OH NONONO LINKIES HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHA

[Anonymous No.56349126]

JAPANESE TOKENIZED DEPOSIT NETWORK EXPLICITLY DOESN'T USE CHAINLINK CCIP!

"The (Cosmos) IBC framework is used for blockchain interoperability. In turn, the business zones can link to external systems and networks. And the financial zone can be linked for payments on external networks."

It's clear that they are coordinated with JPMorgan, Blackrock and Citi as they announced the same tokenized collateral model in the last 48 hours. Japan has explicitly said they are using a different system for interoperability. This means it is almost guaranteed that the other coordinated tokenized projects by the big boys do not use CCIP. The only thing that Chainlink did was give them a PoC and successful experiments, now they're just using other shit LMAO. Thanks for finding open source software though!

https://www.ledgerinsights.com/japanese-tokenized-deposit-dcjpy-2024/

[Anonymous No.56349137]

Thank you so much for this anon. I just sold everything

[Anonymous No.56349160]

>>56349126
So another L1 competition of Chainlink

[Anonymous No.56349163]

>>56349137
Cope with sarcasm all you want, Cosmos IBC is now the market leading interoperability protocol

[Anonymous No.56349164]

>>56349126
is this good for us holding atom? cuz i really wanna dump it. i also hold link and am trans if that matters.

[Anonymous No.56349245]

thanks OP will buy more LINK shortly

[Anonymous No.56349254]

>>56349163
I just sold what the hell more do you want from me

[Anonymous No.56349319]

>>56349126
who fucking cares, if they want to interact with us banks using link they will need an oracle to do so

[Anonymous No.56349542]

>>56349126
>it's over because Citi uses Canton!
>it's also over because Japan uses Cosmos!

And how do you interoperate between Canton and Cosmos?

[Anonymous No.56349993]

>>56349126
>Cosmos
Lmao are they high on Fugu?
Cosmos got hacked twice

[Anonyous No.56351363]

>>56349163
what market?

[Anonymous No.56351382]

[Anonymous No.56351398]

Do faggots really just sit around all day waiting for any news that they can spin into fud? What an existence.

[Anonymous No.56351419]

>>56349993
and being sued by the SEC
>>56351398
Bingo

[Anonyous No.56351575]

>>56351398
They obviously do.

[Anonymous No.56351671]

Did anyone even read the article? This is bullish for LINK.

[Anonymous No.56351715]

>>56351671
Of course it is, these banks and companies are already fragmented all over the place between Hyperledger, R3 Corda, Cosmos SDK, etc...

[Anonymous No.56351794]

First Cantong and now this! Oh the horror! Anyway not selling

[Anonymous No.56351816]

>>56351671
>interoperability buzzword salad
yep still not selling fuddie

[Anonymous No.56351836]

>>56349163
Always has been. Too bad it doesn't actually acrue value to the cosmos hub.

[Anonymous No.56352083]

>>56349542
kek, nice one

[Anonymous No.56352089]

>>56349137
Of course you didn’t. Ur retarded and that makes it funnier kek

[Anonymous No.56352530]

the disingenuous fud against link on biz is astonishing, multiple canton threads (even though it's a layer 1 similar to avax), multiple japan/Progmat threads, is it just the one guy posting all of them all? how much time do these people dedicate to making up link fud

[Anonymous No.56353050]

>>56352530
>my $7 shit coin is above all skepticism

[Anonymous No.56353127]

>>56349542
It’s over because everyone wants to use other options over Chainlink for the reason that Chainlink because of biz is now associated with Nazi autistic retards

[Anonymous No.56353180]

>>56352530
They waited until the Goldman talk day too kek. That Canton news it 5 months old and they trot it out now?

[Anonymous No.56353480]

>>56349160
No, not competition because they're not even in the same league. Cosmos makes interoperable blockchains easy, just works, and doesn't require a fat Russian and a bunch of bagholding chuds as middlemen.

[Anonymous No.56355751]

>>56353050
>moon 77 ID
Bullish

[Anonymous No.56355759]

>>56349126
DCJPY gets absolutely mogged by Progmat and Canton

[Anonymous No.56355771]

>I can't find a Japanese tradwife to impregnate so now I need to post fud on /biz/

[Anonymous No.56356177]

>>56351671
it literally says that chainlink is not needed. cosmos is.

[Anonymous No.56356291]

>>56356177
Checked so cosmos will handle transactions between japanese banks and if they want to connect to banks worldwide that are swift members they use link, ok, got it.

[Anonymous No.56356368]

>>56356291
everybody will use cosmos, the industry standard for interoperability
https://labs.hyperledger.org/labs/yui.html

[Anonymous No.56356402]

>>56356368
lol two days ago it was “everybody will use Canton”

[Anonymous No.56356830]

>haha everyone is using their own L1 just like Sergey said they would! It's so over for Chain-Link!

[Anonymous No.56356949]

>>56356177
Too bad Cosmos' tokenomics are fucking dogshit, otherwise I'd be grabbing a bag asap.

[Anonymous No.56357350]

>>56356402
porn addicted fudders cannot get their scripts straight
>>56356830
kek

[Anonymous No.56357595]

>>56349163
33% attack

[Anonymous No.56357669]

>>56349542
Quant has the same narrative and is IIRC being tested/used by SIA, referenced by the BIS, etc. Link by SWIFT. So even on that level, it doesn't seen certain that it will only be one protocol desu. Quant in particular wants a standardized system in which people can create their own Quant type of interop integration and then connect to others...

[Anonymous No.56359533]

>>56356949
ATOM has the highest APR in crypto but it comes from airdrops, not from staking.

[Anonymous No.56360821]

>>56349542
Kek

[Anonymous No.56361162]

>>56356830

[Anonymous No.56361967]

>>56351816
He's not fudding, are you retarded?
Judging from that paragraph, they're trying to use some semi-finished protocol (see last part)

[Anonymous No.56362233]

>>56351398
They are not called kekfuddies for nothing

[Anonymous No.56362241]

>>56351398
as opposed to linktards grasping at straws with their endless breadcrooombing?

[Anonymous No.56362253]

>>56362241
How would you even know about all of this breadcroombing if you're not a Link holder and follower yourself?

[Anonymous No.56362257]

>>56362253
Your endless filter evading spam threads have done a pretty good job at letting the entire board know about your mental illness
do you have anything to say apart from ad homs?

[Anonymous No.56362265]

>>56362257
>Your endless filter evading spam threads
The thread you're in right now clearly states "Chainlink", "Linkies", "CCIP".
You wouldn't be in here if you actually had filters on. Oops.
(also, it's a fud thread, which is 90% of all Link threads)

You're not well in the head, are you?

[Anonymous No.56362274]

>>56362265
Are you going to pretend that breadcrooomb threads are not blatantly evading filters using some seemingly non link-related buzzword? Are you going to pretend that your role model tripfaggot pooopoop isn't spamming his shilling mantra relentlessly on every /biz/ thread he can find?
Are you anaware of the absolute dact that anyone who has been lurking for more than 2 years has inevitably been exposed to your obnoxious shilling?
If so, you're being extremely disingenuous or naive or retarded, can't really tell

[Anonymous No.56362282]

>>56362274
>"dude stop evading my filters!"
>posts in threads clearly tagged with "Chainlink", "Linkies", "CCIP"

only a Jew could get caught lying so blatantly and still just keep going

[Anonymous No.56362292]

>>56362282
>oh fuck he's wrecking my carefully constructed narrative of playing the victim!
>moar ad homs !
at the very least, you're as deranged as the infamous bulgarian fudders you so often invoke
>Inb4 how do u know about them??? huh?? Huhhhhhh?????

[Anonymous No.56362308]

>>56362241
>>56362257
>>56362274
>>56362292
How’s that filter working?

[Anonymous No.56362325]

>>56362308
what filter?

[Anonymous No.56362344]

How does this compare with Canton?

[Anonymous No.56362346]

kek kiddos

[Anonymous No.56362347]

>>56362257
>filter evading
>>56362274
>evading filters

What filters?

[Anonymous No.56362353]

>>56362347
the implication being that you must use filters in order to spot filter evading posts? not really, like I said, most of the breadcrumb threads filter evade by using non related buzzwords
unless you expect the board to filter an entire dictionary

[Anonymous No.56362362]

>>56362353
>complains about too many Link threads
>doesn’t use filters
>also complains about filter evasion

This fucking pilpul lmao

[Anonymous No.56362381]

>>56362362
>too many Link threads
well, that is a fact, it is literally the only shitcoin allowed to have 10+ threads at all times
>>doesn’t use filters

[Anonymous No.56362389]

>>56362362
>doesn’t use filters
>also complains about filter evasion
>thinks those two are mutually exclusive
why would I use filters when you constantly go out of your way to evade them? I'm simply stating facts here and you are hellbent on finding something to attack me instead of my argument

[Anonymous No.56362394]

>>56362381
>it is literally the only shitcoin allowed to have 10+ threads at all times
Most of them fud threads like this one kek

[Anonymous No.56362400]

>>56362394
yeah and most of them "fud" threads are also populated by shills like you, ready to dispel all fud and set the record straight
essentially both "fud" and positive threads act as link advertising, but I know you're going to ignore this fact as well

[Anonymous No.56362407]

>56362138
prime example of what I'm talking about right here
this is clearly filter evasion, and I don't even need to use filters to see this

[Anonymous No.56362409]

>>56362400
>both “fud” and positive threads act as link advertising
So you’re a Link advertiser, got it.
Shoo shoo you filthy avocado

[Anonymous No.56362412]

>>56362409
kek, I'm trying to engage in meta conversation hoping to instill some sanity, the world is not black and white moron

[Anonymous No.56362416]

>>56362412
Stop shitting up this board with your Link spam, avocado

[Anonymous No.56362435]

>>56349126
>metaverse zone
U guys know all this meme shit is bs right?
No serious business gives a shit about your little linkies and smart contracts and shitcoins
You want steady returns? Invest in msft/aapl/amzn or some shit

[Anonymous No.56362437]

>Bankchains being silo'd is bad for interoperability layers
Absolute state of fudcucks holy shit

[Anonymous No.56362489]

>>56349126
Is this bullish for cosmos (atom)?

[Anonymous No.56362513]

>>56362489
I am retarded and don't know anything, but in the beginning of the year i was sold on COSMOS ATOM and its ecosystem. It just seems like there is passion and brains behind the project, they are aiming big and i was holding a lot earlier in the year but had to pull out for an emergency, its worth noting that the initial creator of COSMOS left the company to focus on his new technology GNOSIS, which is pumped way higher than ATOM atm. I believe in the future looks positive for both projects and its worth holding some and keeping an eye on what its doing, COSMOS is quite popular in general. I am mostly holding LINK rn, but i believe in the COSMOS ecosystem and also plan on buying GNOSIS. If you hold ATOM on the Keplr wallet, you can directly vote and be a voice for the governance of the project in a very direct way that at times is swayed by whale validators, but in general provides a lot of transparency for the inner workings of the COSMOS ecosystem. Also im retarded and dont know anything and make no money lol.

[Anonymous No.56362526]

>>56362489
no

[Anonymous No.56362691]

>>56362526
yo this token is the real deal it's a real moonshot I just heard about this from my boy /biz/ and lemme tell you its going to be massive it's got that real zoomer community behind it It's got memes cats and that vibe that gets the kids going if it does what /biz/ says it's going to be a real 1000x play

[Anonymous No.56362788]

>>56362412
>100 posts by this id
Oof lmao

[Anonymous No.56362898]

>>56362325
Precisely, you fucking kike. You exclaim that LINK-poster are evading filters but you're in a fud thread which would be easily filtered.
Here's ((you)).

[Anonymous No.56363205]

>>56362274
>2 years
Stfu and lurk newfag this is a link board; you missed the boarding, and you will miss when we launch. cope, seethe, and lick my smoothly shaven eggshell textured nutsack.

[Anonymous No.56365089]

>>56351398
>reality is fud

[Anonymous No.56365119]

>>56349126
Oh no! Not the 1000th L1 that will be paying up and using link to function!

[Anonymous No.56366953]

>>56362489
I don't think so, but atom is a very good pick. It's among the few assets I'm holding for the long term, along with Dua, Fet, Agix, and a few others. For Dua, I'm counting on their multifunctional smart wallet as a catalyst for good price action once it goes live.