JP Morgan tokenized asset platform

[Anonymous No.56345548]

Chainlink nowhere to be seen. Link bros did we miss the train??

[Anonymous No.56345569]

And before advocates start saying that never was a Chainlink use case... pic rel

[Anonymous No.56345570]

Onyx = LIINK = Chainlink.

Either good bait from an oldfag or dogshit from an absolute newfag, hard to tell

[Anonymous No.56345573]

>>56345548
Yeah, no need to move those assets around or anything

[Anonymous No.56345577]

>>56345548

[updatoorAnon !!ADA8YAIIWw/ No.56345579]

Did people really think trillion dollar banks would be using a shitty crypto token and hand millions of dollars to 4chan neets? What the fuck

[Anonymous No.56345589]

>>56345570
Liink!= link

Absolute retard believing all the shit the shills told you here. There is no link token on onyx whatever if the tech is the same and Chainlink helped only thing that matters is are they using the token you bought they are not

[Anonymous No.56345594]

>>56345589
Lmao a private blockchain is peak retarded. Might as well use a database. If there’s no public touchpoint, why even bother. Absolute joke. The whole point is open and fair collaboration, this is a convoluted database kek

[Anonymous No.56345601]

>>56345594
Meant for >>56345579

[Anonymous No.56345616]

>>56345589
Christine Moy headed up the entire project for a long time, can’t fud me faggot

[Anonymous No.56345629]

>>56345616
It's not fud. These are two different projects. If you have proof of the opposite feel free to post it (you won't)

[Anonymous No.56345639]

>>56345569

[Anonymous No.56345650]

Tyrone

[updatoorAnon !!ADA8YAIIWw/ No.56345666]

>>56345594
Banks are literally just Alameda with restraints

>>56345639
What a retarded article. You're better off buying Amazon, Nvidia, Accenture, etc. the real benefactors of RWA

[Anonymous No.56345674]

>>56345548
Isn't onyx a private blockchain like canton? If they were to communicate with each other they would need ccip? Or am i missing something?

[Anonymous No.56345700]

>>56345674

[Anonymous No.56345711]

>>56345666
Catch me on Arkefi the Art and Cas RWA invested by ArtBAanx and AlllianceBlock.That is the real deal dude.

[Anonymous No.56345712]

>>56345629
https://www.pymnts.com/blockchain/2021/jpmorgan-uses-liink-network-to-help-fis-innovate-payments-economics/

Now fuck off bitch

[Anonymous No.56345714]

>>56345674
Were discussing this trillion dollar usecase here >>56345569

[Anonymous No.56345721]

>>56345712
No mention of Chainlink. Are you high or just thought no one would actually read it?

[Anonymous No.56345723]

>>56345721
TYRONE

[Anonymous No.56345734]

>>56345721
Do you not know who Christine Moy you insufferable faggot?

[Anonymous No.56345735]

>>56345548
it's not like blockchain is some super secret technology. JPM can design its own in-house blockchain for RWA and an oracle if they really wanted to. But there's no real point for an oracle service. Financial intelligence and information for the underlying assets already exists.

[Anonymous No.56345744]

>>56345548
Everyone already knew this was going to happen. Honestly it was obvious from the start how that shit ceo would just lemming everyone off a cliff. We fucking told you all that J.P. Morgan or any other bank can literally just steal links tech since it’s basically out in the open. Seriously, banks literally just hired top tier cs guys to just rip it and that’s it. Chainlink has no reason to exist, but we thank the company for doing our work LOL

[Anonymous No.56345745]

>>56345734
Yes I know who she is there is no mention of Chainlink this isnt a proof this is blythe masters level of delusion once again

[Anonymous No.56345751]

>>56345745
Goodnight, always enjoy the fud. Why can’t you people just enjoy the ride, you’ve fudded enough

[Anonymous No.56345761]

>>56345735
It could be a real deal but we need some Defi-oriented RWA instead yeah. FraxFinace and SpoolFi, Pendle how about those? Not some JP stuff.

[Anonymous No.56345778]

>>56345569
you didn't even read the article lel

[Anonymous No.56345795]

>>56345548
It's almost like blockchain is worthless and (((they))) are only going to use the parts that prevent people from getting rich in their platform

[Anonymous No.56345900]

>>56345744
you cant just replicate chainlink lol

[Anonymous No.56345971]

>>56345548
Thanks OP. Just sold my link stack for 10,000 geodes (onyx tokens)

[Anonymous No.56346114]

>citi using citi token services (CTS)
>JP Morgan using Onyx
>Hurr gurr look guys neither of them is using the Chainlink blockchain reeeee

[Anonymous No.56346127]

>>56345579
Yes

[Anonymous No.56346130]

>>56345548
>>56346114
CCIP will connect them and link stakers will get JP Morgan and Citi tokens in a fat air drop when staking 0.2 comes out

[Anonymous No.56346387]

>>56345751
>everything is fud

Retard

[Anonymous No.56346441]

>>56346130
Avocado's are losing their minds lmao

[. No.56346482]

>>56345700
Checked and smoking gun pilled

[Anonymous No.56347403]

>>56345548
This one stings even more than canton because we had JPM crumbs with Liink, wtf went wrong?

[Anonymous No.56347494]

>>56345548
Sergey just got done saying banks aren't going to use BNB for their blockchain and each bank would have it's own chain. The whole point of chainlink is it will.... link these chains.

[Anonymous No.56347711]

>>56345594
actually no
for these banks the point is that a trustless and fast execution system increases capital efficiency and liquidity by an order of magnitude
they have no interest operating on a public blockchain, however their users do in some cases
so they will do what they can privately
but when required they will use public chains such as kadena
EVM chains need not apply, they are just for POC

[Anonymous No.56349270]

>>56347711
Kys seriously

[Anonymous No.56349496]

>>56347494
>>56345674
They need an interoperability protocol yes. But coincidentally (not) a huge Japanese conglomerate of 4 banks has announced that they're doing the same thing basically. The difference is they gave some more details, especially on interoperability. And instead of Chainlink, they use Cosmos. CCIP just lost big time. It's super likely that JPM uses ATOM IBC too as the announcements were basically coordinated, so they're on the same page.