The reality about why Chainlink won't pump

[Anonymous No.56167518]

Chainlink cannot and will not pump regardless of how insanely bullish the SWIFT and DTCC collaborations are for very simple reasons: Sergey refuses to align himself with the VCs and market makers who missed out on cheap ICO LINK and have since funded their own competitors, he not only refuses to give them cheap LINK OTC in exchange for their market manipulation and marketing tactics, but he's also arrogantly making enemies out of them by threatening their lucrative rackets like MEV *AND* he's telling them to pay up, when extracting value is their entire modus operandi.

Meanwhile, CZ had to turn off the wash trading bots because he's got the SEC and regulators crawling up his ass for destroying their asset SBF, and retail is flat out broke because of the fed and recession.

To make matters even worse, Sergey is still dumping insane amounts despite having already secured a billion in runway at the top and the market having no real volume anymore and everyone being demoralized at the bottom of the bear market. There's no grassroots narrative catching on anymore because signal to noise ratio is completely compromised and astroturfed, with all the VC shills and fake bots all over CT.

The reality is that they hyped up CCIP for the last couple of years but then they released it with no actual users, no retail bridge, and total daily revenue is less than $1000, and no one outside of the LINK marine bubble echo chamber is aware or gives a shit about what it is because now every community is entrenched in their bagholding beliefs, deaf to other narratives like terminally deluded cult members, it's as true for linkies are for nolinkies, as for every other project. No one is suddenly going to sell what they hold to join up another different cult. And there's no new blood coming in either.

[Anonymous No.56167525]

who cares, they have banking partners going into production with ccip
this whole space is a pond, you're caring about things from the wild west days which we about to exit
the vcs are flies, small fry

[Anonymous No.56167528]

all true and irrefutable

[Anonymous No.56167533]

>>56167518
Do i even need to quote the line?

[Anonymous No.56167534]

>>56167528
Also this, took a me bit

[Anonymous No.56167540]

>>56167533
which line?

[Anonymous No.56167542]

So true anon. Im a former deluded Linktard. Those of you still on the boat need to wise the fuck up. The 'tech' doesn't matter IF NOBODY CARES. Unless you can convince normies to give a fuck, which Sergey has proven he cannot, it's not going to be worth even a fraction of what you think it should. Nobody fucking cares about Link outside of biz.

There is no new blood coming in. Just cut your losses and hit the next one.

[Anonymous No.56167547]

>>56167518
>Chainlink cannot pump
We literally got a 3 year pump, followed by a 3 year dump/consolidation. Guess what happens next.

[Anonymous No.56167549]

>>56167518
True, but also don't forget that years of bullying him on biz, retail chainlinkholders being right-wingers and crypto being one degenerate chess pool doesn't make him loyal to the token holders in anyway. He isn't out to get the token to $1000. He just want to make a great SaaS product and uses the tokens to extract funds to kickstart his company. The only reason it ever pumped to $60 was because of the lack of supply (Binance was running out of Link).

Still I hold some, just as an hedge if I'm wrong but it isn't 100% of my portfolio anymore and I'm not autistically following all the leads anymore.

[SAGE No.56167598]

>fudcuck manifesto, and you know the fuddie will switch ids to reply to himself
yeah sorry dont care, not selling
all fields

[Anonymous No.56167671]

>>56167549
based peepshow enjoyer

[Anonymous No.56167676]

>>56167518
>SpamShit thread
herbs

[Anonymous No.56167734]

>all that fud mental diarrhea
Yeah not selling tho. I bought more today. How does that make you feel fuddie?

[Anonymous No.56168712]

>>56167518
youre one retarded moron, you don't know whats around the corner

[Anonymous No.56168746]

thanks just sold 100k

[Anonymous No.56168754]

>>56167518
>he not only refuses to give them cheap LINK OTC

Lol, that's like his favorite hobby, giving link for free to institutions, that's precisely why the token won't pump are you retarded

[Anonymous No.56168763]

>>56167518
If Sergey is working with massive banks, why does he need to onboard scammy web3 companies for BUILD? I don’t understand

[Anonymous No.56168771]

It won't pump because the token is not needed for anything. They could sign up all the banks in the world and create the new web3 nirvana and all that horseshit and LINK would still be an unnecessary and forgotten ERC20 token worth about the cost of a cup of coffee.

[Anonymous No.56168785]

itt desperate fuddies trying to make you sell your linkies

[Anonymous No.56168825]

>>56167518
>SWIFT and DTCC collaborations
>Collaborations

None of these have resulted in a single dollar of revenue for Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.56168840]

>>56168825
>revenue for Chainlink
Explain to the class how you think Chainlink should be making revenue from users.

[Anonymous No.56168860]

>>56167542
False premise: the tech is worthless because DEFI is a total failure, a joke, nothing but fraud, bad math and bad spaghetti code.

[Anonymous No.56168883]

>>56167598
Didn't read; never buying your bags.

[Anonymous No.56168887]

>>56168860
>chainlink bad because crypto bad

what a novel approach

[Anonymous No.56168888]

>>56167734
>I bought more today

May we see it?
Lmao, we all know you don't have money.

[Anonymous No.56168889]

>>56168840
They don’t need to make revenue, they already have billions of dollars from dumping link on the market. At this point Sergey just needs to kick the can down the road until he dies. He can easily pay himself a million dollars a year in salary from the treasury. Comfy life desu

[Anonymous No.56168891]

>>56167547
3 year crab?

[Anonymous No.56168898]

>>56168889
So if we don't want Sergey dumping anymore, Chainlink should be making revenue, right?

Explain how they would extract revenue from use.

[Anonymous No.56168901]

>>56168840
What is the purpose of these fraudulent collaborations?

>>56168887
The tech is worthless because DEFI is a failure. Chainlink's only hope for adoption was within the DEFI ecosystem.

Meanwhile, ALL shitcoins besides BTC are just empty, speculative garbage with no purpose and therefore Chainlink is dead.

Bitcoin does not need Chainlink for ANYHTHING. Only BTC will emerge once the SEC is done with its new digital asset framework.

[Anonymous No.56168915]

>>56168901
>What is the purpose of these fraudulent collaborations?
Fucking what?

My question was: explain how Chainlink should be extracting revenue from use.

>>56168901
>DEFI is a failure
OOF, take that Ethereum and the rest of crypto.

[Anonymous No.56168916]

>>56168898
>Explain how they would extract revenue from use.

They can't. CCIP earns $4 a day. Less than a Lemonade stand.

The sad reality is, Chainlink's primary source of income was and is dumping pre-mined air tokens to spot markets.

[Anonymous No.56168928]

>>56168916
>They can't

So why do you keep saying they should be making revenue?

[Anonymous No.56168935]

>>56168916
>Missing the point this hard
These are the people fudding LINK. Lmao.

[Anonymous No.56168939]

>>56168928
>So why do you keep saying they should be making revenue?

Are you retarded?
The purpose of every business is to make money.

[Anonymous No.56168947]

>>56167518
>No one is suddenly going to sell what they hold to join up another different cult. And there's no new blood coming in either.
Yep
I enjoy laughing at linkies on biz
Been coming here for years and watching the meltdown since ATH has been great

[Anonymous No.56168950]

>>56168939
>The purpose of every business is to make money.
So how would Chainlink make money off the use of its product?

It's a very simple question, you should be able to answer it very succinctly.

[Anonymous No.56169022]

>>56168901
>the Swift, DTCC, … collaborations with Chainlink are f-f-f-FRAUDULENT

Delicious turbocope

[Anonymous No.56169041]

>>56168898
There’s no need to make revenue, there’s no need to do anything at all. Sergey already made it. You’re viewing the project from a holder's perspective instead of a company owner's perspective.

[Anonymous No.56169057]

>>56169041
So selling tokens is a perfectly valid business strategy.
Glad you agree.

[Anonymous No.56169088]

>>56169057
>So selling tokens is a perfectly valid business strategy.
Of course it is! It’s a very based strategy. Making it financially while making racist linkies poor is probably Sergey’s dream and he achieved it.

[Anonymous No.56169097]

>>56169088
Then why are so many fudders crying about muh revenue?

[Anonymous No.56169131]

>>56168915
>explain how Chainlink should be extracting revenue from use
Not a single fuddie has ever been able to answer this.

[Anonymous No.56169160]

>>56169097
I don’t think most linkies are complaining about that. The main complaint I often see is the crappy price action.

If you as a CEO dump hundreds of thousands of your own “extremely valuable” token on the open market (tokens which are supposed to be for institutions btw lol) during a bear market, whilst already having billion of dollars in your treasury, and refusing to adopt a defensive position against shorting companies (nexo, celcius, etc.) of course most of your holders will get mad. It’s an extremely bad look.

Sergey is based though, he only cares about his own well-being as well as his company’s USD treasury. Link token be damned, let holders absorb the damage hahaha

[Anonymous No.56169174]

>>56168763
Chainlink the project exists in a world of uncertainty, mainly uncertainty of timing. When tradfi demand for Chainlink services, (the when is somewhat unknown), ramps up, Chainlink labs can't say alright just wait 3 years while we build a team. This is also why the dumpings (which are inflationarily mild contrary to popular moanings) are incessant because of uncertainty. To clarify, 4th IR doesn't happen if Chainlink isn't ready with a 500 member team when the rest of world is ready. So what do you do with a 500 person team while waiting? You prepare and you service whatever demand is there at the moment. At the moment, scammy web3 companies.

[Anonymous No.56169183]

>>56169160
>CEO dump hundreds of thousands of your own “extremely valuable” token on the open market
Why did you put "extremely valuable" in quotation marks?
All kinds of firms are selling "extremely valuable" things all the time.

>(tokens which are supposed to be for institutions btw lol)
Source?

>Sergey only cares about his own well-being
So he SHOULD be relying on revenue instead of dumping tokens?
Please explain how he should be making revenue from the use of his product.

[Anonymous No.56169236]

>>56169160
>anything that is sold must be considered worthless by the seller!
The absolute mindset of the Link fudder.

[Anonymous No.56169244]

>>56167518
i take the same approach to LINK that i take to silver
that which can not continue will not continue

[Anonymous No.56169258]

>>56169160
selling at regular intervals, even during a bear market, is more fair to us than just timing the top

[Anonymous No.56169262]

>>56169183
dunno why you're even wasting your time with these retards
they're literally just paid third world trash that can't even do basic things like read the whitepaper or come up with novel fud
the only thing they have is just about saying the same tired old shit ad nauseum, to an tiny audience of investors who would never fall for it on a dead business and finance board

[Anonymous No.56169270]

>>56169262
to a*

[Anonymous No.56169273]

>>56169174
I propose the following theory. Chainlink labs’ main customer base has always been web3 companies, and financial institutions are a longshot that will probably not happen. Sergey is ok with this though, as he already has his web3 clients and billions of USD in his treasury. Would you be comfortable in Sergey’s position? Thoughts?

>>56169183
Such a hard on for revenue. You should probably move to reading SP500 companies’ financial statements instead of being in crypto hah! No need for revenue, billions of dollars in the company’s treasury ensure decades of comfy runway for Sergey.

[Anonymous No.56169282]

>>56169183
>All kinds of firms are selling "extremely valuable" things all the time.
You might even say that’s the basis for “commerce”.
One of the oldest human occupations outside of hunter/gatherer.

But of course, when Link is involved anything normal instantly becomes a crime against nature itself.

[Anonymous No.56169295]

>>56169273
If you don't like how he's selling his tokens, then how should Sergey be making money?

[Anonymous No.56169318]

>>56169236
>anything that is sold must be considered worthless by the seller!
Hey, you said it, not me lol.

>>56169258
>selling at regular intervals, even during a bear market, is more fair to us than just timing the top
Well, if you say so. A CEO dumping millions on link when he already has decades of runway doesn’t look too good, but maybe linkers have some secret esoteric knowledge for why that’s a good thing.

>>56169262
If link is such a good investment, why:
>1: Are there so many “fudders”
>2: The price is lower than a year ago

[Anonymous No.56169322]

>>56169318
>Hey, you said it, not me lol.
That's what you implied with your quotation marks.

[Anonymous No.56169333]

>>56169295
>If you don't like how he's selling his tokens, then how should Sergey be making money?
Huh? Who said I don’t like that. I love the way Sergey makes linkers seethe by dumping on them lmao

The man is a genius

[Anonymous No.56169340]

>>56167518
Yes, your statement applies to every cryptocurrency

[Anonymous No.56169359]

>>56169318
>A CEO dumping millions on link when he already has decades of runway doesn’t look too good,
first of all, learn English. secondly, I didn't say it was necessarily good, I said it's better than the alternative which I clearly stated
we know they have x amount of tokens to get rid of, given that, their system isn't that bad/could be worse

[Anonymous No.56169373]

>>56169359
Correct. You will take Sergey’s link dumps and you will be happy.

[Anonymous No.56169385]

>>56169333
>dumping on them
Do you often refer to yourself in the third person plural?

[Anonymous No.56169407]

>>56169385
Always

[Anonymous No.56169428]

>>56169273
>I propose the following theory. Chainlink labs’ main customer base has always been web3 companies, and financial institutions are a longshot that will probably not happen. Sergey is ok with this though, as he already has his web3 clients and billions of USD in his treasury. Would you be comfortable in Sergey’s position? Thoughts?
My thoughts are that in complete contradiction to what you state Sergey thinks financial institutions are inevitable (not a longshot) and that he is not driven by making bank but by changing the world, meaning that he sees servicing web3 clients as meaningful to the degree in which they play a part in chaninging the world. I think he has a lot of money in the treasury and seeks to and more because the 4th IR is possible only to the extent that Chainlink is ready to facilitate it.

[Anonymous No.56169435]

>>56169282
>when Link is involved anything normal instantly becomes a crime against nature itself.
it's the most bizarre thing.
And they have no idea how to actually explain the obvious double standard either.
Just look at pMVPNEGF, all he knows is that his feelings tell him he doesn't like Sergey's dumps, but he has no idea how these dumps relate to the broader crypto market.
Nor does he have any clue how the fuck else Chainlink should be making money.

[Anonymous No.56169450]

>>56169174
This.
Sergey said they have 500 people working on CCIP, and that's obviously not for handling the current Aave and SNX traffic.

[Anonymous No.56169457]

It's going to be nice when some of these fud spammers are found, tortured, and killed.

[Anonymous No.56169487]

>>56169428
Very well. I appreciate your insights.

I don’t agree, as it is my experience that oftentimes, CEOs actions and words will not be congruent.

Is there a chance Sergey has told everyone a bullish story while quietly escaping through the backdoor? I know most people here will tell me that’s not the case, but just keep it in mind.

[Anonymous No.56169497]

>>56169487
The bullish stories aren't coming from Sergey.

[Anonymous No.56169517]

>>56168916
Focus on the new and promising oracles, especially Supra Oracle.

[Anonymous No.56169519]

>>56167518
>tfw you have lived enough to see the link holders slowly become xrp schizos

[Anonymous No.56169578]

>>56169497
If you had researched and benchmarked chainlink, you would know that 90% of Innotribe projects are just like it.

>successful experiment with swift
>more successful experiments the next couple of years
>head of innovation publishes bullish news
>silence
>startup is never heard of again

How sad it is living in a bubble

[Anonymous No.56169610]

>>56169578
>How sad it is living in a bubble
I'm in a bubble with Swift, DTCC, etc.
That's hilarious.

>innotribe
Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.56169619]

>>56167518
everyone makes chainlink bigger than it is.
it's just a crypto startup that got lucky and amassed billions in cash during the bullrun from dumping on investors.
the difference is that sergey actually wants to use this "free money" from the erc20 tokens to build something as he's a very ambitious person with high dreams.
you don't see cardano or algorand building anything worthwhile and they also amassed billions from token dumping on normie retail.
chainlink is different, but the link token does NOT have good tokenomics. maybe sergey didn't plan that far ahead, but that's the hard truth.

once you realize this you can finally be at peace and stop being a cringe baggie shilling your altcoin on twitter

[Anonymous No.56169771]

>>56169610
I’ll give you an example.

https://www.swift.com/news-events/press-releases/swift-innotribe-announces-five-finalists-its-startup-challenge-singapore
>Fastacash, providing a global platform to enable users to transfer value (money, airtime, coupons, etc.) along with digital content through any social network and messaging platform, enabling secure and cost-effective transactions.

https://thepaypers.com/online-payments/fastacash-nails-cellum-partnership-for-trillion-dollar-worth-mobile-payments-market-accession--762977
>fastacash nails Cellum partnership for trillion dollar worth mobile payments market accession

https://fintechnews.sg/28096/fintech/hottest-fintech-startup-singapore-progress/
>What Happened to Fintech Singapore’s Previous Pick of Hottest Fintech Startups?
>The last update we got from Fastacash was in 2017 when Myanmar’s MyPay was reportedly in talks to acquire the company. No official announcement has been made and the Fastacash website has been taken down.

There are hundreds of examples like Chainlink where the startup goes nowhere. Sergey is a genius because he’s locked that sweet cash while leaving people like you holding pure hopium.

Don’t be too mad, the game was rigged from the start.

[Anonymous No.56169810]

>>56169771
I wasn't talking about Innotribe, was I? I was talking about Swift.

[Anonymous No.56169843]

>>56169771
And yet only chainlink gets invited to Sibos each year. How strange

[Anonymous No.56169842]

>>56169810
How sad. You don’t even know Innotribe is part of SWIFT.

Leave investing to the adults kid. Go back to your warehouse job or something.

[Anonymous No.56169860]

>>56169842
>You don’t even know Innotribe is part of SWIFT.
I absolutely do, but Chainlink hasn't had anything to do with Innotribe since 2017.
Chainlink has been working with Swift since then, though.

[Anonymous No.56169910]

>>56169771
>>56169842

None of these startups made it to SIBOs, or were so influential that they gave the keynote at SIBOs, or have ex-Google CEO's interested in working with them, I could go on about the differentiators, but you are disingenuous and it's obvious enough that I needn't refute your point any further.

[Anonymous No.56169924]

>>56169843
That’s what you think because you’re hyper fixated on chainlink. Quant for example, has been invited multiple times too, as well as companies you don’t pay attention to because you only listen to Sergey’s talks.

>>56169860
>Chainlink has been working with Swift since then, though.
Like dozens of other startups that have gone nowhere after five years or so.

I won’t try to convince you of anything fellow anons, keep holding link if you want. That’s pretty funny to see desu, Sergey is indeed a genius.

[Anonymous No.56169932]

>>56169924
>Like dozens of other startups that have gone nowhere after five years or so.
Such as?

[Anonymous No.56169976]

>>56167734
>gamestop hodler

[Anonymous No.56169989]

I already sold most of my link. Its a dead project

[Anonymous No.56170013]

>>56169924
It’s what I think because it’s true. Show some proof to the contrary please

[Anonymous No.56170022]

>>56169924
>Quant for example, has been invited multiple times too
Not even once.

[Anonymous No.56170059]

>>56169097

>desperate bagholder desperately trying to "win" based on semantics

pure desperation. Also...chart

>>56169258
>>56169359

>stockholm

>>56169262
L M A O muhhhh whitepaper...this dude is stuck in 2017 (back when Link was actually a good investment). Uncle Rico syndrome


>>56169295
he's worth $500M from scamming you and you're worried about his salary LOL


>>56169487
>Is there a chance Sergey has told everyone a bullish story while quietly escaping through the backdoor?

This, just like what he did at NXT. He's a sociopath. Kushti pointed that out years ago


>>56169843
>raises $5 Billion
WOW a conference! And he did the KEYNOTE oh that's incredible!!!!!

[Anonymous No.56170090]

>>56170059

The other guy is a decent writer you sound retarded and brown

[Anonymous No.56170101]

>>56170059
>semantics
kek I'm not the one who keeps bringing up revenue, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.56170245]

>>56168825
you have no idea about private chain transactions or what's going on behind closed doors. it wasn't apparent to anyone until recently that link was charging companies for price feeds in usd.

[Anonymous No.56170301]

>>56169924
>Quant for example, has been invited multiple times too

Can you prove it?

[The Real Astro No.56170361]

>>56167676
This is a bot.

[Anonymous No.56170386]

Telecom is the catalyst

[Anonymous No.56170558]

>>56169924
>>56169842
>>56169771
>>56169578
>>56169487
>>56169407
>>56169373
>>56169333
>>56169318
>>56169273
>>56169160
>>56169088
>>56169041
>>56168889
>>56168763

You come and spend several hours fudding a token you supposedly don't like ?
Is this what your life is ? Are you even paid ?
Trying to sound intelligent while fudding things ?

I agree 100% with >>56169910
And the more you fight, the more I buy. INB4 "I tried to warn you", yes you did, and you did your job so well I bought some more LINK.

Picrel, I dedicated this fud, thanks for the LINK, fudder.
How does that make you feel ?

[Anonymous No.56170672]

>>56167518
>hyped up CCIP for the last couple of years but then they released it with no actual users, no retail bridge, and total daily revenue is less than $1000
>Why Chainlink not start at 100% from 0%? The building not complete upon being began after fund secure? This we call scam.
retard

[Anonymous No.56170944]

FUD finally progressed to "you're right but it still won't go up"

[Anonymous No.56171159]

>>56170672
>>56170944
the fud is entertaining, let them be. its hilarious to wonder if each post is in bad or good faith. can they REALLY be this stupid? no way, right? i suggest letting them freely continue

[Anonymous No.56172184]

>>56169318
>but maybe linkers have some secret esoteric knowledge for why that’s a good thing
it is a once in 1000 year event

[Anonymous No.56172187]

>>56170944
and is it wrong? is it going up?

[Anonymous No.56172681]

>>56170022
>>56170301
Fudders please answer this. I was on the fence about buying link and then you guys made a lot of points that made me doubtful but now this has gone unanswered and its making it seem like CL isn't just another failed innotribe start up which will disappear in another year or two. Where did you guys go? Im so lost without you.

[Anonymous No.56173419]

didn't read the thread
I still hold link.
thanks for the free fud

[Anonymous No.56173588]

>>56173419
pretty much this
>15pbtid fudder
and i only read half of one post before just writing him off and skimming the thread
keep at it fuddie

[Anonymous No.56173770]

>>56173419
>>56173588
Linkers have become the equivalent of brainless plebbitors. Kinda bearish, but bullish for Sergey though.

[Anonymous No.56174271]

[Anonymous No.56174522]

>>56167518
HOLY FUCK READ WHAT YOU WROTE YOU ARE SO SCHIZO YOU FUCKING MENTAL RETARD SERGEYS DAD IS DRIVING AROUND A LAMBO WHILE YOU TYPE THIS SHIZO SHIT ON A FROG BOARD

[Anonymous No.56176014]

>>56167518
WRONG! Wrong on all counts

[Anonymous No.56176078]

>>56169619
the LINK token is a mere ERC-20. Acktshually an ERC-677 to be precise.
This is interdasting. Because supposubtly chainlink is middleware. Chainlink is a decentralized oracle network. But the ERC-677 is trapped on a public blockchain Ethereum that is nothing but centralised by Joe Lubin's circumcised cock and Vitalik foundation, so it's not right. Something;s not right.
If Chainlink wants to transcend to some high road abstraction layer, it gets bogged.
You're telling me Swift and DTCC want Lubin's cock and Vitalik telling them what they can and can't do on their roadmap through the purge splurge demiurge surge merge serge?
I seriously doubt that.
The DONs and the VRF and the price feeds and the CCIP are neat. That doesn't change the fact that the token is nothing but an not needed premined ERC-677 on a premined scam PoS shitchain. SAD!

[Anonymous No.56176105]

This movie is about Sergei, his business model and ethics, and his six-sided blue jew token: Chainlink. He wants to leave me in Antarctica until the dogs tear me apart and he figured out some way to monetize that. They aren't tearing me apart, however, and his coin is not performing.

[Anonymous No.56176155]

>>56169860
>I absolutely do
haha, sure

[Anonymous No.56176195]

The cuckolds of crypto
>September 4, 2020:
LINK: $12.50
BTC: $10,434
ETH: $388
BNB: $20.62
XRP: $0.23
ADA: $0.08
DOGE: $0.002
SOL: $2.71
TRX: $0.03
MATIC: $0.01

>September 4, 2023:
LINK: $5.96
BTC: $25,743
ETH: $1,623
BNB: $214.45
XRP: $0.50
ADA: $0.25
DOGE: $0.063
SOL: $19.36
TRX: $0.07
MATIC: $0.55

[Anonymous No.56176264]

>>56167525
based
OP is like a hysterical woman while sergey is cool and collected

[Anonymous No.56176269]

Test

[Anonymous No.56176345]

>>56176195
imagine making this meme and trying to explain it to a family member or friend without coming off as a porn addicted loser lmao

[Anonymous No.56176388]

>>56167518
chainlink is really carrying the /biz these days, if it dies then the board will die too

[Anonymous No.56176644]

Kek fuddies

[Anonymous No.56176650]

>>56168891
The consolidation was the crab wren

[Anonymous No.56177464]

Why is everyone bitching about stuff that was addressed in the very first white paper. Tokens being sold for the war chest and given for bootstrapping purposes were known. The whole idea of chainlink is a neutral service all banks, clearing houses and whatever will use. Chainlink must be beyond reproach in every dealing and every movement. Letting a few small fry firms short the price is nothing when you've had the green light from swift from day 1. He can't go after any of them and considering the insane regulatory environment it has to be seen that there was no token price management by chainlink. The tokens were available on the open market and there were no further actions taken by chainlink to manipulate or even discuss the price in any way. It seems like the nexo situation resolved itself as most of these things do.

It sucks for holders yes for the 'short term' 2 years is absolutely short term when the lawyers that are trying to even think of building the legal framework for how this will all be handled were only having their first discussions on bitcoin in 2018. You saw the bloke from ANZ saying their digital asset teams didn't exist 2 years ago. What more do you fucking want. It's pretty simple if you can't buy now at 6 to 7 dollars when chainlink is a 500 man team and all the breadcrumbs came true then don't ever dare say you'd have bought in '17 or' 18 because the risk to reward ratio was much higher then than it was now.

[Anonymous No.56178782]

>>56167518
VCs just dont matter when you have friends like DTCC and SWIFT. Whatcha smokin anon? You think a few garage funds will be able to hold link down forever? get rekt boi

[Anonymous No.56178822]

>>56177464
Because fudders are unironically late buyers who fell for the 1K EOY meme. The only cope they have now is being bitter and seething at early buyers.

[Anonymous No.56178896]

if people are upset by link dumping tokens, wait till they hear about all the dumping btc miners do

[Anonymous No.56179621]

>>56176345
Suck my btc lil linkcel

[Anonymous No.56179638]

>>56167518
ccip isnt live yet, wait for smartcon (t. insider)

[Anonymous No.56180683]

>>56179621
>no argument
so yes, yes you are a porn addicted loser
no one will ever see this garbage and sell, they'll just think you're a creepy retard

[Anonymous No.56180702]

>>56178896
lol ETH was 4k WITH based miners dumping every single solitary ETH they mined.

Sassal.cuck absolutely MALDING at these undeniable FACTS

[Anonymous No.56180728]

>>56167518
Thanks for the info. Where can I find the CCIP daily revenues?

[Anonymous No.56180756]

>>56170944
>babby learns what investing is

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.56180768]

>>56177464
Based clearpilled OG. It's insane how much fudders can get away with this late in the game. Hopefully the intellectually honest high IQ effort posters will begin to return. Top buying zoomer hustlebros who are still hanging around need to begin to pipe down and lurk more, let their intellectual betters explain to them how things are. A hard rain is due.

[Anonymous No.56180772]

>>56178896
Scroll up, cuckold

>>56179638
30 more years

>>56180728
Look at Eric Wallach twitter. His recent post has link to Dunecharts. Just fyi, the revenues are smaller than a 6 year olds lemonade stand

>>56176345
Imagine telling your dad you spent the day tracking a random man’s jerkoff habits. Youre a fag

[Anonymous No.56180776]

>>56171159
>good faith

Are you really gonna pull the virtue signal card here dog? Look in the mirror

[Anonymous No.56180793]

>>56167518
>Chainlink cannot and will not pump
Ahhhhhh,
>#yawn.#
Did you enjoy missing the bottom of the market? You'll have a few years to tell me about it.

[Anonymous No.56180832]

>5pbtid
>trying so hard to get a (you)
sorry, but, im just not gonna give you a (you)! i know, i know, you're putting in a lot of effort here but im just not gonna do it! hahaha

[Anonymous No.56180848]

>>56180772
Thanks. Revenue shows CCIP has been an absolute flop. It's got a puncher's chance that a key player adopts it and it catches on.

[Anonymous No.56180917]

>>56180772
>fudcuck makes embarrassing porn diary posts and biz finds out about it because some guy literally just typed "geoxadem" in google
>"help! help! everyone else is a loser becsuse im a porn addict and this shows in every meme i make!"
amazing logic adem
i can tell why the only job you can get is working for an MLM scam company

[Anonymous No.56182376]

>>56180683
Weird projection bro youre literally the only one thinking about porn and porn addiction and bringing it up it every chance your get lmaoo