[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 448 KB, 678x665, 1000000149.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56370946 No.56370946 [Reply] [Original]

Can someone tell me how to actually do your own research? I'm too retarded to read white papers because none of it makes sense, and every other form of news is just people endlessly shilling their bags.

Please bros I just want to stop losing money over and over

>> No.56370971

Nobody reads white papers

>> No.56370987
File: 171 KB, 1202x850, 1667539290027902.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56370987

>>56370946
Most of the whitepapers are trash. They are written by jeets to give the project credibility, but for the most part they are nonsense.

I mostly try to see how active project's github is, how often commits are pushed, how often releases happen. If the project has nothing but a copypasted smartcontract then it's like a shitcoin.

This is an example of an active project with several active repositories:
>github.com/plebbit

>> No.56370994

>>56370946
Dyor is mostly a meme, but I can try to help you. There is this concept called top-down analysis which says you start with big picture of narrative and drill down to companies executing well.

So you start with "what's the next narrative? Is it AI, RWAs, boomers buying crypto in 401ks"?

Then you look at what coins are available that follow that narrative.

Let's take AI even though it's bullshit - what coins are doing AI? Is the team good? Did they pump already? Do they actually do anything that is remotely believable as a bullshit cover story?

Can you find any coins that haven't ICOed yet?

It's all a huge pain and you are probably better off riding scam pumps. Some other anon can explain that to you.

"Dyor" is kind of a rare cross between understanding tech, markets, and crypto markets (and the associated narratives). It's very difficult to actually do well.

>> No.56371034

>>56370946
everything in this thread so far would lose you money.

>> No.56371216

>>56370994
This.
Also (some alpha here):
1) narrative
2) market size
3) competitors
4) business value add
then once you can answer all this, go to:
5) team - whats they background, how long have they worked together etc
6) professionality - webpage, do they pander to "investors" or what what they actually want to do?
7) github - is there code activity
8) marketing - does it look like jeet scam or
9) social media shills vs fud - what is the argument of shillers vs fudders? which side sounds more rational and professional?
Lastly..
Are you Fomoing in or did you just discover a new gem that no one else found? Does it make sense that you found in a way that not every other dumb 4channer found it?

>> No.56371319

>>56370946
It's basically all just luck

>> No.56371621

>>56371216
Anddd I will bite. If you have something, list it. I literally have nothing. AGIX was recommended, but I don't believe in the AI narrative since you need big companies to train models.

>> No.56371634
File: 394 KB, 574x581, eightpounds.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56371634

>>56370946
why did you shave that cat