Kemal - how can block chains help AI?

[Anonymous No.56347295]

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-can-blockchains-help-ai-kemal-el-moujahid-dl3pf

Not gonna lie this is kinda frightening. Worst case scenario bros...

[Anonymous No.56347376]

>>56347295
yeh, I see it too anon. this ship though is sailing with or without you.

[Anonymous No.56347465]

>>56347376
T-this isn't the beast system is it? Sergay isn't gonna start wars and go conquering is he?

[Anonymous No.56347544]

oh another cuck woe is me um guyz is link LE BAD!?!?!?! thread. you don't understand the tech, you don't understand the esoteric shit, you don't understand a.i., you don't understand shit. stfu and go whinge on reddit, they like that there

[Anonymous No.56347763]

>>56347544
>you don't understand the esoteric shit
Explain then anon.

[Anonymous No.56347987]

>>56347544
Anon

[Anonymous No.56348022]

>>56347544
very based, sick to death of these crybabies

[Anonymous No.56348049]

>>56347295
Honestly I get what he’s saying but there is some next level retarded shit in there

>we need cameras to automatically create a blockchain record so we know the photo is real
>takes photo of a fake photo

Now what? Putting something in a blockchain only guarantees authenticity in select scenarios. Fantasy concepts like this expose him as slightly above average intellect with no real foresight. Foresight is pretty important for someone at the head of product. I hope he’s very fucking good at customer insight collection and interpretation or he is going to build some retarded shit for them.

[Anonymous No.56348065]

>>56347465
idk and >>56347544 may be alluding to things such s the black cube the Gabba, metatronic. that sort of thing maybe, idk

[Anonymous No.56348328]

>>56348022
I am no fudder, i am genuinely concerned...

[Anonymous No.56348730]

>>56348049
>Honestly I get what he’s saying but there is some next level retarded shit in there
>
>>we need cameras to automatically create a blockchain record so we know the photo is real
>>takes photo of a fake photo


> Take photo of event, include GPS coordinates in metadata of a photo (like how it's normally done) and upload to a blockchain with another signature from blockchain photo uploading app that requires another signature and coordinates from uploader
> le funny troll faggotron 5000 attempts to screenshot and upload, whoops no metadata. Spoofed the metadata on the screenshot? Whoops blockchain loading app requires signature from a device to separate between emulated OSes and actual running devices.

[Anonyous No.56348863]

>>56347763
It's a bot post.

[Anonyous No.56348885]

>>56347465
Haven't read the link
But I don't have to, it is the beast system. Total 1984 surveillance and control, even of your thoughts.

[Anonymous No.56349027]

>>56347295
Oh shit... he specifically mentions Bittensor. I know there are some chads on this board who own it. I think we gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.56349052]

>>56348049
You do that with hashed images and put that whole package onchain so its immutable, more transparent and easily trackable by everyone... You exposed yourself as a midwit

[Anonymous No.56349067]

>>56347295
Y-you ever th-think we are building our own p-prison, bros?

[Anonymous No.56349130]

There's interesting stuff in this article, but I'm not convinced.

1. Verifying authenticity: Sure, if we have a blockchain, we can use it for that. But you don't actually use the ledger, just regular cryptographic signatures.

2. Verifying identity: Again, no ledger involved.

3. Verifying ownership: I don't know of any technology that prevents me from copying a book and changing the name of the author, so I'm not sure how blockchain helps here.

4. Verifying provenance: Yes, the AI's owner may choose to use provenance data. Or not. What's their incentive?

5. Creating an AI incentive system: Yes, the AI's owner may want to share some of the spoils. What's their incentive?

6. Verifying AI: Verifiability (aka formal proofs) is an entire research field. It intersects with blockchain in a few places, but doesn't require any kind of blockchain.

7. Decentralizing AI: If you decentralize AI, you will definitely need some cryptography (probably without a ledger, though) to carry your proofs. But the time & energy cost of training a decentralized AI is staggering, even without blockchain.

[Anonyous No.56350729]

>>56349067
>buys rebar because he thinks the price will go up
>price goes up because lots of prisons are being built
>YOU'RE BUILDING YOUR OWN PRISON

[Anonymous No.56351266]

Yeah that's pretty spooky, the digitization of human society.

[Anonymous No.56351298]

Antichrist bros.... are we ushering in the end of human purity?

[Anonymous No.56352982]

>>56349130
1 -> What infrastructure would you use to facilitate those signatures? Where would you store them?

2 -> same

3 -> For Stable Diffusion and other models training off of datasets, how do you know who created what data item in those datasets?

4 -> More people will contribute willingly if you incentivize them as opposed to not incentivizing them for contribution. Basic shit anon

[Anonymous No.56353950]

Wow very cool thanks for this blog post chainlink labs advocate

[Anonymous No.56354129]

>>56349067
yes. and you get to decide whether you want to be a warden or a prisoner. that's what brought you here.