[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 80 KB, 978x1042, 1644015412548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188620 No.56188620 [Reply] [Original]

Does super-linear staking ruin the value proposition of C-Link?

>> No.56188635

>>56188620
No it literally saves the project. If Chainlink HAD to be 1-1 collateral for every single contract then it would eventually need to come close to global digital GDP. Which might sound bullish as "Wow million dollar link!" but would really just kill the project as there isn't enough liquidity on the planet to support that sort of valuation.
Under SLS you can still have $10k LINK but that $10T cap can support the sort of global collateral we expect to see, and is actually possible.

>> No.56188641

You chinklink advertisers need to go back to twitter and stay there

>> No.56188651
File: 217 KB, 1546x444, Screen Shot 2017-12-17 at 11.02.36 am.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188651

>>56188641
literally never used twitter I've been here since you were in diapers, which is not actually a useful metric considering, as a diaper fetishist, you have always been in diapers.

>> No.56188660
File: 6 KB, 300x168, 1691553721261823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188660

>>56188620
No.

>> No.56188661

Advertising and begging remains advertising and begging
And this "hey fellow user" method is annoying. Go compete with the other "hey fellow user" advertisers on their platform, twitter

>> No.56188677

>>56188661
What? This is the LINK board. How can you advertise something on a board dedicated to it?

>> No.56188684

>>56188641
>>56188661
thanks for the bumps. you might want to fix your broken bot though.

>> No.56188691

Hey chainlink team, I appreciate you ramping up marketing in /biz/. Don’t get discouraged by people that hurl shit at you. You do deserve it for negligent marketing management though, so it’ll take some time for the sentiment to change before the next run. Good thinking starting now, say hi to the fatman from the anons.

>> No.56188696

>>56188635
fair point. though i wonder why there wasn't more of a realization that the project was untenable before it was announced.

>> No.56188704

>>56188691
I hear through the grapevine this is why Adelyn is currently unemployed

>> No.56188736
File: 662 KB, 777x777, 1655652580919049.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188736

>>56188691
Thank you!

>> No.56188748
File: 14 KB, 275x275, 1499726195854.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188748

>>56188696
it was a pretty big "oopsie poopsie" of sergey. good thing they fixed it though. smooth sailing ahead

>> No.56188803

>>56188620
Backwards thinking. The SL staking is there to secure the network. More secure = better. Think of it as a backstop, if it goes lower than X the security guarantees of the network no longer apply. Because of SL staking the threshold for that happening is so low thats it irrelevant ie. it does nothing to the token price.
On the other hand the APY % of the network is much better indicator for the value of the token.

>> No.56188848
File: 77 KB, 680x692, c56.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188848

this is a chainlink board
fuddies pls go
browns jews jannies and bulgarians go commit die

>> No.56188926

>>56188620
it needs to be as secure as possible. so no.