CCIP Summer

[Anonymous No.56162499]

$80K total revenue after 3 months, giving annualized revs of $320,000. At a $3.7B valuation, Link trades at a 11,563x multiple. Hmmm…

[Anonymous No.56162549]

>>56162499
>cumulative revenue
>linear trend instead of parabolic
This implies that the network isn't growing. Mathlets don't @ me.
>Verification not required.

[Anonymous No.56162566]

>>56162549
this! wake me up when the parabolic chart looks like that one!

[Anonymous No.56162568]

>>56162549
>growth isn't growth unless it's exponential

[Anonymous No.56162577]

>>56162568
its not growth, its stagnant, fix revenue, niggertier anon....

[Anonymous No.56162586]

>>56162499
>80k

So this world changing tech makes as much money as an IT monkey in the Midwest…KEK LINKIES

[Anonymous No.56162589]

>>56162549
Zoom out

[Anonymous No.56162592]

>>56162577
he literally can't understand because the graph is going up

[Anonymous No.56162597]

>>56162568
unironically true.

[Anonymous No.56162607]

>>56162568
The absolute state of advocates

[Anonymous No.56162614]

https://dune.com/ericwallach/chainlink-ccip-revenue

CCIP has done $4.92 of revenue today on Ethereum.

[Anonymous No.56162627]

>>56162568
Mathlet subhuman detected. Whats cumulative revenue anon? It's the integral of r(t) dt. That integral is a linear function c*t. That only happens if r(t) = c, a constant. Cope, sneed and dial8, tranny retard.

[Anonymous No.56162644]

>>56162627
looks like every day it's accumulating more, fag

[Anonymous No.56162664]

>>56162577
But it’s only 3 fucking months retard

[Anonymous No.56162696]

>>56162644
>>56162664

look at the link above. All of the chains had higher revs in the first month versus now. In other words, growth has slowed. The question is why? They said for years there was incredible demand for this service

[Anonymous No.56162819]

>>56162696
Volume is pretty shit across all chains right now. Crypto is in a bear market.

[Anonymous No.56162823]

>>56162644
No shit you brainless nigger kek. You need to have white skin, blue eyes and passed Calc 2 in order to be considered human.
>Verification not required.

[Anonymous No.56162832]

>>56162823
nobody cares about your fancy number magic nerd

[Anonymous No.56162851]

>>56162832
Kek shitskin baggie kek
Cope and seethe, you will never be white

[Anonymous No.56162864]

>>56162499
daily reminder that rollbit does 3x the revenue of link in a single day than link is projected to make all year

[Anonymous No.56162888]

>>56162823
I could have passed calc2 if I studied but I was too busy SMASHING PUSSY YOU NERD FAGGOT LMAO

[Anonymous No.56162924]

>>56162888
oh wow you put your dick in some festering brainless gash, good job bro

[Anonymous No.56162929]

would you rather take 1 million dollars of revenue today or start with a penny of revenue and double it every day for 90 days? quid quo pro. cogito ergo sum.

[Anonymous No.56162947]

>>56162888
checkd + based
get rekt, number nerd

[Anonymous No.56162974]

>>56162499
This guy is shit at graphs

[Anonymous No.56163076]

Ohhhhh so THIS is why Chainlink is only six dollars. It's basically bullshit that they tried to hide as long as possible because there's zero demand. Now I get why it didn't release in 2022

[Anonymous No.56163223]

>>56162929
what you're describing is exponential growth. the data we have so far does not show exponential growth

[Anonymous No.56163225]

>>56162888
You’re on 4chan, on /biz for that matter

[Anonymous No.56163254]

the worst thing a shitcoin can ever do is deliver a product
then everyone can see just how small the market for their token really is

[Anonymous No.56163301]

>>56163254
correct. speculation has 10x or more the pumping power than any delivered product

[Anonymous No.56163302]

>>56162614
Paradigm-chaning technology

[Anonymous No.56163365]

>>56163302
you dropped this G, king

[Anonymous No.56163418]

I feel as though there is an agenda here but not sure what it is.

[Anonymous No.56163432]

>>56163418
Eric Wallach is none other than Eric Wall Taproot Wizard and longtime LINK fudder!

[Anonymous No.56163470]

>>56163432
Not the data silly goose, the delivery of the data.

[Anonymous No.56163777]

>>56163470
Its suspicious I'll give you that. Probably riddled with mathematical incogsistencies.

Remember back in the day when we were just regular link marines fighting against the VCs? I remember fighting in the jungles watching for VC foxholes.

Matter of fact why is it that blacks can commit petty street crime but if a white person does it they need to write a full book-length incel manifesto explaining why they turned to a life of crime. I'd like to turn to a life of petty street crime one day but I uninstalled GTA. What is this insane double standard?

In the future incel manifesto reviews will become the most popular book review type. The New Yorker will gush about how this incel manifesto captured the tormented soul of the individual currently incarcerated.

[Anonymous No.56163835]

>>56163777
I normally don’t respond to schizo posting but I have to admire those trips.

[Anonymous No.56163904]

What the fuck is up with all the brainlets ITT?

>>56162499
>CCIP is Chainlink's only revenue driver

>>56162549
>lineair growth is le bad when the network isn't even open to non-pilot users yet

>>56162864
>my shady crypto casino launders a million dollars a day, buy the totally needed "utility" token!

>>56163254
>don't deliver products goylink, it makes the rest of the space look bad

Absolutely trash opinions and insights in this thread. Kindly kys.

[Anonymous No.56163923]

>>56162499
>0 growth
>12k a month
I can see why Sergei has to dump his LINK on you baggies. No way can they afford 600 HR women with that kind of revenue.

[Anonymous No.56164416]

>>56163904
no, it just makes chainlink look bad when nobody wants to pay for anything they offer.
if they kept talking big and not delivering they might have had a chance at a second cycle, like cardano. but now? it's basically over for them.

[Anonymous No.56164459]

>>56163904
it's called a fud thread, how new are you?
it's used to filter new arrivals
ccip is barely live, it's basically still in testing with few early users just using it for messaging
we know this, they don't

[Anonymous No.56164548]

>>56163254
Thats pretty funny. I was trying to explain that to people in one of the RWA threads and they literally just kept falling back on

>muhhhhhhh insert elite banker here said our buzzwords!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.56164584]

>>56164548
That was a pajeet thread. Read the room.

[Anonymous No.56164592]

don't be this guy anon

[Anonymous No.56164594]

[Anonymous No.56164690]

>>56162499
ok scammer

[Anonymous No.56164833]

>>56164594
>6 years later
>the swift experiement has progressed into…another experiment
>0 users

[Anonymous No.56164895]

>>56164833
the first cycle really is the do or die time for these alts. for most its easy, get retail interested. for business products like chainlink offers they have to do a lot more work. once that post-pump bear market hits and liquidity disappears their funding sources disappear too.

[Anonymous No.56164947]

>>56163923
>his shitcoin of choice can't even afford 600 HR women
Weaak

[Anonymous No.56164996]

>>56164594
Ah, old fud. Like a warm blanket.

[Anonymous No.56165087]

[Anonymous No.56165101]

>>56162499
>near vertical growth
Is you dense

[Anonymous No.56165103]

>>56164996
and now they know, he's still dumping hundreds of millions of dollars worth of link at 10% of its ath? not very confident that revenue is coming any time soon, or at all.

[Anonymous No.56165112]

>>56165103
what do you mean?

[Anonymous No.56165119]

>>56165103
he's not dumping

he's just decentralizing the network, chud

[Anonymous No.56165141]

>>56165112
logically if there was a huge pump expected he would wait to "dump" his tokens to maximize profits but since he's doing it now midwit took that as evidence that there is no near-term pump expected

[Anonymous No.56165162]

>>56162499
Kekfuddies will insist that LINK tokens are not like stocks that entitle you to a share of a company's profits but then they will also go and calculate the PE ratio. Interdasting.

[Anonymous No.56165215]

>>56165141
near-term? ha. they've been dumping nearly a decade worth of runway for how long now?
the only people who think long-term success is all but guaranteed are those buying what chainlink themselves are desperate to sell.

[Anonymous No.56165216]

>>56165162
Posting the actual revenue numbers is fud?

>entitle you to a share of profits
Huh? What stock market are you following? You seem confused. Also what share of profit for Link? Their operating loss in hundred mils per year

[Anonymous No.56165440]

>>56162888
>>56162947
>>56163904
ITT Dunning-Kruger brownskin midwits coping over their shit tier token not needed "investment" kek
NGMI

[Anonymous No.56165851]

>>56165216
Its not fud, there is just no correlation there so you may in fact be retarded. Remind me again, dear fuddie, what the price of the LINK token was in May of 2021 when CCIP revenue was $0.

[Anonymous No.56166196]

>>56165851
Aaaaaaand just like that the thread died

[Anonymous No.56166230]

>Sir Gay Nasty Slob just blew high finance
Yes homo

[Anonymous No.56167206]

>$80K total revenue after 3 months
Thank fucking god I snapped out of it all and moved on to Kava. Holy SHIT what a shit show.

[Anonymous No.56167374]

>>56162499
>Intellectually dishonest post.
You do know that CCIP is in a limited access mainnet release right now, right? It's not actually available to the general public yet.

[Anonymous No.56167818]

>>56162499
>i-its earning NOTHING after all this time!!
>it's dead!!
...
>goto https://ccip.chain.link/
>pick latest 5 transactions
>inspect the payload/data as text (not hexadecimal)
https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0xc05e62a997b11eabca295026fcb527b53e592ff703de15dd79bc8e442ff6c34f
>new message with Id 12
https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x5f1f0b2144d4aa061dae6c3f6bdb58746d481f4f7a83550370e04baeedef577a
>new message with Id 11
https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x3fb34e11085644e50c55ef30f63711b7c5f1b2bf42aeb02294a32d4ebadd8aac
>new message with Id 84
https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0xed966d76d36162ec1a4c94ee438e353b0164da2d7f4fa0107f5d2e52f68b4188
>new message with Id 85

80k revenue with ONLY test transactions. Just imagine how much money will this shit earn once the floodgates are open (and they will be).

The future is bright bros.

[Anonymous No.56167826]

The thing is obviously revenue will grow. But the counter-argument is, LINK talked this up for so long... they don't have barely anyone significant on launch? muh partnerships muh integrations, muh swift. LINK holders will live in their fantasy world of 'we will be billionaires soon, two more weeks, trust the big macs', while FUDers will just kind've lie. The reality seems to be somewhere in the middle. Something very underwhelming with maybe no real world value that will make money but not as much as you thought.

[Anonymous No.56167882]

>>56167826
Thats cope. Just because there is a schizo on each extreme doesnt mean we meet in the middle. Link is going to $0 or $1T+ mcap

[Anonymous No.56167889]

>>56167882
It's going to $0

[Anonymous No.56167932]

when you get to know how much Bubblebot giving profit you will forget everything so what are you waiting for join now
bubblebot.finance

[Anonymous No.56167984]

>>56164416
>nobody wants to pay for anything they offer
kek

[Anonymous No.56167999]

>>56167818
This.
The mainnet numbers are for very strictly limited pilot purposes only.
Even the testnet numbers are limited, but already they're very high.

[Anonymous No.56168045]

>>56167826
Hmm this anon seems reasonable…>>56167889
kek

[Anonymous No.56168197]

>>56162499
This garbage is so comically overpriced, it makes the 2000 Dotcom bubble look tame and reasonable in comparison.

Holy fuck, this needs to drop another 99.99% along with all the other worthless shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.56168199]

>>56168197
CCIP is overpriced?

[Anonymous No.56168206]

>>56162614
Holy shit kek.
Sergey should open up a lemonade stand, it would generate more income.

[Anonymous No.56168213]

>>56163254
THIS.

VeChain and Chainlink figured this out, that's why they dangle some new SOON promise carrot to the desperate bagholders, into perpetuity.

[Anonymous No.56168215]

>>56163904
>CCIP is Chainlink's only revenue driver

Well, we know their primary source of income is dumping millions of premined air tokens from the ICO into the spot markets. DUH.

What do you say to that, advocate faggot?

[Anonymous No.56168221]

>>56167984
Yep, looks like nobody is paying for what Chainlink has to offer.

Your screen grab changes nothing, all I have to do is look at CCIP "revenues". Chainlink has no other revenues except token dumps.

[Anonymous No.56168225]

>>56168221
>$850k annually for feeds per project
>"Yep, looks like nobody is paying for what Chainlink has to offer"

[Anonymous No.56168229]

>>56168215
You want the makers of decentralized protocols to extract a percentage off each use?
Even Vitalik isn’t as brazen with his MEV, and that’s already bad enough.

[Anonymous No.56168231]

>>56168199
Chainlink is overpriced.

It's a failing software company registered in the Caymans with no viable software products, and some illegally raised security masquerading as a "utility token" which makes it uninvestable to any institutions in the US or pretty much anywhere.

A software company with $4 a day in sales from their software products is not worth 3.7 BILLION dollars LMao.

Fair value on Chainlink if you ignore their illegal funding token is between $500,000-2 MM.

[Anonymous No.56168235]

>>56168225
>850k annually for feeds per project

May we see them?

>>56168229

>decentralized protocols

It's a proprietary software product.

[Anonymous No.56168325]

>>56168235
>May we see them?
sure: >>56167984

[Anonymous No.56168369]

>>56168235
>It's a proprietary software product.
Did we get a new script? Chainlink is opensource so we are supposed to use that to say either pajeets/chinks will copy paste (APU3, BAND etc.) or banks will copy the code and make their own (Liink etc.). What is it now?

[Anonymous No.56168670]

>>56165851
May 2021 was the height of covid stimulus printing. Look at anything back then.

[Anonymous No.56168920]

>>56168670
Irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.56169254]

>>56168670
which is why it's critical to understand that link peaked in 2020, a year earlier.

[Anonymous No.56169636]

>>56162568
Chainlink holders are so low IQ its sometimes its not even funny.

[Anonymous No.56169649]

>>56162499
kek baggies still in denial
sergey thanks the baggies for funding his dreams

[Anonymous No.56170148]

>>56165851
>it's fud
>it's not fud but price pumped before in a bull run

You're steering this off topic. The fuck does May '21 price have to do with CCIP revenue

[Anonymous No.56170180]

>>56170148
>The fuck does May '21 price have to do with CCIP revenue
Well if Link had a higher price when CCIP was literally 0, then why are you now trying to correlate Link's price to CCIP?

[Anonymous No.56170611]

>all this brownoid fuddie megacope
Yawn not selling lol

[Anonymous No.56170638]

>>56170611
hey. buddy

[Anonymous No.56170646]

DR:NS
Kek fuddies

[Anonymous No.56170792]

>>56170611
>held link through a 90% drop
>people who didn't lose 90% of their unrealized gains are the ones coping
linkies are truly the women of crypto

[Anonymous No.56170879]

>>56162568
Kek are linkniggers really this dumb

[Anonymous No.56171376]

>>56170792
i bought at 15 cents and made a plan to hold forever. now i'm staking and making more money than you ever have made by trading. simple as.

[Anonymous No.56171442]

>>56168325
That's not a balance sheet nor remotely credible as a proof of revenue.

Why does Chainlink not have proper financial filings and disclosures?

They did sell a security to the public after all, that obligates them to put out regular filings and financial statements to the public.

Oh right, it's an illegal scam in the Caymans in violation of almost every securities act rule there is, LMAO.

You fucking worthless niggers. Realize that NO ONE.
NO
ONE

Will be buying your bags.

[Anonymous No.56171458]

>>56170646
Didn't read; never buying

[Anonymous No.56171479]

>>56162664
>>56162696
I unironically know why... CL Labs is so fucking slow... I was there in 2016...2018..2020... barely any progress... the github repos are moving like fucking snails, it's like only 3 dudes commit once in a while... the fucking whitepaper 2.0 was a joke...

Potential clients literally left... from crypto

[Anonymous No.56171536]

>>56162499
Bitcoin generates $0 revenue and actually costs money to run, the price hinges on new money retards buying up the supply or “stablecoins” issuers to print up their own $ to trade for it. Link is the same but with more steps

[Anonymous No.56171570]

>>56171536
Bitcoin is a universal currency/store of value. The first decentralized, digital commodity.

LINK is just a shitcoin from 2017.

[Anonymous No.56171596]

>>56171536
Doesn't really make sense to compare BTC and Chainlink though. It's like comparing gold versus Google.

[Anonymous No.56171689]

>>56171570
>>56171596
You are experiencing something called cognitive dissonance.
Bitcoin is a "store of value" because it is considered to have value.
And it has this despite generating negative revenue.

Holding any other crypto to a higher standard is a priori bunk.

[Anonymous No.56171695]

>>56171689
>Bitcoin is a "store of value" because it is considered to have value.
by midwits, yes
actual rich people just use it to move money around, and store value in gold

[Anonymous No.56172490]

>>56171689
All value is subjective retard.
Gold is only valuable because people believe it to be.

[Anonymous No.56172618]

>>56162499
CCIP isn't public right now you dumbfuck.Its literally being tested on mainnet
It will be public post smartcon.

[Anonymous No.56172654]

>>56162627
>implying seething bagholding cultists understand math

[Anonymous No.56172728]

>>56170792
You could have bought at 5 and be way up already but you're too stupid

[Anonymous No.56172877]

>>56162499
Revenue will soon be millons a month. Within a few years. And link will keep its 11,563x multiple btw

[Anonymous No.56172920]

>>56172877
Checked

[Anonymous No.56172983]

Yes clearly id logically sell now after 6 years of breadcrumbs being confirmed beyond even our wildest dreams. Please stop fudding it's so boring that's probably the worst part of the boring low quality fud is it's made the board go from amazing and fun to oh wow another faggot with zero effort fud that doesn't even make sense. Prior fud was tongue in cheek this is just pathetic now.

[Anonymous No.56174266]

Looking at all current number of CCIP test transactions, they're currently generating around ~$6 revenue per tx. Eth is running closer to $0.40 per tx.

Given that there is rumblings of high demand from reputable sources, I could imagine seeing tens of thousands of transactions per day by end of year.

If it works as expected then by EOY 2023 the per annum revenue generated will likely be in the tens of millions just from CCIP. If 2024/25 is the bull run we expect, then it's not unreasonable to imagine a 5-10x + increase in activity and subsequently 5-10x + increase in revenue.

If CCIP captures the kind of adoption that many are hinting at, then Chainlink will be one of the highest revenue generating project in the space (if not #1), with the most robust integration into the actual financial system.

We're all gonna make it.

t. Sept 2017 og

[Anonymous No.56174497]

>>56174266
LMFAO IMAGINE PAYING $6 PER TRANSACTION TO KNOW THE PRICE OF ETH HOLY FUCK SCAM

[Anonymous No.56175777]

>>56172490
>All value is subjective
What do you think "is considered to" means, esl vindapoo.

[Anonymous No.56175868]

>>56171689
>muh altcoin should be worth bitcoin because I AM a special snowflake
Youre in denial bro.

>>56171695
More denial. Youre in for lots of pain when instis buy btc hand over fist

>>56172490
Babby takes econ 101. Classic retard fudding gold which has a history of value over literally any other asset. SURELY that will change “soon” when your virgin squad plaid wearing geeks breaks through modern finance

>>56172728
You couldve bought btc at 16000 or eth at 900 last year. Or Tesla stock. All crush limpdick cuckold Link “gains” (opp cost losses)

>>56172983
>>56174266

>Incoherent cuckold ramble

[Anonymous No.56176318]

>>56175868
>10pbtid fudding an investment
I know for a certainty that you've never touched a woman (n. adult human female)

[Anonymous No.56176351]

>>56174266
why would a speculative crypto bullrun affect an interoperability protocol for banks? there is zero correlation

[Anonymous No.56176378]

>>56176351
t. midwit

[Anonymous No.56176383]

>>56176378
t. butthurt shill

[Anonymous No.56176386]

>>56174266
Checked

[Anonymous No.56176532]

>>56176351
Crypto bull runs substantially increase engagement (in the form of buying, transferring, borrowing, using financial products, etc).

If you can't figure out how this will effect the number of CCIP txs then that's on you.

[Anonymous No.56176884]

>>56163254
Kek this. I tried to warn linkies back in 2021 but they were convinced there will be billions of dollars worth of demand for smart contracts and the only reason they didn't launch their smart contract yet was because they needed link. The crypto market is still way too young and new for legacy firms to dive into. Any product released is going to have very little demand since it's only crypto native projects that would use it.

[Anonymous No.56177011]

>>56176884
>they were convinced there will be billions of dollars worth of demand for smart contracts
Wanna know who else is convinced of this, but with trillions instead of billions?

[Anonymous No.56177041]

Go read the Wikipedia article for DTC(C) and see how rapidly it scaled. Also notice there were holdouts. A few years off yet. But it's a few years off from taking over the entirety of banking. I hope all my linkie brothers use their new found wealth to not do evil and fall into drugs or lose it gambling or on women.

[Anonymous No.56177951]

>>56177011
>>56177041
>10 more years

The chart

[Anonymous No.56179265]

>>56177041
>I hope all my linkie brothers use their new found wealth to not do evil and fall into drugs or lose it gambling or on women

the linkies who were going to do that already did that