Why aren't they buying link?

File: 202 KB, 2048x2048, SWIFT_logo.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 09:46:05 2023 No.56021037 [Reply] [Original]

Why aren't they buying link?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 09:48:52 2023 No.56021051 token is not needed, just tech.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 09:49:29 2023 No.56021054 >>56021051 eventually. Just ride the fucking dragon and don't question it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 09:52:14 2023 No.56021065 >>56021037 SWIFT doesn't need LINK. It's one of the few entities that don't. All 11,000 of SWIFT's client financial institutions need LINK.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:01:59 2023 No.56021308 if they actually adopted ccip they would never buy it but rather be given it or otc at the very least

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:11:59 2023 No.56021341 Insider here. CCIP will not be used but rather a private fork of it run by us that uses digital US dollars.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:15:08 2023 No.56021348 >>56021054 it's not a dragon it's a fucking submarine

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:16:08 2023 No.56021352 >>56021065 Why aren't all 11,000 of SWIFT's client financial institutions buying link?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:16:21 2023 No.56021354 File: 51 KB, 956x329, 1687223633770285.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56021051

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:19:01 2023 No.56021359 They are in on the scam

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:25:26 2023 No.56021375 >>56021308 Given? Lol is this a joke? Are we the only one buying this shit what the fuck they were supposed to pump our bags

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:31:27 2023 No.56021392 Sergey has been working with SWIFT even before Chainlink was a thing. SWIFT is in from the get go

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:33:48 2023 No.56021400 File: 321 KB, 945x664, 1677807373052327.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56021037 >>56021308 >>56021341 >>56021352 >>56021375 They'll buy it as they use it. Likely they'll buy it without even knowing it.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:36:36 2023 No.56021404

SWIFT isn't an investment fund, that's why. Their business makes money in other ways.
The real question is how big are the LINK bags of private individuals working at SWIFT? How much does Johnathan Ehrenfeld Sole hold? How about Tom Zschach? Nick Kerigan?
How about the people at ANZ bank?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:39:19 2023 No.56021415 >>56021352 Because none of them know. Because there are only a handful of CTOs on the planet who actually have a full, clear view of what is transpiring here. >some startup? Not only that, some CRYPTO startup? I'm not even going to waste my time

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:44:45 2023 No.56021429 >>56021415 By now most of them know about CCIP. They just want the threshold to be as low as possible, so all they want and need to know is "can we pay in fiat" or whatever. And the answer is they can, at a 10% premium.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:45:59 2023 No.56021431 >>56021037 remember less than 10% of the ico actually went to the ico, everything else was already giving to insiders but they just kept the charades high there are those missing bags

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:54:50 2023 No.56021465 >>56021429 and does that premium go to link holders or the fat man? I think we both know the answer

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:56:48 2023 No.56021473 >>56021465 It goes to the nodes that handle the conversion. CCIP is a direct payment model, hence the automated token conversion: >>56021354

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 11:59:22 2023 No.56021479 >>56021415 Why aren't the the handful of CTOs on the planet who actually have a full, clear view of what is transpiring here buying link?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:02:15 2023 No.56021491 >>56021479 Link consistently has high volume, major players can accumulate large amounts every day. And with bitcoin stomping on every little Link pump, it won’t show in the price.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:07:29 2023 No.56021506 File: 1.36 MB, 2960x2350, 1693158570150915.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56021479 What makes you think they aren't?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:09:47 2023 No.56021517 Who 'they'? SWIFT? SWIFT is not buying anything. It's a financial messaging network, whose members are major banks around the world.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:27:29 2023 No.56021597 >>56021506 the price (it's $6)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:33:33 2023 No.56021625 >>56021597 Look at what bitcoin did after this Swift announcement.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:40:08 2023 No.56021653 File: 69 KB, 983x180, 16E022E0-4454-4CD8-A68F-C6E75F5AA726.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56021054 >eventually You’re equally retarded as fudders

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:41:09 2023 No.56021657 >>56021354 I love how fudders are pretending this post doesn’t exist kek

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:41:56 2023 No.56021664 >>56021037 >coin not needed >sirgay betray >price of a cup of coffee >sirgay pay for tranny harem >sirgay and le bigmac

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:52:45 2023 No.56021711

>>56021473
Stop lying. Nothing is converted. They put the tokens in a pool and Sergey gives link from his premint to nodes. Not one link is bought in the process

>payments made in alternative assets will be withdrawn to separate maintenance pools and replaced within the CCIP contracts with LINK based on the exchange rate at the time of payment

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:54:14 2023 No.56021719 >>56021711 >Nothing is converted. That’s not what the code says.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:54:38 2023 No.56021722 >>56021711 Are you actually fucking retarded?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:56:53 2023 No.56021725 >>56021719 >>56021722 The link comes from the uncirculating supply. It's not bought, it has no effect on price, except dilution of course. And Sergey keeps the tokens in his "maintenance pool"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 12:59:36 2023 No.56021733 >>56021725 Yep. What you gonna do about it?

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:04:08 2023 No.56021749

>>56021725
>The link comes from the uncirculating supply.
You forgot to post the source, boss.

And even if that were the case, mass institutional adoption will chew through the remining tokens in no time.
Certainly faster than Bitcoin (another 100 years of inflationary subsidized miner rewards) and Ethereum (literally unlimited inflationary subsidized miner rewards)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 13:14:27 2023 No.56021804 >>56021749 >t-that’s whatahoutism!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:05:15 2023 No.56022040 >>56021749 >And even if that were the case nice concession >mass institutional adoption will nice pie in the sky the absolute state of stinkie shills

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:26:56 2023 No.56022132 >>56021749 cringe and cope

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:39:13 2023 No.56022210 >>56022040 >>mass institutional adoption >pie in the sky You may want to check out Swift's latest press release.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:41:35 2023 No.56022225

>>56022210
>successful experiments and trials
wowzies, so exciting!11
sorry shill, heard it at all before years ago, with a certain other major altcoin who did "experiments, trials, and integrations" with "massive and numerous institutional entities"
guess what happened
not interested in your heavy bags

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:41:56 2023 No.56022232 File: 54 KB, 256x256, fire.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] we make it by EOY bros. final stretch.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:43:05 2023 No.56022239 >>56022225 So you admit that chainlink and swift were working together from the start?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:44:06 2023 No.56022242 >>56022132 >>56022040 Also why can’t you guys provide source?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:45:17 2023 No.56022253 >>56021404 >How much does Johnathan Ehrenfeld Sole hold 0 >How about Tom Zschach? 0 >Nick Kerigan? 0 >How about the people at ANZ bank? annnnnnd.....0

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:46:43 2023 No.56022271 >>56021749 the stinkie admitted it :} token not needed just inflation :}

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:47:31 2023 No.56022278

https://cryptonews.net/news/altcoins/22691501/
>LINK’s forecasted price action for the next month could mark the beginning of an important shift. The projected peak of $8.71 would take the token close to its yearly high. If LINK can successfully break through this level, it would mark the first higher-high since November 2021 when LINK was trading at $38.
>Peak projected to be $8.71 for 2023
>Mentions it was $38 in November 2021
>$8.71 will the yearly high

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:47:39 2023 No.56022279 >>56022239 That has been known since 2017. His point is that it means jack shit at this point. Linkies are the boy who cried wolf. The source is the chart, take a look at it to see for yourself. "It's all about bucks kid, the rest is noise"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:48:44 2023 No.56022286 >>56022278 pathetic stinkies :} the best is already behind u bet it feels bad :}

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:52:23 2023 No.56022314

>>56022278
https://coinpaper.com/2200/chainlink-and-swift-experiment-could-lead-to-link-breakout
>In the event of a bullish breakout, the altcoin’s price may attempt to challenge the $6.680 resistance and flip the price point into support within the following week. Continued buy pressure may also lead to LINK’s price rising to as high as $7.731 over the next couple of weeks. A potential early indication of the bullish breakout will be when LINK closes a daily candle above the $6.127 mark.
>As high as $7.731
I kinda miss 2020 where it was crazy watching it go from $3 to $4, then to $6 then to $8 in a day. Then testing $10-14 and moons to $20 for a bit. That was before the retard money with the stimmy hysteria. Doubt there's going to be FOMO to blast this thing off.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 14:59:53 2023 No.56022358

>>56022225
>sorry shill, heard it at all before years ago, with a certain other major altcoin who did "experiments, trials, and integrations" with "massive and numerous institutional entitie
Nothing like this.
Also, look at the current ranking of this coin you mentioned.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:05:52 2023 No.56022393

>>56022358
>bro, our experiments are bigger and better dude!
kek, if you're not another paid advocate, you're literally being played like a fiddle, that certain altcoin employed the exact same shilling narratives years ago
https://cointelegraph.com/news/ripple-joins-bis-cross-border-payments-task-force
and still does, and you don't even realize it inside your little chainlink information bubble
>look at the ranking dude!
even if we pretend for a moment that crypto mcap isn't a totally worthless and made up metric (literally current price x circulating supply) which amounts to absolutely nothing tangible or meaningful, that coin has been slowly but surely, losing ranks since 2015
remember when it used to be #2? I do
tl:dr if not shill, you're retarded

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:11:17 2023 No.56022427 >>56022040 >"I don't believe you, but let's say hypothetically you're correct..." >ah-HAH! Nice concession, shill. Gottem! ???

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:11:18 2023 No.56022428 >>56022393 >task force lmao Imagine comparing literal adoption with sitting on a board.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:12:36 2023 No.56022436 ah, paid advocate it is

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:16:44 2023 No.56022468 >>56022279 Uh no The fud was about swift never being involved with chainlink, ever.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:19:22 2023 No.56022487 >>56022468 SWIFT involvement has been the main selling poinf of LINK on this board since the very beginning, but keep trying to gaslight

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:22:08 2023 No.56022502 >>56022487 That’s exactly what I am saying my illiterate jeet friend So you agree with me that swift and chainlink were working partners from the beginning? Sucks to be xrp holder Kek

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:23:03 2023 No.56022511 >>56022502 and I am saying to you more experiments with SWIFT in 2016+7 isn't news anymore, retard

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:26:34 2023 No.56022535 >>56022314 >I kinda miss 2020 and whats the difference between now and then thats right the dumpings, its gonna be another 6 years of disappointments

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:28:18 2023 No.56022547 >>56022535 >Sergey wasn't dumping in 2020 Anon, I...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:39:10 2023 No.56022609 >>56022511 >more experiments with SWIFT in 2016+7 isn't news anymore The CCIP experiments are new since three months ago.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 15:54:17 2023 No.56022691 >>56022511 >swift isn’t working with chainlink you schizo delusional retards >o-ok they are working together but it’s old news and no one cares lol You are here >chainlink goes to $1k a pop >ropes himself

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:12:44 2023 No.56022806 >>56021065 SUPRA might be a better option for them

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:16:51 2023 No.56022831 >>56021354 Are you saying this can't be forked and altered to use a different token? Tell me you are a nocoder without telling me.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:20:27 2023 No.56022849 >>56022831 You mean like Litecoin did with Bitcoin?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:20:52 2023 No.56022854 >>56022831 yup :} very easy to just change that token to "DoggyElonFartBucket" token :}

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:25:33 2023 No.56022885 >>56022806 What the hell is that? Sounds new and shitty

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 16:56:21 2023 No.56023092 >>56021359 How did you get to know that?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:00:17 2023 No.56023118 >>56022239 Why did they separate?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:03:40 2023 No.56023148 File: 7 KB, 241x209, ggsggs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56022885 Supra is basically an oracle, much like Chainlink, but it flexes with ultra-low latency, absolute max throughput, and instant alpha finality.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:09:54 2023 No.56023182 >>56023148 i fell for the ultra-low latency oracle meme once already with UMB. never again

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:13:39 2023 No.56023198 >>56023182 NGMI Enjoy dying poor

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:14:32 2023 No.56023208

>>56021352
>>56021037
Insider trading issues?
Buying it would mean they may have insider knowledge about its adoption.
Even if they were speculating it would be a pain to prove they did it honestly.

There are very strong rules for those working in banks about their investments.
They would only be able to invest with specific timings after major news events, and can't sell when they want.

In this case it would mean they have to wait for Swift to officially announce the adoption of the CCIP solution for them to be able to invest into it without insider trading issues.
That could mean a huge never to be filled price gap after the announcement.

There is also the possibility that what Sergey is currently dumping is being taken by some banks as an investment and they already own a sizable part of the token supply.

If what Sergey said is true and they adopt it quickly, it's possible that in the next 1-3 months we get an announcement of Swift using the solution and Chainlink gaping up to its previous ATH.
The price suppression is very abnormal. They are trying to shake out as much people as possible and get all the supply.

When such an extreme manipulation ends it can be expected that it will be extreme in the other direction.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:18:05 2023 No.56023228 >>56023208 it's just risk management big companies can't just dump cash into a fucking crypto just because the stock holders won't allow it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:36:19 2023 No.56023351 board full of neets who every day lay in the bed and talk about a coin that does nothing. get a fking job you bums

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:38:08 2023 No.56023370 >>56021400 good for chainlink labs, irrelevant for anyone else. why is that so hard for you do get through your thick head I will laugh you to scorn when reality finally sets in

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 17:39:21 2023 No.56023374 >>56023370 token needed tho

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:20:18 2023 No.56023614 >>56021037 Some morons funded the development, we’re not sure why.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:22:20 2023 No.56023622 >>56023208 >get all the supply Bro, they are rapidly increasing the supply lol

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 18:54:09 2023 No.56023853

>>56022691
now lets do your reality:

>2018 - 2020: chainlink is going to $1,000 once staking is released
>2021: Link has always been a bear market coin. Staking soon.
>2022: dude the whole market is down, but don't worry, staking soon.
>2023: hahaha bro I sold my stack during the 2 hours it hit $52, then rebought at $4.90. $1,000 was always a meme until staking is out
You are here
>2024: staking 1.0 is being released later this year
>December 15, 2024: Sergey announces staking for 2025
>2025: (Link misses entire bullrun while 20 new altcoins 20-100x)
>ropes

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:16:47 2023 No.56023998 >>56023853 >20 new altcoins 20-100x all BUILD airdrops

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:17:30 2023 No.56024001 >>56023998 this kek even in FUD fantasies, link marines win

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:18:54 2023 No.56024006 >>56023998 Why would anyone besides us buy the build tokens? These won’t pump like people expect. The whole point is avoiding vc scammers who work with market makers to pump prices.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:23:38 2023 No.56024040 >>56023998 sick dude! how many have you got so far? I bet a ton given you're staked all this year right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 19:24:39 2023 No.56024050 >>56024001 >FUD fantasies you mean reality? IE the chart

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:39:20 2023 No.56024969 File: 145 KB, 1213x614, 1778779441s.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Cause everyone that has at least a centimeter of brain has been buying x.com for weeks now and is enjoying the pump? Oh wait you linkies hate pumps, never mind

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 21:40:55 2023 No.56024985 >>56024969 based x.com poster

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 22:11:49 2023 No.56025195 >>56021037 They have a 250 million Link wallet already newfag

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:50:48 2023 No.56025789 >>56021597 It has been in its current channel for a long time. This is deliberate, so they can buy over an extended period, accumulate and not draw interest to it.

Anonymous Mon Sep 4 23:54:26 2023 No.56025813

>>56021749
The source is the blogpost. You think the other tokens are put in maintenance pool and Sergey then buys link on the open market out of the kindness of his heart? It comes from the uncirculating supply and you know it. Just don't lie it's not helping that marines became as bad as fudders.

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:17:41 2023 No.56025965

>>56021354
yeah, they had to make this concession, it is what it is. institutions don't want to juggle multiple tokens and be exposed to crypto volatility, so they'll all pay with usd. swapping to the legacy token is an implementation detail, so they are free to get rid of it at some point

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:20:08 2023 No.56025975 >>56024050 Lmao I hold link but 100% this They are cult members

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 00:27:22 2023 No.56026020 >>56021479 Because that's insider trading and will get their bussy rekt in prison.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:17:08 2023 No.56026289 Why would they?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:25:53 2023 No.56026331 Buy now? >token not yet useful >be holding bags Buy later? >when token actually useful >buy as needed like gas for your lambo Besides: why buy their own coin?

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 01:52:58 2023 No.56026468

>>56021037
I've bought some and glad the LINK price has the bear market discount.
>>56021657
They NGMI some enjoy dying poor
>>56023998
I just had a flash of the Brillion airdrop in my memory. It's now in Phase 2, and they're dishing out $100 worth of DUA to participants

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:01:05 2023 No.56026515 >>56026468 Currynigger

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:02:31 2023 No.56026529 >>56021037 Remember frens… do you best to not catch HIV/AIDS

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 02:31:03 2023 No.56026709 >>56026468 I remember stacking to qualify for the rewards anon. I'm also looking forward to the compliant wallet which would enable recovery options for user assets.

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:13:24 2023 No.56026890

Token not needed.
Btw hows this make you feel?
>September 4, 2020:
LINK: $12.50
BTC: $10,434
ETH: $388
BNB: $20.62
XRP: $0.23
ADA: $0.08
DOGE: $0.002
SOL: $2.71
TRX: $0.03
MATIC: $0.01

>September 4, 2023:
LINK: $5.96
BTC: $25,743
ETH: $1,623
BNB: $214.45
XRP: $0.50
ADA: $0.25
DOGE: $0.063
SOL: $19.36
TRX: $0.07
MATIC: $0.55

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:14:59 2023 No.56026898 >>56021054 OK bro tell that to SWIFT lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:15:10 2023 No.56026899 File: 433 KB, 1425x1053, 1693883709047.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56023208 The proof token is not needed is theres no insiders even front running it and doing insider trading. Its just a dead flat stagnant shitcoin

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 03:19:55 2023 No.56026923 >>56022487 Wrong. the whole selling point was a get rich quick scheme. >1k eoy is fud!! >muh next ethereum!! Yet nothing has materialized 7 years later. Kek baggies

Anonymous Tue Sep 5 09:10:16 2023 No.56028174
File: 85 KB, 500x625, 1612596122933.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Ever since the SWIFT news came out, there's be an insane amount of FUD. Why so much vitriol over a crypto that's #20+ on Coinmarketcap
>Muh shills $1k EOY
STFU, every crypto had that same shit, even GME had that type of shill. ADA, DOGE, SOL, GRT, etc all had people saying it's going to the moment, but all I hear is crickets to those tokens when they're getting dumped on. Are people that mad that every shill has been shilling "oh they're going to be used by SWIFT" only to be told "fake and gay" then getting confirmed that it is in fact working with SWIFT?

Price action is trash though.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 11:12:20 2023 No.56028546 >>56021037 Don't worry they already have their share secured

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 11:26:52 2023 No.56028604 File: 2 KB, 93x125, STUL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>56021037 Saving up for SUPRA.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 12:35:46 2023 No.56028913 >>56021051 Talking about Tech, fast and more reliable oracles are rising. The likes of SUPRA, DIA, and others. Is LINK really going to stand tall?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 13:49:58 2023 No.56029362 >>56021037 Token not needed, saving funds for some based privacy focused alts like MINA, ATOR and RAIL.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 14:04:02 2023 No.56029483 >>56029362 normies don't care about privacy. There isn't going to be retail demand for these. Also hasn't ATOR already done like 10x this year? Post something that hasn't mooned already bro

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 14:08:27 2023 No.56029531 >>56021037 SWIFT sailing the payment space. Next stop should be integration with CryptMi. No one is gonna buy LINK again cus they don't have anything new to offer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 14:10:47 2023 No.56029548 >>56029483 Why are you replying to currynigger bots?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 5 18:20:53 2023 No.56031488 >>56029362 I have bought ATOR and CYMI but no movement yet. Why is this?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance