/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.56180162]

Holy fuck can Link really become billions of marketcap?

[Anonymous No.56180164]

kys

[Anonymous No.56180170]

>>56180162
It's already 4b

[Anonymous No.56180179]

chainst*nk

[Anonymous No.56180187]

>>56180162
By smoking the competition.

[Anonymous No.56180189]

>>56180162
Doubt it. Do you really need 30+ threads to talk about this garbage? What new is being said that couldn't just be contained to one general?

[Anonymous No.56180196]

>56180164
he means thousands of billions or even a million billions retard

[Anonymous No.56180198]

>>56180187
Holy shit bros im gonna make it

[Anonymous No.56180200]

>>56180162
no it's mathematically impossible nothing will reach 1 billion mcap it's just too much

[Anonymous No.56180207]

>>56180162
that guy is the dumbest big $link shiller account on twitter but i won't unfollow because we are mutals

[Anonymous No.56180210]

>>56180207
Bro he has so much alpha it’s how I found this place

[Anonymous No.56180218]

>>56180189
biz could be shilling the 40mil marketcap next generation AI web3 services project that is poised to become as big as $link was/is but it's all oldtroons and pleb top buyers of 2021 alt L1s now. truly over

[Anonymous No.56180226]

>>56180210
he just regurgitates what much smarter link marines (RTJ / LinkDrake) are saying in a dumber way + hypes. he's not smart

[Anonymous No.56180228]

it will be worth trillions in due time

[Anonymous No.56180336]

>>56180210
fucking lol

[Anonymous No.56180503]

>>56180210
Do you hate niggers and kikes? You aren't a true LINK marine unless you want to exterminate the state of Israel.

[Anonymous No.56180827]

>>56180162
Swift is working with Chainlink to maximize security and efficiency and minimize costs, NOT sending billions to chainshit

[Anonymous No.56180855]

>>56180827
this. trillions will come to the chainlink token but only incidentally

[Anonymous No.56180879]

>>56180189
>one general
Fucking never post again newfaggot

[Anonymous No.56180918]

>>56180210
Really hope this is a joke.

[Anonymous No.56181117]

>>56180503
Spics, trannies, and faggots too.

[Anonymous No.56182105]

>>56180162
Wow so i will get 365 per year per staked token :3

[Anonymous No.56182119]

>>56180226
>smart
>linkdrake

Lamo

[Anonymous No.56182143]

>>56182119
Smarter != Smart
You == Retard

[Anonymous No.56182324]

Stop spamming your shit here paid shill fags. Your threads are advertising. Buy an ad

[Anonymous No.56182339]

>>56180189
>general
back to r*ddit

[Anonymous No.56182348]

>>56180189
Shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.56182560]

>>56182119
whats your beef with him his content is good

[Anonymous No.56182600]

>>56180226
Not just that, he literally takes actual actual anon posts from 4chan and copy-pastes the text as if it's his own words. He should at least put it in quotation marks...
Also, when he screenshots anon's posts he should keep the post number/ID.

[Anonymous No.56182632]

>>56180162
haha, it's always the same with these crypto projects
>look at that successful business over there
>now imagine we could insert ourselves as a middleman to siphon off their success

[Anonymous No.56182653]

>>56180503
Kys polcunt, i hope you die in a fire.

[Anonymous No.56182663]

>>56180189
Link board. Nuff said

[Anonymous No.56182680]

>>56180162
>3% of $5 trillion is $150 billion. Per day. Now imagine a large chunk of that going to blockchain actors. That's exactly what the CCIP trials are about

Ok but SWIFTs revenue was 790 million for 2022, why would clients pay 189x times what they’re currently paying per transaction just to use CCIP lol

Is the twitter guy being retarded or what

[Anonymous No.56182698]

>>56182680
No wait what the fuck, the guy in OPs pic is implying 150 billion PER DAY, so 54,750 billion per year. A whooping 69,303 times swifts yearly revenue.

>Uhhh, sir, we’ve updated our fees. Instead of paying $20 for your international bank transfer like last year, now you have to pay $1,386,000 to transfer $500 bucks. But we’re using chainlink now though!

Lol, delusional

[Anonymous No.56182744]

>>56182560
Just an other grifter, living off biz screenshots to impress crypto normies. Has no ideas or opinion of his own, is unable to criticise link, another brick in the normification of the community

[Anonymous No.56182776]

>>56182653
lmao link is a tranny coin, this is proof

[Anonymous No.56182927]

>>56182744
lurk more faggot, drake actually writes the OC on biz that he quotes on CT

[Anonymous No.56182953]

>>56182348
sup zach

[Anonymous No.56182985]

>>56182927
>lurk more

Kek, got to love nulinkers. He's the middle of the IQ curve if it was a person. But that's probably what we need now to appeal to the masses

[Anonymous No.56182993]

>>56182927
All crypto twitter is cringe and cancer, especially those that ride the biz wave

[Anonymous No.56182998]

>>56182927
"community advocates" is a retarded normie concept that entails shilling whatever the situation is. Dont expect any smart individuals signing up to this

[Anonymous No.56183006]

I like frog

[Anonymous No.56183023]

>>56180162
We should be at $80b market cap right now but for some reason we're behind

[Anonymous No.56183034]

>>56182998
community avocados are based. when they say nothing then rapidly post a 100+ post controlled narrative in under seven minutes you know you are in for the ride of your life. Face facts anons sre not as based as paid employees waging. Engagements do not require you to say nigger or kike or faggot. please keep all obscenities to a minimum and help direct the discussion towards the benefit of the chainlink oracle network

[Anonymous No.56183071]

>>56182998
This to be quite honest with you

[Anonymous No.56183084]

>>56180207
Holy shit thats by far the gayest thing i have ever read on this board, and i once stumbled into /lgbt/.
>i hate this guy but he follows me so i keep my feed up to date with his bullshit out of fear of a number on a screen being reduced by 1

[Anonymous No.56183092]

>>56180162
Whole idea behind blockchain adoption is to drastically reduce those fees. Guy is retarded

[Anonymous No.56183169]

>>56180189
This is not /biz/. This is /chainlink/. Always has been.
We found gold, we own this board since 2017.

[Anonymous No.56183192]

>>56180189
We own this board nigger. Go back to discord with you tranny mudslime incel friends. You lost. Cope and seethe.

[Anonymous No.56183219]

>>56180162
Swift transaction costs are not 3% of their volume. What do you moronic braintards seriously believe that? Id be surprised if it was even 0.03%.

[Anonymous No.56183227]

I was going to write a negative post for Bubba, but he isn’t even worth it. He will just ignore it and keep posting the posts here like they were his writings anyway. Twitterfags really are the worst.

[Anonymous No.56183246]

>>56183192
You own nothing you filthy street shitting nigger. You are filtered out, ignored and discounted as token not sneeded

[Anonymous No.56183361]

>>56183219
I think they might actually believe it, I haven't seen any of the Chainlink advocates call it out as wrong information.

[Anonymous No.56183561]

>>56182560
He’s an autistic prick. Acts like he knows everything that’s going to happen while he wage cucks since he didn’t take any profit. He knows nothing.

[Anonymous No.56184133]

>>56180170
It’s 7 billion. FDV is all that matters

[Anonymous No.56184372]

>>56184133
>holding link to a higher standard than every other coin cuz... cuz reasons

[Anonymous No.56184441]

>>56182324
>Your threads are advertising.
kek you do realize /biz/ was created specifically for crypto advertising right?
It was meant to keep bitcoin shilling off /g/

[Anonymous No.56184483]

>>56180198
The journalist that got punched unironically kys'd himself

[Anonymous No.56184498]

This is patently false though, Swift fee’s are like multiple fractions less. Here is the total revenue for swift. We even had a swift portal corporate installation specialist in the thread the other day that explained swift uses a bundle pricing system. They’re literally fractions of a fraction of a penny.

Very bearish that link marines can’t read basic corporate income statements

[Anonymous No.56184506]

>>56184498
lol swift only make $948
linkies are so screwed

[Anonymous No.56184657]

>>56182927
this

[Anonymous No.56184697]

>>56180189
if you can't handle it, filter it or leave.
t. bounced away from /biz/ hard when I saw a catalog of blue, and in retrospect anons were trying to help me get in early

[Anonymous No.56184699]

Is there a 12 month extension?

[Anonymous No.56184751]

>>56184498
>>56184506
Swift isn't a for-profit organisation (as well you know) and so ccip could generate millions, nonse of which Swift would absorb

[Anonymous No.56184915]

>>56184751
*none of which

[Anonymous No.56184927]

>>56180162
Those analogies were made by someone who doesn’t understand the technology he’s trying to make analogies about.

[Anonymous No.56184958]

>>56184751
Sure, chainlink has to compete with the pricing of a non-profit entity then. Sending financial messaging is inherently cheap. If links going to charge 3% fees to move trillions while swift is charging 0.0003% for the same service in tradfi, you will have to induce an insane amount of demand

[Anonymous No.56185091]

>>56184958
>Link offers the same service as Swift

You are the dumbest retard I've probably ever seen on /biz/

[Anonymous No.56186485]

>>56184958
aye mate ur pretty dumb ngl :/

[Anonymous No.56188557]

>>56180162
>3% per dar
>in 33 days, all the money is gone in fees