[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 750 KB, 1883x2966, 1695566915424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56183960 No.56183960 [Reply] [Original]

Reminder:
- Ari Juels is credited with the term proof of work, years before the bitcoin whitepaper
- smartcontract.com was registered one week before the bitcoin whitepaper
- Satoshi used an IP linked to a Russian proxy which also left a review for a hotel and ferry cruise to Estonia
- "I've been in the industry for over 10 years.. well ermm... a few years..."
- SN=SN

>> No.56183964

>>56183960
>smartcontract.com was registered one week before the bitcoin whitepaper
This is the smoking gun for me, we are gonna be so fucking rich

>> No.56183968
File: 412 KB, 1984x2972, cornellos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56183968

>>56183960
the IC3 mafia is behind crypto

>> No.56183973
File: 107 KB, 1600x854, 031F14F4-9338-451D-82EF-79E5EBE4F145.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56183973

>>56183968
And who funds IC3?

>> No.56183979
File: 103 KB, 1000x1430, 1484508926053.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56183979

>>56183960
Then you better pray to God, that he doesn't start dumping his bitcoins the same way he dumps that non-needed token (sorry forgot the name of it)

>> No.56183996

>>56183964
Yeah no. That domain was just acquired by LINK, before it had way other purpose.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120204094059/http://www.smartcontracts.com/

>> No.56184027
File: 612 KB, 777x777, 1675858956499861.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56184027

I like frog

>> No.56184049

>>56183960
Thanks for posting this.
Board cleared of Bulgarians.

>> No.56184055

>>56183996
>uses wrong domain
kekfuddie

>> No.56184060

>>56183996
Hey nigger boy>>56184055

>> No.56184093

>>56183973
The NSF

>> No.56184124

>>56184055
Well no, they own both. The one without s is even older.

https://web.archive.org/web/20040229015253/http://smartcontract.com/

I hold link as well, but the domain stuff is just bullshit and easily debunked.

>> No.56184304
File: 417 KB, 3632x1081, rare emin darpa nsf post2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56184304

>>56184093

>> No.56184306

reminder that there were many attempts before bitcoin, and many attempts after
yet bitcoin won, while everything else retraced it's gains against it.

better luck next life (there isn't one).

>> No.56184440

>>56184124
The fact that someone unrelated used the domain isnt whats interesting. Its the fact that itnwas bought for a cryptographic purpose and was done right before BTCs release that is eye opening. You haven't debunked anything but stray claims that can be made suggesting you are capable of critical thinking. Nice try though. Im sure you will convince some room temps.

>> No.56184461
File: 70 KB, 696x466, TFW 80 IQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56184461

>>56184440
>room Temps
Um sweetie it has SMART in the name

>> No.56184466

>>56184440
How many related domains were purchased along with smartcontract.com before bitcoin's release? This whole thing would be much less impressive if it turns out that someone bought 1000 random domains relating to cryptography/smart contracts along with that. Dumb it down for me.

>> No.56184472

>>56183960
SN=SN

>> No.56184488

>>56183996
who cares who had it before, retard

>> No.56184630

>>56183964
This can't be a coincidence. But it is.

>> No.56184643

>>56184630
Nothing is a coincidence
SN = SN

>> No.56184761

>>56184466
Doesnt matter if none of them were used for crypto related websites.

>> No.56184964

>>56184761
>Doesnt matter if none of them were used for crypto related websites.
Can you show me evidence of that? How do we not know that some random shitcoin or Cardano are using an old ass bitcoin-era domain? Extraordinary claims require evidence.

>> No.56184997
File: 732 KB, 1898x1154, 1694039606464874.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56184997

>>56184964
The evidence has been posted, you can dig it up in the archives for more detail, here is one snippit. If youre asking me to provide evidence that cardano or some other crypto project registered a smartcontract or cryptographically related domain name, and used it for a cryptographiglcally related website, just prior to the BTC white paper being published then I cannot help you there and doubt such a thing exists.

>> No.56185001

>>56184997
Cryptographically*

>> No.56185126

>>56183960
Wait what, the reviewer speaks of himself in third person and is called Sergey?

>> No.56185301

>>56185126
If I remember, the post was made by his mom or something. I think >>56184997 has more information on that, but I haven't looked at it in a while

>> No.56185559
File: 203 KB, 1024x836, 4234235234134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56185559

>>56183960
damn how desperate are you?

>> No.56185698

>>56184630
>>56183964
Did anyone get the whois?

>> No.56185972

>>56184630
There are no coincidences in my frame of reference

>> No.56186016
File: 232 KB, 774x742, denationalization.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56186016

Once you build a network which globally connects all the CBDCs, you also have a network which provides global reach to privately-issued currencies. Is Satoshi still Satoshi?

>> No.56186029
File: 305 KB, 828x1469, suggest.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56186029

>>56186016

>> No.56186037

>>56186029
Ayyyyy that’s my screen cap

>> No.56186038
File: 667 KB, 643x979, dahlia libra diem fed faggots.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56186038

>>56186029

>> No.56186076

>>56185972
HE SAID THE LINE

>> No.56186132

>>56186016
>privately-issued currencies
you dont need to wait for cbdcs. banks will provide their own stablecoins

>> No.56186219

>>56184488
If somebody had it before it’s more like the register date (which also was just a renewal, as it was registered years before) is just accidentally close to the BTC white paper.

Though it could also be that owner changed one day before BTC WP (Transfer also triggers renewal), and it was indeed SN buying it for LINK, but way more unlikely.

Most likely is that LINK bought it somewhere 2013+ when crypto was already a thing. This would also match archive.org history, as there was a domain parking page 2011/2013. So no imo, LINK is great but this is too shizo.

>> No.56186280

Watch lex friedman ask sergey are you satoshi ? He is sweating too much to a semi-serious question. Some things are better left alone.

>> No.56186297

>>56183960
Wow
So you're saying in 2009 Serge wasn't obese yet huh.

>> No.56186899

>>56184466
Back in like 2009 when the btc white paper came out, smart contracts were pretty fucking unheard of. You basically had to already know what was coming to make that connection.

>> No.56186973

>>56186029
This was related to all the banks that partnered with them.

>> No.56187077

>>56186029
>>56186038
Interesting. Was NDAnon referring to diem?

>> No.56187118
File: 336 KB, 2956x1663, BED381E2-AF1F-45D7-B119-14597AE8A0A2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187118

>>56187077
He was referring to Cypherium. Biggest wildcard play in crypto ATM. Libra is what Cypherium uses and hit mainnet around the date that insider anon posted. The CEO was in Facebook HQ around that time to consult as well. Diem and Cypherium were using the same protocol. They are an IC3 member as well. Weirdest project in Crypto either the next 1000x or going to 0.

>> No.56187286

>>56184093
But just in case, we're police

>> No.56187339
File: 591 KB, 777x777, 1600303889825.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187339

>>56184027
Fellow gentleman of taste I see. .

>> No.56187346

>>56183960
Adam Back invented pow dumbass

>> No.56187353
File: 470 KB, 1080x2400, Screenshot_20230924_172055_DuckDuckGo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187353

>>56186219
Do you have the record of it being registered years before 2008. The whois showed its renewal wasnt until 2018. So a 10 year registration. A simple check shows that updating and renewing will not affect the registration date.

>> No.56187434
File: 71 KB, 885x402, 1581964295218.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187434

>> No.56187452
File: 34 KB, 596x319, 1589028959557.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187452

>> No.56187465
File: 185 KB, 981x671, 1591376350498.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187465

>> No.56187477
File: 462 KB, 1132x1644, 1594323557401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187477

>> No.56187490
File: 3.12 MB, 3872x2592, 1594415886255.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187490

>> No.56187558

>>56187477
now THIS is true schizo posting

>> No.56187575

>>56187353
Retroactively:

Dec 2 2014 sc is live. There are no prior captures of that full launched site as it appears on this date.

Jan 3 2014 is last (most recent) site capture where its generic 'were under construction and coming soon' page displays.

June 19 and 25 2013 still show the same under construction page as above in the above capture.

Nothing is captured for the year of 2012.

Feb 2 2011 shows the domain as registered by this point but has no under construction placeholder landing page. It does have a people search from information.com (the generic sort you see when clicking a link to a defunct website) presumably provided by the domain registrar. Clicking the 'contact owner' link on this 2011 capture routes to the dec 07 2013 capture's contact us section of the smartcontract.com's under construction page.

October 25 2008, domain is registered right before btc whitepaper per >>56187434. There is no capture for this and none since the march 11 2008 with no subsequent captures until the above example on feb 2 2011.

Dec 23 2007, feb 9th 2008, and march 11 2008 show another placeholder type page provided courtesy of godaddy (as opposed to the information.com one) which shows the godaddy copyright as valid up until 2008.

Nothing is captured for 2006.

Feb 5 2005 is the legal company's use of the domain which was shown earlier in thread.

>> No.56187592

>>56187575
Very organic posting, nothing to do with delphi for sure

>> No.56187594
File: 459 KB, 1791x1312, 1596497768470.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187594

>>56187558
Thank you sir!

>> No.56187641
File: 307 KB, 1159x652, 1683062998723637.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187641

>> No.56187643
File: 84 KB, 1170x428, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187643

>>56186029

>> No.56187644

>>56187592
Not a delphi discordian, bored and autistic. If you have a linm to the server though, feel free to post it. I've been curious about whay goes on there. My suspicion is artfag schizo 42 larper types pretending they're God itself mixed with tranny/bbc/cuck posters. Probably nothing worthwhile actually going on in there. But I'd need an in to confirm that hunch.

>> No.56187685
File: 953 KB, 1170x4431, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187685

>>56187644

>> No.56187730

>>56187644
Checked. Sorry man, I meant to quote OP, not sure why I quoted you lol.

What I mean is that this delphi group is shilling chainlink and they’re paid posters. Also, regarding who owned the smartcontract.com domain originally, it was Alex Chapurnoy. See info below:

>Smart contract was part of nxt. You can see on the nxt forums that kushti and Steve both left Sergey due to disagreements on how it should be run.

>Alex: Yes, I was among cofounders of smartcontract.com back in 2014 which was pivoted then into ChainLink in 2017 (I left in late 2015). Before smartcontract we did 3 other projects with Sergey Nazarov, secureae.com (frontend for Nxt DEX), http://www.cryptamail.com/ (encrypted email on Nxt blockchain), and some trading data aggregation service for Sergey's pals. And I think it was me who entered Sergey into the crypto-space, back in late 2013.
--

>@HeracliteanBeatdown obviously neither me nor Sergey are Satoshis. I was p2p tech fan and did some things before discovering Bitcoin in early 2011 , but before that discovery I was mostly interested in grid computing and so on. When I got Sergey into space in late 2013, his knowledge of Bitcoin and related things (alts started to be more innovative than just Litecoin and forks of Litecoin, who can remember FeatherCoin or Novacoin now heh) was about zero. And his interest was about to establish some startup to get VC funding and do proper exit few years after. Me and Steve spent a lot of time to teach him to say not-to-crazy things to investors. SV investors were pretty okay about listening to crazy things though, but later proper guys did due dilligence usually.

IMPORTANT BIT:
>And his (Sergey) interest was about to establish some startup to get VC funding and do proper exit few years after.

It’s obvious to me Sergey already made enough money off of chainlink. It wouldn’t even surprise me if it was him the one that founded delphi and dropped crumbs throughout the years to dump on linkers

>> No.56187739
File: 1.32 MB, 1170x7527, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187739

>>56187685

>> No.56187745

>>56187685
Tranny jannies 404d the thread on this. The schizo idea of every IoT connected endpoint being a sensor to feed data to the blockchain for the omnipresent AI false God may be a reality. Granted, this is just making it so cellphone numbers can bind to and unbind from wallets for easily sending crypto with minimal to no setup required. Do you have the caps about patents MS had to use human biometric data on chain? I seem to recall something like that being shared. A literal take on proof of work.

>> No.56187753

>>56187730
No exit yet

>> No.56187757

>>56187753
Sergey has multiple billions in liquid USD after dumping millions of link. What do you call that if not a quiet exit?

>> No.56187759

Thanks. Just went 20x short with $50,000

>> No.56187766

>>56187730
The problem with this story is he says he discovered btc in 2011 so therefore couldn't have registered the site in 2008. He is a liar and just from the tg screenshots that have been shared he has a large ego evidenced by his need to feel close to or have been a part of something special. Believe what you want but this doesn't pass the smell test to me. I do believe him when he says Sergey and Steve left over a disagreement but I think he was projecting when he said which party left over the VC involvement. Especially considering chainlink didn't court VCs or have seed rounds prior to their barely publically accessible ICO which required anons to pool together. Anyway, this is all evident with a little scrutiny.

>> No.56187810

>>56187766
>The problem with this story is he says he discovered btc in 2011 so therefore couldn't have registered the site in 2008.
Smart contracts have been a concept since the mid 90s, why do you say it’s not possible for Alex to have registered the smartcontract domain in 2008? Even more so when he’s been working on cryptography since the early 200s?

>> No.56187817
File: 504 KB, 1600x1120, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187817

>>56187745

>> No.56187854
File: 1.94 MB, 3388x5933, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187854

>> No.56187865

56187817
56187854
Pathetic shill begging for (You)s. Go back to your delphi discord nigger

>> No.56187882

>>56187865
fuck off delphi

>> No.56187894

>>56187882
You fuck off, delphi.

>> No.56187900

>>56187730
Tell me more about this theory that Sergey started Delphi.

>> No.56187904

>>56187882
>>56187894
>>56187900
You’re all the same guy. Fuck off.

>> No.56187911

this thread SUCKS

>> No.56187910
File: 54 KB, 680x437, 1636733563673.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187910

fattin no start anytin, na ari dey pull pull rope since

>> No.56187930

>>56187810
So you mean to tell me he registered it in 2008 despite, by his own admission, having no awareness of BTC until 2011 (yet somehow understood concepts that would be built upon that precursory tech) and then, getting increasingly ridiculous here, hands over the domain he registered to the very people he claims just wanted to scam folks who he supposedly wouldn't do further business with? Doesn't pass the sniff test.
>>56187817
Its all coming together.

>> No.56187931
File: 2.19 MB, 1024x1024, 598399_3 mystical nobody's sit shrouded as they build the_xl-1024-v1-0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187931

>>56187904
Is it a group, is it me, is it us? I don't know what assertion you are making, the incoherence is volatile. Mustafa mad.

>> No.56187957

>>56187911
Yeah, but it's a great tool for learning more about delphi and how they operate by seeing them in action.

>> No.56187959
File: 919 KB, 652x5070, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187959

>> No.56187964
File: 1.55 MB, 1170x8046, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187964

>>56187959
Rapy

>> No.56187968
File: 1.30 MB, 1170x5962, Image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187968

>>56187964
>>56187959

>> No.56187981

>>56187930
>So you mean to tell me he registered it in 2008 despite, by his own admission, having no awareness of BTC until 2011 (yet somehow understood concepts that would be built upon that precursory tech)
What does bitcoin have to do with smart contracts? Chepurnoy not knowing about bitcoin until 2011 has nothing to do with him registering the smartcontrcat domain in 2008. He was already working in distributed systems by then

>> No.56187982

>>56187957
Will somebody please give me a qrd on this Delphi.

>> No.56187996
File: 413 KB, 828x1792, 767D5D2F-A70A-4767-BF1C-6A48B8D88537.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56187996

>>56187982

>> No.56187999

>>56187982
it doesn’t exist. Chainlink unironically going to $1000 EOY, don’t listen to the retarded fud

>> No.56188003
File: 393 KB, 828x1792, 4B6B1312-0DEE-4CDF-9C6E-D4F8DFFBD029.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188003

>>56187996

>> No.56188007
File: 54 KB, 656x679, 1653533473167.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188007

no I am the real astro

>> No.56188012
File: 502 KB, 777x777, 1600316171600.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188012

>>56187996
>>56187999
Woah. That's crazy. Do you guys know anymore? I feel like I'm in a movie right now this is so crazy. Should I buy some more chainlink?

>> No.56188015
File: 64 KB, 1828x358, 2AE7FFD1-44C3-478E-BCC7-2C269000C82A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188015

>>56188012
Yeah

>> No.56188018

if delphi is so clever right then how come ari juels is too stupid to get in

>> No.56188023

>>56188018
He’s in 216

>> No.56188038
File: 338 KB, 942x840, 1685661900410828.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188038

>>56188018
Not even Ari can get an invite? Shit these guys are like some 4chan illuminati chainlink gestapo.

>> No.56188050
File: 2.11 MB, 220x190, 1678503943379123.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188050

>>56188038
I heard ari's dick pic was rejected for being too small if you know what I'm saying

>> No.56188056

>>56188038
Awww sheeit. Alright guys, had enough of messing with the linkmarines (cattle).

I’ll be back when it’s time to dump on them kek.

See y’all in the discord

And remembers fellow link holders, $1000 EOY, TO THE MOON! DIAMOND HANDS.

>> No.56188164
File: 62 KB, 600x600, 42 (25).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188164

>> No.56188386
File: 1.05 MB, 1080x2400, Screenshot_20230924_201923_DuckDuckGo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56188386

>>56187981
Decentralized, consensus mechanism to validate.

>> No.56188395

>>56188038
This is what they want you to think. Discord is dead tho. Hence all the samefagging.

>> No.56189044
File: 145 KB, 547x1131, IMG_8566.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56189044

Chainlink technology is patented by Nchain (Satoshi)

>> No.56189086
File: 142 KB, 553x1128, IMG_8565.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56189086

>>56189044

>> No.56189347

>>56186280
Searched this up and wow...he really is getting kind of defensive. Kike Fridman then starts making bullshit statements regarding le bitcoin community and looking away to try to change the topic.

>> No.56189355

>>56189347
I always thought it was Paul Le Roux. The thought of some incel programmer Rhodesian racist groyper-bellied chud being the creator is just so kino.

>> No.56190605

>>56184997
>hasn't changed his pfp in 10 years
Okay, now this is based.

>> No.56190897

>>56188395
you'd be surprised whats happened in the background the last few years

>> No.56191002

>>56183960
Even back then he was a fat ass. Holy shit, quantitative eating is true.

>> No.56191962

>>56190897
What happened?

>> No.56192003

>>56189044
>>56189086
No surprise that another scammer would be claiming to have made link in this thread. First kushti and now wright. This is what grifters do though.

>> No.56192019

>>56191962
They made a lot of ms paint memes about porn addiction.