of a profit later on. And on the company side, they literally use token sales to finance operations. It's the same way public companies use an ATM (at the market) facility to raise money instead of doing an offering.

[Anonymous No.56378851]

>>56377733
Check'd

[Anonymous No.56378920]

>>56377345
Are you new? They pivoted to AI after Chat-GPT's explosion and no one cared, before that they pivoted to NFT's like Bored Apes and no one cares, before that they pivoted to blockchain casino VRF, and no one cared, before that they pivoted to Proof of Reserve after TerraLuna and 3AC, and no one cared

They are desperate and the world rightfully backslaps Sergey for the grifting leech that he is. Next pivot, screencap this, will be related to DECO after a cyber pandemic, an no one will care.

[Anonymous No.56379582]

>>56378920
So after the oracle problem was solved, you are saying that they shouldn't pivot their interest momentarily to expand chainlink's functions to something new?

[Anonymous No.56379678]

>>56377063
its a desacralised barnacle for connecting the blockchain and the real world in a tampon proof way and basically its going to $81,000 because of the the singerality

[Anonymous No.56379935]

>>56378834
This is what I'm saying. I know we have no legal leg to stand on with LINK but they could at least disclose the minimum level of transparency and really explain their equity and funding structure. I don't even really know if Chainlink is a for profit foundation or not

[Anonymous No.56380398]

>>56379678
This

[Anonymous No.56380464]

>>56378834
The weirdest part is seeing wrecked bagholders repeat this all over social media. Pure stockholm

[Anonymous No.56380501]

>>56378834
how low iq are you?
this posture is to avoid a security classification retard
you should be very thankful how tidy chainlink is in dancing around this stuff
notice how they weren't mentioned in any of the sec filling this year

[Anonymous No.56380713]

>>56378391
Which ones are you talking about? Seems to me you just want to throw out random "facts"

[Anonymous No.56380874]

>>56380501
cope