/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.56241770]

Is there any reason not to stake 100% of your LINK stack once it opens for the public? Is spreading your stack across multiple node operators necessary or is it redundant?

[Anonymous No.56241798]

>>56241770
That should be the plan for anyone who knows what link represents. Selling link on spot is idiotic

[Anonymous No.56241894]

I'm waiting to see a node glitch out and get its entire supply slashed to zero in a couple minutes.

[Anonymous No.56241936]

>>56241894
My mindset is that, granted I’m a noob on these matters, if anything happens to one of the nodes then Chainlink is equal to being worthless and the value of the token won’t matter either way. This is why I’m wondering why one should not just go 100% staking.

[Anonymous No.56241949]

>>56241770
Holy fuck, these Chainshill niggers need to be banned.

The fucking jannies a bagholding trannie, clearly.

[Anonymous No.56242059]

>>56241936
This is correct but always leave 5 percent out in a hw wallet or something cold storage for you never know what the fuck scenario. Maybe you want to sell 500 @ 400 usd or something to fund a few high class osakan whores

[Anonymous No.56242096]

>>56241936
if you read the whitepaper, you'll see that chainlink reserves the right to ultimately decide what happens. the whole tower of artificial complexity comes down to this "failsafe". they won't let any node fail, the goal here is selling more tokens, bad press would interfere with this

[Anonymous No.56242161]

>>56242059
better sell 30-50% it will correct again like 70-90%.
Holding during peak euphoria for 4% is stopid.