/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.56337311]

Is it too late to save WFH?

Is there anything we can do.

[Anonymous No.56337315]

>>56337311
First we must find out why it is going away

[Anonymous No.56337319]

>>56337311
>be me
>WFH day 915
can you elaborate OP?

[Anonymous No.56337340]

>>56337311
>Is it too late to save WFH?
Yes
>Is there anything we can do.
Get the fuck out of the rat race, do something entrepreneurial/acquire your own business or do anything that allows you to make money without having to be somewhere.
>>56337315
>First we must find out why it is going away
It's about sending a message to the masses that you're still controlled slaves regardless of how much money you're taking home or how fancy your title is. There's no other good reason for abolishing WFH, this it can only be concluded that making people commute and dick around at offices is about either: control, is a humiliation ritual, or to stimulate bullshit parts of the economy that should've been out of business long ago

[Anonymous No.56337344]

>>56337340
In a market with competition, if having WFH is a true advantage and more desirable than in-person then companies that allow it will succeed. Companies don't knee-cap themselves for shits and giggles (unless they're influenced by (((Blackrock))) or whatever, even then)

[Anonymous No.56337349]

>>56337340
>do anything that allows you to make money without having to be somewhere.
ask me how I make 500 dollars a day per 100K in capital (you wont)

[sage No.56337421]

>>56337344
>if having WFH is a true advantage and more desirable than in-person then companies that allow it will succeed. Companies don't knee-cap themselves for shits and giggles
Sure they do, CEOs are highly networked with other CEOs, they're on the board of other companies, it's easy enough to make handshake deals with their commercial real estate CEOs to all collectively bring employees back to offices to keep prices up, in exchange for the CEOs getting kickbacks or cushy deals in the future, not even from commercial realstate owners directly, could be from the government that doesn't want a big crash and see this as a preventive measure - more people coming into the office means more people buying cars, eating out for lunch/dinner, using gas, etc. Who cares if the company has to pay a few million for office lease when the CEOs and board members get to prop up their portfolio and get sweet deals. The only people that end up screwed from having to pay more are the bottom rung, but at least they get to keep their jobs if there's no big crash.
I've only seen startups or mid-sized companies still allowing WFH, they don't get any sweet handshake deals so they take advantage of not having to pay for office space and having more leverage in their hiring since it's also what workers want.

[Anonymous No.56337427]

>>56337311
>gut feeling
>not scientificull!1!1!1!

Gut feeling has been crafted by thousands of years of evolution faggot. It’s that simple.

[Anonymous No.56337444]

>>56337344
I would agree with you if most of the fortune 500 companies weren't being held up by subsidies from different departments of the US government so they never did while the feds get to pick who wins and loses.

[Anonymous No.56337456]

>>56337349
>ask me how I make 500 dollars a day per 100K in capital (you wont)
Sure, how do you do it?

[Anonymous No.56337473]

>>56337311
Go back to plebbit with your church of science nonsense. We believe in ghosts round here boy!

[Anonymous No.56337499]

>>56337456
>be me, your capital
>find a beaten down tech stock
>develop a thesis on why it will rise
>stock must be high beta, high iv, not bullshit
>if government is involved, very good sign
>sell puts at .20 delta 40-70 days ote
>hold 100% cash collateral in a 5% fund
>repeat until as rich as desired

[Anonymous No.56338725]

Unions are pretty successfully locking it in in Australia. Disability rights organisations too

[Anonymous No.56338769]

>>56337311
>WFH
WFH is here to stay and it is expanding. It is 100% all around better.

[Anonymous No.56338781]

I thought I liked wfh but I am getting lonely and going to the office more to be around people. Am I an NPC?

[Anonymous No.56338783]

>>56338781
yes, you have high estrogen

[Anonymous No.56338788]

>>56338783
That explains my gyno

[Anonymous No.56338793]

>>56338788
cabbage is natural estrogen blocker

[Anonymous No.56338872]

>>56337499
>thesis fails
>ACK

[Anonymous No.56338885]

>>56337311
smuggle quick set concrete into the building. hide it in your lunch bag, whatever. dump it in the toilets. it's that simple. sabotage the building until it's legally uninhabitable.

[Anonymous No.56338889]

>>56337311
Ironic thing is the last two years, nothing was based on any strong scientific evidence, at most the weak kind

The difference is, when a pharma company says something its automatically science to normies and politicians

[Anonymous No.56338936]

>>56338889
>have literally zero qualifications except that one week at the tank station when mom told him to get a job
>decide science is le bad because chronically surrounded by 4chan flavored npcs and other chronically online miscreants
I'd tell you to take your meds, but you don't believe in them, so stay schizo I guess

[Anonymous No.56338994]

>>56337340
>>56337421
Wish I had more people like you guys around me…
You said everything I thought about going back into the office.
Ah. Fuck em.
Come as late as you can, leave early, bring your food, only shit on the job, take long coffee breaks, work even less if you can slow your rhythm.
We go back to the 80’s mode, office space and stuff like this.


They said at my job that «some studies said creativity and culture is better when you are at the office». They couldn’t outright say productivity dropped. Because it would have been a lie.
But they can target the «bullshit»aspect of work. Whatever.

[Anonymous No.56339235]

Wouldn't everything on the right fall under "opinion papers"? Seems disingenuous.

[Anonymous No.56339381]

>>56338936
I published more papers than you can count chud

German government for example said themselves after request by the afd that they have no scientific study that proofs the effects of the vaxx, yet they still wanted to do a mandate

[Anonymous No.56339976]

>>56337311
>Randomized controlled trials
If these are so strong scientifically, why don't they do them in the vaccine approval process?

[Anonymous No.56339987]

>>56337311
commercial properties ain't gonna pay for themselves, wagie. Back to the cagie.

[Anonymous No.56340012]

Doesn't need saved. Some level of it is here to stay. It allows companies to save money on office rents as well as offer a lower salary in exchange for the privilege. For roles that don't need much micromanagement or in person interaction it's a slam dunk.

[Anonymous No.56340024]

>If these are so strong scientifically, why don't they do them in the vaccine approval process?

[Anonymous No.56340055]

>>56339235
No, they are the rantings of schizophrenic science deniers. Scientific opinion papers are published in peer reviewed journals and form the foundation of scientific evidence, as you can see on the diagram.

[Anonymous No.56340080]

>>56339381
the only paper you published is the toilet kind, in the gas station restroom

[Anonymous No.56340113]

>>56337311
fixed

[Anonymous No.56342474]

>>56338769
what are the best jobs to wfh going into 2024?

[Anonymous No.56342591]

>>56337311
not much you can do anymore no

[Anonymous No.56342668]

>>56338885
>The Office: Directors Cut edition with bonus scenes

[Anonymous No.56342837]

>>56338781
Be glad there are laws to protect you and "people" like you from men like me 100% ong