[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 74 KB, 1920x1080, pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56061371 No.56061371 [Reply] [Original]

There is no difference between stocks, NFTs, crypto, or anything else. You're sitting in your room in your underwear buying imaginary shit hoping to sell it for more later. It's all a glorified ponzi scheme.

>> No.56061383

>>56061371
Life is a ponzi scheme

>> No.56061398

>>56061371
if i played this ponzi scheme right in 2020 i would be a free man right now
cant say that about anything else

>> No.56061411

>>56061398
>if i played this ponzi scheme right
Yeah bro. Totally. You would be rich now too if you picked the right lotto numbers.

>> No.56061437

>>56061371
wow dood i never realized this before, you opened my third eye bro im enlightened now

>> No.56061451

>>56061371
Wow ur so insightful

>> No.56061453

>>56061371
stocks actually are slightly different in that you can buy a bunch and actually change a company

>> No.56061458

>>56061411
i actually reached 6 figures retard
why am i even answering this is either bait or youre retarded anyway

>> No.56061460

>>56061371
>crypto
>hoping to sell it
Newfag detected. The goal is to get more crypto, not trade it for fiat.

>> No.56061463
File: 1.14 MB, 1022x1432, image6-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56061463

>>56061371
Yes
Your point being?

>> No.56061592

>>56061371
Your post contains several logical errors and fallacies:

False Equivalence Fallacy: The statement equates stocks, NFTs, crypto, and other assets, suggesting there is no difference between them. This oversimplification ignores the fundamental differences between these investment types, their underlying assets, and the purposes they serve in financial markets.

Sweeping Generalization Fallacy: The statement generalizes all investments in stocks, NFTs, and crypto as people buying "imaginary shit" and labels them as a "glorified ponzi scheme." This is an overly broad and negative characterization that does not consider the diverse range of investments and their potential benefits or risks.

Ad Hominem Fallacy: The statement uses derogatory language by implying that individuals participating in these markets are simply sitting in their rooms in their underwear. This is an ad hominem attack, focusing on the perceived behavior or character of investors rather than addressing the validity of the investments themselves.

Here's some advice:
It's crucial to approach discussions about investments with nuance and avoid oversimplifications and generalizations. Understanding the intricacies of different asset classes is essential for making informed decisions and engaging in productive discourse.